REPRESENTATION OF THE ADMINISTRATION AT JUDICIAL AUTHORITIES AND RESPONSIBILITY OF THE REPRESENTATIVES

Number: 3 May 1, 2016
Yrd. Doç. Dr. Mehmet Karaarslan
EN TR

REPRESENTATION OF THE ADMINISTRATION AT JUDICIAL AUTHORITIES AND RESPONSIBILITY OF THE REPRESENTATIVES

Abstract

Public authority and institutions hold the capacity of the concerned party in any legal and administrative cases relevant to their own business and procedures before arbitration and enforcement offices. In such cases the authorities are represented by their legal affairs managers, legal counsels, law procedures managers, attorneys and department heads in the capacity of their proxy. The Legislative Decree with no 659 which regulates this issue does not cover all public authority and institutions, due to various legal states that changes between the authorities for such representatives consequently cause different salary and personal benefits to prevail in practice. Therefore, a general employee law which covers all public authority and institutions and regulates the establishment and structure of legal departments, and all rights and liabilities of the representatives working in such departments from the start of their career in this profession until their retirement. In this study current legal status, representatives; legal, penal and disciplinary responsibilities of representatives are reviewed.

Keywords

Representation of the administration, attorneys of the administration, responsibilities of the representatives, attorney, legal counsel

References

  1. No references found
APA
Karaarslan, Y. D. D. M. (2016). İdare’nin Yargısal Mercilerde Temsili ve Temsilcilerin Sorumluluğu. Ankara Barosu Dergisi, 3, 419-465. https://izlik.org/JA72DJ97FH
AMA
1.Karaarslan YDDM. İdare’nin Yargısal Mercilerde Temsili ve Temsilcilerin Sorumluluğu. JABA. 2016;(3):419-465. https://izlik.org/JA72DJ97FH
Chicago
Karaarslan, Yrd. Doç. Dr. Mehmet. 2016. “İdare’nin Yargısal Mercilerde Temsili Ve Temsilcilerin Sorumluluğu”. Ankara Barosu Dergisi, nos. 3: 419-65. https://izlik.org/JA72DJ97FH.
EndNote
Karaarslan YDDM (May 1, 2016) İdare’nin Yargısal Mercilerde Temsili ve Temsilcilerin Sorumluluğu. Ankara Barosu Dergisi 3 419–465.
IEEE
[1]Y. D. D. M. Karaarslan, “İdare’nin Yargısal Mercilerde Temsili ve Temsilcilerin Sorumluluğu”, JABA, no. 3, pp. 419–465, May 2016, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA72DJ97FH
ISNAD
Karaarslan, Yrd. Doç. Dr. Mehmet. “İdare’nin Yargısal Mercilerde Temsili Ve Temsilcilerin Sorumluluğu”. Ankara Barosu Dergisi. 3 (May 1, 2016): 419-465. https://izlik.org/JA72DJ97FH.
JAMA
1.Karaarslan YDDM. İdare’nin Yargısal Mercilerde Temsili ve Temsilcilerin Sorumluluğu. JABA. 2016;:419–465.
MLA
Karaarslan, Yrd. Doç. Dr. Mehmet. “İdare’nin Yargısal Mercilerde Temsili Ve Temsilcilerin Sorumluluğu”. Ankara Barosu Dergisi, no. 3, May 2016, pp. 419-65, https://izlik.org/JA72DJ97FH.
Vancouver
1.Yrd. Doç. Dr. Mehmet Karaarslan. İdare’nin Yargısal Mercilerde Temsili ve Temsilcilerin Sorumluluğu. JABA [Internet]. 2016 May 1;(3):419-65. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA72DJ97FH