Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Development of Career Barriers Inventory (CBI)

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 34 Sayı: 1, 182 - 196, 31.01.2019
https://doi.org/10.16986/HUJE.2018037395

Öz

The aim
of this study is to develop a scale to measure the career barriers of university
students. In the scope of the study, pilot study on the scale of 25 students; explanatory
factor analysis (EFA) on 387 students; confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) on 573
students and test-retest reliability on 21 students were conducted. The explanatory
and confirmatory factor analyses were performed for the construct validity of the
scale. The Perceived Career Barrier Scale was used for the criterion-related validity
study. Parallel analysis was used to determine the number of factors for CBS. In
the reliability studies of the scale, Cronbach's Alpha internal consistency coefficient
and test-retest correlation were calculated. According to the results of EFA and
CFA, the coefficients of internal consistency were 0,79-0,75 for the first dimension,
0,71-0,63 for the second dimension; 0,71-0,68 for the third dimension and 0,52-0,50
for the fourth dimension of the scale. Correlation coefficients (r) corrected for
test retest reliability were found to be 0,93 for the first dimension, 0,81 for
the second dimension, 0,89 for the third dimension, and 0,65 for the fourth dimension.

Kaynakça

  • Bademci, V. (2007). Ölçme ve araştırma yöntembiliminde paradigma değişikliği: testler güvenilir değildir. Ankara: Yenyap Yayınları.
  • Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588–606.
  • Betz, N. E. (2000). Self-efficacy theory as a basis for career assessment. Journal of Career Assessment, 8(3), 205-222.
  • Bordin, E. S. (1946). Diagnosis in counseling and psychotherapy. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 6, 169-184.
  • Byars, A. M. (1997). Ethnic and racial influences on African American college women’s career self-efficacy. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Arizona State University, Temple, AZ.
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2007). Veri analizi el kitabı. Ankara: PegemA Yayıncılık.
  • Constantine, M. G., Wallace, B. C., & Kindaichi, M. M. (2005). Examining contextual factors in the career decision status of African American adolescents. Journal of Career Assessment, 13(3), 307-319.
  • Creed, P. A., Patton, W., & Bartrum, D. (2004). Internal and external barriers, cognitive style, and the career development variables of focus and indecision. Journal of Career Development, 30(4), 277-294.
  • Crespin, A. C. (2006). Contributors to college women’s career decision-making self-efficacy: support, barriers, and coping. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Fordham University, New York, NY.
  • Crites, J. O. (1969). Vocational psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Ferry, N. M. (2006). Factors influencing career choices of adolescents and young adults in rural Pennsylvania. Journal of Extension.44(3), 1-12.
  • Fitzgerald, L. F., & Crites, J. 0. (1980). Toward a career psychology of women: What do we know? What do we need to know? Journal of Counseling Psychology, 27, 44-62.
  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2009). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson Company.
  • Holland, J. L., Daiger, D. C, & Power, P. G. (1980). My vocational situation: Description of an experimental diagnostic form for the selection of vocational assistance. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
  • Howell, F. M., Frese, W., & Sollie, C. R. (1977). Ginzberg’s theory of occupational choice: A reanalysis of increasing realism. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 11, 332-346
  • Howell, F. M., Frese, W., & Sollie, C. R. (1984). The measurement of perceived opportunity for occupational attainment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 25, 325–346.
  • İnandı, Y. (2009). Kadın öğretmenlerin okul müdürü olmaları önündeki engeller (Mersin İli örneği-Türkiye). Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 36, 161-178.
  • İnandı, Y., Tunç, B., & Uslu, F. (2013). Eğitim fakültesi öğretim elemanlarının kariyer engelleri ile iş doyumları arasındaki ilişki. Eğitim Bilimleri Araştırma Dergisi, 3(1), 219-238.
  • Kelly, R. R., & Hatcher, T. (2013). Decision-making self-efficacy and barriers in career decision making among community college students. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 37(2), 103-113.
  • Kline, R. B. (1999). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. New York: The Guilford Press.
  • Kline, P. (2010). A psychometrics primer. London: Free Assn Books.
  • Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45, 79–122.
  • London, M. (2014). Career barriers: How people experience, overcome, and avoid failure. New York: Psychology Press.
  • Luzzo, D. A., & McWhirter, E. H. (2001). Sex and ethnic differences in the perception of educational and career‐related barriers and levels of coping efficacy. Journal of Counseling & Development, 79(1), 61-67.
  • McWhirter E. H. (1992). A test of the career commitment and aspirations of Mexican American high school girls. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Arizona State University, Temple, AZ.
  • Migunde, Q., Agak, J., & Odiwuor, W. (2012). Gender differences, career aspirations and career development barriers of secondary school students in Kisumu municipality. Gender and Behaviour, 10(2), 4987-4997.
  • Özyürek, R. (2013). Sosyal-bilişsel yaklaşımlar. B. Yeşilyaprak (Ed.). Mesleki Rehberlik ve Kariyer Danışmanlığı: Kuramdan Uygulamaya (s. 219-271). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
  • Patton, W., Creed, P. A., & Watson, M. (2003). Perceived work related and non‐work related barriers in the career development of Australian and South African adolescents. Australian Journal of Psychology, 55(2), 74-82.
  • Quimby, J. L., & O'Brien, K. M. (2004). Predictors of student and career decision‐making self‐efficacy among nontraditional college women. The Career Development Quarterly, 52(4), 323-339.
  • Raubenheimer, J. (2004). An item selection procedure to maximise scale reliability and validity. Journal of Industrial Psychology, 30(4), 59-64.
  • Sürücü, M. (2011). Mesleki seçim hedeflerinin kariyer engelleri ve sosyal bilişsel değişkenler tarafından yordanmasına ilişkin bir model sınaması. Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi. Gazi Üniversitesi, Ankara.
  • Swanson, J. L., & Tokar, D. M. (1991a). College students’ perceptions of barriers to career development. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 38, 92-106.
  • Swanson, J. L., & Tokar, D. M. (1991b). Development and initial validation of the Career Barriers Inventory. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 39(3), 344-361.
  • Swanson, J. L., & Woitke, M. B. (1997). Theory into practice in career assessment for women: Assessment and intervention regarding perceived career barriers. Journal of Career Assessment, 5, 431-450.
  • Swanson, J. L., Daniels, K. K., & Tokar, D. M. (1996). Assessing perceptions of career-related barriers: The Career Barriers Inventory. Journal of Career Assessment, 4(2), 219-244.
  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston: Pearson, Allyn & Bacon.
  • Tien, H. L. S. (1998). Development and Initial Validation of a Chinese Career Barriers Inventory. Retrieved from, https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED427045.
  • Tien, H. L. S., Wang, Y. F., & Liu, L. C. (2009). The role of career barriers in high school students' career choice behavior in Taiwan. The Career Development Quarterly, 57(3), 274-288.
  • Williamson, E. G. (1939). How to council students?. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Ziebell, J. L. C. (2010). Promoting viable career choice goals through career decision-making self-efficacy and career maturity in Inner-City high school students: A test of social cognitive career theory. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University Of Minnesota, Minnesota, MN.

Kariyer Engelleri Ölçeği’nin (KEÖ) Geliştirilmesi

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 34 Sayı: 1, 182 - 196, 31.01.2019
https://doi.org/10.16986/HUJE.2018037395

Öz

Bu çalışmada üniversite öğrencilerinin
kariyer engellerini ölçmek amacıyla Kariyer Engelleri Ölçeği (KEÖ) geliştirilmiştir.
Ölçek geliştirme aşamaları dört ayrı çalışma grubu üzerinde gerçekleştirilmiştir.
Çalışma kapsamında Güneydoğu Anadolu Bölgesi’nde bir üniversitede 2016-2017 öğretim
yılı bahar yarıyılında öğrenim gören 25 öğrenci üzerinde ölçeğin pilot uygulama;
387 öğrenci üzerinde açımlayıcı faktör analizi, 573 öğrenci üzerinde doğrulayıcı
faktör analizi ve 21 öğrenci üzerinde ise test tekrar test güvenirliği yapılmıştır.
Ölçeğin yapı geçerliği için açımlayıcı ve doğrulayıcı faktör analizi yapılmıştır.
Aynı zamanda ölçeğin ölçüt bağıntılı geçerlik çalışması için Algılanan Kariyer Engelleri
Ölçeği kullanılmıştır. KEÖ’nün faktör sayısını belirlemede paralel analizden yararlanılmıştır.
Ölçeğin güvenirliğini belirlemek için iç tutarlılık ve test tekrar test katsayıları
hesaplanmıştır. İç tutarlılık katsayısının hesaplanmasında Cronbach α katsayısı
kullanılmıştır. Farklı çalışma grupları üzerinde yapılan açımlayıcı ve doğrulayıcı
faktör analizi sonuçlarına göre, sırasıyla iç tutarlılık katsayıları ölçeğin birinci
boyutu için 0,79-0,75; ikinci boyut için 0,71-0,63; üçüncü boyut için 0,71-0,68
ve dördüncü boyut için 0,52-0,50 olarak bulunmuştur. Test tekrar test güvenirlikleri
için düzeltilmiş korelasyon katsayıları (r) birinci boyut için 0,93, ikinci boyut
için 0,81, üçüncü boyut için 0,89 ve dördüncü boyut için 0,65 olarak bulunmuştur.

Kaynakça

  • Bademci, V. (2007). Ölçme ve araştırma yöntembiliminde paradigma değişikliği: testler güvenilir değildir. Ankara: Yenyap Yayınları.
  • Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588–606.
  • Betz, N. E. (2000). Self-efficacy theory as a basis for career assessment. Journal of Career Assessment, 8(3), 205-222.
  • Bordin, E. S. (1946). Diagnosis in counseling and psychotherapy. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 6, 169-184.
  • Byars, A. M. (1997). Ethnic and racial influences on African American college women’s career self-efficacy. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Arizona State University, Temple, AZ.
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2007). Veri analizi el kitabı. Ankara: PegemA Yayıncılık.
  • Constantine, M. G., Wallace, B. C., & Kindaichi, M. M. (2005). Examining contextual factors in the career decision status of African American adolescents. Journal of Career Assessment, 13(3), 307-319.
  • Creed, P. A., Patton, W., & Bartrum, D. (2004). Internal and external barriers, cognitive style, and the career development variables of focus and indecision. Journal of Career Development, 30(4), 277-294.
  • Crespin, A. C. (2006). Contributors to college women’s career decision-making self-efficacy: support, barriers, and coping. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Fordham University, New York, NY.
  • Crites, J. O. (1969). Vocational psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Ferry, N. M. (2006). Factors influencing career choices of adolescents and young adults in rural Pennsylvania. Journal of Extension.44(3), 1-12.
  • Fitzgerald, L. F., & Crites, J. 0. (1980). Toward a career psychology of women: What do we know? What do we need to know? Journal of Counseling Psychology, 27, 44-62.
  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2009). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson Company.
  • Holland, J. L., Daiger, D. C, & Power, P. G. (1980). My vocational situation: Description of an experimental diagnostic form for the selection of vocational assistance. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
  • Howell, F. M., Frese, W., & Sollie, C. R. (1977). Ginzberg’s theory of occupational choice: A reanalysis of increasing realism. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 11, 332-346
  • Howell, F. M., Frese, W., & Sollie, C. R. (1984). The measurement of perceived opportunity for occupational attainment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 25, 325–346.
  • İnandı, Y. (2009). Kadın öğretmenlerin okul müdürü olmaları önündeki engeller (Mersin İli örneği-Türkiye). Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 36, 161-178.
  • İnandı, Y., Tunç, B., & Uslu, F. (2013). Eğitim fakültesi öğretim elemanlarının kariyer engelleri ile iş doyumları arasındaki ilişki. Eğitim Bilimleri Araştırma Dergisi, 3(1), 219-238.
  • Kelly, R. R., & Hatcher, T. (2013). Decision-making self-efficacy and barriers in career decision making among community college students. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 37(2), 103-113.
  • Kline, R. B. (1999). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. New York: The Guilford Press.
  • Kline, P. (2010). A psychometrics primer. London: Free Assn Books.
  • Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45, 79–122.
  • London, M. (2014). Career barriers: How people experience, overcome, and avoid failure. New York: Psychology Press.
  • Luzzo, D. A., & McWhirter, E. H. (2001). Sex and ethnic differences in the perception of educational and career‐related barriers and levels of coping efficacy. Journal of Counseling & Development, 79(1), 61-67.
  • McWhirter E. H. (1992). A test of the career commitment and aspirations of Mexican American high school girls. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Arizona State University, Temple, AZ.
  • Migunde, Q., Agak, J., & Odiwuor, W. (2012). Gender differences, career aspirations and career development barriers of secondary school students in Kisumu municipality. Gender and Behaviour, 10(2), 4987-4997.
  • Özyürek, R. (2013). Sosyal-bilişsel yaklaşımlar. B. Yeşilyaprak (Ed.). Mesleki Rehberlik ve Kariyer Danışmanlığı: Kuramdan Uygulamaya (s. 219-271). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
  • Patton, W., Creed, P. A., & Watson, M. (2003). Perceived work related and non‐work related barriers in the career development of Australian and South African adolescents. Australian Journal of Psychology, 55(2), 74-82.
  • Quimby, J. L., & O'Brien, K. M. (2004). Predictors of student and career decision‐making self‐efficacy among nontraditional college women. The Career Development Quarterly, 52(4), 323-339.
  • Raubenheimer, J. (2004). An item selection procedure to maximise scale reliability and validity. Journal of Industrial Psychology, 30(4), 59-64.
  • Sürücü, M. (2011). Mesleki seçim hedeflerinin kariyer engelleri ve sosyal bilişsel değişkenler tarafından yordanmasına ilişkin bir model sınaması. Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi. Gazi Üniversitesi, Ankara.
  • Swanson, J. L., & Tokar, D. M. (1991a). College students’ perceptions of barriers to career development. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 38, 92-106.
  • Swanson, J. L., & Tokar, D. M. (1991b). Development and initial validation of the Career Barriers Inventory. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 39(3), 344-361.
  • Swanson, J. L., & Woitke, M. B. (1997). Theory into practice in career assessment for women: Assessment and intervention regarding perceived career barriers. Journal of Career Assessment, 5, 431-450.
  • Swanson, J. L., Daniels, K. K., & Tokar, D. M. (1996). Assessing perceptions of career-related barriers: The Career Barriers Inventory. Journal of Career Assessment, 4(2), 219-244.
  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston: Pearson, Allyn & Bacon.
  • Tien, H. L. S. (1998). Development and Initial Validation of a Chinese Career Barriers Inventory. Retrieved from, https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED427045.
  • Tien, H. L. S., Wang, Y. F., & Liu, L. C. (2009). The role of career barriers in high school students' career choice behavior in Taiwan. The Career Development Quarterly, 57(3), 274-288.
  • Williamson, E. G. (1939). How to council students?. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Ziebell, J. L. C. (2010). Promoting viable career choice goals through career decision-making self-efficacy and career maturity in Inner-City high school students: A test of social cognitive career theory. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University Of Minnesota, Minnesota, MN.
Toplam 40 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Özlem Ulaş Bu kişi benim 0000-0002-2757-7905

Seval Kızıldağ 0000-0002-3357-7186

Yayımlanma Tarihi 31 Ocak 2019
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2019 Cilt: 34 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Ulaş, Ö., & Kızıldağ, S. (2019). Kariyer Engelleri Ölçeği’nin (KEÖ) Geliştirilmesi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 34(1), 182-196. https://doi.org/10.16986/HUJE.2018037395