Araştırma Makalesi

Efficacy of Genetic Sonogram For Predicting Aneuploidy In a High-Risk Pregnancy Population

Cilt: 5 Sayı: 2 31 Ağustos 2020
PDF İndir
EN

Efficacy of Genetic Sonogram For Predicting Aneuploidy In a High-Risk Pregnancy Population

Abstract

AİM: This study evaluates the efficacy of genetic sonogram for predicting aneuploidy in high-risk pregnancies. METHODS: This retrospective study included 1363 pregnant women who underwent a second trimester genetic sonogram due to high-risk pregnancy. Sensitivity, specificity, odds ratio, (+) and (-) likelihood ratios were calculated for each of the ultrasonography markers. RESULTS: Among the high-risk pregnancy study population, there was no significant difference regarding advanced maternal age, presence of a relative with Down Syndrome, history of anomaly in the previous pregnancy, hyperechogenic bowels, pyelectasis, nuchal fold thickness > 5 mm, ventriculomegaly, choroid plexus cyst, single umbilical artery, or presence of right echogenic intracardiac focus between the control and aneuploidy groups (p>0.05). Tricuspid regurgitation, hypoplasia/absence of nasal bone, short femur, short humerus and left echogenic intracardiac focus were associated with increased risk of aneuploidy (p<0.05). The risk of aneuploidy was increased by 14.45 fold (95% CI 2.90-71.85) in cases with tricuspid regurgitation, 18.01 (5.46-59.32) fold by hypoplasia/absence of nasal bone, 9.74 (3.70-25.65) fold by presence of short femur, 11.42 (4.30-30.30) fold by presence of short humerus, and 4.20 (1.39-12.64) fold with the presence of left echogenic intracardiac focus. Analysis of combined markers showed that hypoplasia/absence of nasal bone + short humerus + tricuspid regurgitation resulted in the highest risk (OR = 11.20, LHR = 7.53). CONCLUSION: İn some countries, where NIPT are not thoroughly diffused,Genetic sonography is recommended for Down syndrome risk modification in high-risk pregnancies.

Keywords

Kaynakça

  1. 1. ACOG Committee Opinion: Down Syndrome Screening. Publication No. 141, 1994, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Washington, DC.
  2. 2. Lynch L, Berkowitz RL: Amniocentesis, Skin Biopsy, Umblical Cord Blood Sampling in the Prenatal Diagnosis of Genetic Disorders. in Reece EA, Hobbins JC, Mahoney MJ. (eds): Medicine of the Fetus and Mother. Philadelphia. JB. Lippincott, 1992 , pp 641-652
  3. 3. Scott F, Peters H, Boogert T et al. The loss rates for invasive prenatal testing in a specialised obstetric ultrasound practice. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2002; 42: 55-8.
  4. 4. Nyberg DA, Souter VL. Sonographic markers of fetal aneuploidy. Clin Perinatol 2000; 27: 761-89.
  5. 5. Vintzileos AM, Egan JF. Adjusting the risk for trisomy 21 on the basis of second trimester ultrasonography. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1995; 172: 837-844.
  6. 6.American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 88, December 2007. Invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy. Obstet Gynecol 2007;110: 1459–67.
  7. 7. Benacerraf BR, Neuberg D, Bromley B, Frigoletto FD Jr. Sonographic scoring index for prenatal detection of chromosomal abnormalities. J Ultrasound Med 1992; 11: 449-58.
  8. 8. Odibo AO, Sehdev HM, Gerkowicz S, Stamilio DM, Macones GA.. Comparison of the efficiency of second-trimester nasal bone hypoplasia and increased nuchal fold in Down syndrome screening. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;199:281.e1–5.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Cerrahi

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yayımlanma Tarihi

31 Ağustos 2020

Gönderilme Tarihi

19 Mart 2020

Kabul Tarihi

17 Ağustos 2020

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2020 Cilt: 5 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

Vancouver
1.Fama Toker, Bulat Aytek Şık, Yılda Arzu Aba. Efficacy of Genetic Sonogram For Predicting Aneuploidy In a High-Risk Pregnancy Population. Arch Clin Exp Med. 01 Ağustos 2020;5(2):69-74. doi:10.25000/acem.706112