Review
BibTex RIS Cite

Endokron restorasyonlar

Year 2019, Volume: 6 Issue: 2, 201 - 205, 01.08.2019
https://doi.org/10.15311/selcukdentj.339075

Abstract

Endodontik
tedavi görmüş ve kuron harabiyeti fazla olan dişlerin restorasyonunda
uygulanacak tedavi ile ilgili bir fikir birliğine hala varılamamıştır. Geleneksel
yöntemde bu dişlerin tedavisi kanal içi post üzerine uygulanan tam kuron
restorasyonları ile yapılmaktadır. Fakat bu tedavi esnasında sağlam dokuların
da kaldırılması sebebiyle geriye kalan diş dokusunun biyomekanik özellikleri
değişmekte ve güçsüzleşmektedir. Adeziv sistemlerin gelişmesine parelel olarak bu
vakalarda yeni tedavi alternatifleri uygulanmaktadır. Endokuron restorasyonlar
aşırı madde kaybına sahip endodontik tedavi görmüş dişlerin tedavisinde,
post-kuron restorasyonlara alternatif olarak kullanılan yeni bir tedavi
seçeneğidir. Endokuron restorasyonlar tek parça olarak üretilmektedir. Bu
restorasyonlar pulpa odasından ve kavite duvarlarından destek aldığı için
makromekanik tutuculuk sağlarken, adeziv sistem ile simante edilmesi sayesinde
mikromekanik tutuculuk da elde edilmektedir. Endokuron restorasyonların
uygulamasının basit, seans sayılarının az, preparasyon sırasında sağlam diş
dokusunun daha az kaldırılması, kısa kanallı, kalsifiye, tıkalı ve kökleri eğri
olan dişlerde uygulanabilmesi, kökte perforasyon ve kırık oluşturma riskinin
bulunmaması ve oklüzal mesafenin az olduğu hastalarda uygulanabilmesi gibi pek
çok avantajı bulunmaktadır. Endokuron restorasyonlar ile yapılmış literatürde
az sayıda çalışma mevcuttur. Bu derlemenin amacı yakın bir geçmişten itibaren
kullanılan endokuron restorasyonların tarihçesini, sınıflamasını, avantajlarını
ayrıntılı bir biçimde inceleyerek konuyla ilgili yapılan in vivo ve in vitro
çalışmaları değerlendirmektedir.


Anahtar kelimeler: Endokuron;
endodontik tedavili diş; aşırı madde kaybı; adeziv restorasyon








References

  • 1. Zhu Z, Dong XY, He S, Pan X, Tang L. Effect of Post Placement on the Restoration of Endodontically Treated Teeth: A Systematic Review. Int J Prosthodont. 2015;28:475-83.
  • 2. Ree M1, Schwartz RS. The endo-restorative interface: current concepts. Dent Clin North Am. 2010;54:345-74.
  • 3. Assif D, & Gorfil C () Biomechanical considerations in restoring endodontically treated teeth Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1984;71;565-67.
  • 4. Ross IF. Fracture susceptibility of endodontically treated teeth. Journal of Endodontics 1980; 6:560-65.
  • 5. Soares CJ, Santana F, Silva NR, Pereira JC, & Pereira CA () Influence of the endodontic treatment on mechanical properties of root dentin Journal of Endodontics 2007;33:603-06.
  • 6. Sedrez-Porto JA, Rosa WL, da Silva AF, Münchow EA, Pereira-Cenci T. Endocrown restorations: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent. 2016;52:8-14.
  • 7. Biacchi GR, Mello B, Basting RT. The endocrown: an alternative approach for restoring extensively damaged molars. J. Esthet. Restor Dent. 2013;25:383-90 . 8. Bindl A, Mörmann WH. Clinical evaluation of adhesively placed Cerec endo-crowns after 2 years—preliminary results. J Adhes Dent. 1999;1:255-65.
  • 9. Pissis P. Fabrication of a metal-free ceramic restoration utilizing the monobloc technique Practical Periodontics and Aesthetic Dentistry 1995;7:83-94.
  • 10. Bindl A, Mörmann WH. Clinical evaluation of adhesively placed Cerec endocrowns after 2 years—preliminary results Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 1999;1:255-65.
  • 11. Chaio C, Kuo J, Lin Y, Chang Y Fracture resistance and failure modes of CEREC endo-crowns and conventional post and core-supported CEREC crowns Journal of Dental Sciences 2009: 4:110-17.
  • 12. Zarone F, Sorrentino R, Apicella D, Valentino B, Ferrari M, Aversa R, Apicella A. Evaluation of the biomechanical behavior of maxillary central incisors restored by means of endocrowns compared to a natural tooth: a 3D static linear finite elements analysis. Dent Mater. 2006;22:1035-44.
  • 13. Bindl A, Richter B, Mörrmann WH Survival of ceramic-computer-aided/manufacturing crowns bonded to preparations with reduced macroretention geometry International Journal of Prosthodontics 2005; 18:219-24.
  • 14. Biacchi GR, Basting RT. Comparison of fracture strength of endocrowns and glass fiber postretained conventional crowns. Oper Dent 2012;37:130-36.
  • 15. Dejak B, Młotkowski A. 3D-Finite element analysis of molars restored with endocrowns and posts during masticatory simulation. Dent Mater. 2013;29:309-17.
  • 16. Biacchi GR, Basting RT. Comparison of fracture strength of endocrowns and glass fiber post-retained conventional crowns. Oper Dent. 2012;37:130-6.
  • 17. Dietschi D, Duc O, Krejci I, Sadan A. Biomechanical considerations for the restoration of endodontically treated teeth: a systematic review of the literature, Part II (Evaluation of fatigue behavior, interfaces, and in vivo studies). Quintessence Int 2008; 39: 117-29.
  • 18. Rocca GT, Rizcalla N, Krejci I. Fiber-reinforced resin coating for endocrown preparations: a technical report. Oper Dent 2013;38:242-48.
  • 19. Ramirez-Sebastia A, Bortolotto T, Cattani-Lorente M, Roig M, Krejci I. Adhesive restoration of anterior endodontically treated teeth: influence of post length on fracture strength. Clin Oral Investig 2014;18:545-54.
  • 20. Pedrollo Lise D, Van Ende A, De Munck J, Umeda Suzuki TY, Cardoso Vieira LC, Van Meerbeek B. Biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated premolars using different preparation designs and CAD/CAM materials. J Dent. 2017;59:54-61.
  • 21. Belleflamme MM, Geerts SO, Louwette MM, Grenade CF, Vanheusden AJ, Mainjot AK. No post-no core approach to restore severely damaged posterior teeth: An up to 10-year retrospective study of documented endocrown cases. J Dent. 2017;63:1-7.
  • 22. Mörmann WH, Bindl A, Lüthy H, Rathke A. Effects of preparation and luting system on all-ceramic computer-generated crowns. Int J Prosthodont. 1998;11:333-9.
  • 23. Fernandes da Cunha L, Gonzaga CC, Pissaia JF, Correr GM. Lithium silicate endocrown fabricated with a CAD-CAM system: A functional and esthetic protocol. J Prosthet Dent. 2017;118:131-34.
  • 24. Bilgin MS, Erdem A, Tanrıver M. CAD/CAM Endocrown Fabrication from a Polymer-Infiltrated Ceramic Network Block for Primary Molar: A Case Report. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2016;40(4):264-8.
  • 25. Guo J, Wang Z, Li X, Sun C, Gao E, Li H. A comparison of the fracture resistances of endodontically treated mandibular premolars restored with endocrowns and glass fiber post-core retained conventional crowns. J Adv Prosthodont. 2016;8:489-93.
  • 26. Aktas G, Yerlikaya H, Akca K. Mechanical Failure of Endocrowns Manufactured with Different Ceramic Materials: An In VitroBiomechanical Study. 2016 Jul 28. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12499.
Year 2019, Volume: 6 Issue: 2, 201 - 205, 01.08.2019
https://doi.org/10.15311/selcukdentj.339075

Abstract

References

  • 1. Zhu Z, Dong XY, He S, Pan X, Tang L. Effect of Post Placement on the Restoration of Endodontically Treated Teeth: A Systematic Review. Int J Prosthodont. 2015;28:475-83.
  • 2. Ree M1, Schwartz RS. The endo-restorative interface: current concepts. Dent Clin North Am. 2010;54:345-74.
  • 3. Assif D, & Gorfil C () Biomechanical considerations in restoring endodontically treated teeth Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1984;71;565-67.
  • 4. Ross IF. Fracture susceptibility of endodontically treated teeth. Journal of Endodontics 1980; 6:560-65.
  • 5. Soares CJ, Santana F, Silva NR, Pereira JC, & Pereira CA () Influence of the endodontic treatment on mechanical properties of root dentin Journal of Endodontics 2007;33:603-06.
  • 6. Sedrez-Porto JA, Rosa WL, da Silva AF, Münchow EA, Pereira-Cenci T. Endocrown restorations: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent. 2016;52:8-14.
  • 7. Biacchi GR, Mello B, Basting RT. The endocrown: an alternative approach for restoring extensively damaged molars. J. Esthet. Restor Dent. 2013;25:383-90 . 8. Bindl A, Mörmann WH. Clinical evaluation of adhesively placed Cerec endo-crowns after 2 years—preliminary results. J Adhes Dent. 1999;1:255-65.
  • 9. Pissis P. Fabrication of a metal-free ceramic restoration utilizing the monobloc technique Practical Periodontics and Aesthetic Dentistry 1995;7:83-94.
  • 10. Bindl A, Mörmann WH. Clinical evaluation of adhesively placed Cerec endocrowns after 2 years—preliminary results Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 1999;1:255-65.
  • 11. Chaio C, Kuo J, Lin Y, Chang Y Fracture resistance and failure modes of CEREC endo-crowns and conventional post and core-supported CEREC crowns Journal of Dental Sciences 2009: 4:110-17.
  • 12. Zarone F, Sorrentino R, Apicella D, Valentino B, Ferrari M, Aversa R, Apicella A. Evaluation of the biomechanical behavior of maxillary central incisors restored by means of endocrowns compared to a natural tooth: a 3D static linear finite elements analysis. Dent Mater. 2006;22:1035-44.
  • 13. Bindl A, Richter B, Mörrmann WH Survival of ceramic-computer-aided/manufacturing crowns bonded to preparations with reduced macroretention geometry International Journal of Prosthodontics 2005; 18:219-24.
  • 14. Biacchi GR, Basting RT. Comparison of fracture strength of endocrowns and glass fiber postretained conventional crowns. Oper Dent 2012;37:130-36.
  • 15. Dejak B, Młotkowski A. 3D-Finite element analysis of molars restored with endocrowns and posts during masticatory simulation. Dent Mater. 2013;29:309-17.
  • 16. Biacchi GR, Basting RT. Comparison of fracture strength of endocrowns and glass fiber post-retained conventional crowns. Oper Dent. 2012;37:130-6.
  • 17. Dietschi D, Duc O, Krejci I, Sadan A. Biomechanical considerations for the restoration of endodontically treated teeth: a systematic review of the literature, Part II (Evaluation of fatigue behavior, interfaces, and in vivo studies). Quintessence Int 2008; 39: 117-29.
  • 18. Rocca GT, Rizcalla N, Krejci I. Fiber-reinforced resin coating for endocrown preparations: a technical report. Oper Dent 2013;38:242-48.
  • 19. Ramirez-Sebastia A, Bortolotto T, Cattani-Lorente M, Roig M, Krejci I. Adhesive restoration of anterior endodontically treated teeth: influence of post length on fracture strength. Clin Oral Investig 2014;18:545-54.
  • 20. Pedrollo Lise D, Van Ende A, De Munck J, Umeda Suzuki TY, Cardoso Vieira LC, Van Meerbeek B. Biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated premolars using different preparation designs and CAD/CAM materials. J Dent. 2017;59:54-61.
  • 21. Belleflamme MM, Geerts SO, Louwette MM, Grenade CF, Vanheusden AJ, Mainjot AK. No post-no core approach to restore severely damaged posterior teeth: An up to 10-year retrospective study of documented endocrown cases. J Dent. 2017;63:1-7.
  • 22. Mörmann WH, Bindl A, Lüthy H, Rathke A. Effects of preparation and luting system on all-ceramic computer-generated crowns. Int J Prosthodont. 1998;11:333-9.
  • 23. Fernandes da Cunha L, Gonzaga CC, Pissaia JF, Correr GM. Lithium silicate endocrown fabricated with a CAD-CAM system: A functional and esthetic protocol. J Prosthet Dent. 2017;118:131-34.
  • 24. Bilgin MS, Erdem A, Tanrıver M. CAD/CAM Endocrown Fabrication from a Polymer-Infiltrated Ceramic Network Block for Primary Molar: A Case Report. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2016;40(4):264-8.
  • 25. Guo J, Wang Z, Li X, Sun C, Gao E, Li H. A comparison of the fracture resistances of endodontically treated mandibular premolars restored with endocrowns and glass fiber post-core retained conventional crowns. J Adv Prosthodont. 2016;8:489-93.
  • 26. Aktas G, Yerlikaya H, Akca K. Mechanical Failure of Endocrowns Manufactured with Different Ceramic Materials: An In VitroBiomechanical Study. 2016 Jul 28. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12499.
There are 25 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Dentistry
Journal Section Review
Authors

Melahat Çelik Güven

Gülhan Yıldırım

Publication Date August 1, 2019
Submission Date September 20, 2017
Published in Issue Year 2019 Volume: 6 Issue: 2

Cite

Vancouver Çelik Güven M, Yıldırım G. Endokron restorasyonlar. Selcuk Dent J. 2019;6(2):201-5.