Comparison of Belt and Suspender’s Technique with simple double-row rotator cuff repair in patients with chronic rotator cuff tear
Öz
Aim: Surgical treatment of chronic rotator cuff tears is still unclear. Many surgical techniques have been used in the treatment. The aim of the study is to compare the functional outcomes of two different surgical techniques.
Methods: Of the 27 patients in the study; 13 underwent Belt and Suspender's Technique (2 male, 11 female), 14 underwent simple double row rotator cuff repair technique (4 male, 10 female). Clinical assessment was made according to American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scoring system and Visual Analog Scale (VAS).
Results: There was no statistically significant difference between postoperative ASES scores, VAS scores, range of motions (ROM) and complications. In both groups, failure of healing was seen in one each patient.
Conclusion: According to this study treatment for chronic rotator cuff tear using a Belt and Suspender's technique is as effective and reliable as simple double row cuff repair technique method with low complication rates and good results can be achieved in clinical outcomes in the early postoperative period.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kaynakça
- 1. Klein J, Whitsell B, Artemiadis PK, Buneo CA. Perception of Arm Position in Three-Dimensional Space. Front Hum Neurosci. 2018;12:331.
- 2. Ban I, Troelsen A, Christiansen DH, Svendsen SW, Kristensen MT. Standardised test protocol (Constant Score) for evaluation of functionality in patients with shoulder disorder. Dan Med J. 2013;60:A4608.
- 3. Randelli P, Cucchi D, Ragone V, de Girolamo L, Cabitza P, Randelli M. History of rotator cuff surgery. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015;23:344-62.
- 4. Randelli P, Bak K, Milano G. State of the art in rotator cuff repair. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015;23:341.
- 5. Lerner M, Turkmen I, Bernd L. Formation of a physiological reverse shoulder joint. BMJ Case Rep. 2016 Jan 20;2016. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2015-213795.
- 6. Constant CR, Murley AH. A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1987:214:160-4.
- 7. Beauthier V, Sanghavi S, Roulot E, Hardy P. Humeral head osteonecrosis following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010;18:1432-4.
- 8. Tsiouri C, Mok DH. Early pullout of lateral row knotless anchor in rotator cuff repair. Int J Shoulder Surg. 2009;3:63-5. 9. Yamakado K, Katsuo S, Mizuno K, Arakawa H, Hayashi S. Medial Rotator Cuff Failure After Arthroscopic Double-Row Rotator Cuff Repair Arthroscopy. 2010;26:430-5. 10. Kim KC1, Shin HD, Cha SM, Lee WY. Comparison of Repair Integrity and Functional Outcomes for 3 Arthroscopic Suture Bridge Rotator Cuff Repair Techniques Am J Sports Med. 2013;41:271-7.
Ayrıntılar
Birincil Dil
İngilizce
Konular
Cerrahi
Bölüm
Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar
İsmail Türkmen
*
0000-0001-7594-1989
Türkiye
Yayımlanma Tarihi
30 Kasım 2018
Gönderilme Tarihi
13 Eylül 2018
Kabul Tarihi
15 Ekim 2018
Yayımlandığı Sayı
Yıl 2018 Cilt: 3 Sayı: 3