Efficacy of Genetic Sonogram For Predicting Aneuploidy In a High-Risk Pregnancy Population
Abstract
Keywords
References
- 1. ACOG Committee Opinion: Down Syndrome Screening. Publication No. 141, 1994, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Washington, DC.
- 2. Lynch L, Berkowitz RL: Amniocentesis, Skin Biopsy, Umblical Cord Blood Sampling in the Prenatal Diagnosis of Genetic Disorders. in Reece EA, Hobbins JC, Mahoney MJ. (eds): Medicine of the Fetus and Mother. Philadelphia. JB. Lippincott, 1992 , pp 641-652
- 3. Scott F, Peters H, Boogert T et al. The loss rates for invasive prenatal testing in a specialised obstetric ultrasound practice. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2002; 42: 55-8.
- 4. Nyberg DA, Souter VL. Sonographic markers of fetal aneuploidy. Clin Perinatol 2000; 27: 761-89.
- 5. Vintzileos AM, Egan JF. Adjusting the risk for trisomy 21 on the basis of second trimester ultrasonography. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1995; 172: 837-844.
- 6.American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 88, December 2007. Invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy. Obstet Gynecol 2007;110: 1459–67.
- 7. Benacerraf BR, Neuberg D, Bromley B, Frigoletto FD Jr. Sonographic scoring index for prenatal detection of chromosomal abnormalities. J Ultrasound Med 1992; 11: 449-58.
- 8. Odibo AO, Sehdev HM, Gerkowicz S, Stamilio DM, Macones GA.. Comparison of the efficiency of second-trimester nasal bone hypoplasia and increased nuchal fold in Down syndrome screening. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;199:281.e1–5.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Surgery
Journal Section
Research Article
Authors
Fama Toker
Türkiye
Bulat Aytek Şık
*
0000-0002-4165-9405
Türkiye
Yılda Arzu Aba
0000-0001-6660-4964
Türkiye
Publication Date
August 31, 2020
Submission Date
March 19, 2020
Acceptance Date
August 17, 2020
Published in Issue
Year 2020 Volume: 5 Number: 2