BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

KÜRESEL YÖNETİŞİM: EKONOMİK BÜYÜME VE GELİR DAĞILIMI

Yıl 2019, Sayı: 112, 137 - 158, 01.03.2019

Öz

Küresel yönetişim, soğuk savaşın ardından ortaya çıkan gelişmeler içinde ekonomik küreselleşmenin rekabetçi baskısının sonucu olmuştur. Maliyetleri azaltmak ve daha verimli hale getirmek için, bu baskılar esas olarak devlet kurumlarına odaklanmıştır. Ekonomik verimliliği ve büyümeyi artırarak tüm ulusların refahını artırma potansiyelini hedefleyen küreselleşme, sürecinin etkin ve demokratik yönetişimden yoksun olması nedeniyle yetersiz kalmıştır. Ulusun hâlâ önemli olduğu bir dünyada, küreselleşmenin yönetişimi ulusal düzeyde yönetişim tarafından gerçekleştirilmiştir. Bu süreçte, sosyal politikanın belirleyici aktörlerinin gücünü kısmen veya tamamen kaybetmesi, sosyal politika yönetişim meselesini gündeme getirirken, yeni dönemde endişe ve belirsizlik doğmasına yol açmıştır. Küresel yönetişim küresel uygarlık olarak tanımlanır ve küresel kaos için anahtardır. Küresel kaosun nedenlerini anlamadan sorun çözülemez. Küreselleşme olgusu tarafından yaratılan yıkım, hem uluslararası ilişkiler hem de sosyal politika açısından incelenmeli ve çözülmelidir. Bu çalışmada yönetişim endeksi, ekonomik büyüme ve gelir dağılımı ilişkisi incelenmiş ve yönetişim artışının ekonomik büyüme sağladığı fakat gelir dağılımını düzeltmediği görülmüştür

Kaynakça

  • Aaron, H. (1967), The Foundation of the War on Poverty, Re-examined, America Economic Review 57, 1229–1243.
  • Anderson, T. W. (1964), An Introduction to Multivariate Statistical Analysis, 2nd Edition. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
  • Aras, G. and Crowther, D. (2009), “Corporate Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility in Context”, in Global Perspectives on Corporate Governance and CSR, (edts) Aras, G. and Crowther, D., Farnham, England.
  • Börzel, T. A. and Risse T. (2010), “Governance without a State: Can It Work?”, Regulation & Governance, 4 (2), June, pp.113–134.
  • Cederman, L. (2001), “Back to Kant: Reinterpreting the Democratic Peace as a Macrohistorical Learning Process”, The American Political Science Review, 95, 1, pp.15-31.
  • Clark, I. (2000), Governance, the State, Regulation and Industrial Relations, Routledge, New York.
  • Credit Suisse (2015), “Global Wealth Report”, Global Wealth Data Book. https:// www.credit-suisse.com/us/en/news-and-expertise/research/credit- suisse-research-institute/ publications.html. ( Access: 14.10.2018).
  • Daly, M. (2003), “Governance and Social Policy”, Journal of Social Policy, 32 (1), January, pp. 113- 128.
  • Das, D. K. (2009), Two Faces of Globalization, Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, Cheltenham, UK.
  • Deacon, B. (2007), Global Social Policy and Governance, Sage Publication, London.
  • Deutsch, K. W. (1978), The Analysis of International Relations, New Jersey, Prentice-Hall Inc.
  • Dingwerth, K. and Pattberg P. (2006), “Global Governance as a Perspective on World Politics”, Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations, 12 (2), 185-203.
  • Doyle, M. (2005), “Three Pillars of the Liberal Peace”, The American Political Science Review, 99, 3, 463-466.
  • Erdut, Z. (2004), 1. Ulusal Sosyal Politika Kongresi, Yaşam Boyu Sosyal Koruma, Devrimci İşçi Sendikaları Konfederasyonu, Ankara, Dedeman Otel, 22-24 Ocak, s. 32-57.
  • Ervik, R., Kildal, N. and Nilssen, E. (2009), “Introduction”, in the Role of International Organizations in Social Policy, (edts) Ervik, R., Kildal, N. and Nilssen, E., Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, Cheltenham, UK.
  • Galtung, J. (1971), “A Structural Theory of Imperialism”, Journal of Peace Research, 8, 2, 81-117.
  • Gough, I. (2013), “Climate Change, Social Policy, and Global Governance”, Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy, 29 (3), pp.185– 203.
  • Güney, A. (2006), “Bob Jessop’da Yönetişim Kavramı: Stratejik İlişkisel Devlet Biçiminden Yönetişim Biçimine”, Memleket Siyaset Yönetim, 1, s. 153-171.
  • Hazenberg, H. (2013), “Is Governance Democratic?”, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 16 (1), pp.1-23.
  • ILO (2004), A Fair Globalization: Creating Opportunities for All, International Labour Office, (ILO) Geneva.
  • Jessop, B. ( 2005), Hegemonya Post-Fordizm ve Küresellesme Ekseninde Kapitalist Devlet, (edts) Yarar, B. ve Özkazanç, A., İletisim Yayınları, İstanbul.
  • Kazepov, Y. (2010), “Rescaling Social Policies towards Multilevel Governance in Europe: Some Reflections on Processes at Stake and Actors Involved”, in Rescaling Social Policies: Towards Multilevel Governance in Europe, (edts) Kazepov, Y., Ashgate Publishing, European Centre Vienna.
  • Keune M. and Marginson P. (2013), “Transnational Industrial Relations as Multi- Level Governance: Interdependencies in European Social Dialogue”, British Journal of Industrial Relations, 51 (3), September, pp. 473–497.
  • Kohler-Koch, B. and Rittberger B. (2006), “Review Article: ‘Governance Turn’ in EU Studies”, Journal of Common Market Studies, 44 (1), September, pp. 27–49.
  • Kondo, S. (2002), “Fostering Dialogue to Strengthen Good Governance”, in Public Sector Transparency and Accountability: Making it Happen, OECD, Paris.
  • Koray, M. (2005), Avrupa Toplum Modeli, 2. Baskı, İmge Yayınevi, Ankara.
  • Köse A. H., Reyhan H. ve Senalp M. G., (2003), “Küresel Yönetişim ve Sendikalar”, Türkiye.
  • Lee, S. ve McBride, S. (2007), Neo-Liberalism, State Power and Global Governance, Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands.
  • LeBlanc, M. (2000), Poverty, Policy and the Macroeconomy, United States of Department of Agriculture, Technical Bulletins 1889.
  • Maoz, Z. and Abdülali N. (1989), “Regime Types and International Conflict, 1816-1976”, The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 33, 1, 3-35.
  • McGrew, A. (2002), Liberal Internationalism: Between Realism and Cosmopolitanism, Held, D., McGrew, A., (edts), Governing Globalization: Power, Authority and Global Governance, (267-289), Cambridge, Polity Press.
  • OECD (2014), “Focus on Inequality and Growth”. http://www.oecd.org/social/ Focus-Inequality-and-Growth-2014.pdf , ( Access: 17.01.2018).
  • Oneal, J. R., Russett, B., and Berbaum M., (2003), “Causes of Peace: Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organizations, 1885-1992”, International Studies Quarterly, 47, 3, 371-393.
  • Özaydın, M. M. (2008), “Küresel Etkilerle Şekillenen Sosyal Politika Anlayışı Ekseninde Sosyal Politikaların Geleceğini Tartışmak”, Gazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 10 (1), s.163-180.
  • Özer, M. A. (2006),” Yönetişim Üzerine Notlar”, Sayıştay Dergisi, 63 (1), 59-89.
  • Rajagopal, B. (2013), “Global Governance: Old and New Challenges”, in Realizing the Right to Development: Essays in Commemoration of 25 Years of the United Nations Declaration on the Right to Development, Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (UNHRC), New York.
  • Rosenau J. N. (1995), Governance in the Twenty-first Century, Global Governance, Vol. 1. No. 1.
  • Scolte, A. A. (2004), “Civil Society and Democratically Accountable Global Governance”, Government and Opposition, 39 (2), pp. 125-391.
  • Sözen, S. ve Algan B. (2009), İyi Yönetişim, İçişleri Bakanlığı Genel Yayın No: 654, Ankara.
  • Şenses, F. (2014), “Gelir Dağılımı ve Yoksulluk: Temel Eğilimler, Nedenler ve Politikalar”, Kalkınmada Yeni Yaklaşımlar (der. Ahmet Faruk Aysan ve Devrim Dumludağ), İmge Kitabevi, İstanbul, s. 93-121.
  • Rummel, R. J. (1983), “Libertarianism and International Violence”, The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 27, 1, 27-71.
  • Waltz, K. N. (2000), “Structural Realism after the Cold War”, International Security 25, 1, 5-41.
  • Welz, C. (2008), The European Social Dialogue under Articles 138 and 139 of the EC Treaty, Kluwer Law Publishing.
  • Yeates, N. (2002), “Globalization and Social Policy: From Global Neoliberal Hegemony to Global Political Pluralism”, Global Social Policy, 2 (1), pp. 69–91.
  • Yüksel, M. (2000), “Yönetişim Kavramı Üzerine”, Ankara Barosu Dergisi, 58(3): 145-159.

GLOBAL GOVERNANCE: ECONOMIC GROWTH AND INCOME DISTRIBUTION

Yıl 2019, Sayı: 112, 137 - 158, 01.03.2019

Öz

Global governance has been the result of competitive pressure of economic globalization within the framework of the developments following the end of cold war era. To reduce the costs and make them more efficient, these pressures have mainly focused on public institutions. Targeting increasing the well-being of all nations by promoting economic efficiency and growth, globalization has failed to fulfil this target due to the lack of effective and democratic governance in the process. In a world in which the nation state is still important, governance of globalization has been carried out by nation-level governance. In this process, partial or complete loss of power by the actors determining the social policies has brought the issue of social policy governance to the agenda and led to the rise of uncertainty and concern in the new era. In this study, the relationship between governance index, economic growth and income distribution was examined and it was observed that the increase in governance ensured economic growth but did not improve the income distribution

Kaynakça

  • Aaron, H. (1967), The Foundation of the War on Poverty, Re-examined, America Economic Review 57, 1229–1243.
  • Anderson, T. W. (1964), An Introduction to Multivariate Statistical Analysis, 2nd Edition. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
  • Aras, G. and Crowther, D. (2009), “Corporate Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility in Context”, in Global Perspectives on Corporate Governance and CSR, (edts) Aras, G. and Crowther, D., Farnham, England.
  • Börzel, T. A. and Risse T. (2010), “Governance without a State: Can It Work?”, Regulation & Governance, 4 (2), June, pp.113–134.
  • Cederman, L. (2001), “Back to Kant: Reinterpreting the Democratic Peace as a Macrohistorical Learning Process”, The American Political Science Review, 95, 1, pp.15-31.
  • Clark, I. (2000), Governance, the State, Regulation and Industrial Relations, Routledge, New York.
  • Credit Suisse (2015), “Global Wealth Report”, Global Wealth Data Book. https:// www.credit-suisse.com/us/en/news-and-expertise/research/credit- suisse-research-institute/ publications.html. ( Access: 14.10.2018).
  • Daly, M. (2003), “Governance and Social Policy”, Journal of Social Policy, 32 (1), January, pp. 113- 128.
  • Das, D. K. (2009), Two Faces of Globalization, Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, Cheltenham, UK.
  • Deacon, B. (2007), Global Social Policy and Governance, Sage Publication, London.
  • Deutsch, K. W. (1978), The Analysis of International Relations, New Jersey, Prentice-Hall Inc.
  • Dingwerth, K. and Pattberg P. (2006), “Global Governance as a Perspective on World Politics”, Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations, 12 (2), 185-203.
  • Doyle, M. (2005), “Three Pillars of the Liberal Peace”, The American Political Science Review, 99, 3, 463-466.
  • Erdut, Z. (2004), 1. Ulusal Sosyal Politika Kongresi, Yaşam Boyu Sosyal Koruma, Devrimci İşçi Sendikaları Konfederasyonu, Ankara, Dedeman Otel, 22-24 Ocak, s. 32-57.
  • Ervik, R., Kildal, N. and Nilssen, E. (2009), “Introduction”, in the Role of International Organizations in Social Policy, (edts) Ervik, R., Kildal, N. and Nilssen, E., Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, Cheltenham, UK.
  • Galtung, J. (1971), “A Structural Theory of Imperialism”, Journal of Peace Research, 8, 2, 81-117.
  • Gough, I. (2013), “Climate Change, Social Policy, and Global Governance”, Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy, 29 (3), pp.185– 203.
  • Güney, A. (2006), “Bob Jessop’da Yönetişim Kavramı: Stratejik İlişkisel Devlet Biçiminden Yönetişim Biçimine”, Memleket Siyaset Yönetim, 1, s. 153-171.
  • Hazenberg, H. (2013), “Is Governance Democratic?”, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 16 (1), pp.1-23.
  • ILO (2004), A Fair Globalization: Creating Opportunities for All, International Labour Office, (ILO) Geneva.
  • Jessop, B. ( 2005), Hegemonya Post-Fordizm ve Küresellesme Ekseninde Kapitalist Devlet, (edts) Yarar, B. ve Özkazanç, A., İletisim Yayınları, İstanbul.
  • Kazepov, Y. (2010), “Rescaling Social Policies towards Multilevel Governance in Europe: Some Reflections on Processes at Stake and Actors Involved”, in Rescaling Social Policies: Towards Multilevel Governance in Europe, (edts) Kazepov, Y., Ashgate Publishing, European Centre Vienna.
  • Keune M. and Marginson P. (2013), “Transnational Industrial Relations as Multi- Level Governance: Interdependencies in European Social Dialogue”, British Journal of Industrial Relations, 51 (3), September, pp. 473–497.
  • Kohler-Koch, B. and Rittberger B. (2006), “Review Article: ‘Governance Turn’ in EU Studies”, Journal of Common Market Studies, 44 (1), September, pp. 27–49.
  • Kondo, S. (2002), “Fostering Dialogue to Strengthen Good Governance”, in Public Sector Transparency and Accountability: Making it Happen, OECD, Paris.
  • Koray, M. (2005), Avrupa Toplum Modeli, 2. Baskı, İmge Yayınevi, Ankara.
  • Köse A. H., Reyhan H. ve Senalp M. G., (2003), “Küresel Yönetişim ve Sendikalar”, Türkiye.
  • Lee, S. ve McBride, S. (2007), Neo-Liberalism, State Power and Global Governance, Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands.
  • LeBlanc, M. (2000), Poverty, Policy and the Macroeconomy, United States of Department of Agriculture, Technical Bulletins 1889.
  • Maoz, Z. and Abdülali N. (1989), “Regime Types and International Conflict, 1816-1976”, The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 33, 1, 3-35.
  • McGrew, A. (2002), Liberal Internationalism: Between Realism and Cosmopolitanism, Held, D., McGrew, A., (edts), Governing Globalization: Power, Authority and Global Governance, (267-289), Cambridge, Polity Press.
  • OECD (2014), “Focus on Inequality and Growth”. http://www.oecd.org/social/ Focus-Inequality-and-Growth-2014.pdf , ( Access: 17.01.2018).
  • Oneal, J. R., Russett, B., and Berbaum M., (2003), “Causes of Peace: Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organizations, 1885-1992”, International Studies Quarterly, 47, 3, 371-393.
  • Özaydın, M. M. (2008), “Küresel Etkilerle Şekillenen Sosyal Politika Anlayışı Ekseninde Sosyal Politikaların Geleceğini Tartışmak”, Gazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 10 (1), s.163-180.
  • Özer, M. A. (2006),” Yönetişim Üzerine Notlar”, Sayıştay Dergisi, 63 (1), 59-89.
  • Rajagopal, B. (2013), “Global Governance: Old and New Challenges”, in Realizing the Right to Development: Essays in Commemoration of 25 Years of the United Nations Declaration on the Right to Development, Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (UNHRC), New York.
  • Rosenau J. N. (1995), Governance in the Twenty-first Century, Global Governance, Vol. 1. No. 1.
  • Scolte, A. A. (2004), “Civil Society and Democratically Accountable Global Governance”, Government and Opposition, 39 (2), pp. 125-391.
  • Sözen, S. ve Algan B. (2009), İyi Yönetişim, İçişleri Bakanlığı Genel Yayın No: 654, Ankara.
  • Şenses, F. (2014), “Gelir Dağılımı ve Yoksulluk: Temel Eğilimler, Nedenler ve Politikalar”, Kalkınmada Yeni Yaklaşımlar (der. Ahmet Faruk Aysan ve Devrim Dumludağ), İmge Kitabevi, İstanbul, s. 93-121.
  • Rummel, R. J. (1983), “Libertarianism and International Violence”, The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 27, 1, 27-71.
  • Waltz, K. N. (2000), “Structural Realism after the Cold War”, International Security 25, 1, 5-41.
  • Welz, C. (2008), The European Social Dialogue under Articles 138 and 139 of the EC Treaty, Kluwer Law Publishing.
  • Yeates, N. (2002), “Globalization and Social Policy: From Global Neoliberal Hegemony to Global Political Pluralism”, Global Social Policy, 2 (1), pp. 69–91.
  • Yüksel, M. (2000), “Yönetişim Kavramı Üzerine”, Ankara Barosu Dergisi, 58(3): 145-159.
Toplam 45 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Bölüm Research Article
Yazarlar

Murat Bınay

Nesrin Atalay Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Mart 2019
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2019 Sayı: 112

Kaynak Göster

APA Bınay, M., & Atalay, N. (2019). GLOBAL GOVERNANCE: ECONOMIC GROWTH AND INCOME DISTRIBUTION. Sayıştay Dergisi(112), 137-158.