Turkish Modernity and Epistemic Communities in the Social Sciences: Transfer of Intellectual Knowledge among Religion and Science?

Yıl 2016, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 10, 181 - 199, 01.06.2016

Ruhi Can Alkın

Öz

In this study, transformation process of epistemic communities in modern Turkey, which helps us understanding the imagined conflict among science and religion, will be issued and the problematic regarding an assumed competition among religion and science will be focused on. In doing so, it is proposed to illustrate the unique model of religious intellectual manner in Turkey, which both embraces religion and science without problematizing them as the conflict areas. At the end of the study, it is proposed to clarify the relationship among modernity, religion, intellectual knowledge and scientific language in specific to modern Turkish history

Anahtar Kelimeler

Religion, Science, Epistemic Communities, Intellectual Knowledge

Türk Modernleşmesi ve Sosyal Bilimlerde Epistemik Cemaatler: Entelektüel Bilginin Bilim ve Din Arasında Transferi mi?

Öz

Bu çalışmada, Türkiye’de bilim ve din arasında var olduğu düşünülen çatışmayı anlamaya yardımcı olacak olan epistemik cemaatler arasındaki geçiş süreci konu edilecek ve bilimle din arasında yaşandığı varsayılan çatışma üzerinde odaklanılacaktır. Bu yolla, Türkiye’de entelektüel çabanın kendine has bir durumu olarak hem dini hem de bilimi, bu iki olguyu bir çatışma perspektifinden görmeyerek kucaklayan tavır ortaya konulmuş olacaktır. Çalışmanın sonunda, modern Türk tarihi özelinde din, modernite, entelektüel bilgi ve bilimsel dil arasındaki ilişkiye dair açılımlar getirilecektir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Din, Bilim, Epistemik topluluklar, Entelektüel Bilgi

Kaynakça

• Arslan, H. (2007), Epistemik Cemaat: Bir Bilim Sosyolojisi Denemesi (İstanbul: Paradigma Yayınları.
• Birekul, M. (2012), Bilginin Toplumsal İnşası: Bir Sosyal Gerçeklik Olarak Bilginin İslamileştirilmesi Sorunu, Milel ve Nihal Dergisi, 9 (3), 49- 74.
• Bloodgood, E. (2008). Epistemic Communities, Norms and Knowledge. In- ternational Studies Association Annual Conference, San Francisco, CA, March 26-29.
• Burak, B. (2011). The Role of the Military in Turkish Politics: To Guard Whom and to What, European Journal of Economic and Political Stud- ies, 4 (1), 143-169.
• Brine, J. (2000). TSER and the epistemic community of European social re- searchers. Journal of European Social Policy,10 (3), 267-282.
• Bruner, J. P. (2013). Policing Epistemic Communities. Episteme, 10, 403-416.
• Crane, D. (1967). The Gatekeepers of Science: Some Factors Effect the Se- lection of Articles for Scientific Journals. The American Sociologist, 2 (4), 195-201.
• Dever, A. (2012). Lords of the Knowledge: “Epistemic Community”. FLSF, 13, 201-217.
• Durkheim, E. (1982). Basic Rules of Sociological Method. Edited with an In- troduction by Steven Lukes, trans by: W. D. Halls, London: The Free Press.
• Kant, I. (1784, 2010). An Answer to the Question: “What Is Enlightenment?”. New York: Penguin.
• Kuhn, T. S. (1996). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 3rd edition. Chi- cago: The University of Chicago Press.
• Kukla, A. (2000). Social Constructivism and the Philosophy of Science. Routledge: New York.
• Lynch, M. P. (2001). Truth in Context: An Essay on Pluralism and Objectivity. MIT Press: Massachusetts.
• Mardin, Ş. (2006). Religion, Society, and Modernity in Turkey. Syracuse Uni- versity Press: Syracuse, NY.
• Miller, H. T. & Fox, C. J. (2001). The Epistemic Community. Administration and Society, 32 (6), 668-685.
• Nelson, L. H. (1992). Epistemological Communities. In: Feminist Epistemol- ogies, Eds: Linda Alcoff & Elizabeth Potter, Routledge: New York, 121–160.
• Parla, T. (1985). The Social and Political Thought of Ziya Gökalp: 1876-1924. Brill: Amsterdam.
• Rai, D. (2012). Renewal of the Rights Discourse. Social Change, 42 (4), 559- 563.
• Satana, N. (2007). Transformation of the Turkish Military and the Path to Democracy. Armed Forces & Society, 34, 357-388.
• Toulmin, S. (1972). Human Understanding: The Collective Use and Evolution of Concepts. Princeton University Press: Princeton.
• Tuna, K. (2014). Türkiye’de Sosyolojinin 100 Yılı Üzerine. Sosyoloji Divanı, 4, 9-23.
• Wittgenstein, L. (2001).Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, trans by. C. K. Og- den, Routledge.
• Kaynakça Bilgisi / Citation Information
• Alkın, R. C. (2016). Turkish modernity and epistemic communities in the social sciences: transfer of intellectual knowledge among religion and science?. OPUS – Uluslararası Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi, 6(10), 181-199.