An Investigation into the Impact of Influencers Producing Technological Content on Instagram on Customers’ Purchasing Decisions

Abstract

Nowadays, social media influencers play a significant role in the world of marketing. Social media influencers reach large audiences by producing content on social media platforms, and they exert considerable impact on these audiences. The literature suggests that social media users form parasocial relationships, and these relationships develop based on the influencer’s characteristics, such as attractiveness, expertise, credibility, and similarity. It has also been proven in various studies that social media influencers have a strong effect on increasing the purchasing intentions of their followers. In this study, the effects of social media influencers on parasocial relationships and the purchasing intentions of their followers were examined. The research was conducted among Instagram users in Turkey, and the data were collected using a survey method. The survey included statements aimed at measuring elements such as parasocial relationships, attractiveness, expertise, credibility, and similarity. Because of the data analysis, it was found that characteristics such as influencers’ attractiveness and expertise strengthen parasocial relationships, and these relationships positively influence followers’ purchasing intentions. Additionally, the perception of fairness also had a significant impact on these relationships. These findings suggest that social media influencers can be an effective tool in marketing strategies.

Keywords

• Social Media Influencers
• Purchase Intention
• Social Media Communication

References

1. Akdeniz, P. C., & Uyar, K. (2021). Tüketicilerin satın alma niyetlerinde sosyal medya fenomenleri ile kurulan parasosyal etkileşimin rolü. Erciyes Akademi, 35(4), 1669-1688. google scholar
2. Aw, E. C.-X., & Chuah, S. H.-W. (2021). “Stop the unattainable ideal for an ordinary me!” This study fosters parasocial relationships with social media influencers: The role of self-discrepancy. Journal of Business Research, 132, 146-157. google scholar
3. Aytulun, G., & Sunal, A. B. (2020). Medya karakterleriyle kurulan parasosyal etkileşim. Psikiyatride Güncel Yaklaşımlar, 12(4), 494-506. google scholar
4. Bastrygina, T., & Lim, W. M. (2023). Foundations of consumer engagement with social media influencers. International Journal of Web Based Communities, 19(2-3), 222-242. google scholar
5. Batıgün, A. D., & Sunal, Y. (2017). Parasocial interaction with media characters. Current Approaches in Psychiatry, 12(4), 444-456. https:// www.cappsy.org/archives/vol12/no4/cap_12_04_05_en.pdf google scholar
6. Brislin, R. (1976). Comparative research methodology: Cross-cultural studies. International Journal of Psychology, 11(3), 215-229. google scholar
7. Brockner, J., de Cremer, D., van Dijke, M., de Schutter, L., Holtz, B., & van Hiel, A. (2021). Factors affecting supervisors’ enactment of interpersonal fairness: The interactive relationship between managers’ informational fairness and supervisors’ sense of power. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 42(6), 800-813. google scholar
8. Brown, S. (2019). Parasocial interaction and influencer marketing: Examining the influence of media personas on consumer behavior. Journal of Marketing Research, 56(4), 145-159. google scholar

9. Cabeza-Ramîrez, L. J., Sânchez-Canizares, S. M., Santos-Roldân, L. M., & Fuentes-Garcîa, F. J. (2022). Impact of the perceived risk in influencers' product recommendations on their followers' purchase attitudes and intention. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 184, 121997. google scholar
10. Casalo, L. V., Flaviân, C., & Ibânez-Sânchez, S. (2020). Influencers on Instagram: Antecedents and consequences of opinion leadership. Journal of Business Research, 117, 510-519. google scholar
11. Cash, P., Isaksson, O., Maier, A., & Summers, J. (2022). Sampling in design research: Eight key considerations. Design Studies, 78, 101077. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2021.101077 google scholar
12. Chen, Y., Lu, Y., Wang, B., & Pan, Z. (2016). Understanding self-disclosure on social networking sites: An integrated model based on social cognitive theory and the technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 53(3), 381-393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im. 2015.09.003 google scholar
13. Childers, C. C., Lemon, L. L., & Hoy, M. G. (2019). # Sponsored# Ad: Agency perspective on influencer marketing campaigns. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 40(3), 258-274. google scholar
14. Choi, W.-S., Kang, S.-W., & Choi, S. B. (2022). Creativity in the South Korean workplace: Procedural justice, abusive supervision, and competence. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(1), 500-510. google scholar
15. Chung, S., & Cho, H. (2017). Fostering parasocial relationships with celebrities on social media: Implications for celebrity endorsement. Psychology & Marketing, 34(4), 481-495. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21001 google scholar
16. Çelik, K. (2021). The effects of information, entertainment, and relationship maintaining motivations on social media use. Jomelips-Journal of Management Economics Literature Islamic and Political Sciences, 6(2), 28-45. https://doi.org/10.24013/jomelips.1020599 google scholar
17. Çelik, K., & Bora, C. (2021). Investigation of Instagram postings of hotel businesses using a content analysis method. Journal of Tourism and Gastronomy Studies, 9(4), 2813-2836. https://doi.org/10.21325/jotags.2021.921 google scholar
18. Çelik, K., & Taş, A. (2021). Investigation of factors affecting consumer behaviors before purchase: A research on Instagram shoppers. Journal of Business Research-Turk, 13(4), 3821-3834. google scholar
19. Çelik, K., Özköse, H., & Güleryüz, S. (2018). Structural equation modeling with R. Eurasian Journal of Researches in Social and Economics (EJRSE), 5(10), 38-48. google scholar
20. Dahanayake, P., Rajendran, D., Selvarajah, C., & Ballantyne, G. (2018). Justice and fairness in the workplace: A trajectory for managing diversity. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 37(5), 470-490. google scholar
21. De Veirman, M., Cauberghe, V., & Hudders, L. (2017). Marketing through Instagram influencers: The impact of number of followers and product divergence on brand attitude. International Journal of Advertising, 36(5), 798-828. google scholar
22. Delbaere, M., Michael, B., & Phillips, B. J. (2021). Social media influencers: A route to brand engagement for their followers. Psychology & Marketing, 38(1), 101-112. google scholar
23. Dhandra, T. K. (2019). Achieving triple dividend through mindfulness: More sustainable consumption, less unsustainable consumption and more life satisfaction. Ecological Economics, 161, 83-90. google scholar
24. Ecker, U. K. H., & Antonio, L. M. (2021). Can you believe it? An investigation into the impact of retraction source credibility on the continued influence effect. Memory & Cognition, 49(4), 631-644. google scholar
25. Farivar, S., Wang, F. & the Yuan, Y. (2021). Opinion leadership vs. para-social relationships: Key factors in influencer marketing. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 59, 102371. google scholar
26. Fornell C. & Larcker D.F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312. google scholar
27. Freberg, K., Graham, K., McGaughey, K. & Freberg, L. A. (2011). Who are the social media influencers? A study of public perceptions of personality. Public Relations Review, 37(1), 90-92. google scholar
28. Gil de Zûniga, H., Jung, N., & Valenzuela, S. (2018). Social media use for news and individuals' social Capital, civic engagement, and political participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17(3), 319-336. google scholar
29. Hair J.F., Black W.C., Babin B.J., & Anderson R.E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education. google scholar
30. Hernândez Soto, R., Gutierrez Ortega, M., & Rubia Avi, B. (2021). Key Factors in Knowledge-Sharing Behavior in Virtual Communities of Practice: A systematic review. Education in the Knowledge Society, 22(2), 215-227. google scholar
31. Horton, D., & Wohl, R. R. (1956). Mass communication and parasocial interaction: Observations on intimacy at a distance. Psychiatry, 19(3), 215-229. google scholar
32. Hughes, C., Swaminathan, V., & Brooks, G. (2019). Driving brand engagement through online social influencers: An empirical investigation of sponsored blogging campaigns. Journal of MarKeting, 83(5), 78-96. google scholar
33. lacobucci, D., & Duhachek, A. (2003). Advancing alpha: Measuring reliability with confidence. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13(4), 478-487. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327663jcp1304_14 google scholar
34. Ismagilova, E., Slade, E., Rana, N. P., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2020). The effect of characteristics of source credibility on consumer behavior: A meta-analysis. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 53(3), 1-9. google scholar
35. Jin, S. V., Muqaddam, A., & Ryu, E. (2019). Instafamous and social media influencer marketing. MarKeting Intelligence and Planning, 37(5), 567-579. google scholar
36. Joshi, Y., & Rahman, Z. (2019). Consumers' sustainable purchase behaviour: Modeling the impact of psychological factors. Ecological Economics, 159, 235-243. google scholar
37. Keskin, A. (2020). Parasosyal etkileşim açısından K-Pop fanlığı: Army hayran kültürü üzerinde bir inceleme. İnönü Üniversitesi İletişim FaKültesi EleKtroniK Dergisi (İNİF E-Dergi), 5(1), 25-38. google scholar
38. Keskin, S. (2020). The social anxiety scale for e-learning environments (SASE). Interactive Learning Environments, 28(7), 1-15. https:// www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10494820.2020.1769681 google scholar
39. Ki, C.-W. C., & Kim, Y.-K. (2019). The mechanism by which social media influencers persuade consumers: The role of consumers’ desire to mimic. Psychology & MarKeting, 36(10), 905-922. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21244. google scholar
40. Kim, D. Y., & Kim, H. Y. (2021). Influencer Advertising on Social Media: The Multiple Inference Model on Influencer-Product Congruence and Sponsorship Disclosure. Journal of Business Research, 130, 405-415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.02.020 google scholar
41. Kim, J., & Song, H. (2016). Celebrity’s self-disclosure on Twitter and parasocial relationships: A mediating role of social presence. Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 570-577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.083 google scholar
42. Koay, K. Y., Lim, W. M., Kaur, S., Soh, K., & Poon, W. C. (2023). How and when social media influencers' intimate self-disclosure fosters purchase intentions: the roles of congruency and parasocial relationships. MarKeting Intelligence & Planning, 41(6), 790-809. google scholar
43. Koh, J., Kim, Y. G., & Kim, Y. G. (2003). Sense of virtual community: A conceptual framework and empirical validation. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 8(2), 75-94. google scholar
44. Lee, J. E., & Watkins, B. (2016). YouTube vloggers' influence on consumer luxury brand perceptions and intentions. Journal of Business Research, 69(12), 5753-5760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.171 google scholar
45. Lee, J. E., & Watkins, B. (2016). YouTube vloggers’ influence on consumer luxury brand perceptions and intentions. Journal of Business Research, 69(12), 5753-5760. google scholar
46. Leite, F. P., & Baptista, P. d. P. (2021). The effects of social media influencers’ self-disclosure on behavioral intentions: The role of source credibility, parasocial relationships, and brand trust. Journal of MarKeting Theory and Practice, 30(3), 295-311. google scholar
47. Liu, M. T., & Brock, J. L. (2011). Selecting a female athlete endorser in China: The effect of attractiveness, match-up, and consumer gender difference. European Journal of MarKeting, 45(7), 1214-1235. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090561111137688. google scholar
48. Liu, M. T., Liu, Y., & Lin, C. P. (2019). Vlog and brand evaluations: The influence of parasocial interaction. Asia Pacific Journal of MarKeting and Logistics, 31(1), 1-17. google scholar
49. Lou, C. (2022). Social media influencers and followers: Theorization of a trans-parasocial relation and explication of its implications for influencer advertising. Journal of Advertising, 51(1), 4-21. google scholar
50. Lou, C., & Kim, H. K. (2019). Fancying the new rich and famous? Explicating the roles of influencer content, credibility, and parental mediation in adolescents’ parasocial relationships, materialism, and purchase intentions. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(2), 256-276. google scholar
51. Lueck, J. A. (2015). Friend-zone with benefits: The parasocial advertising of Kim Kardashian. Journal of MarKeting Communications, 21(2), 91-109. google scholar
52. Majewski, G., Usoro, A. & Khan, I. (2011). Knowledge sharing in immersive Virtual communities of practice. Vine, 41 (i), 41-62. google scholar
53. McQuarrie, E. F., Miller, J., & Phillips, B. J. (2013). The megaphone effect: Taste and audience in fashion blogging. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(1), 136-158. google scholar
54. Munnukka, J., Uusitalo, O., & Toivonen, H. (2016). Trustworthiness of peer endorsers and advertising effectiveness. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 33(3), 182-192. google scholar
55. NunnallyI J.C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill google scholar
56. Park, H., & Lee, J. (2021). Impact of social media influencers on consumers’ purchase intentions: The role of parasocial interaction. Computers in Human Behavior, 115, 106576. google scholar
57. Pennington, N., Hall, J. A., & Hutchinson, A. (2016). To tweet or not to tweet: Explaining fan-celebrity interaction on Twitter. Iowa Journal of Communication, 48(1), 55-75. https://scholarworks.uni.edu/ijc/vol48/iss1/7. google scholar
58. Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., Lee, J.Y., & Podsakoff N.P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88. 5.879 google scholar
59. Schiappa, E., Allen, M., & Gregg, P. B. (2007). Parasocial relationships and television: A meta-analysis of the effects. Mass Media Effects Research: Advances Through Meta-Analysis, 301-314. google scholar
60. Smith, A. (2020). Social media influencers and consumer behavior: The power of parasocial relationships. International Journal of Digital Marketing, 12(2), 120-135. google scholar
61. Usoro, A., & Majewski, G. (2011). Intensive knowledge sharing: Finnish Laurea laboratory case study. Vine, 41(1), 7-25. google scholar
62. Uwa, K. L. (2022). Organizational fairness and organizational citizenship behavior: A study of selected fast food industries in Uyo metropolis, Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria. International Journal of Business and Management Review, 10(2), 33-43. google scholar
63. Vrontis, D., Makrides, A., Christofi, M., & Thrassou, A. (2021). Social media influencer marketing: A systematic review, integrative framework and future research agenda. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 45(4), 617-644. google scholar
64. Xiang, L., Zheng, X., Lee, M. K., & Zhao, D. (2016). Exploring consumers’ impulse buying behavior on social commerce platform: The role of parasocial interaction. International Journal of Information Management, 36(3), 333-347. google scholar
65. Xiao, M., Wang, R., & Chan-Olmsted, S. (2018). Factors affecting YouTube influencer marketing credibility: A heuristic-systematic model. Journal of Media Business Studies, 15(3), 188-213. google scholar
66. Xu, X., & Pratt, S. (2018). Social media influencers as endorsers to promote travel destinations: an application of self-congruence theory to the Chinese Generation Y. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 35(7), 958-972. google scholar
67. Yuan, L., & Dennis, A. R. (2019). Acting like humans? Anthropomorphism and consumer’s willingness to pay in electronic commerce. Journal of Management Information Systems, 36(2), 450-477. google scholar
68. Yuan, S., & Lou, C. (2020). How social media influencers foster relationships with followers: Roles of source credibility and fairness in parasocial relationships and product interest. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 20(2), 133-147. https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019. 2020.1769514. google scholar
69. Zheng, X., Men, J., Xiang, L., & Yang, F. (2019). The role of technology attraction and parasocial interaction in social shopping websites. International Journal of Information Management, 51, 1-13. google scholar