ATIK SUDAN İZOLE EDİLEN FENOL DEGRADE EDİCİ BAKTERİLERİN ENZİMATİK VE ANTİBİYOTİK DUYARLILIK AKTİVİTELERİ

Yıl 2017, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2, 64 - 74, 31.08.2017

Nilgün Poyraz Mehmet Burçin Mutlu

https://doi.org/10.18036/aubtdc.289555

Öz

Çalışma kapsamında
iki farklı atık su arıtma tesisinin çeşitli ünitelerinden örnek alınmış ve bu
örneklerin pH ve element içerikleri belirlenmiştir. Özellikleri belirlenen
örneklerden fenollü besiyerine inokülasyon yapılmış ve 19 izolat elde
edilmiştir. Bu izole edilen 19 izolattan morfolojik olarak farklı olduğu
düşünülen 9 izolatın tanımlaması yapılmıştır. İzolatlar arasında yoğun olarak Pseudomonas türleri belirlenmiştir.
Tanımlanan bu 9 izolatın atık sulardaki arıtım potansiyellerini
değerlendirebilmek için antibiyotik duyarlılık testi gerçekleştirilmiştir.
Ayrıca izolatların amilaz ve proteaz enzim üretim aktiviteleri
değerlendirilmiştir. İzolatların ofloksasin, azitromisin ve streptomisine
duyarlı oldukları belirlenmiştir. Enzim üretim yetenekleri değerlendirildiğinde
ise yalnızca 2 izolat zayıf proteaz aktivitesi gösterirken izolatların çoğu
amilaz aktivitesi göstermiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Atık su, antibiyotik, amilaz

ENZYMATIC AND ANTIBIOTIC SUSCEPTIBILITY ACTIVITIES OF PHENOL DEGRADING BACTERIA ISOLATED FROM WASTE WATER

Öz

In the scope of the study, samples were
taken from various units of two different wastewater treatment plants and pH
and element contents of these samples were determined. Samples were inoculated on phenolic media and totally 19
isolates were obtained. Of these 19 isolates,
9 of them thought to be morphologically different were identified. Pseudomonas species have been identified
dominantly among the isolates. An antibiotic susceptibility test was performed to evaluate the treatment
potential of these 9 isolates in the wastewater. In addition, amylase and protease enzyme production
activities of isolates were evaluated. It has been determined that isolates are susceptible to ofloxacin,
azithromycin and streptomycin. When enzyme production capabilities were evaluated, only 2 isolates showed
poor protease activity, while most isolates showed amylase activity.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Wastewater, antibiotics, amylase

Kaynakça

• [1] Wagner M, Loy A, Nogueira R, Purkhold U, Lee N, and Daims H. Microbial community composition and function in wastewater treatment plants. A Van Leeuw J Microb, 2002;. 81(1): 665-680.
• [2] Wagner M, & Loy A. Bacterial community composition and function in sewage treatment systems. Curr Opin Biotechnol, 2002;13(3): 218-227.
• [3] Facchin S, Alves PDD, de Faria Siqueira F, Barroca TM, Victória JMN, & Kalapothakis E. Biodiversity and secretion of enzymes with potential utility in wastewater treatment. Open Journal of Ecology (OJE), 2013; 3(1): 34-47. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oje.2013.31005
• [4] Jin B, Van Leeuwen HJ, Patel B, & Yu Q. Utilisation of starch processing wastewater for production of microbial biomass protein and fungal α-amylase by Aspergillus oryzae. Bioresource Technol, 1998; 66(3): 201-206.
• [5] Gupta R, Beg Q.K. and Lorenz P. Bacterial alkaline proteases: Molecular approaches and industrial applications. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, 2002;59:15-32. doi:10.1007/s00253-002-0975-y
• [6] Ichida JM, Krizova L, LeFevre CA, Keener HM, Elwell DL and Burtt Jr EH Bacterial inoculum enhances keratin degradation and biofilm formation in poultry compost. J Microbiol Methods, 2001; 47: 199-208. doi:10.1016/S0167-7012(01)00302-5
• [7] Rigo E, Rigoni RE, Lodea P, Oliveira D, Freire DMG and Luccio M. Application of different lipases as pretreatment in anaerobic treatment of waste- water. Environ Eng Sci, 2008;25: 1243-1248. doi:10.1089/ees.2007.0197
• [8] Leal MCCR, Freire DMG, Cammarota MC and Sant’Anna Jr GL. Effect of enzymatic hydrolysis on anaerobic treatment of dairy wastewater. Process Biochem, 2006; 41: 1173-1178. doi:10.1016/j.procbio.2005.12.014
• [9] Karam J, & Nicell JA Potential applications of enzymes in waste treatment. J Chem Technol Biot,1997; 69(2): 141-153.
• [10] Lane, DJ, Pace B, Olsen GJ, Stahl DA, Sogin ML, Pace NR, Rapid determination of 16S ribosomal RNA sequences for phylogenetic analyses. Proc Natl Acad Sci, 1985; 82(20):6955-6959.
• [11] Singh P, & Kumari P. Isolation and characterization of amylase producing Bacillus spp. from selected soil sample. IJRBS, 2016;5(2);24-29. http://www.ijrbs.in ISSN 2319-2844
• [12] Tennalli G, Udapudi B, Naik P. Isolation of Proteolytic Bacteria and Characterization of their Proteolytic Activity. International Journal of Advances in Engineering, Science and Technology (IJAEST), 20102; 2(3),ISSN : 2249-913X.
• [13] Xing M, Li X, Yang J. Treatment performance of small-scale vermifilter for domestic wastewater and its relationship to earthworm growth, reproduction and enzymatic activity. Afr. J Biotechnol, 2010; 9:7513–7520.
• [14] Amador PP, Fernandes RM, Prudêncio MC, Barreto MP, & Duarte IM. Antibiotic resistance in wastewater: Occurrence and fate of Enterobacteriaceae producers of Class A and Class C β-lactamases. J Environ Sci Health A, 2015;50(1):26-39.
• [15] Oubrim N. Removal of antibiotic-resistant Salmonella in sewage water from wastewater treatment plants in Settat and Soualem, Morocco. Eur J Sci Res, 2012; 68(4): 565–573.