Sosyal Kredi Sisteminin Eğitim ve Okul Yönetimine Yansımaları

Year 2023, Volume: 23 Issue: 2, 166 - 176, 29.12.2023

Murat Taşdan

https://doi.org/10.53629/sakaefd.1348301

Abstract

Çin’deki uygulamalarla gündeme gelen Sosyal Kredi Sistemi (SKS) dijital araçları ve yapay zekayı da kullanarak kişi ve kuruluşlara davranış ve eylemlerine göre puanlar veren kapsamlı bir değerlendirme/gözetim yöntemidir. SKS, toplumsal davranış, gözetim ve mahremiyet üzerindeki potansiyel etkileri nedeniyle çokça tartışılmaktadır. Bu çalışmada, SKS’nin anlamı, amacı ve işleyişi ortaya konmuş, sistemin üstünlük, sınırlılık ve riskleriyle eğitime ve eğitim yönetimine olası etkileri tartışılmıştır. Çalışma alanyazın taramasına dayalı derleme niteliğinde gerçekleştirilmiştir. SKS, okulda iyileştirme alanlarının belirlenmesinde, okul gelişimi için destek ve kaynaklar sağlanmasında, öğretmenlerin ve öğrencilerin daha objektif değerlendirilmesinde, eğitim yönetimindeki uygulamaların şeffaf, hesap verebilir olmasında, öğrencilerin ek desteğe veya kaynaklara ihtiyaç duyduğu alanların belirlemesinde ve okula kaynak tahsisinin iyileştirilmesinde eğitim ve okul yönetimine faydalar sağlayabilir. SKS kamu ve eğitim yönetiminde kullanımının önemli riskleri bulunmaktadır. SKS’nin eğitim ve okul yönetiminde kullanımı; öğrenci ve eğitim paydaşlarının toplanan verilerinin mahremiyetinin korunamaması ve etik dışı kullanılması, izlenme korkusuyla öğretmen ve öğrenci arasındaki açık iletişimin bozulması, belirli öğrenci gruplarının haksız yere cezalandırılması, mevcut güç yapıları ile hiyerarşileri daha da güçlendirmesi ve puanı düşük olan öğrencilerin damgalanması gibi riskleri barındırmaktadır.

Keywords

Büyük veri, dijital gözetim, mahremiyet, sosyal kredi sistemi, sosyal kredi sistemi ve okul yönetimi, sosyal kredi sistemi ve eğitim yönetimi

Reflections of the Social Credit System on Education and School Management

Abstract

The Social Credit System (SCS), which has come to the fore with the practices in China, is a comprehensive evaluation/surveillance method that uses digital tools and artificial intelligence to assign scores to individuals and organizations based on their behavior and actions. The SCS has been widely discussed due to its potential effects on social behavior, surveillance and privacy. In this study, the meaning, purpose and functioning of the SCS are presented, and the advantages, limitations and risks of the system and its potential effects on education and educational administration are discussed. The study was conducted as a review based on a literature review. The SCS can provide benefits to education and school management in identifying areas for improvement in schools, providing support and resources for school improvement, evaluating teachers and students more objectively, making educational management practices transparent and accountable, identifying areas where students need additional support or resources, and improving resource allocation to schools. There are significant risks associated with the use of the SCSs in public and education administration. The use of the SCS in education and school governance carries risks such as the inability to protect the privacy and unethical use of data collected from students and education stakeholders, the disruption of open communication between teachers and students for fear of being monitored, the unfair punishment of certain groups of students, the reinforcement of existing power structures and hierarchies, and the stigmatization of students with low scores.

Keywords

Big data, digital surveillance, privacy, social credit system, social credit system and school management, social credit system and education management

References

• Andrejevic, M., & Gates, K. (2014). Big data surveillance: Introduction. Surveillance & Society, 12(2), 185-196.
• Botsman, R. (2017a). Big data meets Big Brother as China moves to rate its citizens. Wired UK. https://www.wired.co.uk/article/chinese-government-social-credit-score-privacy-invasion
• Botsman, R. (2017 b). Who Can You Trust? How Technology Brought Us Together – and Why It Could Drive Us Apart. Portfolio Penguin.
• Brezicha, K., Bergmark, U., ve Mitra, D. (2015). One size fits all? The conditions for conditions for condition-free trust in education. Journal of Educational Change, 16(2), 213-229.
• CAICT (China Academy of Information and Communications Technology). 2017. “Report of the Big Data Development in China (Zhongguo Dashuju Fazhan Diaocha Baogao).” CAICT. China Academy of Information and Communications Technology.
• Chan, T.F.(2018) ”China’s social credit system has blocked people from taking 11 million flights and 4 million train trips”, Business İnsider, 21.03.2018, https://www.businessinsider.com/china-social-credit-system-blocked-people-taking-flights-train-trips-2018-5, (Erişim Tarihi: 21.12.2018).
• Cheung, A. S., & Chen, Y. (2022). From Datafication to Data State: Making Sense of China’s Social Credit System and Its Implications. Law & Social Inquiry, 47(4), 1137-1171.
• China Copyright and Media. (2014). Planning outline for the construction of a social credit system (2014- 2020). https://chinacopyrightandmedia.wordpress.com/2014/06/14/planning-outline-forthe-construction-of-a-social-credit-system-2014-2020/
• Cockburn, H. (2018). ”China blacklists millions of people from booking flights as ‘social credit’ system introduced”, The Independent, 22.11.2018,https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/asia/china-social-credit-system-flight-booking-blacklisted-beijing-points-a8646316.html, (Erişim Tarihi: 21.12.2018).
• Credit, C. (2019). The honesty of the wind bathing neighbourhood Nantong Port Gate commends 20 “integrity residents. Credit China Platform.
• Creemers,R.(2018). China's Social Credit System: An Evolving Practice of Control. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3175792
• Çaycı, A. E., & Çaycı, B. (2017). Dijital İletişim Çağında Teknolojinin Açığa Çıkardıkları: Gözetim Ve Mahremiyet. İnönü Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Elektronik Dergisi (İnif E-Dergi), 1(2), 157-169.
• Daum, J. (2017). China's social credit system: A misunderstood digital dystopia. China Law Translate. https://www.chinalawtranslate.com/en/social-credit-dystopia/
• Ding, S. (2018). Decoding the Chinese Social Credit System: The interplay between personal and social credit. China Media Research, 14(1), 78-84.
• Hou, R., & Fu, D. (2022). Sorting citizens: Governing via China's social credit system. Governance.
• Ingersoll, R. M., Merrill, L., & Stuckey, D. (2014). Seven trends: The transformation of the teaching force. CPRE Research Reports. https://repository.upenn.edu/cpre_researchreports/78
• Jiang, M. (2020). A brief prehistory of China’s social credit system. Communication and the Public, 5(3-4), 93-98.
• Kostka, G ve Zhang, C (2018) Tightening the Grip: Environmental Governance under Xi Jinping. Environmental Politics, https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2018.1491116, forthcoming.
• Kostka, G. (2019). China’s social credit systems and public opinion: Explaining high levels of approval. New media & society, 21(7), 1565-1593.
• Kıldiş, H.P. (2019). Dijital Totalitarizm: Çin’in Sosyal Kredi Sistemi. https://www.ankasam.org/dijital-totalitarizm-cinin-sosyal-kredi-sistemi/
• Li. Q. & Wang, T. (1990). An inquiry into ancient Chinese personnel files. Archives Science Bulletin, 5, 43-46.
• Lubman, S. (2016). “China’s ‘Social Credit’ System: Turning Big Data Into Mass Surveillance”, The Wall Street Journal, 21.12.2016, https://blogs.wsj.com/chinarealtime/2016/12/21/chinas-social-credit-system-turning-big-data-into-mass-surveillance/
• Lyon, D. (2007). Surveillance Studies: An Overview. Cambridge: Polity Press
• Mac Síthigh, D., ve Siems, M. (2019). The Chinese social credit system: A model for other countries?. The Modern Law Review, 82(6), 1034-1071.
• McMullan, T. (2015)”What does the panopticon mean in the age of digital surveillance?”, The Guardian, 23.07.2015,https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2015/jul/23/panopticon-digital-surveillance-jeremy-bentham
• Misra, P. (2019). Lessons from Aadhaar: Analog aspects of digital governance shouldn’t be overlooked. Pathways for Prosperity Commission Background Paper Series, (19), 34.
• Ohlberg, M., Ahmed, S., & Lang, B. (2017). Central planning, local experiments: The complex implementation of China's Social Credit System. MERICS China Monitor. https://www.merics.org/en/china-monitor/central-planning-local-experiments
• Orgad, L., & Reijers, W. (2019). A Dystopian Future? The Rise of Social Credit Systems. The Rise of Social Credit Systems (November 1, 2019). Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies Research Paper No. RSCAS, 94.
• Page, D. (2017). The surveillance of teachers and the simulation of teaching. Journal of Education Policy, 32(1), 1-13.
• Rosenblat, A., & Stark, L. (2016). Algorithmic Labor and Information Asymmetries: A Case Study of Uber's Drivers. International Journal of Communication, 10, 3758–3784.
• Sewell, W. H. (2005). Logics of history. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Pres
• Shahin, S., & Zheng, P. (2020). Big data and the illusion of choice: Comparing the evolution of India’s aadhaar and China’s social credit system as technosocial discourses. Social Science Computer Review, 38(1), 25-41.
• Shen, C. F. (2019). Social credit system in China. City University of Hong Kong.
• Síthigh, M. D., & Siems, M. (2019). The Chinese social credit system: A model for other countries?. The Modern Law Review, 82(6), 1034-1071.
• Topcu, N. (2020). Orwell’ın 1984’ü Çin’de Gerçek Mi Oluyor? Sosyal Kredi Sisteminin Geçmişi, Bugünü ve Geleceği. İnsan ve Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 3(2), 684-695.
• Werbach, K.(2022). "Orwell That Ends Well? Social Credit as Regulation for the Algorithmic Age." U. Ill. L. Rev. (2022): 1417.
• Yu, L., Li, X., Tang, L., Zhang, Z., & Kou, G. (2015). Social credit: a comprehensive literature review. Financial Innovation, 1(1), 1-18.
• Zuboff, S. (2019, January). Surveillance capitalism and the challenge of collective action. In