A new concept and framework proposal for analyzing consumption spaces and third places: “spaceplace”

Yıl 2023, Sayı: 84, 7 - 26, 31.12.2023

Nuri Yavan Ceyda Kurtar Anlı

https://doi.org/10.17211/tcd.1308233

Öz

This study aims to present a new notion and framework that conceptualizes 'space' and 'place', two fundamental concepts in geography, and micro-scale consumption spaces and third places as "spaceplace". This new notion and framework offer us two important possibilities. The first one allows us to have a discussion that goes beyond the classic locational choice and needs-focused analysis by highlighting consumption spaces within economic geography. The second one offers a new, more inclusive and practical concept and analysis framework by operationalizing the concepts of 'space' and 'place' theoretically discussed and defined in geographical literature at the scale of micro consumption spaces. The proposed concept of “spaceplace” has been developed both through the conceptualizations of the servicescape, the third place and the relational third place, and the analysis and innovative interpretation of data obtained from fieldwork from a different perspective. In this context, the characteristics that define the concept of 'spaceplace' consist of four components: distinction (consumption practices, lifestyle and cultural capital), scale (conscious-emotion, experiential and relational), agency of the place (release of the place, realization of the place and identity of the place), and product (symbolic, social, and cognitive). Starbucks and Simit Sarayi, two consumption spaces with different structures and meanings, were used as the case area for the construction and development of the concept. The study has a design that includes both qualitative and quantitative methods. A total of 426 surveys were conducted in both places. In addition, in-depth interviews were conducted with 26 consumers and 8 managers in Starbucks and Simit Sarayı. In this context, the most important finding of the study is that micro consumption spaces in particular third places, although being places focused on socialization, also reproduce the cultural distinctions and experiences of society both through product and space. Therefore, thinking and using the characteristics of the ‘spaceplace’ concept and the framework it offers together in operationalizing different consumption spaces provide a broader and deeper analysis opportunity.
Keywords: Space, place, scale, product, distinction, spaceplace, consumption spaces, third place, geographies of consumption

Anahtar Kelimeler

Space, place, scale, product, spaceplace, geographies of consumption, distinction, consumption spaces, third place

Tüketim mekânlarının ve üçüncü yerlerin analizinde yeni bir kavram ve çerçeve önerisi: “mekânyer”

Öz

Bu çalışma coğrafyanın temel kavramlarından ‘mekân’ ve ‘yer’e ilişkin tartışmalar ışığında, tüketimin ve sosyalleşmenin biraradalığını sağlayan üçüncü yerler ile mikro ölçekteki tüketim mekânlarını “mekânyer” olarak kavramsallaştıran yeni bir nosyon ve çerçeve sunmayı amaçlamaktadır. Bu yeni nosyon ve çerçeve bize iki önemli olanak sunmaktadır. Bunlardan ilki, ekonomik coğrafya içerisinde tüketim mekânlarını öne çıkararak, klasik lokasyonel seçim ve ihtiyaç odaklı analizin ötesine geçen bir tartışma yapmamıza imkân sağlamaktadır. İkincisi ise, coğrafya literatüründe teorik olarak tartışılan ve tanımlanan ‘mekân’ ve ‘yer’ kavramlarının mikro tüketim mekânları ölçeğinde işlemselleştirilmesini sağlayarak daha kapsayıcı ve pratik bir yeni bir kavram ve analiz çerçevesi önerisi ortaya koymaktadır. Önerilen kavram hem hizmet ortamı, üçüncü yer ve ilişkisel üçüncü yer kavramsallaştırmaları üzerinden hem de saha çalışmasından elde edilen verilerin analizi ve farklı bir perspektifle yenilikçi olarak yorumlanması üzerinden geliştirilmiştir. Bu bağlamda önerilen ‘mekânyer’ kavramını tanımlayan özellikler, ayrım (tüketim pratikleri, yaşam tarzı ve kültürel sermaye), ölçek (bilinç-duygu, deneyimsel ve ilişkisel), yerin failliği (yerin serbestliği, yerin gerçekleşmesi ve yerin kimliği) ve ürün (sembolik, toplumsal ve bilişsel) olmak üzere dört bileşenden oluşmaktadır. Sözkonusu kavramın inşası ve geliştirilmesinde birbirinden farklı yapılara ve anlamlara sahip iki tüketim mekânı olan Starbucks ve Simit Sarayı örneklem alanı olarak kullanılmıştır. Çalışma hem nitel hem de nicel yöntemi bir arada içeren tasarıma sahiptir. Her iki mekânda toplam 426 anket yapılmıştır. Aynı zamanda Starbucks ve Simit Sarayında 26 tüketici ve 8 yönetici ile derinlemesine görüşmeler gerçekleştirilmiştir. Bu bağlamda çalışmanın en önemli bulgusu, mikro tüketim mekânlarının özellikle de üçüncü yerlerin sosyalleşmeye odaklı yerler olsalar da aynı zamanda toplumun kültürel ayrımlarını ve deneyimlerini hem ürün hem de mekân üzerinden yeniden üretmekte oldukları yönündedir. Bu nedenle tüketim mekânlarının işlemselleştirilmesinde önerilen ‘mekânyer’ kavramının ve sunduğu çerçevenin özelliklerinin birlikte düşünülmesi ve kullanılması daha kapsamlı ve derin bir analiz imkânı sunmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Mekân, yer, ölçek, ürün, mekânyer, tüketim coğrafyası, ayrım, üçüncü yer

Kaynakça

• Agnew, J. (1987). Place and politics: The geographical mediation of state and society. Allen & Unwin.
• Agnew, J. (2005). Space: Place. In P. Clocke & R. Johnston (Eds.), Spaces of geographical thought (pp. 81-96). Sage.
• Agnew, J. (2011). Space and place. In J. Agnew & D. N. Livingstone (Eds.), The sage handbook of geographical knowledge (pp.316-330). Sage.
• Alcalde, M. C. (2009). Between Incas and Indians Inca Kola and the construction of a Peruvian-global modernity. Journal of Consumer Culture, 9(1), 31–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540508099700
• Amin, A. & Thrift, N. (2004). The blackwell cultural economy reader. Blackwell.
• Bağcı, U. E. & Yavan, N. (2022). Geleneksel perakendeci bakkalların rekabetçi stratejileri: Değer zinciri analizi. Ege Coğrafya Dergisi, 31(1), 17-31. https://doi.org/10.51800/ecd.1014325
• Bak, S. (2005). From strange bitter concoction to romantic necessity: The social history of coffee drinking in South Korea. Korea Journal, 45(2), 37-59.
• Bak, S. (2006). McDonald’s in Seoul: Food choices, identity and nationalism. In J. L. Watson (Ed.), Golden arches east McDonald’s in east Asia (2th edition, pp.136-160). Stanford University Press.
• Baudillard, J. (2013). Tüketim toplumu: Söylenceleri/yapıları. (6. bs.) (H. Deliceçaylı & F. Keskin, Çev.). Ayrıntı.
• Bestor, T. C. (2000). How sushi went global. Foreign Policy. 121, 54-63. https://doi.org/10.2307/1149619
• Bitner, M. J. (1992). Servicescapes: The impact of physical surroundings on customers and employees. Journal of Marketing, 56, 57-71. https://doi.org/10.2307/1252042
• Bookman, S. (2014). Brands and urban life: specialty coffee, consumers, and the cocreation of urban cafe sociality. Space and Culture, 17(1), 85-99. https://doi.org/10.1177/1206331213493853
• Borsellino, R; Charles-Edwards, E & Corcoran, J. (2021). A toolkit for measuring visitation in third places. Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy, 14, 547-567.https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12061-020-09372-1.
• Bourdieu, P. (2017). Ayrım: Beğeni yargısının toplumsal eleştirisi. (2. bs) (D. Fırat & G. Berkkurt, Çev.). Heretik.
• Broadway, M., Legg, R. & Broadway, J. (2018). Coffeehouses and the art of social engagement: An analysis of Portland coffeehouses. Geographical Review, 108(3), 433-456. https://doi.org/10.1111/gere.12253
• Brodway, M. J. & Engelhardt, O. (2021). Designing places to be alone or together: A look at independently owned Minneapolis coffeehouses. Space and Culture, 24(2), 310-327. https://doi.org/10.1177/1206331218820244
• Cabras, I. & Mount, M. P. (2017). How third places foster and shape community cohesion, economic development and social capital: The case of pubs in rural Ireland. Journal of Rural Studies, 55, 71-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.07.013
• Caldwell, M. L. (2004). Domesticating the french fry McDonalds and consumerism in Moscow. Journal of Consumer Culture, 4(1), 5-26. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540504040902
• Casey, E. S. (1997). The fate of place: A philosophical history. University of California Press. Castree, N. (2009) Place: Connections and boundaries in an interdependent world. In N. J. Clifford, S.L. Holloway, S.P. Rice & G. Vallentine (Eds.), Key concepts in geography (2th edition, pp.153-172). Sage.
• Coe, N. M., Kelly, P. F. & Yeung, H. W. C. (2013). Economic geography: A contemporary introduction. 2th edition. Wiley.
• Coe, N. M., Kelly, P. F. & Yeung, H. W. C. (2020). Economic geography: A contemporary introduction. 3th edition. Wiley Blackwell.
• Cook, I. & Crang, P. (2016). Consumption and its geographies. In P. Daniels, M. Bradshaw, D. Shaw, J. Sidaway and T. Hall (Eds.), An introduction to human geography (5th edition, pp. 379-396). Pearson Education.
• Crang, P. (1997). Cultural turns and the (Re) constitution of economic geography. In R. Lee ve J. Wills (Eds.), Geographies of economies (pp.3-15). Routledge.
• Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. 3th edition. Sage
• Cresswell, T. (2015). Place an introduction. 2th edition. Wiley-Blackwell. Crewe, L. (2011). Geographies of retailing and consumption: The shopping list compendium. In A. Leyshon, R. Lee, L. McDowell & P. Sunley (Eds.), The sage handbook of economic geography (pp. 305–321). Sage.
• Crick, A. P. (2011a). New third places: Opportunities and challenges. Tourism Sensemaking: Strategies to Give Meaning to Experience Advances in Culture, Tourism and Hospitality Research, 5, 63–77. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1871-3173(2011)0000005006.
• Crick, A. P. (2011b). Rethinking Oldenburg: Third places and generation Y in a developing country context. International CHRIE ConferenceRefereed Track 7. https://scholarworks.umass.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1655&context=refereed
• Çağlar, A. S. (2011). McDöner ‘döner kebap and the social positioning struggle of German Turks. In G. Baumann ve S. Vertovec (Eds.), Multiculturalism critical concepts in sociology volume iii multiculturalism in the public sphere: City and school, markets and media (pp.413-431). Routledge.
• Çakı, F. & Kızıltepe, B. (2017). Üçüncü yerler olarak kafeler ve gençlik: Balıkesir örnek olay incelemesi. Akademik İncelemeler Dergisi, 12(1), 173-202. https://doi.org/10.17550/akademikincelemeler.308922
• Dolley, J. (2020). Community gardens as third places. Geographical Research, 58(2), 141-153. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-5871.12395.
• Elden, S. (2009). Space I. In R. Kitchen & N. Thrift (Eds.), International encyclopedia of human geography (pp. 262-267). Elsevier.
• Fantasia, R. (1995). Fast food in France. Theory and Society, 24 (2), 201-243. http://www.jstor.org/stable/658098
• Griffith, M. A. & Gilly, M.C. (2012). Dibs! customer territorial behaviors. Journal of Service Research, 15(2), 131-149. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670511430530
• Grinsphun, H. (2014). Deconstructing a global commodity: Coffee, culture, and consumption in Japan. Journal of Consumer Culture, 14(3), 343-364. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540513488405
• Hall, M. (2011). Anchoring and exposing in the third place: Regular identification at the boundaries of social realms. M/C Journal, 14(5), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.5204/mcj.422
• Hampton, K. N. & Gupta, N. (2013). Community and social interaction in the wireless city: Wifi use in public and semi-public spaces. In A. Tijora ve G. Scambler (Eds.), Cafe society (pp.147-172). Palgrave Macmillan.
• Harvey, D. (2006). Space as a keyword. In N. Castree & D. Gregory (Eds.), David Harvey: A critical reader (pp. 270-293). Blackwell.
• Harvey, D. (2015). Kozmopolitik ve özgürlük coğrafyaları. (Z. C. Başeren, Çev). İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları.
• Hawkins, C. J. & Ryan, L. J. (2013). Festival spaces as third places. Journal of Place Management and Development, 6 (3),192-202. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JPMD-02-2013-0002
• Herod, A. (2008). Scale: The local and the global. In N. Clifford, S. Holloway, S.P. Rice & G. Valentine (Eds.), Key concepts in geography (pp. 217-235). Sage.
• Hess, M. (2004). Spatial relationships? Towards a reconceptualization of embeddedness. Progress in Human Geography, 28 (2), 165-186. https://doi.org/10.1191/0309132504ph479oa
• Hickman, P. (2013). Third places and social interaction in deprived neighbourhoods in Great Britain. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 28, 221–236. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10901-012-9306-5
• Johnstone, M.L. (2012). The servicescape: The social dimensions of place. Journal of Marketing Management, 28 (11-12), 1399-1418. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2012.694370
• Jones, M. (2009). Phase space: Geography, relational thinking, and beyond. Progress in Human Geography, 33(4), 487–506. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132508101599
• Kaya, İ. (2014). Nitel araştırma yöntemleri. İçinde Y. Arı & İ. Kaya (Eds.), Coğrafya araştırma yöntemleri (s. 267-301). Coğrafyacılar Derneği Yayınları.
• Kervankıran, İ., Kurnaz, Z. & Başçı, E. (2021). Bir yer olarak Göbeklitepe’nin ötekileş(tiril)en son sakinleri. Sosyoloji Araştırmaları Dergisi, 24(3), 29-63. https://doi.org/10.18490/sosars.1014205
• Kitchin, R. & Tate, N. J. (2000). Conducting research in human geography: Theory, methodology and practice. Routledge.
• Kitchin, R. (2009). Space II. In R. Kitchen & N. Thrift (Eds.), International encyclopedia of human geography (pp. 268-275). Elsevier.
• Kjeldgaard, D. & Ostberg, J. (2007). Coffee grounds and the global cup: Glocal consumer culture in Scandinavia. Consumption Markets & Culture, 10 (2), 175-187. https://doi.org/10.1080/10253860701256281
• Kuno, K. (2011). School libraries as the third place. Lifelong Education and Libraries, 11, 109-118. https://repository.kulib.kyoto-u.ac.jp/dspace/bitstream/2433/152088/1/lel11_109.pdf
• Kurtar Anlı, C. (2021). Mekân ve yer kavramları bağlamında üçüncü yerlerin tüketim coğrafyası perspektifinden analizi. [Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi]. Ankara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
• Kurtar Anlı, C. & Yavan, N. (2019). Deneyim yaratmada mekânın rolü: Starbucks ve Kahve Dünyası’nın deneyim ekonomisi ve üçüncü yer bakımından analizi. Gaziantep Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 18(1), 100-132. https://doi.org/10.21547/jss.494355
• Kurtar Anlı, C. & Yavan, N. (2023). Tüketim mekânları olarak yerel ve küresel kafe zincirlerinin üçüncü yer kriterleri bakımından analizi. International Journal of Geography and Geography Education (IGGE), 49, 133-157. http://dx.doi.org/10.32003/igge.xx
• Laing, A. & Royle, J. (2013). Examining chain bookshops in the context of third place. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 41(1), 27-44. https://doi.org/10.1108/09590551311288157
• Lefebvre, H. (2014). Mekânın üretimi. (I. Ergüden, Çev.). Sel. Lin, E. Y. (2012). Starbucks as the third place: Glimpses into Taiwan’s consumer culture and lifestyles. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 24(1-2), 119-128. https://doi.org/10.1080/08961530.2012.650142
• Lin, H., Pang, N. & Luyt, B. (2015). Is the library a third place for young people? Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 47(2), 145–155. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000614532303
• Lukito, Y. N. & Xenia, A.P. (2018). Experiencing contemporary cafes and changes in the characteristic of third places. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 126 (2018) 012208, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/126/1/012208
• Mansvelt, J. (2005). Geographies of consumption. Sage.
• Mansvelt, J. (2012). Making consumers and consumption. In T. Barnes, J. Peck and E. Sheppard (Eds.), The wileyblackwell companion to economic geography (pp. 444–457). Wiley-Blackwell.
• Mansvelt, J. (2022). Geographies of consumption. Oxford Bibliographies (Online). DOI: 10.1093/OBO/978.019.9874002-0054.
• Marston, S.A. (2000). The social construction of scale. Progress in Human Geography, 24(2), 219-242. https://doi.org/10.1191/030913200674086272
• Marston, S. A., Jones, J. P.III & Woodward, K. (2005). Human geography without scale. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 30, 416-432. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5661.2005.00180.x
• Massey, D. (1994). Space, place and gender. The University of Minnesota Press McArthur, J. A. & White, A. F. (2016). Twitter chats as third places: Conceptualizing a digital gathering site. Social Media + Society, JulySeptember, 1–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2056305116665857
• Memarovic, N., Fels, S., Anacleto, J., Calderon, R., Gobbo, F. & Carroll, J.M. (2014). Rethinking third places: Contemporary design with technology. Special Issue: Community Informatics and Urban Planning, 10(3), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.15353/joci.v10i3.3440
• Merriman, P. (2022). Space. Routledge.
• Mikunda, C. (2006). Brand lands, hot spots & cool spaces: Welcome to the third place and the total marketing experience. Kogan Page.
• Miles, S. (2010). Spaces for consumption. Sage.
• Nguyen, T.V.T., Han, H., Sahito, N. & Lam, T. N. (2019). The bookstore-café: Emergence of a new lifestyle as a third place in Hangzhou, China. Space and Culture, 22(2), 216–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/1206331218795832
• Oldenburg, R. (1999). The great good places: cafes, coffee shops, bookstores, bars, hair salons and other hangouts at the hearth of community. 2th edition. De Capo Press
• Oldenburg, R. & Brissett, D. (1982). The third place. Oualitative Sociology, 5(4), 265-284. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00986754 Oxford Learner’s Dictionaries (n.d.). ‘Product’. Retrieved December 14, 2020, from https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/product?q=product
• Peters, D.M. (2016). Inked: Historic African American beach site as collective memory and group third place sociability on Martah’s Vineyard. Leisure Studies, 35(2), 187-199. https://doi.org/10.1080/02614367.2014.986506
• Pine, J. & Gilmore, J. (2011). Deneyim ekonomisi. (L. Cinemre, Çev.). Optimist Yayınları. Purnell, D. & Breede, D. C. (2018). Traveling the third place: Conferences as third places. Space and Culture, 21(4), 512–523. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1206331217741078
• Ram, U. (2004). Glocommodification: How the global consumes the local – McDonald’s in Israel. Current Sociology, 52(1), 11-31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392104039311
• Ram, U. (2007). Liquid identities mecca cola versus coca cola. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 10(4), 465-484. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549407081952
• Raviv, Y. (2003). Falafel: A national icon. Gastronomica, 3(3), 20-25. https://doi.org/10.1525/gfc.2003.3.3.20
• Relph, E. (1976). Place and placelessness. Pion Limited.
• Rosenbaum, M. S. (2005). The symbolic servicescape: Your kind is welcomed here. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 4(4), 257–267. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.9
• Rosenbaum, M.S. (2006). Exploring the social supportive role of third places in consumers’ lives. Journal of Service Research, 9 (1), 59-72. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670506289530
• Rosenbaum, M. S. (2009). Restorative servicescapes: restoring directed attention in third places. Journal of Service Management, 20(2), 173-191. https://doi.org/10.1108/09564230910952762
• Rosenbaum, M.S., Sweeney, J.C & Windhorst, C. (2007). The restorative qualities of an activity-based, third place café for seniors: restoration, social support, and place attachment at mather’s—more than a café. Seniors Housing & Care Journal, 17(1), 39-54. http://www.nic.org/NicStore/p-300-2009-seniors-housing-care-journal.aspx
• Rosenbaum, M. S. & Massiah, C. (2011). An expanded servicescape perspective. Journal of Service Management, 22(4), 471-490. https://doi.org/10.1108/09564231111155088
• Rosenbaum, M.S., Kelleher, C., Friman, M., Kristensson, P. & Scherer, A. (2017). Re-placing place in marketing: A resource-exchange place perspective. Journal of Business Research, 79, 281–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.01.009
• Sack, R.D. (1980). Conceptions of space in social thought: A geographic perspective. University of Minnesota Press. Schultz, H. & Yang, D.J. (2017). Starbucks gönlünü işe vermek. (10. bs) (Ö. F. Birpınar, Çev.). Babıali Kültür Yayıncılığı.
• Seamon, D. (2012). Place, place identity, and phenomenology: A triadic interpretation based on J. G. Bennett’s systematics. In H. Casakin & F. Bernardo (Eds.), The role of place identity in the perception, understanding and design of built environments (pp. 3-21). Bentham ebooks.
• Seamon, D. (2018). Life takes place: phenomenology, lifeworlds, and place making. Routledge.
• Simit Sarayı (2020, Aralık 12). ‘Biz kimiz’. https://www.simitsarayı.com/biz-kimiz
• Slater, A. & Koo, H. J. (2010). A new type of “third place”? Journal of Place Management and Development, 3(2), 99-112. https://doi.org/10.1108/17538331011062658
• Soja, E. W. (1996). Thirdspace ‘journeys to Los Angeles and other realand imagined places. Blackwell.
• Soukup, C. (2006). Computer-mediated communication as a virtual third place: building Oldenburg’s great good places on the world wide web. New Media & Society, 8(3), 421-440. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444806061953
• Steinkuehler, C. A. (2005). The new third place: Massively multiplayer online gaming in American youth culture. Tidskrift, 3, 16-33.
• Steinkuehler, C. A. & Williams, D. (2006). Where everybody knows your (screen) name: Online games as third places. Journal of ComputerMediated Communication,11, 885–909. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00300.x
• Şardağ, A. & Kervankıran, İ. (2022). Turizm mekanlarının yeniden üretimle metalaş(tırıl)ması: Mevlana müzesi ve çevresi. Türk Coğrafya Dergisi, 80, 71-86. https://doi.org/10.17211/tcd.1079438 TDK (t.y.). ‘Ürün’. 13 Aralık 2020 https://sozluk.gov.tr
• Thiele, K. & Klagge, B. (2021). Third places and educational justice: Public libraries in the context of covid-19. Erdkunde, 75(1), 31-49. https://doi.org/10.3112/erdkunde.2021.01.03
• Thompson, S. (2018). Exploring the nature of third places and local social ties in high-density areas: the case of a large mixed-use complex. Urban Policy and Research, 36(3), 304-318. https://doi.org/10.1080/08111146.2018.1502660
• Thompson, C. J. & Arsel, Z. (2004). The Starbucks brandscape and consumers’ (anticorporate) experiences of glocalization. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(3), 631-642. https://doi.org/10.1086/425098
• Tuan, Y. F. (1975). Place: An experiental perspective. Georaphical Review, 65(2), 151-165. https://doi.org/10.2307/213970
• Tuan, Y. F. (1977). Space and place the perspective of experience. University of Minnesota Press.
• Tuan, Y.F. (2005). Mekân ve yer: Hümanistik perspektif. İçinde Y. Arı (Ed.), 20. yüzyılda Amerikan coğrafyasının gelişimi (s. 119-134) (Y. Arı, Çev.). Çizgi Kitabevi. (Orijinal çalışma 1974’te yayınlandı).
• Warf, B. (2012). Introduction: Fusing economic and cultural geography. In B. Warf (Ed.), Encounters and engagements between economic and cultural geography (pp.1-18). Springer.
• Woldoff, R. A., Lozzi, D. M. & Dilks, L. M. (2013). The social transformation of coffee houses: The emergence of chain establishments and the private nature of usage. International Journal of Social Science Studies, 1(2), 205-218. https://doi.org/10.11114/ijsss.v1i2.200
• Wrigley, N. & Lowe, M. (2002). Reading retail: A geographical perspective on retailing and consumption spaces. Routledge.
• Urry, J. (2015). Mekanları tüketmek. (2. bs) (R. G. Öğdül, Çev.). Ayrıntı.
• Yavan, N. (2006). Türkiye’de doğrudan yabancı yatırımların lokasyon seçimi. İktisadi Araştırmalar Vakfı.
• Yavan, N. (2014a). Nicel araştırmalarda veri ve veri toplama teknikleri. İçinde Y. Arı & İ. Kaya (Eds.), Coğrafya araştırma yöntemleri (s. 219-266). Coğrafyacılar Derneği Yayınları.
• Yavan, N. (2014b). Nicel araştırmada ölçme, değişken ve ölçekler. İçinde Y. Arı & İ. Kaya (Eds.), Coğrafya araştırma yöntemleri (s. 209-217). Coğrafyacılar Derneği Yayınları.
• Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H. (2018). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. (11. bs). Seçkin.
• Yurdadön Arslan, P. & Yavan, N. (2018). Mekânın üretimi ve Lefebvre’in mekânsal üçlü kavramsallaştırmasının görünürlüğü: Taksim Gezi Parkı örneği. Planlama, 28(3), 302–314. https://doi.org/10.14744/planlama.2018.25338