Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

THE MODERATOR EFFECT OF FAMILY MEMBERSHIP ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CORPORATE REPUTATION AND FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 13 Sayı: 26, 287 - 310, 29.12.2023

Öz

It is accepted that a positive corporate reputation is a strategic resource and strategic resources create a competitive advantage in today's conditions where competition is getting more intense. It is predicted that corporate reputation, which is considered as a strategic resource, has the power to affect the financial performances of companies. In this context, the main purpose of the research is to determine the relationship between corporate reputations and financial performance of companies and to reveal the formative effect of family ownership on this relationship. The research sample consists of 175 observations of 35 companies traded in Borsa Istanbul between 2014-2018 and included in the Turkey 100 (Turkey's Most Reputable Brands Report) list published by Brand Finance. “Pooled Regression Model (Panel EKK)” was used as the analysis method in the research. According to the research findings, it has been seen that family membership has a formative effect on the relationship between corporate reputation and financial performance.

Kaynakça

  • Adler, P. S., & Kwon, S. W. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 17-40.
  • Alparslan, A., & Aygün, M. (2013) Kurumsal Sosyal Sorumluluk ve Firma Performansı. S.D.Ü. İ.İ.B.F. Dergisi, 18(1), 435-448.
  • Anderson, R. C., & Reeb, D. M. (2003). Founding‐family ownership and firm performance: evidence from the S&P 500. The journal of finance, 58(3), 1301-1328.
  • Ang, J. S., Cole, R. A., & Lin, J. W. (2000). Agency costs and ownership structure. The Journal of Finance, 55(1), 81-106.
  • Arregle, J. L., Hitt, M. A., Sirmon, D. G., & Very, P. (2007). The development of organizational social capital: Attributes of family firms. Journal of Management Studies, 44(1), 73-95.
  • Bahar, B. (2019). Kurumsal itibar ve kuramsal temelleri. Yaşar Üniversitesi E-Dergisi, 14(55), 226-236.
  • Baker, M., Stein, J. C., & Wurgler, J. (2003). When does the market matter? Stock prices and the investment of equity-dependent firms. The quarterly journal of economics, 118(3), 969-1005.
  • Baltagi, H. B. (2005). Econometric Analysis of Panel Data. 3. Baskı, England: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
  • Bammens, Y., Voordeckers, W., & Van Gils, A. (2011). Boards of directors in family businesses: A literature review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 13(2), 134-152.
  • Barney, J. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17 (1): 99-120.
  • Baron, M. R., & Kenny, A. D. (1986). The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173 – 1182.
  • Barth, E., Gulbrandsen, T., & Schønea, P. (2005). Family ownership and productivity: The role of owner-management. Journal of Corporate Finance, 11(1-2), 107-127.
  • Bayrakdaroğlu, A. (2010). Mülkiyet Yapısı ve Finansal Performans: İMKB Örneği. Ekonomi Bilimleri Dergisi, 2(2), 11-20.
  • Berrone, P., Cruz, C., Gomez-Mejia, L. R., & Larraza-Kintana, M. (2010). Socioemotional wealth and corporate responses to institutional pressures: Do family-controlled firms pollute less?. Administrative science quarterly, 55(1), 82-113.
  • Bertinetti, G. S., Cavezzali, E., & Gardenal, G. (2013). The effect of the enterprise risk management implementation on the firm value of European companies. Department of Management, Università Ca'Foscari Venezia Working Paper, (10).
  • Binz, C., Hair Jr, J. F., Pieper, T. M., & Baldauf, A. (2013). Exploring the effect of distinct family firm reputation on consumers’ preferences. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 4(1), 3-11.
  • Bjuggren, C. M., Johansson, D., & Sjögren, H. (2011). A note on employment and gross domestic product in Swedish family-owned businesses: A descriptive analysis. Family Business Review, 24(4), 362-371.
  • Block, J. H., & Wagner, M. (2014). The effect of family ownership on different dimensions of corporate social responsibility: Evidence from large US firms. Business Strategy and the Environment, 23(7), 475-492.
  • Bonacich, E. (1973). A theory of middleman minorities. American sociological review, 583-594.
  • Boyd, B. K., Bergh, D. D., & Ketchen Jr, D. J. (2010). Reconsidering the Reputation Performance Relationship: A Resource-Based View. Journal of Management, 36(3), 588-609.
  • Buğra, A. (2016). Devlet ve İş Adamları. İletişim Yayınları, İstanbul.
  • Caliskan, E., Icke, B., & Ayturk, Y. (2011). Corporate reputation and financial performance: evidence from Turkey. Research Journal of International Studies, 18(1), 61-72.
  • Carney, M. (1998). A management capacity constraint? Obstacles to the development of the overseas Chinese family business. Asia Pacific journal of management, 15, 137-162.
  • Casson, M. (1999). The economics of the family firm. Scandinavian economic history review, 47(1), 10-23.
  • Citak, L. (2007). The Impact of Ownership Structure on Company Performance; A Panel Data Analysis on Istanbul Stock Exchange Listed (ISE-100) Companies. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 9, 231-245.
  • Contractor, F. J., Kumar, V., & Kundu, S. K. (2007). Nature of the relationship between international expansion and performance: The case of emerging market firms. Journal of World Business, 42(4), 401-417.
  • Cromie, S., Stephenson, B., & Monteith, D. (1995). The management of family firms: An empirical investigation. International Small Business Journal, 13(4), 11-34.
  • Daily, C. M., & Dollinger, M. J. (1992). An empirical examination of ownership structure in family and professionally managed firms. Family business review, 5(2), 117-136.
  • DeAngelo, H., & DeAngelo, L. (2000). Controlling stockholders and the disciplinary role of corporate payout policy: A study of the Times Mirror Company. Journal of financial economics, 56(2), 153-207.
  • Deephouse, D. L., & Carter, S. M. (2005). An examination of differences between organizational legitimacy and organizational reputation. Journal of management Studies, 42(2), 329-360.
  • Deephouse, D. L., & Jaskiewicz, P. (2013). Do family firms have better reputations than non‐family firms? An integration of socioemotional wealth and social identity theories. Journal of management Studies, 50(3), 337-360.
  • Demirag, I., & Serter, M. (2003). Ownership patterns and control in Turkish listed companies. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 11(1), 40-51.
  • Denis, D. J., & Denis, D. K. (1994). Majority owner-managers and organizational efficiency. Journal of corporate finance, 1(1), 91-118.
  • DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American sociological review, 147-160.
  • Donckels, R., & Fröhlich, E. (1991). Are family businesses really different? European experiences from STRATOS. Family business review, 4(2), 149-160.
  • Dyer Jr, W. G., & Whetten, D. A. (2006). Family firms and social responsibility: Preliminary evidence from the S&P 500. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 30(6), 785-802.
  • Filatotchev, I., Lien, Y. C., & Piesse, J. (2005). Corporate governance and performance in publicly listed, family-controlled firms: Evidence from Taiwan. Asia Pacific journal of management, 22, 257-283.
  • Fombrun, C. J. (1996), Reputation: Realizing Value From The Corporate Image, Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
  • Fombrun, C. J., & Shanley, M. (1990). What's in a Name? Reputation Building and Corporate Strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 33(2), 233-258.
  • Fombrun, C., & Van Riel, C. (1997). The Reputational Landscape: a Convergence of Research and Practice. Corporate Reputation Review, 1(1 and 2), 1-16.
  • Frenkel, S. J. (2001). Globalization, athletic footwear commodity chains and employment relations in China. Organization studies, 22(4), 531-562.
  • Goldberg, M. E., & Hartwick, J. (1990). The effects of advertiser reputation and extremity of advertising claim on advertising effectiveness. Journal of consumer research, 17(2), 172-179.
  • Gomez-Mejia, L. R., Cruz, C., Berrone, P., & De Castro, J. (2011). The bind that ties: Socioemotional wealth preservation in family firms. The academy of management annals, 5(1), 653-707.
  • Gottschalk, P. (2011). Corporate social responsibility, governance and corporate reputation. World Scientific.
  • Gönenç, H. (2006). Ownership concentration and corporate performance of Turkish companies. In The Turkish Economy (pp. 212-236). Routledge.
  • Gözen, A., & Ülgen, B. (2018). The relationship between organizational ambidexterity and family business performance. International Journal of Commerce and Finance, 4(2), 94-107.
  • Gujarati, D. N. (2003). Basic Econometrics, 4. Baskı, New York: McGraw-Hill Companies.
  • Habbershon, T. G., Williams, M., & MacMillan, I. C. (2003). A unified systems perspective of family firm performance. Journal of business venturing, 18(4), 451-465.
  • Hall, R. (1992). The Strategic Analysis of İntangible Resources. Strategic Management Journal, 13(2), 135-144.
  • Handler, W. C. (1989). Methodological issues and considerations in studying family businesses. Family business review, 2(3), 257-276.
  • Hitt, M. A., Hoskisson, R. E., & Kim, H. (1997). International diversification: Effects on innovation and firm performance in product-diversified firms. Academy of Management journal, 40(4), 767-798.
  • Huybrechts, J., Voordeckers, W., Lybaert, N., & Vandemaele, S. (2011). The distinctiveness of family-firm intangibles: A review and suggestions for future research. Journal of Management & Organization, 17(2), 268-287.
  • Kadıbeşegil, S. (2006). İtibar Yönetimi, Medicat yayınları, İstanbul.
  • Kennedy, P. (2006). Ekonometri Kılavuzu, Çev: Şenay Açıkgöz ve Muzaffer Sarımeşeli, Gazi Kitabevi, Ankara.
  • Kılıç, M., & Ayrıçay, Y. (2018). Yönetim kurulu ve sahiplik yapısının finansal performans üzerindeki etkisi: BIST imalat sanayi sektöründe bir alan araştırması. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 20(2), 177-192.
  • Kırım, A. (2005), Aile Şirketlerinin Yönetimi, Sistem Yayıncılık, İstanbul.
  • King, B. G., & Whetten, D. A. (2008). Rethinking the relationship between reputation and legitimacy: A social actor conceptualization. Corporate Reputation Review, 11, 192-207.
  • La Porta, Rafael., Lopez-De-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (1999). Corporate Ownership Around the World. The Journal of Finance, 54(2), 471-517.
  • Lafferty, B. A., & Goldsmith, R. E. (1999). Corporate credibility’s role in consumers’ attitudes and purchase intentions when a high versus a low credibility endorser is used in the ad. Journal of business research, 44(2), 109-116.
  • Lange, D., Lee, P. M., & Dai, Y. (2011). Organizational reputation: A review. Journal of management, 37(1), 153-184.
  • Le Breton–Miller, I., & Miller, D. (2006). Why do some family businesses out–compete? Governance, long–term orientations, and sustainable capability. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 30(6), 731-746.
  • Lee, J. (2006). Family firm performance: Further evidence. Family business review, 19(2), 103-114.
  • Martínez, J. I., Stöhr, B. S., & Quiroga, B. F. (2007). Family ownership and firm performance: Evidence from public companies in Chile. Family Business Review, 20(2), 83-94.
  • Mazzola, P., Sciascia, S., & Kellermanns, F. W. (2013). Non-linear effects of family sources of power on performance. Journal of Business Research, 66(4), 568-574.
  • McClean, E. J., Burris, E. R., & Detert, J. R. (2013). When does voice lead to exit? It depends on leadership. Academy of management Journal, 56(2), 525-548.
  • McConaughy, D. L., Walker, M. C., Henderson Jr, G. V., & Mishra, C. S. (1998). Founding family-controlled firms: Efficiency and value. Review of Financial economics, 7(1), 1-19.
  • McVey, H., & Draho, J. (2005). US family‐run companies–they may be better than you think. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 17(4), 134-143.
  • Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American journal of sociology, 83(2), 340-363.
  • Moores, K., & Barrett, M. (2002). Learning Family Business, Paradoxes and Pathways. Aldeshot. Hampshire: Ashgate Publishing Limited.
  • Ntim, C. G., & Soobaroyen, T. (2013). Corporate governance and performance in socially responsible corporations: New empirical insights from a neo-institutional framework. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 21(5): 468–494
  • Okan, T., İlhan-Nas, T., & Tatoğlu, E. (2013). Yönetim Kurulu Yapısı ve Kurumsal Mesafe Etkileşiminin Çokuluslu İşletmelerin Uluslararasılaşma Stratejileri Üzerindeki Etkisi. IV. Örgüt Kuramı Çalıştayı Bildiriler Kitabı, 8-9.
  • Omar, M., Williams, R. L., & Lingelbach, D. (2009). Global Brand Market-Entry to Manage Corporate Reputation. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 18 (3), 177-187.
  • Orth, U. R., & Green, M. T. (2009). Consumer loyalty to family versus non-family business: The roles of store image, trust and satisfaction. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 16(4), 248-259.
  • Özcan, K. (2011). Kurumsal Söylemin Rasyonel Temelleri: Yeni Kurumsal Kuram Rasyonalite Tartışması. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 13, 297-326.
  • Özen, Ş. (2013). Yeni Kurumsal Kuram. D. Taşçı ve E. Erdemir (Der.), Örgüt Kuramları, içinde (119-139), Anadolu Üniversitesi Yayınları, Eskişehir.
  • Petkova, A. P. (2016). Standing out or blending in? The formation of new firms’ legitimacy and reputation under different levels of market uncertainty. Corporate Reputation Review, 19, 22-34.
  • Pindado, J., Requejo, I., & de la Torre, C. (2008). Does family ownership impact positively on firm value? Empirical evidence from Western Europe. Documento de Trabajo, 2(08), 1-34.
  • Rindova, V. P., Williamson, I. O., & Petkova, A. P. (2010). Reputation as an intangible asset: Reflections on theory and methods in two empirical studies of business school reputations. Journal of Management, 36(3), 610-619.
  • Roberts, P. W., & Dowling, G. R. (2002). Corporate Reputation and Sustained Superior Financial Performance. Strategic Management Journal, 23(12), 1077-1093.
  • Sacristán-Navarro, M., Gómez-Ansón, S., & Cabeza-García, L. (2011). Family ownership and control, the presence of other large shareholders, and firm performance: Further evidence. Family Business Review, 24(1), 71-93.
  • Sageder, M., Duller, C., & Mitter, C. (2015). Reputation of family firms from a customer perspective. International Journal of Business Research, 15(2), 13-24.
  • Sageder, M., Mitter, C., & Feldbauer‐Durstmüller, B. (2018). Image and reputation of family firms: a systematic literature review of the state of research. Review of Managerial Science, 12, 335-377.
  • Salvato, C., & Melin, L. (2008). Creating value across generations in Family‐Controlled businesses: The role of family social capital. Family business review, 21(3), 259-276.
  • Shleifer, A., & Summers, L. H. (1988). Breach of trust in hostile takeovers. In Corporate takeovers: Causes and consequences (pp. 33-68). University of Chicago Press.
  • Sirmon, D. G., & Hitt, M. A. (2003). Managing resources: Linking unique resources, management, and wealth creation in family firms. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 27(4), 339-358.
  • Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of management review, 20(3), 571-610.
  • Şanal, M., & Özgen, H. (2013). Kurumsallaşma ve Kurumsal Girişimcilik İlişkisi Üzerine Bir Araştırma. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 22(2), 15-26.
  • Tuncel, H. T. (2011). Aile Şirketlerinde Kurumsallaş(ama)ma. Konya Ticaret Odası-Etüd Araştırma Servisi, 1-8.
  • Türköz, T. (2020). Kurumsal Yönetim İlkelerine Uyum ile Kurumsal İtibar İlişkisinde Aile Sahipliğinin Rolü. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
  • Villalonga, B., & Amit, R. (2006). How do family ownership, control and management affect firm value?. Journal of financial Economics, 80(2), 385-417.
  • Vitezić, N. (2011). Corporate Reputation and Social Responsibility: An Analysis of Large Companies In Croatia. International Journal of Economics and Business Research, 8(10), 85-96.
  • Walker, K. (2010). A Systematic Review of The Corporate Reputation Literature: Definition, Measurement, and Theory. Corporate Reputation Review, 12(4), 357-387.
  • Wei, L. Q., & Lau, C. M. (2008). The impact of market orientation and strategic HRM on firm performance: The case of Chinese enterprises. Journal of International Business Studies, 39, 980-995.
  • Weigelt, K. & Camerer, C. (1988). Reputation And Corporate Strategy: A Review of Recent Theory and Applications. Strategic Management Journal, 9, 443-454.
  • Westhead, P., & Cowling, M. (1997). Performance contrasts between family and non‐family unquoted companies in the UK. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 3(1), 30-52.
  • Whyte, M. K. (1996). The Chinese family and economic development: Obstacle or engine?. Economic development and cultural change, 45(1), 1-30.
  • Yener, M. & Ergun, S. (2014). İtibar Yönetimi: Tanım, Ölçüm ve Teori. Haluk Sümer ve Helmut Pernsteiner (Ed.). İtibar Yönetimi, içinde (3-23), Beta Yayınları, İstanbul.
  • Yurtoglu, B. B. (2000). Ownership, control and performance of Turkish listed firms. Empirica, 27, 193-222.
  • Zellweger, T. M., Kellermanns, F. W., Eddleston, K. A., & Memili, E. (2012). Building a family firm image: How family firms capitalize on their family ties. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 3(4), 239-250.

KURUMSAL İTİBAR İLE FİNANSAL PERFORMANS ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİDE AİLE ÜYELİĞİNİN BİÇİMLEYİCİ ETKİSİ

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 13 Sayı: 26, 287 - 310, 29.12.2023

Öz

Rekabetin giderek yoğunlaştığı günümüz şartlarında olumlu bir kurumsal itibarın stratejik bir kaynak olduğu ve stratejik kaynakların ise rekabet avantajı yarattığı kabul edilmektedir. Özellikle stratejik bir kaynak olarak kabul edilen kurumsal itibarin, firmaların finansal performanslarını etkileme gücüne sahip olduğu öngörülmektedir. Bu kapsamda araştırmanın temel amacı kurumsal itibarlar ile firmaların finansal performansları arasındaki ilişkiyi belirlemek ve bu ilişkide aile sahipliğinin biçimleyici etkisini ortaya koymaktır. Araştırma örneklemi 2014-2018 yılları arasında Borsa İstanbul’da işlem gören ve Brand Finance tarafından yayınlanan Turkey 100 (Türkiye’nin en İtibarlı Markalar Raporu) listesinde yer alan 35 firmaya ait 175 adet gözlemden oluşmaktadır. Araştırmada analiz yöntemi olarak “Havuzlanmış Regresyon Modeli (Panel EKK)” kullanılmıştır. Araştırma bulgularına göre, kurumsal itibarın finansal performans arasındaki ilişkide aile üyeliğinin biçimleyici bir etkiye sahip olduğunu görülmüştür.

Kaynakça

  • Adler, P. S., & Kwon, S. W. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 17-40.
  • Alparslan, A., & Aygün, M. (2013) Kurumsal Sosyal Sorumluluk ve Firma Performansı. S.D.Ü. İ.İ.B.F. Dergisi, 18(1), 435-448.
  • Anderson, R. C., & Reeb, D. M. (2003). Founding‐family ownership and firm performance: evidence from the S&P 500. The journal of finance, 58(3), 1301-1328.
  • Ang, J. S., Cole, R. A., & Lin, J. W. (2000). Agency costs and ownership structure. The Journal of Finance, 55(1), 81-106.
  • Arregle, J. L., Hitt, M. A., Sirmon, D. G., & Very, P. (2007). The development of organizational social capital: Attributes of family firms. Journal of Management Studies, 44(1), 73-95.
  • Bahar, B. (2019). Kurumsal itibar ve kuramsal temelleri. Yaşar Üniversitesi E-Dergisi, 14(55), 226-236.
  • Baker, M., Stein, J. C., & Wurgler, J. (2003). When does the market matter? Stock prices and the investment of equity-dependent firms. The quarterly journal of economics, 118(3), 969-1005.
  • Baltagi, H. B. (2005). Econometric Analysis of Panel Data. 3. Baskı, England: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
  • Bammens, Y., Voordeckers, W., & Van Gils, A. (2011). Boards of directors in family businesses: A literature review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 13(2), 134-152.
  • Barney, J. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17 (1): 99-120.
  • Baron, M. R., & Kenny, A. D. (1986). The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173 – 1182.
  • Barth, E., Gulbrandsen, T., & Schønea, P. (2005). Family ownership and productivity: The role of owner-management. Journal of Corporate Finance, 11(1-2), 107-127.
  • Bayrakdaroğlu, A. (2010). Mülkiyet Yapısı ve Finansal Performans: İMKB Örneği. Ekonomi Bilimleri Dergisi, 2(2), 11-20.
  • Berrone, P., Cruz, C., Gomez-Mejia, L. R., & Larraza-Kintana, M. (2010). Socioemotional wealth and corporate responses to institutional pressures: Do family-controlled firms pollute less?. Administrative science quarterly, 55(1), 82-113.
  • Bertinetti, G. S., Cavezzali, E., & Gardenal, G. (2013). The effect of the enterprise risk management implementation on the firm value of European companies. Department of Management, Università Ca'Foscari Venezia Working Paper, (10).
  • Binz, C., Hair Jr, J. F., Pieper, T. M., & Baldauf, A. (2013). Exploring the effect of distinct family firm reputation on consumers’ preferences. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 4(1), 3-11.
  • Bjuggren, C. M., Johansson, D., & Sjögren, H. (2011). A note on employment and gross domestic product in Swedish family-owned businesses: A descriptive analysis. Family Business Review, 24(4), 362-371.
  • Block, J. H., & Wagner, M. (2014). The effect of family ownership on different dimensions of corporate social responsibility: Evidence from large US firms. Business Strategy and the Environment, 23(7), 475-492.
  • Bonacich, E. (1973). A theory of middleman minorities. American sociological review, 583-594.
  • Boyd, B. K., Bergh, D. D., & Ketchen Jr, D. J. (2010). Reconsidering the Reputation Performance Relationship: A Resource-Based View. Journal of Management, 36(3), 588-609.
  • Buğra, A. (2016). Devlet ve İş Adamları. İletişim Yayınları, İstanbul.
  • Caliskan, E., Icke, B., & Ayturk, Y. (2011). Corporate reputation and financial performance: evidence from Turkey. Research Journal of International Studies, 18(1), 61-72.
  • Carney, M. (1998). A management capacity constraint? Obstacles to the development of the overseas Chinese family business. Asia Pacific journal of management, 15, 137-162.
  • Casson, M. (1999). The economics of the family firm. Scandinavian economic history review, 47(1), 10-23.
  • Citak, L. (2007). The Impact of Ownership Structure on Company Performance; A Panel Data Analysis on Istanbul Stock Exchange Listed (ISE-100) Companies. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 9, 231-245.
  • Contractor, F. J., Kumar, V., & Kundu, S. K. (2007). Nature of the relationship between international expansion and performance: The case of emerging market firms. Journal of World Business, 42(4), 401-417.
  • Cromie, S., Stephenson, B., & Monteith, D. (1995). The management of family firms: An empirical investigation. International Small Business Journal, 13(4), 11-34.
  • Daily, C. M., & Dollinger, M. J. (1992). An empirical examination of ownership structure in family and professionally managed firms. Family business review, 5(2), 117-136.
  • DeAngelo, H., & DeAngelo, L. (2000). Controlling stockholders and the disciplinary role of corporate payout policy: A study of the Times Mirror Company. Journal of financial economics, 56(2), 153-207.
  • Deephouse, D. L., & Carter, S. M. (2005). An examination of differences between organizational legitimacy and organizational reputation. Journal of management Studies, 42(2), 329-360.
  • Deephouse, D. L., & Jaskiewicz, P. (2013). Do family firms have better reputations than non‐family firms? An integration of socioemotional wealth and social identity theories. Journal of management Studies, 50(3), 337-360.
  • Demirag, I., & Serter, M. (2003). Ownership patterns and control in Turkish listed companies. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 11(1), 40-51.
  • Denis, D. J., & Denis, D. K. (1994). Majority owner-managers and organizational efficiency. Journal of corporate finance, 1(1), 91-118.
  • DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American sociological review, 147-160.
  • Donckels, R., & Fröhlich, E. (1991). Are family businesses really different? European experiences from STRATOS. Family business review, 4(2), 149-160.
  • Dyer Jr, W. G., & Whetten, D. A. (2006). Family firms and social responsibility: Preliminary evidence from the S&P 500. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 30(6), 785-802.
  • Filatotchev, I., Lien, Y. C., & Piesse, J. (2005). Corporate governance and performance in publicly listed, family-controlled firms: Evidence from Taiwan. Asia Pacific journal of management, 22, 257-283.
  • Fombrun, C. J. (1996), Reputation: Realizing Value From The Corporate Image, Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
  • Fombrun, C. J., & Shanley, M. (1990). What's in a Name? Reputation Building and Corporate Strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 33(2), 233-258.
  • Fombrun, C., & Van Riel, C. (1997). The Reputational Landscape: a Convergence of Research and Practice. Corporate Reputation Review, 1(1 and 2), 1-16.
  • Frenkel, S. J. (2001). Globalization, athletic footwear commodity chains and employment relations in China. Organization studies, 22(4), 531-562.
  • Goldberg, M. E., & Hartwick, J. (1990). The effects of advertiser reputation and extremity of advertising claim on advertising effectiveness. Journal of consumer research, 17(2), 172-179.
  • Gomez-Mejia, L. R., Cruz, C., Berrone, P., & De Castro, J. (2011). The bind that ties: Socioemotional wealth preservation in family firms. The academy of management annals, 5(1), 653-707.
  • Gottschalk, P. (2011). Corporate social responsibility, governance and corporate reputation. World Scientific.
  • Gönenç, H. (2006). Ownership concentration and corporate performance of Turkish companies. In The Turkish Economy (pp. 212-236). Routledge.
  • Gözen, A., & Ülgen, B. (2018). The relationship between organizational ambidexterity and family business performance. International Journal of Commerce and Finance, 4(2), 94-107.
  • Gujarati, D. N. (2003). Basic Econometrics, 4. Baskı, New York: McGraw-Hill Companies.
  • Habbershon, T. G., Williams, M., & MacMillan, I. C. (2003). A unified systems perspective of family firm performance. Journal of business venturing, 18(4), 451-465.
  • Hall, R. (1992). The Strategic Analysis of İntangible Resources. Strategic Management Journal, 13(2), 135-144.
  • Handler, W. C. (1989). Methodological issues and considerations in studying family businesses. Family business review, 2(3), 257-276.
  • Hitt, M. A., Hoskisson, R. E., & Kim, H. (1997). International diversification: Effects on innovation and firm performance in product-diversified firms. Academy of Management journal, 40(4), 767-798.
  • Huybrechts, J., Voordeckers, W., Lybaert, N., & Vandemaele, S. (2011). The distinctiveness of family-firm intangibles: A review and suggestions for future research. Journal of Management & Organization, 17(2), 268-287.
  • Kadıbeşegil, S. (2006). İtibar Yönetimi, Medicat yayınları, İstanbul.
  • Kennedy, P. (2006). Ekonometri Kılavuzu, Çev: Şenay Açıkgöz ve Muzaffer Sarımeşeli, Gazi Kitabevi, Ankara.
  • Kılıç, M., & Ayrıçay, Y. (2018). Yönetim kurulu ve sahiplik yapısının finansal performans üzerindeki etkisi: BIST imalat sanayi sektöründe bir alan araştırması. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 20(2), 177-192.
  • Kırım, A. (2005), Aile Şirketlerinin Yönetimi, Sistem Yayıncılık, İstanbul.
  • King, B. G., & Whetten, D. A. (2008). Rethinking the relationship between reputation and legitimacy: A social actor conceptualization. Corporate Reputation Review, 11, 192-207.
  • La Porta, Rafael., Lopez-De-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (1999). Corporate Ownership Around the World. The Journal of Finance, 54(2), 471-517.
  • Lafferty, B. A., & Goldsmith, R. E. (1999). Corporate credibility’s role in consumers’ attitudes and purchase intentions when a high versus a low credibility endorser is used in the ad. Journal of business research, 44(2), 109-116.
  • Lange, D., Lee, P. M., & Dai, Y. (2011). Organizational reputation: A review. Journal of management, 37(1), 153-184.
  • Le Breton–Miller, I., & Miller, D. (2006). Why do some family businesses out–compete? Governance, long–term orientations, and sustainable capability. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 30(6), 731-746.
  • Lee, J. (2006). Family firm performance: Further evidence. Family business review, 19(2), 103-114.
  • Martínez, J. I., Stöhr, B. S., & Quiroga, B. F. (2007). Family ownership and firm performance: Evidence from public companies in Chile. Family Business Review, 20(2), 83-94.
  • Mazzola, P., Sciascia, S., & Kellermanns, F. W. (2013). Non-linear effects of family sources of power on performance. Journal of Business Research, 66(4), 568-574.
  • McClean, E. J., Burris, E. R., & Detert, J. R. (2013). When does voice lead to exit? It depends on leadership. Academy of management Journal, 56(2), 525-548.
  • McConaughy, D. L., Walker, M. C., Henderson Jr, G. V., & Mishra, C. S. (1998). Founding family-controlled firms: Efficiency and value. Review of Financial economics, 7(1), 1-19.
  • McVey, H., & Draho, J. (2005). US family‐run companies–they may be better than you think. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 17(4), 134-143.
  • Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American journal of sociology, 83(2), 340-363.
  • Moores, K., & Barrett, M. (2002). Learning Family Business, Paradoxes and Pathways. Aldeshot. Hampshire: Ashgate Publishing Limited.
  • Ntim, C. G., & Soobaroyen, T. (2013). Corporate governance and performance in socially responsible corporations: New empirical insights from a neo-institutional framework. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 21(5): 468–494
  • Okan, T., İlhan-Nas, T., & Tatoğlu, E. (2013). Yönetim Kurulu Yapısı ve Kurumsal Mesafe Etkileşiminin Çokuluslu İşletmelerin Uluslararasılaşma Stratejileri Üzerindeki Etkisi. IV. Örgüt Kuramı Çalıştayı Bildiriler Kitabı, 8-9.
  • Omar, M., Williams, R. L., & Lingelbach, D. (2009). Global Brand Market-Entry to Manage Corporate Reputation. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 18 (3), 177-187.
  • Orth, U. R., & Green, M. T. (2009). Consumer loyalty to family versus non-family business: The roles of store image, trust and satisfaction. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 16(4), 248-259.
  • Özcan, K. (2011). Kurumsal Söylemin Rasyonel Temelleri: Yeni Kurumsal Kuram Rasyonalite Tartışması. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 13, 297-326.
  • Özen, Ş. (2013). Yeni Kurumsal Kuram. D. Taşçı ve E. Erdemir (Der.), Örgüt Kuramları, içinde (119-139), Anadolu Üniversitesi Yayınları, Eskişehir.
  • Petkova, A. P. (2016). Standing out or blending in? The formation of new firms’ legitimacy and reputation under different levels of market uncertainty. Corporate Reputation Review, 19, 22-34.
  • Pindado, J., Requejo, I., & de la Torre, C. (2008). Does family ownership impact positively on firm value? Empirical evidence from Western Europe. Documento de Trabajo, 2(08), 1-34.
  • Rindova, V. P., Williamson, I. O., & Petkova, A. P. (2010). Reputation as an intangible asset: Reflections on theory and methods in two empirical studies of business school reputations. Journal of Management, 36(3), 610-619.
  • Roberts, P. W., & Dowling, G. R. (2002). Corporate Reputation and Sustained Superior Financial Performance. Strategic Management Journal, 23(12), 1077-1093.
  • Sacristán-Navarro, M., Gómez-Ansón, S., & Cabeza-García, L. (2011). Family ownership and control, the presence of other large shareholders, and firm performance: Further evidence. Family Business Review, 24(1), 71-93.
  • Sageder, M., Duller, C., & Mitter, C. (2015). Reputation of family firms from a customer perspective. International Journal of Business Research, 15(2), 13-24.
  • Sageder, M., Mitter, C., & Feldbauer‐Durstmüller, B. (2018). Image and reputation of family firms: a systematic literature review of the state of research. Review of Managerial Science, 12, 335-377.
  • Salvato, C., & Melin, L. (2008). Creating value across generations in Family‐Controlled businesses: The role of family social capital. Family business review, 21(3), 259-276.
  • Shleifer, A., & Summers, L. H. (1988). Breach of trust in hostile takeovers. In Corporate takeovers: Causes and consequences (pp. 33-68). University of Chicago Press.
  • Sirmon, D. G., & Hitt, M. A. (2003). Managing resources: Linking unique resources, management, and wealth creation in family firms. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 27(4), 339-358.
  • Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of management review, 20(3), 571-610.
  • Şanal, M., & Özgen, H. (2013). Kurumsallaşma ve Kurumsal Girişimcilik İlişkisi Üzerine Bir Araştırma. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 22(2), 15-26.
  • Tuncel, H. T. (2011). Aile Şirketlerinde Kurumsallaş(ama)ma. Konya Ticaret Odası-Etüd Araştırma Servisi, 1-8.
  • Türköz, T. (2020). Kurumsal Yönetim İlkelerine Uyum ile Kurumsal İtibar İlişkisinde Aile Sahipliğinin Rolü. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
  • Villalonga, B., & Amit, R. (2006). How do family ownership, control and management affect firm value?. Journal of financial Economics, 80(2), 385-417.
  • Vitezić, N. (2011). Corporate Reputation and Social Responsibility: An Analysis of Large Companies In Croatia. International Journal of Economics and Business Research, 8(10), 85-96.
  • Walker, K. (2010). A Systematic Review of The Corporate Reputation Literature: Definition, Measurement, and Theory. Corporate Reputation Review, 12(4), 357-387.
  • Wei, L. Q., & Lau, C. M. (2008). The impact of market orientation and strategic HRM on firm performance: The case of Chinese enterprises. Journal of International Business Studies, 39, 980-995.
  • Weigelt, K. & Camerer, C. (1988). Reputation And Corporate Strategy: A Review of Recent Theory and Applications. Strategic Management Journal, 9, 443-454.
  • Westhead, P., & Cowling, M. (1997). Performance contrasts between family and non‐family unquoted companies in the UK. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 3(1), 30-52.
  • Whyte, M. K. (1996). The Chinese family and economic development: Obstacle or engine?. Economic development and cultural change, 45(1), 1-30.
  • Yener, M. & Ergun, S. (2014). İtibar Yönetimi: Tanım, Ölçüm ve Teori. Haluk Sümer ve Helmut Pernsteiner (Ed.). İtibar Yönetimi, içinde (3-23), Beta Yayınları, İstanbul.
  • Yurtoglu, B. B. (2000). Ownership, control and performance of Turkish listed firms. Empirica, 27, 193-222.
  • Zellweger, T. M., Kellermanns, F. W., Eddleston, K. A., & Memili, E. (2012). Building a family firm image: How family firms capitalize on their family ties. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 3(4), 239-250.
Toplam 99 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Konular Strateji
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Elif Sis Atabay 0000-0003-3862-6060

Kader Şahin 0000-0003-2957-1854

Yayımlanma Tarihi 29 Aralık 2023
Gönderilme Tarihi 7 Temmuz 2023
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2023 Cilt: 13 Sayı: 26

Kaynak Göster

APA Sis Atabay, E., & Şahin, K. (2023). KURUMSAL İTİBAR İLE FİNANSAL PERFORMANS ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİDE AİLE ÜYELİĞİNİN BİÇİMLEYİCİ ETKİSİ. Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 13(26), 287-310.
AMA Sis Atabay E, Şahin K. KURUMSAL İTİBAR İLE FİNANSAL PERFORMANS ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİDE AİLE ÜYELİĞİNİN BİÇİMLEYİCİ ETKİSİ. KTÜSBD. Aralık 2023;13(26):287-310.
Chicago Sis Atabay, Elif, ve Kader Şahin. “KURUMSAL İTİBAR İLE FİNANSAL PERFORMANS ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİDE AİLE ÜYELİĞİNİN BİÇİMLEYİCİ ETKİSİ”. Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 13, sy. 26 (Aralık 2023): 287-310.
EndNote Sis Atabay E, Şahin K (01 Aralık 2023) KURUMSAL İTİBAR İLE FİNANSAL PERFORMANS ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİDE AİLE ÜYELİĞİNİN BİÇİMLEYİCİ ETKİSİ. Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 13 26 287–310.
IEEE E. Sis Atabay ve K. Şahin, “KURUMSAL İTİBAR İLE FİNANSAL PERFORMANS ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİDE AİLE ÜYELİĞİNİN BİÇİMLEYİCİ ETKİSİ”, KTÜSBD, c. 13, sy. 26, ss. 287–310, 2023.
ISNAD Sis Atabay, Elif - Şahin, Kader. “KURUMSAL İTİBAR İLE FİNANSAL PERFORMANS ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİDE AİLE ÜYELİĞİNİN BİÇİMLEYİCİ ETKİSİ”. Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 13/26 (Aralık 2023), 287-310.
JAMA Sis Atabay E, Şahin K. KURUMSAL İTİBAR İLE FİNANSAL PERFORMANS ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİDE AİLE ÜYELİĞİNİN BİÇİMLEYİCİ ETKİSİ. KTÜSBD. 2023;13:287–310.
MLA Sis Atabay, Elif ve Kader Şahin. “KURUMSAL İTİBAR İLE FİNANSAL PERFORMANS ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİDE AİLE ÜYELİĞİNİN BİÇİMLEYİCİ ETKİSİ”. Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, c. 13, sy. 26, 2023, ss. 287-10.
Vancouver Sis Atabay E, Şahin K. KURUMSAL İTİBAR İLE FİNANSAL PERFORMANS ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİDE AİLE ÜYELİĞİNİN BİÇİMLEYİCİ ETKİSİ. KTÜSBD. 2023;13(26):287-310.

KTÜSBD

KTUJSS

Creative Commons Lisansı
Bu eser Creative Commons Atıf 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.