Research Article

Evaluation Of Non-Metastatic Testicular Cancer Pathology Results: Our Clinical Experience And Review Of The Literature

Volume: 2 Number: 2 August 28, 2018
EN TR

Evaluation Of Non-Metastatic Testicular Cancer Pathology Results: Our Clinical Experience And Review Of The Literature

Abstract

Introduction:

Testicular cancer is a rarely seen malignancy in men with a ratio of 10/100000. Testicular cancers are mostly affecting adolescents, young adults and it comprises nearly %1 of

all male cancers.


Materials and Methods:

32 patients that were undergone radical orchidectomy due to testicular cancer between January 2007 and July 2016 were included in this study. The design of the study was retrospective.


Results:

When the pathologic materials were evaluated; 15 patients (46.8%) had mixt germ cell tumor, 9 patients (28.1%) had seminoma, 1 patient (3.1%) had testicular lymphoma, 3 patients (9.3%) had yolk sac tumor, 2 patients (6.2%) had hipocellular inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor(burned-out testicule tumor), 2 patients (6.2%) had sex cord stromal tumor.


Conclusion:

In our study we reviewed the histopathologic results of 32 patients. There were no lymph node or distant metastasis for the patients and during the follow-up program there were no recurrence or progression. Testicular cancers are important uropathologic entities for treatment and close follow up. Our clinical experience has been presented in the study.


Keywords

References

  1. 1. Albers P, Albrecht W, Algaba F, et al. Guidelines on Testicular Cancer: 2015 Update. European urology. 2015;68:1054-68.
  2. 2. Chakrabarti PR, Dosi S, Varma A, Kiyawat P, Khare G, Matreja S. Histopathological Trends of Testicular Neoplasm: An Experience over a Decade in a Tertiary Care Centre in the Malwa Belt of Central India. Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR. 2016;10:16-8.
  3. 3. Ghazarian AA, Trabert B, Devesa SS, McGlynn KA. Recent trends in the incidence of testicular germ cell tumors in the United States. Andrology. 2015;3:13-8.
  4. 4. Basiri A, Movahhed S, Parvin M, Salimi M, Rezaeetalab GH. The histologic features of intratubular germ cell neoplasia and its correlation with tumor behavior. Investigative and clinical urology. 2016;57:191-5.
  5. 5. Kalin M, Mauti L, Pless M. [Testicular Cancer: Diagnostics, Therapy and Follow Up]. Praxis. 2016;105:643-8.
  6. 6. Shtricker A, Silver D, Sorin E, et al. The value of testicular ultrasound in the prediction of the type and size of testicular tumors. International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology. 2015;41:655-60.
  7. 7. Lim B, Song SH, Song G, Kim KS. Changes of calcific density in pediatric patients with testicular microlithiasis. Korean journal of urology. 2015;56:318-23.
  8. 8. Cooper ML, Kaefer M, Fan R, Rink RC, Jennings SG, Karmazyn B. Testicular microlithiasis in children and associated testicular cancer. Radiology. 2014;270:857-63.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

-

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Selçuk Sarıkaya * This is me

Rıdvan Özbek This is me

Görkem Güvenir This is me

Çağrı Şenocak This is me

Publication Date

August 28, 2018

Submission Date

March 8, 2018

Acceptance Date

June 10, 2018

Published in Issue

Year 2017 Volume: 2 Number: 2

APA
Sarıkaya, S., Özbek, R., Güvenir, G., Şenocak, Ç., Güler Şimşek, G., & Bozkurt, Ö. F. (2018). Evaluation Of Non-Metastatic Testicular Cancer Pathology Results: Our Clinical Experience And Review Of The Literature. Akademik Araştırma Tıp Dergisi, 2(2), 49-52. https://izlik.org/JA89JT33GF
AMA
1.Sarıkaya S, Özbek R, Güvenir G, Şenocak Ç, Güler Şimşek G, Bozkurt ÖF. Evaluation Of Non-Metastatic Testicular Cancer Pathology Results: Our Clinical Experience And Review Of The Literature. AATD. 2018;2(2):49-52. https://izlik.org/JA89JT33GF
Chicago
Sarıkaya, Selçuk, Rıdvan Özbek, Görkem Güvenir, Çağrı Şenocak, Güler Şimşek Gülçin, and Ömer Faruk Bozkurt. 2018. “Evaluation Of Non-Metastatic Testicular Cancer Pathology Results: Our Clinical Experience And Review Of The Literature”. Akademik Araştırma Tıp Dergisi 2 (2): 49-52. https://izlik.org/JA89JT33GF.
EndNote
Sarıkaya S, Özbek R, Güvenir G, Şenocak Ç, Güler Şimşek G, Bozkurt ÖF (August 1, 2018) Evaluation Of Non-Metastatic Testicular Cancer Pathology Results: Our Clinical Experience And Review Of The Literature. Akademik Araştırma Tıp Dergisi 2 2 49–52.
IEEE
[1]S. Sarıkaya, R. Özbek, G. Güvenir, Ç. Şenocak, G. Güler Şimşek, and Ö. F. Bozkurt, “Evaluation Of Non-Metastatic Testicular Cancer Pathology Results: Our Clinical Experience And Review Of The Literature”, AATD, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 49–52, Aug. 2018, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA89JT33GF
ISNAD
Sarıkaya, Selçuk - Özbek, Rıdvan - Güvenir, Görkem - Şenocak, Çağrı - Güler Şimşek Gülçin - Bozkurt, Ömer Faruk. “Evaluation Of Non-Metastatic Testicular Cancer Pathology Results: Our Clinical Experience And Review Of The Literature”. Akademik Araştırma Tıp Dergisi 2/2 (August 1, 2018): 49-52. https://izlik.org/JA89JT33GF.
JAMA
1.Sarıkaya S, Özbek R, Güvenir G, Şenocak Ç, Güler Şimşek G, Bozkurt ÖF. Evaluation Of Non-Metastatic Testicular Cancer Pathology Results: Our Clinical Experience And Review Of The Literature. AATD. 2018;2:49–52.
MLA
Sarıkaya, Selçuk, et al. “Evaluation Of Non-Metastatic Testicular Cancer Pathology Results: Our Clinical Experience And Review Of The Literature”. Akademik Araştırma Tıp Dergisi, vol. 2, no. 2, Aug. 2018, pp. 49-52, https://izlik.org/JA89JT33GF.
Vancouver
1.Selçuk Sarıkaya, Rıdvan Özbek, Görkem Güvenir, Çağrı Şenocak, Gülçin Güler Şimşek, Ömer Faruk Bozkurt. Evaluation Of Non-Metastatic Testicular Cancer Pathology Results: Our Clinical Experience And Review Of The Literature. AATD [Internet]. 2018 Aug. 1;2(2):49-52. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA89JT33GF