Research Article

Efficacy of Genetic Sonogram For Predicting Aneuploidy In a High-Risk Pregnancy Population

Volume: 5 Number: 2 August 31, 2020
EN

Efficacy of Genetic Sonogram For Predicting Aneuploidy In a High-Risk Pregnancy Population

Abstract

AİM: This study evaluates the efficacy of genetic sonogram for predicting aneuploidy in high-risk pregnancies. METHODS: This retrospective study included 1363 pregnant women who underwent a second trimester genetic sonogram due to high-risk pregnancy. Sensitivity, specificity, odds ratio, (+) and (-) likelihood ratios were calculated for each of the ultrasonography markers. RESULTS: Among the high-risk pregnancy study population, there was no significant difference regarding advanced maternal age, presence of a relative with Down Syndrome, history of anomaly in the previous pregnancy, hyperechogenic bowels, pyelectasis, nuchal fold thickness > 5 mm, ventriculomegaly, choroid plexus cyst, single umbilical artery, or presence of right echogenic intracardiac focus between the control and aneuploidy groups (p>0.05). Tricuspid regurgitation, hypoplasia/absence of nasal bone, short femur, short humerus and left echogenic intracardiac focus were associated with increased risk of aneuploidy (p<0.05). The risk of aneuploidy was increased by 14.45 fold (95% CI 2.90-71.85) in cases with tricuspid regurgitation, 18.01 (5.46-59.32) fold by hypoplasia/absence of nasal bone, 9.74 (3.70-25.65) fold by presence of short femur, 11.42 (4.30-30.30) fold by presence of short humerus, and 4.20 (1.39-12.64) fold with the presence of left echogenic intracardiac focus. Analysis of combined markers showed that hypoplasia/absence of nasal bone + short humerus + tricuspid regurgitation resulted in the highest risk (OR = 11.20, LHR = 7.53). CONCLUSION: İn some countries, where NIPT are not thoroughly diffused,Genetic sonography is recommended for Down syndrome risk modification in high-risk pregnancies.

Keywords

References

  1. 1. ACOG Committee Opinion: Down Syndrome Screening. Publication No. 141, 1994, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Washington, DC.
  2. 2. Lynch L, Berkowitz RL: Amniocentesis, Skin Biopsy, Umblical Cord Blood Sampling in the Prenatal Diagnosis of Genetic Disorders. in Reece EA, Hobbins JC, Mahoney MJ. (eds): Medicine of the Fetus and Mother. Philadelphia. JB. Lippincott, 1992 , pp 641-652
  3. 3. Scott F, Peters H, Boogert T et al. The loss rates for invasive prenatal testing in a specialised obstetric ultrasound practice. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2002; 42: 55-8.
  4. 4. Nyberg DA, Souter VL. Sonographic markers of fetal aneuploidy. Clin Perinatol 2000; 27: 761-89.
  5. 5. Vintzileos AM, Egan JF. Adjusting the risk for trisomy 21 on the basis of second trimester ultrasonography. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1995; 172: 837-844.
  6. 6.American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 88, December 2007. Invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy. Obstet Gynecol 2007;110: 1459–67.
  7. 7. Benacerraf BR, Neuberg D, Bromley B, Frigoletto FD Jr. Sonographic scoring index for prenatal detection of chromosomal abnormalities. J Ultrasound Med 1992; 11: 449-58.
  8. 8. Odibo AO, Sehdev HM, Gerkowicz S, Stamilio DM, Macones GA.. Comparison of the efficiency of second-trimester nasal bone hypoplasia and increased nuchal fold in Down syndrome screening. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;199:281.e1–5.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Surgery

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

August 31, 2020

Submission Date

March 19, 2020

Acceptance Date

August 17, 2020

Published in Issue

Year 2020 Volume: 5 Number: 2

Vancouver
1.Fama Toker, Bulat Aytek Şık, Yılda Arzu Aba. Efficacy of Genetic Sonogram For Predicting Aneuploidy In a High-Risk Pregnancy Population. Arch Clin Exp Med. 2020 Aug. 1;5(2):69-74. doi:10.25000/acem.706112