In vitro ZnO Nanoparticles Enhanced Pea (Pisum sativum L.) Seedlings Growth

Year 2022, Volume: 9 Issue: 4, 1080 - 1087, 18.10.2022

Merve Şimşek Geyik Büşra Yazıcılar Sinan Ata İsmail Bezirganoglu

https://doi.org/10.30910/turkjans.1115351

Cited By: 1

Abstract

Zinc is a minor micronutrient that is also involved in carbohydrate, protein synthesis metabolisms. The present study was carried out to analyze in response to DNSA, proline, protein and MDA (Malondialdehit) responses in the form of zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO NPs) in Pisum sativum, for a period of 21st and 35th days. Two P. sativum (Maro Tarım and Kars) were used as the material in the presence of 0.8 ppm and 1.8 ppm ZnO nanoparticulate. The length and biomass of plants increased significantly upon ZnO NPs application. The activation of shoot and root length in two tested ecotypes was remarkably increased by ZnO. Accumulation of Zn increases in presence of 0.8 ppm Zn+ nanoparticle in P. sativum, which lower concentration more affected than higher concentration in terms of growth parameters. The amount of protein showed an increase, while those of DNSA and proline response to ZnO NPs in the higher concentration. However, there were significant differences between control and ZnO treatments in response to DNSA and proline. Malondialdehyde content displayed a gradual increase in leaf samples of P. sativum plants. The results suggest that lower application of ZnO NPs (0.8 ppm) could be promoted to the development process of plants and can be stimulated as a Zn regulator factor for crop physiological mechanisms.

Keywords

Pisum sativum, in vitro culture, growth parameters, ZnO NPs

In vitro ZnO Nanopartikülleriyle Geliştirilmiş Bezelye (Pisum sativum L.) Fidelerinin Büyümesi

Abstract

Zinc is a minor micronutrient that is also involved in carbohydrate, protein synthesis metabolisms. The present study was carried out to analyze in response to DNSA, proline, protein and MDA (Malondialdehit) responses in the form of zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO NPs) in Pisum sativum, for a period of 21st and 35th days. Two P. sativum (Maro Tarım and Kars) were used as the material in the presence of 0.8 ppm and 1.8 ppm ZnO nanoparticulate. The length and biomass of plants increased significantly upon ZnO NPs application. The activation of shoot and root length in two tested ecotypes was remarkably increased by ZnO. Accumulation of Zn increasedin presence of 0.8 ppm Zn+ nanoparticle in P. sativum, which lower concentration more affected than higher concentration in terms of growth parameters. The amount of protein showed an increase, while those of DNSA and proline response to ZnO NPs in the higher concentration. However, there were significant differences between control and ZnO treatments in response to DNSA and proline. Malondialdehyde content displayed a gradual increase in leaf samples of P. sativum plants. The results suggest that lower application of ZnO NPs (0.8 ppm) could be promoted to the development process of plants and can be stimulated as a Zn regulator factor for crop physiological mechanisms.

Keywords

Pisum sativum, in vitro kültür, büyüme parametreleri, ZnO nanopartiküller

References

• Bates, L. S., Waldren, R. P., Teare, I. D. 1973. Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant and soil, 39(1):205-207.
• Bezirganoğlu, İ. 2017. Response of five triticale genotypes to salt stress in in vitro culture. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 41(5):372-380.
• Bezirganoglu, I., Uysal, P., Yiğit, O. R. 2018. Cold stress resistance and the antioxidant enzyme system in Pisum sativum. The Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences, 28(2): 561-567.
• Cunningham, F. J., Goh, N. S., Demirer, G. S., Matos, J. L., Landry, M. P. 2018. Nanoparticle-mediated delivery towards advancing plant genetic engineering. Trends in biotechnology, 36(9):882-897.
• Del Buono, D., Di Michele, A., Costantino, F., Trevisan, M., & Lucini, L. (2021). Biogenic ZnO nanoparticles synthesized using a novel plant extract: application to enhance physiological and biochemical traits in maize.Nanomaterials, 11(5):120.
• Dimkpa, C. O., Latta, D. E., McLean, J. E., Britt, D. W., Boyanov, M. I., Anderson, A. J. 2013. Fate of CuO and ZnO nano-and microparticles in the plant environment. Environmental science & technology, 47(9):4734-4742.
• Duhan, J. S., Kumar, R., Kumar, N., Kaur, P., Nehra, K., Duhan, S. 2017. Nanotechnology: The new perspective in precision agriculture. Biotechnology Reports, 15:11-23.
• El-Mahdy, M. T., Elazab, D. S. 2020. Impact of zinc oxide nanoparticles on pomegranate growth under in vitro conditions. Russian Journal of Plant Physiology, 67(1):162-167.
• Erdal, S. 2012. Androsterone-induced molecular and physiological changes in maize seedlings in response to chilling stress. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 57:1-7.
• Faizan, M., Bhat, J. A., Chen, C., Alyemeni, M. N., Wijaya, L., Ahmad, P., & Yu, F. 2021. Zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO-NPs) induce salt tolerance by improving the antioxidant system and photosynthetic machinery in tomato. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 161:122-130.
• Hashemi, S., Asrar, Z., Pourseyedi, S., Nadernejad, N. 2019. Investigation of ZnO nanoparticles on proline, anthocyanin contents and photosynthetic pigments and lipid peroxidation in the soybean. IET nanobiotechnology, 13(1):66-70.
• Heath, R. L., Packer, L. 1968. Photoperoxidation in isolated chloroplasts: I. Kinetics and stoichiometry of fatty acid peroxidation. Archives of biochemistry and biophysics, 125(1):189-198.
• Hussain, A., Ali, S., Rizwan, M., ur Rehman, M. Z., Javed, M. R., Imran, M., Nazir, R. 2018. Zinc oxide nanoparticles alter the wheat physiological response and reduce the cadmium uptake by plants. Environmental Pollution, 242:1518-1526.
• Jaleel, C. A., Sankar, B., Sridharan, R., Panneerselvam, R. 2008. Soil salinity alters growth, chlorophyll content, and secondary metabolite accumulation in Catharanthus roseus. Turkish Journal of Biology, 32(2):79-83.
• Khan, F. U., Khan, Z. U. H., Ma, J., Khan, A. U., Sohail, M., Chen, Y., Pan, X. 2021. An Astragalus membranaceus based eco-friendly biomimetic synthesis approach of ZnO nanoflowers with an excellent antibacterial, antioxidant and electrochemical sensing effect. Materials Science and Engineering: C, 118:111432.
• Laemmli, U. K. 1970. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. nature, 227(5259), 680-685.
• Liang, Z., Pan, X., Li, W., Kou, E., Kang, Y., Lei, B., Song, S. 2021. Dose-Dependent Effect of ZnO Quantum Dots for Lettuce Growth. ACS omega, 6(15):10141-10149.
• Murashige, T., Skoog, F. 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiologia plantarum, 15(3), 473-497.
• Naseer, M., Aslam, U., Khalid, B., Chen, B. 2020. Green route to synthesize Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles using leaf extracts of Cassia fistula and Melia azadarach and their antibacterial potential. Scientific Reports, 10(1):1-10.
• Rajput, V. D., Minkina, T., Kumari, A., Singh, V. K., Verma, K. K., Mandzhieva, S., Keswani, C. 2021. Coping with the challenges of abiotic stress in plants: New dimensions in the field application of nanoparticles. Plants, 10(6): 1221.
• Regni, L., Del Buono, D., Micheli, M., Facchin, S. L., Tolisano, C., Proietti, P. 2022. Effects of Biogenic ZnO Nanoparticles on Growth, Physiological, Biochemical Traits and Antioxidants on Olive Tree In Vitro. Horticulturae, 8(2):161.
• Sanzari, I., Leone, A., Ambrosone, A. 2019. Nanotechnology in plant science: to make a long story short. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 7:120.
• Sturikova, H., Krystofova, O., Huska, D., Adam, V. 2018. Zinc, zinc nanoparticles and plants. Journal of hazardous materials, 349:101-110.
• Wang, X., Yang, X., Chen, S., Li, Q., Wang, W., Hou, C., Wang, S. 2016. Zinc oxide nanoparticles affect biomass accumulation and photosynthesis in Arabidopsis. Frontiers in plant science, 6:1243.
• Yazıcılar, B., Böke, F., Alaylı, A., Nadaroglu, H., Gedikli, S., Bezirganoglu, I. 2021. In vitro effects of CaO nanoparticles on Triticale callus exposed to short and long-term salt stress. Plant Cell Reports, 40(1):29-42.