Sağ Kanat Yetkeciliğinin Adil Dünya İnancı ve Toplumsal Önceliklerle İlişkisi

Abstract

Bu çalışmanın temel amacı, Türkiye bağlamında, üniversite mezunu ağırlıklı yetişkin örneklemde sağ kanat yetkeciliği (SKY) ile adil dünya inancı (ADİ) arasındaki ilişkilerin incelenmesidir. Çalışmada katılımcıların SKY düzeyleri ile sosyodemografik özellikleri ve çeşitli toplumsal alanlara atfettikleri önem düzeyleri arasındaki ilişkiler de değerlendirilmiştir. Araştırma, ilişkisel tarama modelinde tasarlanmış nicel bir çalışma olup, 100 üniversite mezunu ve 32 üniversite öğrencisinden oluşan toplam 132 katılımcıdan çevrimiçi anket yöntemiyle, kolayda örnekleme yoluyla toplanan veriler üzerinden yürütülmüştür. Örneklemin yaş dağılımı orta-ileri yetişkinlere kaymaktadır (Ort.=50,37; %62,9’u 50 yaş üstü); bu nedenle bulguların yaş/kuşak (kohort) kompozisyonuna duyarlı olabileceği ve genç örneklemlere genellenirken temkinli olunması gerektiği not edilmelidir. Bulgular, SKY puanları ile hem kişisel hem de genel adil dünya inancı puanları arasında pozitif yönlü ilişkiler bulunduğunu göstermektedir. Bunun yanı sıra, SKY düzeyi arttıkça eğitim ile haklar ve özgürlükler alanlarına atfedilen önemin azaldığı saptanmıştır. Bulgular, SKY ile ADİ arasındaki ilişkilerin psikolojik ve sosyo-bilişsel süreçler bağlamında ele alınabileceğine işaret etmektedir.

Keywords

• Sağ Kanat Yetkeciliği
• Adil Dünya İnancı
• Sosyal Öncelikler
• Yetkecilik

The Relationship Between Right Wing Authoritarianism, Belief In A Just World And Social Priorities

Abstract

The main objective of this study is to examine the relationships between right-wing authoritarianism (RWA) and belief in a just world (BJW) in a sample of adults, predominantly university graduates, within the context of Turkey. The study also evaluates the relationships between participants' levels of RWA and their sociodemographic characteristics, and the importance they attribute to various social areas. This research is a quantitative study designed using a correlational survey model, and data was collected from a total of 132 participants (100 university graduates and 32 university students) via an online survey using convenience sampling. The age distribution of the sample is shifting towards middle-aged to older adults (Mean = 50.37; 62.9% are over 50); therefore, it should be noted that the findings may be sensitive to age/generation (cohort) composition and caution should be exercised when generalizing to younger samples. The findings show a positive correlation between RWA scores and both personal and overall BJW scores. Furthermore, it was found that as the level of RWA increases, the importance attributed to education and rights and freedoms decreases. These findings suggest that the relationships between RWA and BJW can be examined within the context of psychological and socio-cognitive processes.

Keywords

• Right Wing Authoritarianism
• Belief in a Just World
• Social Priorities

References

1. Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, J. D., ve Sanford, N. D. (1950). The authoritarian personality. The Norton Library.
2. Altemeyer, B. (1996). The authoritarian specter. Harvard University Press.
3. Altemeyer, B. (2004). Highly dominating, highly authoritarian personalities. The Journal of Social Psychology, 144(4), 421-448, https://doi.org/10.3200/SOCP.144.4.421-448
4. Altemeyer, B. (2006). The authoritarians. University of Manitoba, Canada. Erişim: https://theauthoritarians.org/options-for-getting-the-book/
5. Aydoğan, E. (2021). Kişilik, kültür, sağ kanat yetkeciliği, siyasal ideoloji ve adil dünya inancı arasındaki ilişkiler [Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi]. İstanbul Arel Üniversitesi.
6. Brandt, M. J., ve Henry, P. J. (2012). Gender inequality and gender differences in authoritarianism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(10), 1301–1315. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167212449871
7. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
8. Dalbert, C. (1999). The world is more just for me than generally: about the personal belief in a just world scale's validity. Social Justice Research 12, 79–98. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022091609047

9. Duckitt, J. (2001). A dual-process cognitive-motivational theory of ideology and prejudice. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 33, pp. 41–113). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(01)80004-6
10. Duckitt, J., ve Sibley, C. G. (2009). A dual-process motivational model of ideology, politics, and prejudice. Psychological Inquiry 20(2-3), 98–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/10478400903028540
11. Duckitt, J., ve Sibley, C. G. (2010). Personality, ideology, prejudice, and politics: A dual-process motivational model. Journal of Personality, 78(6), 1861-1894. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00672.x
12. Duriez, B., Soenens, B., ve Vansteenkiste, M. (2008). The intergenerational transmission of authoritarianism: The mediating role of parental goal promotion. Journal of Research in Personality, 42(3), 622–642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2007.08.007
13. Göregenli, M. (2003). Şiddet, kötü muamele ve işkenceye ilişkin değerlendirmeler, tutumlar ve deneyimler. İşkencenin Önlenmesinde Hukukçuların Rolü Projesi Raporu. İzmir.
14. Güldü, Ö. (2011). Sağ kanat yetkeciliği ölçeği: Uyarlama çalışması. A.Ü. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 2(2), 27-51. https://doi.org/10.1501/sbeder_0000000033
15. Gürşimşek, I., ve Göregenli, M. (2006). Humanistic attitudes, values, system justification, and control beliefs in a Turkish sample. Social Behavior and Personality, 34(7), 747–758. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2006.34.7.747
16. Hafer, C. L., ve Bègue, L. (2005). Experimental research on just-world theory: Problems, developments, and future challenges. Psychological Bulletin, 131(1), 128–167. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.131.1.128
17. Heydari, A., Teymoori, A., ve Haghish, E. F. (2013). Socioeconomic status, perceived parental control, and authoritarianism: Development of authoritarianism in Iranian society. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 16(4), 237–247. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12027
18. Jost, J. T., ve Banaji, M. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1994.tb01008.x
19. Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., ve Sulloway, F. J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129(3), 339–375. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339
20. Jost, J. T., Banaji, M. R., ve Nosek, B. A. (2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25(6), 881– 919. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00402.x
21. Jost, J. T., ve Hunyady, O. (2005). Antecedents and consequences of system-justifying ideologies. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(5), 260–265. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00377.x
22. Kelemen, L., Szabó, Z. P., Mészáros, N. Z., Forgas, J. P., ve László, J. (2014). Social cognition and democracy: The relationship between system justification, just world beliefs, authoritarianism, need for closure, and need for cognition in Hungary. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 2(1), 197–219. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v2i1.208
23. Lambert, A. J., Burroughs, T., ve Nguyen, T. (1999). Perceptions of risk and the buffering hypothesis: The role of just world beliefs and right-wing authoritarianism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(6), 643–656. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167299025006001
24. Lerner, M. J. (1997). What does the belief in a just world protect us from: The dread of death or the fear of understanding suffering? Psychological Inquiry: An International Journal for the Advancement of Psychological Theory, 8 (1), 29-32. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli0801_5 Lundskow, G., Phillips, B., ve Curtiss, P. (2019). Gender and right-wing authoritarianism in a working- class case-study. Journal of Public Governance, 48(2), 16–25. https://doi.org/10.15678/ZP.2019.48.2.02
25. Manzi, C., Roccato, M., Paderi, F., Vitrotti, S., ve Russo, S. (2017). The social development of right-wing authoritarianism: The interaction between parental autonomy support and societal threat to safety. Personality and Individual Differences, 109, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.12.032
26. Minibaş-Poussard, J., ve Bastounis, M. (2002). Do just world beliefs support the status quo? Representations of the state, the citizen and poverty in Paris, Athens and Istanbul [Konferans bildirisi]. International Association for Research in Economic Psychology XXVII Annual Colloquium. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/314245785_Do_just_world_beliefs_support_the_status_quo_Representations_of_the_State_the_Citizen_and_Poverty_in_Paris_Athens_and_Istanbul
27. Montada, L., ve Lerner M. J. (1998). Responses to victimizations and belief in a just world. Springer.
28. Peterson, B. E., Duncan, L. E., ve Wentworth, P. A. (1999). Authoritarianism of parents and offspring: Intergenerational politics and adjustment to college. Journal of Research in Personality, 33(4), 494– 513. https://doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.1999.2260
29. Sakallı-Uğurlu, N., Yalçın, Z. S., ve Glick, P. (2007). Ambivalent sexism, belief in a just world, and empathy as predictors of Turkish students’ attitudes toward rape victims. Sex Roles, 57(11–12), 889–895. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9313-2
30. Tomczak, M. ve Tomczak-Łukaszewska, E. (2014). The need to report effect size estimates revisited: An overview of some recommended measures of effect size. Trends in Sports Sciences, 21, 19-25.
31. Zubielevitch, E., Osborne, D., Milojev, P., ve Sibley, C. G. (2023). Social dominance orientation and right-wing authoritarianism across the adult lifespan: An examination of aging and cohort effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 124(3), 544–566. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000400