ANATOMY PRACTICAL LEARNING: OPINIONS OF MEDICAL FACULTY YEAR 2 STUDENTS ABOUT ANATOMY PRACTICAL COURSE Anatomi Pratik Öğrenimi: Tıp Fakültesi 2. Sınıf Öğrencilerinin Anatomi Pratik Dersi Hakkındaki Görüşleri

Year 2024, Volume: 14 Issue: 1, 1 - 8, 15.03.2024

Adem Tokpınar Selen Yılmaz Muhammet Değermenci Halil Yılmaz Ahmet Payas Orhan Baş

Abstract

ABSTRACT
Objective: With the development of technology, anatomy teaching methods are also updated. In this direction,
different methods are applied in practical courses. It is foreseen that anatomy lessons will be more
useful and laboratory lessons will be active and efficient. Transferring their thoughts and experiences
positively or negatively during the education process can motivate the student. We aim to evaluate the
thoughts and suggestions of the students with the survey study.
Material and Methods: A study was conducted for the practical anatomy education of Ordu University
Faculty of Medicine Term II students during the 2022-2023 academic year. A questionnaire study was organised
to learn the student's perspective on the practice. A total of 12 questions were asked in the questionnaire.
One of these questions was open-ended and the others were multiple choice questions. Except for the
open-ended question, the other questions had to be answered. The survey questions were prepared from
Google Forms application. The questionnaire prepared in this application was delivered to the students via
a link on the social platform.
Results: In the questionnaire, students were asked the question 'Which of the auxiliary resources do you
mostly use?' The rate of tablet use was high in both genders. The expected frequency for male students to
answer 'Textbook' in this question is 1,7. There was no difference between the answers given to this ques-tion
in the whole population (p>0,05). In the questionnaire, the students were asked the question 'Do you
find the question-answer (mini-exam) technique useful while teaching the laboratory course?' The expected
frequency of 'yes' answer is 12,8. There is no difference between the answers given to the this question in
the whole population (p>0,05).
Conclusion: In conclusion, in this study, students were asked multidimensional questions related to the
anatomy course. Positive and negative answers were received and evaluated. According to the results of
the study, the inclusion of technology in every stage of the course shows that the anatomy course can be
taught more efficiently.

Keywords

ANATOMY PRACTICAL LEARNING: OPINIONS OF MEDICAL FACULTY YEAR 2 STUDENTS ABOUT, ANATOMY PRACTICAL COURSE, Anatomi Pratik Öğrenimi: Tıp Fakültesi 2. Sınıf Öğrencilerinin Anatomi Pratik Dersi Hakkındaki Görüşleri

References

• 1. Tokpınar A, Yılmaz S, Yılmaz H, Değermenci M. Investigation of the Opinions of the First-Year Students of Dentistry Who go to Online education on Anatomy Education After the Kahramanmaraş Earthquake. Medical Records. 2023;5(3):603-7.
• 2. Yılmaz H, Polat D, Yılmaz S, Değermenci M, Tokpınar A. Determination of anatomy Self-Efficiency of 2022-2023 Fall Semester of 2nd Class Ordu University Dentistry Students Taking Distance Education. 2023;10(3):121-30.
• 3. Elizondo-Montemayor LL. How We Assess Students Using An Holistic Standardized Assessment System. Medical Teacher. 2004;26(5):400-2.
• 4. Yavuz F, Ertekin T, Elmalı F, Ülger H. Klinik Öncesi Ve Klinik Dönemde Tıp Öğrencilerinin Anatomi Eğitiminde Kadavra Kullanımı İle İlgili Değerlendirmeleri Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi. 2017;26(3):227-32.
• 5. Topal AD, Ocak MA. Harmanlanmiş Öğrenme Ortami İle Hazirlanan Anatomi Dersinin Öğrencilerin Akademik Başarilari Üzerindeki Etkisi. Eğitim teknolojisi kuram ve uygulama. 2014;4(1):48-62.
• 6. Zilundu PL, Chibhabha F, Yu G, Fu R, Zhou LH. Pre-clinical medical students' use of motivational and cognitive study strategies during anatomy learning: A three-year cross-sectional survey. Anatomical sciences education. 2022;15(3):522-34.
• 7. Dinsmore CE, Daugherty S, Zeitz HJ. Teaching and learning gross anatomy: dissection, prosection, or “both of the above?”. Clinical Anatomy. 1999;12(2):110-4.
• 8. Gürpınar E, Hilal B, Tetik C. Tip Fakültesi Öğrencilerinin Öğrenme Stillerinin Belirlenmesi. Tıp Eğitimi Dünyası. 2011;32(32):18-29.
• 9. Hortsch M, Mangrulkar RS. When students struggle with gross anatomy and histology: A strategy for monitoring, reviewing, and promoting student academic success in an integrated preclinical medical2015;8(5):478-83.
• 10. Gözil R, Özkan S, Bahçelioğlu M, Kadıoğlu D, Çalgüner E, Öktem H, et al. Gazi Üniversitesi Tip Fakültesi 2. Sinif Öğrencilerinin Anatomi Eğitimini Değerlendirmeleri. Tıp Eğitimi Dünyası. 2006;23(23):27-32.