A Short Political History of the Legal Profession in Turkey

Abstract

This paper aims to offer a brief historical account of legislative and professional developments concerning the Turkish legal profession within the larger socio-political against a backdrop of political struggles. The original ideological alliance between the profession and the Republic has been a key determinant of the profession’s positions with respect to social and political issues, especially in the early decades of the new state. The relationship, however, has always been influenced by the changing national and international political context. Whereas the profession seemed content to subordinate itself to the executive until the 1950s, the transition to a multi-party system intensified political polarisation, generating controversies about the profession’s relationship with the State. In the following decades, the global leftward movement encouraged many lawyers to actively challenge illegalities. The increasing authoritarianism and widening social and political cleavages of 1980s and 1990s, by contrast, led to a resurgence of the Kemalist constituency within professional associations. In recent years, efforts by the Government to assert absolute control over the state apparatus have provoked the profession to assume even more visibility as a political actor. 

Keywords

• Legal profession,law and modernization,law and politics,legal reform

References

1. Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi. http://www.law.ankara.edu.tr/tarihce/. [Accessed 5 November 2017].
2. Elveriş, İ. 2014. Barolar ve siyaset. Istanbul: Istanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları.
3. Erozan, H. B. 2005. Producing obedience: Law professors and the Turkish state. Ph.D. thesis, University of Minnesota.
4. Hürriyet. 2014. Adli yıl açılış töreni kalktı. [online] [Accessed 8 Nov. 2017]. Available from: http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/adli-yil-acilis-toreni-kalkti-27566137
5. İnanıcı, H. 2008. 21. yüzyılda avukatlık ve baro. Istanbul: Legal Yayınevi.
6. Kalem, S. 2010. Contested meanings-imagined practices: Law at the intersection of mediation and legal profession; A socio-legal study of the juridical field in Turkey. Ph.D. thesis, The New School for Social Research.
7. Karabulut, U. 2013. Muhâmât Kanunu: Türkiye’de avukatlık kurumunun düzenlenmesi ve Istanbul Barosunda yaşanan tasfiyeler. Çağdaş Türkiye Tarihi Araştırmaları Dergisi XIII (27), pp. 79 – 104.
8. Öngün, E. and Hassan, M. 2013. How political dynamics work in professional organizations: The radical left and the Istanbul Bar Association. In: Massicard, É. and Watts, N. F. ed(s). Negotiating political power in Turkey: Breaking up the party. NY: Routledge, pp. 140 – 156.

9. Özbudun, E. 2012. Turkey’s search for a new constitution. Insight Turkey 14 (1), pp. 39 – 50
10. Özkent, A.H. 1940. Avukatın kitabı. İstanbul: Arkadaş Basımevi.
11. Özman, A. 1995. The state and bar associations in Turkey: A study in interest-group politics. Ph.D. thesis, Bilkent University.
12. —— 2000/2001. Hukuk, siyaset, ideoloji ekseninde hukukçu kimliğinin yeniden tanımlanması: Erken cumhuriyet dönemi üzerine bir inceleme. Toplum ve Bilim 87 pp. 164 – 176.
13. Silverman, R. 2017. Who’s left: Filiz Kerestecioğlu and the struggle for rights in Turkey. 22 February. Reuben Silverman. [Online]. [Accessed 7 November 2017]. Available from: https://reubensilverman.wordpress.com/2017/02/22/whos-left-filiz-kerestecioglu-and-the-struggle-for-rights-in-turkey/#_ednref48
14. Söğütlü, İ. 2004. Darülfünun’dan üniversite’ye: Cumhuriyet Türkiyesi’nde ilk üniversite reformu (1933). Liberal Düşünce (34), pp. 121 – 128.
15. Toprak, M. 2014. Geçmişten günümüze avukatlık kanunları. Ankara: TBB yayınları.