Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Tibia Gövde Kırıklarında Talon Ve Geleneksel Kilitli Çivilemenin Retrospektif Karşılaştırması

Year 2024, Volume: 13 Issue: 2, 54 - 60
https://doi.org/10.47493/abantmedj.1373188

Abstract

Amaç: Tibia gövde kırıkları, ortopedik uygulamalarda önemli zorluklar oluşturan yaygın yaralanmalardır. Bu retrospektif çalışmanın amacı, tibia gövde kırıklarının talon ve geleneksel vida kilitleme çivileri ile tedavi edilen hastaların klinik sonuçlarını karşılaştırmaktır.
Yöntem: 2019-2021 yılları arasında tibia intramedüller çivi ameliyatı geçiren 94 hasta çalışmaya dahil edildi. Hastalar distal kilitleme tipine göre iki gruba ayrıldı: Grup 1 geleneksel vida kilitleme, Grup 2 ise Talon kilitleme yöntemi aldı. Hastaların yaş, cinsiyet, travma mekanizması, kırık tipi ve cerrahi verileri analiz edildi. Takip sırasında yaşanan komplikasyonlar ve kemik birleşme süreçleri değerlendirildi ve iki çivi tasarımı arasında karşılaştırıldı.
Bulgular: Çalışmaya alınan hastaların yaş ve cinsiyetleri her iki grupta da istatistiksel olarak benzerdi. Talon grubunda anlamlı derecede daha kısa bir kemik birleşme süresi gözlendi (p <0.001*). OTA sınıflandırmasına göre daha karmaşık kırıklarda vida kilitleme sistemleri tercih edildi (p=0.017). Sonuç: Özellikle genç hastalarda Talon kilitleme çivilerinin geleneksel vida kilitlemeye göre avantajlar sunabileceğini ve daha erken kemik birleşmesine yol açabileceğini göstermektedir. Talon çivilerinin biyomekanik stabilitesinin ve özel kırık tipleri için uygunluğunun araştırılması için daha fazla çalışma gerekmektedir.

References

  • Donnelley CA, von Kaeppler EP, Roberts HJ, Haonga B, Shearer DW, Morshed S. Monoplanar external fixation of comminuted open tibial shaft fractures predicts loss of alignment by one year compared to a statically locked intramedullary SIGN nail. Injury. 2021;52(4):982-7. Epub 2020/11/10. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.10.078. PubMed PMID: 33164834.
  • ÜZÜMCÜGİL O, DOĞAN A, YALÇINKAYA M, DAĞTAŞ MZ, AZAR N, MUMCUOĞLU E, et al. Tibia diyafiz kırıklarının kilitli intramedüller çivileme ile tedavisinde orta dönem sonuçlarımız. Şişli Etfal Hastanesi Tıp Bülteni. 2009;43(2):82-8.
  • Bhandari M, Guyatt GH, Swiontkowski MF, Tornetta P, 3rd, Sprague S, Schemitsch EH. A lack of consensus in the assessment of fracture healing among orthopaedic surgeons. J Orthop Trauma. 2002;16(8):562-6. Epub 2002/09/28. doi: 10.1097/00005131-200209000-00004. PubMed PMID: 12352564.
  • Tekin SB, Mert A, Bozgeyik B. Which is superior in the treatment of AO Type 42A tibial shaft fracture? A comparison of talon intramedullary nailing and conventional locked intramedullary nailing. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2022;28(10):1514-20. Epub 2022/09/29. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2021.36779. PubMed PMID: 36169461; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC10277372.
  • Çamurcu Y, Sofu H, Issın A, Koçkara N, Genç E, Çetinkaya M. Is talon tibial intramedullary nailing clinically superior compared to conventional locked nailing? Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi. 2017;28(3):152-7. Epub 2017/11/11. doi: 10.5606/ehc.2017.55349. PubMed PMID: 29125812.
  • Yapıcı F, Gür V, Onaç O, Alpay Y, Tardus I, Üçpunar H, et al. For Intramedullary Nailing of Femoral Shaft Fractures, Talon Fixation is Helpful to Cope With the Troublesome Distal Locking, But Conventional Distal Locking With Screws Offers a More Stable Construct. Talon Femoral Nail Versus Conventional Femoral Nail. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2022;28(4):513-22. Epub 2022/04/30. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2021.55867. PubMed PMID: 35485511.

Retrospectİve Comparison Of Talon Or Conventional Locking Nailing For Tibial Shaft Fractures

Year 2024, Volume: 13 Issue: 2, 54 - 60
https://doi.org/10.47493/abantmedj.1373188

Abstract

Objective: Tibial shaft fractures are common orthopedic injuries that present challenges in treatment selection. The primary aim of this retrospective study was to compare the clinical outcomes of tibial shaft fractures treated with Talon and conventional locking nails.
Methods: Ninety-four patients who underwent tibial intramedullary nailing between 2019-2021 were included in the study. The patients were divided into two groups based on the type of distal locking used: Group 1 received conventional screw locking, and Group 2 received Talon locking. Patient age, gender, trauma mechanism, fracture type, and surgery data were analyzed. The complications and bone union processes during follow-up were evaluated and compared between the two nail designs.
Results: The age and gender of the patients included in the study were statistically similar in both groups. Furthermore, the Talon group demonstrated significantly shorter union times (p < 0.001*). According to the OTA classification, there was a preference for screw-locking systems in more complex fractures (p = 0.017).
Conclusion: The results of this retrospective study suggest that Talon locking nails may offer advantages over conventional screw locking, especially in younger patients, resulting in earlier bone union. Further research is needed to investigate Talon nails' biomechanical stability and suitability for specific fracture types.

References

  • Donnelley CA, von Kaeppler EP, Roberts HJ, Haonga B, Shearer DW, Morshed S. Monoplanar external fixation of comminuted open tibial shaft fractures predicts loss of alignment by one year compared to a statically locked intramedullary SIGN nail. Injury. 2021;52(4):982-7. Epub 2020/11/10. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.10.078. PubMed PMID: 33164834.
  • ÜZÜMCÜGİL O, DOĞAN A, YALÇINKAYA M, DAĞTAŞ MZ, AZAR N, MUMCUOĞLU E, et al. Tibia diyafiz kırıklarının kilitli intramedüller çivileme ile tedavisinde orta dönem sonuçlarımız. Şişli Etfal Hastanesi Tıp Bülteni. 2009;43(2):82-8.
  • Bhandari M, Guyatt GH, Swiontkowski MF, Tornetta P, 3rd, Sprague S, Schemitsch EH. A lack of consensus in the assessment of fracture healing among orthopaedic surgeons. J Orthop Trauma. 2002;16(8):562-6. Epub 2002/09/28. doi: 10.1097/00005131-200209000-00004. PubMed PMID: 12352564.
  • Tekin SB, Mert A, Bozgeyik B. Which is superior in the treatment of AO Type 42A tibial shaft fracture? A comparison of talon intramedullary nailing and conventional locked intramedullary nailing. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2022;28(10):1514-20. Epub 2022/09/29. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2021.36779. PubMed PMID: 36169461; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC10277372.
  • Çamurcu Y, Sofu H, Issın A, Koçkara N, Genç E, Çetinkaya M. Is talon tibial intramedullary nailing clinically superior compared to conventional locked nailing? Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi. 2017;28(3):152-7. Epub 2017/11/11. doi: 10.5606/ehc.2017.55349. PubMed PMID: 29125812.
  • Yapıcı F, Gür V, Onaç O, Alpay Y, Tardus I, Üçpunar H, et al. For Intramedullary Nailing of Femoral Shaft Fractures, Talon Fixation is Helpful to Cope With the Troublesome Distal Locking, But Conventional Distal Locking With Screws Offers a More Stable Construct. Talon Femoral Nail Versus Conventional Femoral Nail. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2022;28(4):513-22. Epub 2022/04/30. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2021.55867. PubMed PMID: 35485511.
There are 6 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Orthopaedics
Journal Section Research Articles
Authors

Fatih Günaydın 0000-0003-1770-0276

Öner Kılınç 0000-0001-5119-3701

Bülent Skaraya 0000-0002-5000-4478

Yusuf Bayram 0000-0003-1777-2800

Early Pub Date August 15, 2024
Publication Date
Submission Date December 6, 2023
Acceptance Date July 22, 2024
Published in Issue Year 2024 Volume: 13 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Günaydın, F., Kılınç, Ö., Skaraya, B., Bayram, Y. (2024). Retrospectİve Comparison Of Talon Or Conventional Locking Nailing For Tibial Shaft Fractures. Abant Medical Journal, 13(2), 54-60. https://doi.org/10.47493/abantmedj.1373188
AMA Günaydın F, Kılınç Ö, Skaraya B, Bayram Y. Retrospectİve Comparison Of Talon Or Conventional Locking Nailing For Tibial Shaft Fractures. Abant Med J. August 2024;13(2):54-60. doi:10.47493/abantmedj.1373188
Chicago Günaydın, Fatih, Öner Kılınç, Bülent Skaraya, and Yusuf Bayram. “Retrospectİve Comparison Of Talon Or Conventional Locking Nailing For Tibial Shaft Fractures”. Abant Medical Journal 13, no. 2 (August 2024): 54-60. https://doi.org/10.47493/abantmedj.1373188.
EndNote Günaydın F, Kılınç Ö, Skaraya B, Bayram Y (August 1, 2024) Retrospectİve Comparison Of Talon Or Conventional Locking Nailing For Tibial Shaft Fractures. Abant Medical Journal 13 2 54–60.
IEEE F. Günaydın, Ö. Kılınç, B. Skaraya, and Y. Bayram, “Retrospectİve Comparison Of Talon Or Conventional Locking Nailing For Tibial Shaft Fractures”, Abant Med J, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 54–60, 2024, doi: 10.47493/abantmedj.1373188.
ISNAD Günaydın, Fatih et al. “Retrospectİve Comparison Of Talon Or Conventional Locking Nailing For Tibial Shaft Fractures”. Abant Medical Journal 13/2 (August 2024), 54-60. https://doi.org/10.47493/abantmedj.1373188.
JAMA Günaydın F, Kılınç Ö, Skaraya B, Bayram Y. Retrospectİve Comparison Of Talon Or Conventional Locking Nailing For Tibial Shaft Fractures. Abant Med J. 2024;13:54–60.
MLA Günaydın, Fatih et al. “Retrospectİve Comparison Of Talon Or Conventional Locking Nailing For Tibial Shaft Fractures”. Abant Medical Journal, vol. 13, no. 2, 2024, pp. 54-60, doi:10.47493/abantmedj.1373188.
Vancouver Günaydın F, Kılınç Ö, Skaraya B, Bayram Y. Retrospectİve Comparison Of Talon Or Conventional Locking Nailing For Tibial Shaft Fractures. Abant Med J. 2024;13(2):54-60.