Engineering Education Meets the Metaverse

Abstract

The metaverse, a collective virtual shared space created by the convergence of virtually enhanced physical reality and persistent virtual space, encompassing all virtual worlds, augmented realities, and the Internet, offers a unique platform for experiential learning and collaborative education. This study used the Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Scopus via Publish or Perish for source searching, with VOSviewer employed for bibliometric visualization. Following the PRISMA protocol, the study systematically reviewed relevant literature to address the following research questions: (1) What specific fields within engineering education incorporate Metaverse-based learning? (2) Which tools, technologies, or software platforms are employed in these practices? (3) What teaching strategies or educational frameworks are utilized in this context? (4) How do collaboration and interaction between humans and computers take place within the Metaverse? (5) What is the role of digital twins in Metaverse education? This review investigates the metaverse's role in engineering education, highlighting both its positive impacts and potential drawbacks.

Keywords

• Metaverse
• Engineering Education
• Virtual Reality
• E-Learning

References

1. Abraham, A., Suseelan, B., Mathew, J., & Sabarinath, P. (2023). A study on Metaverse in education. 2023 7th International Conference on Computing Methodologies and Communication (ICCMC), 1570-1573. https://doi.org/l0.1109/ICCMC56507.2023.1008391 google scholar
2. Ahn, S., & Heo, Y. (2023). The principles and practices of college writing education using the Metaverse. Korean Journal of General Education. https://doi.org/10.46392/kjge.2023.17.1.6 google scholar
3. Alvarez, J., Deyanira, D., Angel, M. J., & Martînez, M. (2023). Tec Virtual Campus, a metaverse for engineering learning. Conference Name (if applicable). https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUNINE57531.2023.1010285 google scholar
4. Aşıksoy, G. (2023). Empirical studies on metaverse-based education: A systematic review. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy, 13(3), 120-133. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v13i3.36227, doi:10.3991/ijep.v13i3.3622 google scholar
5. Babbar, H. (2023). Digital twin for edge computing in smart vehicular systems. https://doi.org/10.1109/InCACCT57535.2023.10141784 google scholar
6. Bradbury, L. (2022). Research on the application and risk prevention of the Metaverse in vocational education. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 41-54. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-23518-4_4, doi:10.1007/978-3-031-23518-4_ google scholar
7. Braguez, J. M., Braguez, S., Moreira, C., & Filipe, T. (2023). The possibilities of changes in learning experiences with the Metaverse. Procedia Computer Science, 219, 504-511 google scholar
8. Cali, U., Berhane, D., Hajialigol, P., Moazami, A., Gupta, S. N., Lobaccaro, G., & Papa, S. (2023). Digital twins: Shaping the future of energy systems and smart cities through cybersecurity, efficiency, and sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1109/FES57669.2023.10182868, doi: 10.1109/FES57669.2023.10182868 google scholar

9. Camilleri, M. A. (2023). Metaverse applications in education: A systematic review and a cost-benefit analysis. Interactive Technology and Smart Education. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-01-2023-0017, doi: 10.1108/ITSE-01-2023-001 google scholar
10. CeLLina, M., Ce, M., ALÎ, G., Irmici, E., CaLoro, D., Fazzini, D., OLiva, G., & Papa, S. (2023). Digital twins: The new frontier for personalized medicine? Applied Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13137940 doi:10.3390/app13137940 google scholar
11. Chang, S.-C., & Hwang, G.-J. (2018). Impacts of an augmented reaLity-based flipped Learning guiding approach on students’ scientific project performance and perceptions. Computers & Education, 125(1), 226-239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.007 DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.00 google scholar
12. Chen, S. Y., & Liu, Y. (2020). Using augmented reaLity to experiment with eLements in a chemistry course. Computers in Human Behavior, 111, 106418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106418, doi:10.1016/j.chb.2020.10641 google scholar
13. Chua, H. W., & Yu, Z. (2023). A systematic Literature review of the acceptabiLity of the use of Metaverse in education over 16 years. Journal of Computers in Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-023-00273-z, doi:10.1007/s40692-023-00273- google scholar
14. Davis, A., Murphy, J. D., Owens, D., Khazanchi, D., & Zigurs, I. (2009). Avatars, peopLe, and virtuaL worLds: Foundations for research in metaverses. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 10(2), 90 google scholar
15. Daz, T. B., KaragöLge, Z., & Ceyhun, İ. (2020). Üstün yetenekLi öğrenciLerin kimya dersine yöneLik görüşLerinin inceLenmesi: Erzurum BiLsem örneği. Atatürk Üniversitesi Kazım Karabekir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 41, 159-179 google scholar
16. De FeLice, F., PetriLLo, A., Iovine, G., SaLzano, C., & Baffo, I. (2023). How does the Metaverse shape education? A systematic Literature review. Applied Sciences, 13, 5682. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13095682 doi:10.3390/app1309568 google scholar
17. Deng, B. (2023). The impact of the Metaverse on the future deveLopment of enterprises. BCP Business & Management, 36, 151-157. https:// doi.org/10.54691/bcpbm.v36i.340 google scholar
18. Dreamson, N., & Park, G. (2023). Metaverse-based Learning through children's school space design. https://doi.org/10.1111/jade.12449doi: 10.1111/jade.12449; google scholar
19. EL-Din, W. H., EL-Shafai, W., & EL Sayed, A. T. (2023). Integrating digitaL twins with the IoT-based bLockchain: Concept, architec-ture, chaLLenges, and future scope. Wireless Personal Communications. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-023-10538-6, doi:10.1007/ s11277-023-10538-6 google scholar
20. ELfakki, A. O., Sghaier, S., & ALotaibi, A. (2023). An efficient system based on experimentaL Laboratory in 3D virtuaL environment for students with Learning disabiLities. Electronics. https://doi.org/10.3390/eLectronics12040989, doi:10.3390/eLectronics1204098 google scholar
21. Fang, Y. M. (2022). ExpLoring generic and immersive frameworks for human-computer interactions. In C. Stephanidis, M. Antona, and S. Ntoa (Eds.), HCI International 2022 Posters (VoL. 1580, pp. 116-120). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06417-3_ 8, doi:10.1007/978-3-031-06417-3_8 google scholar
22. Fernandes, F. A., & Werner, C. (2023). A scoping review of the Metaverse for software engineering education: Overview, chaLLenges, and opportunities. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments. https://doi.org/10.1162/pres_a_0037 google scholar
23. Fernandes, F. A., & Werner, C. M. L. (2022). A scoping review of the Metaverse for software engineering education: Overview, chaLLenges, and opportunities. Presence: Virtual and Augmented Reality, 31, 107-146. https://doi.org/10.1162/pres_a_0037 google scholar
24. Ferrigno, E. (2023). 3D reaL-time digitaL twin. https://doi.org/10.2118/213115-ms doi:10.2118/213115-ms google scholar
25. FLores-Castaneda, R. O., OLaya-Cotera, S., & Iparraguirre-ViLLanueva, O. (2024). Benefits of Metaverse Application in education: A sys-tematic review. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy, 14(1), 61-81. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v14i1.42421, doi:10.3991/ ijep.v14i1.4242 google scholar
26. FuLLer, A. Z., Fan, C. R., & Day, C. BarLow. (2020). DigitaL twin: EnabLing technoLogies, chaLLenges, and open research. IEEE Access, 8, 108952-108971. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2998358 google scholar
27. Gibson, J. J. (2014). The ecological approach to visual perception: Classic edition. PsychoLogy Press google scholar
28. Haux, R. (2023). Human-computer interaction. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190236557.013.4 google scholar
29. Hayes, A. (2024). Augmented ReaLity (AR): Definition, ExampLes, and Uses. Investopedia. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/a/ augmented-reaLity.asp [Updated February 4, 2024] google scholar
30. He, Q., Wang, G., Luo, L., Shi, Q., Xie, J., & Meng, X. (2017). Mapping the managerial areas of building information modeling (BIM) using scientometric analysis. International Journal of Project Management, 35(4), 670-685. https://doi.Org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.08. 001, doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.08.00 google scholar
31. Ho, K.-H., Hou, Y., Chu, C. F. C., Pan, H., & Chan, T.-T. (2023). Work in progress: An AI-assisted metaverse for computer science education. Conference Name (if applicable). https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUNINE57531.2023.1010281 google scholar
32. Honebein, P. C. (1996). Seven goals for the design of constructivist learning environments. In Constructivist Learning Environments: Case Studies in Instructional Design (pp. 11-24). Educational Technology Publications google scholar
33. Ingole, J. G. (2022). Impact of IoT (Internet of Things) on today’s education system. International Journal of Advanced Research in Science, Communication and Technology. https://doi.org/10.48175/ijarsct-5883 doi:10.48175/ijarsct-5883 google scholar
34. Jadhav, S. G., & Sarnikar, S. (2023). Digital twin of a digital world: Process, data, and experience perspectives. IT Professional, 25(3), 68-73. https://doi.org/10.1109/MITP.2023.3264209 google scholar
35. Jyoti, & Kaur, G. (2023). Research paper on human-computer interaction (HCI). International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research (IJFMR), 5(2), 1-9 google scholar
36. Kalid, K. S., Wan, F., Wan, A., Muhammad, S., Shahrul, A., Sulisworo, D., Fitrianawati, M., & Arshad, C. S. (2022). A proposed implementation of the Internet of Things as a teaching aid for learning science collaboratively. 2022 IEEE AIIC, 9914591. https://doi.org/10.1109/ AiIC54368.2022.9914591, doi: 10.1109/AiIC54368.2022.991459 google scholar
37. Kanematsu, H., Kobayashi, T., Barry, D. M., Fukumura, Y., Dharmawansa, A., & Ogawa, N. (2014). Virtual STEM class for nuclear safety education in metaverse. Procedia Computer Science, 29, 1255-1261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2014.08.224, doi:10.1016/ j.procs.2014.08.22 google scholar
38. Kortelainen, J. T., Minav, T., & Tammi, K. (2023). Digital twin-The dream and the reality. https://doi.org/10.3389/friot.2023.1108777; google scholar
39. Lee, L. H., Braud, T., Zhou, P., Wang, L., Xu, D., Lin, Z., Kumar, A., Bermejo, C., & Hui, P. (2021). All one needs to know about Metaverse: A complete survey on technological singularity, virtual ecosystem, and research agenda. arXiv preprint arXiv:2110,05352 google scholar
40. Lee, Y.-S., & Lee, T.-Y. (2022). Applying the Metaverse Platform and Content in Practical Engineering Education. Journal Name. https:// doi.org/10.15701/kcgs.2022.28.3.3 google scholar
41. Locurcio, L. L. (2022). Dental education in the metaverse. British Dental Journal, 232(4), 191-191. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41415-022-3990-7, DOI: 10.1038/s41415-022-3990- google scholar
42. Lopez-BeLmonte, J., Pozo-Sânchez, S., Moreno-Guerrero, A.-J., & LampropouLos, G. K. (2023). Metaverse in education: A systematic review. RED. Revista De EDucaciön a Distancia, 23(73). https://doi.org/l0.6018/red.51142 google scholar
43. Lopez-BeLmonte, J., Pozo-Sânchez, S., Moreno-Guerrero, A.-J., & Marîn-Marîn, J.-A. (2023). We have reached the GOAL: Teaching method- google scholar
44. oLogy for transforming Learning in the Metaverse. Metaverse Research, 30, 2023. https:doi.org/10.56294/mr20233 google scholar
45. Losovsky, B. Ya. (2023). DigitaL twin for spacecraft concepts. “https://doi.org/10.1109/aero55745.2023.10115665; google scholar
46. Maiti, M., & KayaL, P. (2024). ExpLoring innovative techniques for damage controL during naturaL disasters. Journal of Safety Science anD Resilience. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnLssr.2024.02.004; google scholar
47. Martînez-Miranda, J., & Perez-Espinosa, H. (2023). 104 The use of Language in affective computing for human-computer interaction. İn G. google scholar
48. L. Schiewer, J. ALtarriba, & B. C. Ng (Eds.), Volume 3 (pp. 2127-2158). De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110795486-04 google scholar
49. Mazzuco, A. E., Rocha, A. L., Krassmann, E. B., Reategui, R. S., & Gomes, M. (2022). A systematic review of augmented reaLity in chemistry education. Review of EDucation, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.332 google scholar
50. Meen Teen-Hang, C., & Tijus, S. (2023). SpeciaL issue on human-computer interactions 2.0. ApplieD Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3390/ app1307426 google scholar
51. Meena, S. D., Mithesh, G. S. S., Panyam, R., Chowdary, M. S., Sadhu, V. S., & SheeLa, J. (2023). Advancing education through Metaverse: Components, appLications, chaLLenges, case studies, and open issues. 2023 International Conference on Sustainable Computing anD Smart Systems (ICSCSS), Coimbatore, İndia, 880-889. https://doi.org/10.1109/İCSCSS57650.2023.10169535, doi: 10.1109/İCSCSS57650.2023.1016953 google scholar
52. Mijanovic, N. (2023). Constructivism as a contemporary teaching paradigm. Inovacije u nastavi, 36(i), 21-32. https://doi.org/10.5937/ inovacije2301021m, doi:10.5937/inovacije2301021 google scholar
53. Mitsea, E., Drigas, A., & Skianis, C. (2023). VR gaming for meta-skiLLs training in speciaL education: The roLe of metacognition, motivations, and emotionaL inteLLigence. EDucation Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13070639 doi:10.3390/educsci1307063 google scholar
54. Moher, D., Liberati, A., TetzLaff, J., ALtman, D. G., & PRİSMA Group. (2010). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-anaLyses: The PRİSMA statement. International Journal of Surgery, 8(5), 336-341 google scholar
55. Mozumder, M. A. I., Athar, A., Armand, T. P. T., Sheeraz, M. M., Uddin, S. M. I., & Kim, H.-C. (2023). Technological roadmap of the future trend of Metaverse based on IoT, blockchain, and AI techniques in Metaverse education. 2023 25th International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology (ICACT), Pyeongchang, Korea, 1414-1423. https://doi.org/l0.23919/ICACT56868.2023.1007946 google scholar
56. Muhammad, A. K., Khan, N., Lee, M. Y., Imran, A. S., & Sajjad, M. (2021). School of the future: A comprehensive study on the effectiveness of augmented reality as a tool for primary school children’s education. Applied Sciences, 11(11), 5277. https://doi.org/10.3390/app 11115277 doi:10.3390/app1111527 google scholar
57. Murphy, E. (1997). Constructivism: From philosophy to practice. Educational Resources Information Center (ERIC), U.S. Department of Education. ED 444 966 google scholar
58. Mystakidis, S. (2022). Metaverse. Encyclopedia, 2(1), 486-497. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia201003 google scholar
59. Novak-Marcincin, J., Janak, M., Barna, J., & Novakova-Marcincinova, L. (2014). Application of virtual and augmented reality technology in the education of manufacturing engineers. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 439-446. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05948-8_42, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-05948-8_4 google scholar
60. Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., & others. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/ 10.1136/bmj.n71 doi: 10.1136/bmj.n7 google scholar
61. Page, M. J., Moher, D., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., et al. (2021). PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: Updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n160. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n16 google scholar
62. Petkov, T., Mitkova, M., Surchev, S., Popov, S., Todorov, M., Sotirova, E., Sotirov, S., & Bozov, H. (2019). An application of virtual reality technology in education. https://doi.org/10.1109/EAEEIE46886.2019.900041 google scholar
63. Prakash, A., & Rajendran, R. (2023). Investigating the interaction behaviors of learners in the VR learning environment. Conference Name (if applicable). https://doi.org/10.1109/VRW58643.2023.0030 google scholar
64. Rodrigues, I. S. (2023). IoT as assistive technology: Applications in education as a tool for inclusion. International Journal of Technology in Education. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.357 doi:10.46328/ijte.35 google scholar
65. Roy, R., Babakerkhell, M. D., Mukherjee, S., Pal, D., & Funilkul, S. (2023). Development of a framework for Metaverse in education: A systematic literature review approach. IEEE Access, 11, 57717-57734. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3283273, doi: 10.1109/ ACCESS.2023.328327 google scholar
66. Sabarinath, P. (2023). A study on Metaverse in education. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCMC56507.2023.10083910 google scholar
67. Saha, S. K., Banik, S. T., & Banik, T. (2023). A new era of mobility: Exploring digital twin applications in autonomous vehicular systems. arXiv,org. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2305.16158 google scholar
68. Sahin, D. R., & Yilmaz, M. (2020). The effect of augmented reality technology on middle school students’ achievements and attitudes toward science education. Computers & Education, 144, 103710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103710, doi:10.1016/ j.compedu.2019.10371 google scholar
69. Saidin, N. F., Halim, N. D. A., & Yahaya, N. (2016). Designing Mobile Augmented Reality (MAR) for Learning Chemical Bonds. https://doi. org/10.1007/978-981-10-0237-3_3 google scholar
70. Sailesh, B. S. (2023). Transformation of higher education and research using the Internet of Things. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijitee.g9601.0612723, doi:10.35940/ijitee.g9601.061272 google scholar
71. Schlemmer, E. and Backes, L. (2015). Learning in the metaverses: Coexisting in real virtuality. IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-6351-0", doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-6351- google scholar
72. Sin, Z. P. T., Ye, J., Wu, A. C. H., Zhao, I. D., Li, R. C., Ng, P. H. F., Huang, X., Baciu, G., Cao, J., & Li, Q. (2023). Toward an Edu-Metaverse of knowledge: Immersive exploration of university courses. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 16(6), 1096-1110. https:// doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2023.3290814", doi: 10.1109/TLT.2023.329081 google scholar
73. Thongprasit, J., & Piriyasurawong, P. (2022). Metaverse for developing engineering competency. 2022 Research, Invention, and Innovation Congress (RI2C), 119-123. https://doi.org/10.1109/RI2C56397.2022.991029 google scholar
74. Tlili, A., Altinay, F., Huang, R., Altinay, Z., Olivier, J., Mishra, S., Jemni, M., & Burgos, D. (2022). Are we there yet? A systematic literature review of open educational resources in Africa: A combined content and bibliometric analysis. PLOS ONE, 17(1), e0262615. https:// doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0262615, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.026261 google scholar
75. Tlili, A., Huang, R., Shehata, D., Liu, J., Zhao, J., Metwally, A. H. S., Wang, H., Denden, M., Bozkurt, A., Lee, L. H., Beyoglu, D., Altinay, F., Sharma, R. C., Altinay, Z., Li, Z., Liu, J., Ahmad, F., Hu, Y., Salha, S., Abed, M., & Burgos, D. (2022). Is the metaverse in education a blessing or a curse: A combined content and bibliometric analysis. Smart Learning Environments, 9, 24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s 40561-022-00205-x, doi: 10.1186/s40561-022-00205- google scholar
76. Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523-538. https://doi.org/l0.1007/s11192-009-0146-3, doi:10.1007/s11192-009-0146- google scholar
77. Wardhani, I. P. (2023). Sistem human computer interaction (HCI) keamanan rumah pintar berbasis IoT. Jurnal Ilmu Komputer dan Informatika. https://doi.org/10.54082/jiki.29 doi:10.54082/jiki.29; google scholar
78. Wu, J., & Gao, G. (2022). Edu-Metaverse: Internet education form with fusion of virtual and reality. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 664, 1082-1085 google scholar
79. Zaga, F. A. Ramos. (2023). Enhancing interactive learning in engineering education: Exploring the Metaverse's virtual horizons. 2023 World Engineering Education Forum-Global Engineering Deans Council (WEEF-GEDC), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1109/WEEF-GEDC59520.2023. 10343748, doi: 10.1109/WEEF-GEDC59520.2023.1034374 google scholar
80. Zahra, S., Silvianita, A., Pradana, M., & Utami, F. N. (2021). Analysis of factors affecting the work motivation of teachers at the state private vocational school 08 Kab. In Sleman. Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, April 5-8, 2021 google scholar
81. Zheng, W., Yan, L., Zhang, W., Ouyang, L., & Wen, D. (2023). DKI: Data-knowledge-driven group intelligence framework for smart service in education Metaverse. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.2022.3228849, doi: 10.1109/TSMC.2022.322884 google scholar
82. Zhonggen, Y. (2023). A systematic literature review of the acceptability of the use of Metaverse in education over 16 years. Journal of Computers in Education, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-023-00273-z, doi:10.1007/s40692-023-00273- google scholar
83. Zhou, M. (2022). Editorial: Evolution from AI, IoT and big data analytics to Metaverse. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 9(12), 20412042. https://doi.org/10.1109/JAS.2022.10009854, doi: 10.1109/JAS.2022.1000985 google scholar
84. Zonaphan, L., Northus, K., Wijaya, J., Achmad, S. S., & Sutoyo, R. (2022). Metaverse as a future of education: A systematic review. 2022 CHIuXiD, 77-81. https://doi.org/10.1109/CHIuXiD57244.2022.10009854 google scholar