Research Article

Comparison of Belt and Suspender’s Technique with simple double-row rotator cuff repair in patients with chronic rotator cuff tear

Volume: 3 Number: 3 November 30, 2018
TR EN

Comparison of Belt and Suspender’s Technique with simple double-row rotator cuff repair in patients with chronic rotator cuff tear

Abstract

Aim: Surgical treatment of chronic rotator cuff tears is still unclear. Many surgical techniques have been used in the treatment. The aim of the study is to compare the functional outcomes of two different surgical techniques.

Methods: Of the 27 patients in the study; 13 underwent Belt and Suspender's Technique (2 male, 11 female), 14 underwent simple double row rotator cuff repair technique (4 male, 10 female). Clinical assessment was made according to American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scoring system and Visual Analog Scale (VAS).

Results: There was no statistically significant difference between postoperative ASES scores, VAS scores, range of motions (ROM) and complications. In both groups, failure of healing was seen in one each patient.

Conclusion: According to this study treatment for chronic rotator cuff tear using a Belt and Suspender's technique is as effective and reliable as simple double row cuff repair technique method with low complication rates and good results can be achieved in clinical outcomes in the early postoperative period.

Keywords

References

  1. 1. Klein J, Whitsell B, Artemiadis PK, Buneo CA. Perception of Arm Position in Three-Dimensional Space. Front Hum Neurosci. 2018;12:331.
  2. 2. Ban I, Troelsen A, Christiansen DH, Svendsen SW, Kristensen MT. Standardised test protocol (Constant Score) for evaluation of functionality in patients with shoulder disorder. Dan Med J. 2013;60:A4608.
  3. 3. Randelli P, Cucchi D, Ragone V, de Girolamo L, Cabitza P, Randelli M. History of rotator cuff surgery. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015;23:344-62.
  4. 4. Randelli P, Bak K, Milano G. State of the art in rotator cuff repair. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015;23:341.
  5. 5. Lerner M, Turkmen I, Bernd L. Formation of a physiological reverse shoulder joint. BMJ Case Rep. 2016 Jan 20;2016. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2015-213795.
  6. 6. Constant CR, Murley AH. A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1987:214:160-4.
  7. 7. Beauthier V, Sanghavi S, Roulot E, Hardy P. Humeral head osteonecrosis following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010;18:1432-4.
  8. 8. Tsiouri C, Mok DH. Early pullout of lateral row knotless anchor in rotator cuff repair. Int J Shoulder Surg. 2009;3:63-5. 9. Yamakado K, Katsuo S, Mizuno K, Arakawa H, Hayashi S. Medial Rotator Cuff Failure After Arthroscopic Double-Row Rotator Cuff Repair Arthroscopy. 2010;26:430-5. 10. Kim KC1, Shin HD, Cha SM, Lee WY. Comparison of Repair Integrity and Functional Outcomes for 3 Arthroscopic Suture Bridge Rotator Cuff Repair Techniques Am J Sports Med. 2013;41:271-7.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Surgery

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

November 30, 2018

Submission Date

September 13, 2018

Acceptance Date

October 15, 2018

Published in Issue

Year 2018 Volume: 3 Number: 3

APA
Türkmen, İ. (2018). Comparison of Belt and Suspender’s Technique with simple double-row rotator cuff repair in patients with chronic rotator cuff tear. Archives of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, 3(3), 114-117. https://doi.org/10.25000/acem.459636
AMA
1.Türkmen İ. Comparison of Belt and Suspender’s Technique with simple double-row rotator cuff repair in patients with chronic rotator cuff tear. Arch Clin Exp Med. 2018;3(3):114-117. doi:10.25000/acem.459636
Chicago
Türkmen, İsmail. 2018. “Comparison of Belt and Suspender’s Technique With Simple Double-Row Rotator Cuff Repair in Patients With Chronic Rotator Cuff Tear”. Archives of Clinical and Experimental Medicine 3 (3): 114-17. https://doi.org/10.25000/acem.459636.
EndNote
Türkmen İ (November 1, 2018) Comparison of Belt and Suspender’s Technique with simple double-row rotator cuff repair in patients with chronic rotator cuff tear. Archives of Clinical and Experimental Medicine 3 3 114–117.
IEEE
[1]İ. Türkmen, “Comparison of Belt and Suspender’s Technique with simple double-row rotator cuff repair in patients with chronic rotator cuff tear”, Arch Clin Exp Med, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 114–117, Nov. 2018, doi: 10.25000/acem.459636.
ISNAD
Türkmen, İsmail. “Comparison of Belt and Suspender’s Technique With Simple Double-Row Rotator Cuff Repair in Patients With Chronic Rotator Cuff Tear”. Archives of Clinical and Experimental Medicine 3/3 (November 1, 2018): 114-117. https://doi.org/10.25000/acem.459636.
JAMA
1.Türkmen İ. Comparison of Belt and Suspender’s Technique with simple double-row rotator cuff repair in patients with chronic rotator cuff tear. Arch Clin Exp Med. 2018;3:114–117.
MLA
Türkmen, İsmail. “Comparison of Belt and Suspender’s Technique With Simple Double-Row Rotator Cuff Repair in Patients With Chronic Rotator Cuff Tear”. Archives of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, vol. 3, no. 3, Nov. 2018, pp. 114-7, doi:10.25000/acem.459636.
Vancouver
1.İsmail Türkmen. Comparison of Belt and Suspender’s Technique with simple double-row rotator cuff repair in patients with chronic rotator cuff tear. Arch Clin Exp Med. 2018 Nov. 1;3(3):114-7. doi:10.25000/acem.459636