Speaking with the Dead: New Historicism, Its Roots and Development as an Epoch-making Approach

Year 2024, Issue: Ö14, 1234 - 1249, 21.03.2024

Özlem Sayar

https://doi.org/10.29000/rumelide.1455502

Abstract

This paper aims to examine the status, roots and development of New Historicism as an epoch-making approach in the context of critical analysis. After Stephen Greenblatt coined the term “New Historicism,” Louis Montrose and Greenblatt improved the theory and applied it in different studies, thus contributing to the area. Afterwards, Catherine Gallagher and Greenblatt edited Practicing New Historicism as a guidebook to New Historicists, and through their studies, various critics contributed to the embodiment of this theory in the critical environment. Alternative to Historicism, New Historicism as a theory provides unconventional ways for the analysis of historical processes from different angles. This theory allows multiple perspectives in historiography, thus featuring the experiences, struggles and contributions of the minorities, the weak, the suppressed, or the invisible social groups in history. Thereby, it aims to create a more comprehensive understanding by evaluating the historical background from the eyes of different social units. New Historicism also claims that historical events are to be considered within their social, cultural, environmental and economic context, which provides a new and unconventional method of criticism. Therefore, this paper analyses New Historicism as an epochal approach with the analysis of its roots, arguments, challenges, and techniques, in addition to its relation to various theories such as Marxism, Foucauldian theory, Thick Description, Deconstruction, Historicism, and Cultural Materialism.

Keywords

New Historicism, History, Stephen Greenblatt, Louis Montrose

References

• Barry, P. (2017). Beginning theory: An introduction to literary and cultural theory. Manchester University Press.
• Brannigan, J. (1998). New Historicism and Cultural Materialism. St. Martin’s Press.
• Bressler, C. E. (1994). Literary criticism: An introduction to theory and practice. Prentice Hall.
• Derrida, J. (1997). Of Grammatology. G. C. Spivak (Trans.), The Johns Hopkins University Press.
• Dollimore, J, & Sinfield, A. (1990). Culture and textuality: Debating cultural materialism. Textual practice, 4(1), 91–100.
• Eagleton, T. (2012). Marksizm ve edebiyat eleştirisi. U. Özmakas (Trans.), İletişim.
• Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality, volume 1: An introduction. R. Hurley (Trans.), Pantheon Books.
• ---. (1995). Discipline and punish: the birth of the prison. A. Sheridan (Trans.), Vintage Books.
• ---. (2001). The subject and power. In J. D. Faubion (Ed.) & R. Hurley (Trans.), Power (pp. 326–349), The New Press.
• ---. (2002). Archaeology of knowledge, A. M. Sheridan (Trans.). Smith Routledge.
• Gallagher, C. & Greenblatt, S. (2000). Practicing New Historicism. University of Chicago Press.
• Geertz, C. (1973). The impact of the concept of culture on the concept of man. The interpretation of cultures, Basic Books, Inc., pp. 33–55.
• Greenblatt, S. (1982). Introduction. In S. Greenblatt (Ed.), The power of forms in the English Renaissance (pp. 3-7). Pilgrim Books.
• ---. (1989) Towards a poetics of culture. In H. A. Veeser (Ed.), The New Historicism (pp. 1–15), Routledge.
• ---. (1990). Invisible bullets. Shakespearean Negotiations, Clarendon Press. pp. 21–66.
• ---. (1990). Shakespearean negotiations. Oxford University Press.
• ---. (1990). The circulation of social energy. Shakespearean negotiations, Clarendon Press. pp. 1-21.
• ---. (1991). Resonance and wonder. In I. Karp & S. D. Lavine (Eds.), Exhibiting cultures the poetics and politics of museum display (pp. 42–57). Smithsonian Institution.
• ---. (1995). Culture. In F. Lentricchia & T. McLaughlin (Eds.), Critical terms for literary study, (2nd ed., pp. 225–233). The University of Chicago Press.
• ---. (2005). Renaissance self-fashioning from More to Shakespeare. University of Chicago Press.
• Howard, J. E. (1986). The New Historicism in Renaissance studies. English literary Renaissance, 16 (1), 13–43.
• Marx, K. & Frederick E. (1968). The eighteenth brumaire of Louis Bonaparte. In Selected works in one volume (pp. 96–180), Progress Publishers.
• ---. (1991). Selected works in one volume, Lawrence and Wishart.
• Montrose, L. A. (1980). The purpose of playing: Reflections on a Shakespearean anthropology. Helios, (n.s. (7), pp. 51-74). Classical association of the Southwestern United States.
• ---. (1983). Of gentlemen and shepherds: The politics of Elizabethan pastoral form. ELH, 50 (3), pp. 415–459.
• ---. (1988). ‘Shaping fantasies’: Figurations of gender and power in Elizabethan culture. In S. Greenblatt (Ed.), Representing the English Renaissance (pp. 31–65), University of California Press.
• ---. (1989). Professing the Renaissance: The poetics and politics of culture. In H. A. Veeser (Ed.), The New Historicism (pp. 15–37), Routledge.
• Payne, M. (2005). The Greenblatt Reader. Blackwell Publishing.
• Tyson, L. (2006). Critical Theory Today a User-Friendly Guide. Routledge.
• Veeser, H. A., (Ed.). (1989). Introduction. The New Historicism (pp. ix-xvi). Routledge.
• White, H. (1986). Tropics of discourse: Essays in cultural criticism. The Johns Hopkins University Press.