A Fuzzy DEMATEL Application for Criteria Affecting Database Management System Selection in a Specific Problem Context

Abstract

Database management systems (DBMS) are one of the basic building blocks of many software projects developed in technology companies. However, each DBMS supports different features. It is practically impossible and costly to try out all DBMSs one by one. For this reason, the DBMS to use can be recommended using mathematical methods, considering the criteria desired by the software developers. In this study, a solution for DBMS selection was proposed using fuzzy DEMATEL, which can provide a better solution with fuzzy logic than the exact numerical values of the influence relationship between complex criteria. In the study conducted with the participation of a five-member software team in a technology company, the most effective criterion for DBMS selection was backup properties (0.184), followed by purchase cost (0.177). The least important criterion was user management and authorization properties (0.056). The findings of the relationships between the criteria were identified as the criteria influencing the backup properties, technical support solutions, performance, data storage format, and user management and authorization properties, and influenced by the purchase cost, training cost and common use.

Keywords

• Database Management System
• Fuzzy DEMATEL
• Multi Criteria Decision Making

References

1. Akyuz, E., & Celik, E. (2015). A fuzzy DEMATEL method to evaluate critical operational hazards during gas freeing process in crude oil tankers. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 38, 243-253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2015.10.006 google scholar
2. Ayçin, E. (2018). Using the SWARA and COPRAS methods in the celection of database management system. Journal of Business In The Digital Age, 1(2), 51-58. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/jobda/issue/42057/479092 google scholar
3. Baykasoğlu, A., Kaplanoğlu, V., Durmuşoğlu, Z. D., & Şahin, C. (2013). Integrating fuzzy DEMATEL and fuzzy hierarchical TOPSIS methods for truck selection. Expert Systems with Applications, 40(3), 899-907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.05.046 google scholar
4. Catak, F. O., Karabas, S., & Yildirim, S. (2012). Fuzzy analytic hierarchy based DBMS selection in Turkish national identity card management project. International Journal of Information Sciences and Techniques (IJIST) Vol, 2. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=3900293 google scholar
5. Chang, B., Chang, C. W., & Wu, C. H. (2011). Fuzzy DEMATEL method for developing supplier selection criteria. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(3), 1850-1858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.07.114 google scholar
6. Chen, L. H., &Chiou, T. W. (1999). A fuzzy credit-rating approach for commercial loans: a Taiwan case. Omega, 27(4), 407-419. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0483(98)00051-6 google scholar
7. Ebrahimi, M., & Taheri, M. (2015). Selection of Database management system with fuzzy-AHP for electronic medical record. International Journal of Information Engineering and Electronic Business, 7(5), 1. https://doi.org/10.5815/ijieeb.2015.05.01 google scholar
8. Ertuğrul, İ. (2007). Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process and its Application to Machine Selection Problem in a Textile Firm. Hacettepe University Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences , 25(1), 171-192. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/307603 google scholar

9. Farooque, M., Jain, V., Zhang, A., and Li, Z. (2020). Fuzzy DEMATEL analysis of barriers to Blockchain-based life cycle assessment in China. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 147, 106684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2020.106684 google scholar
10. Kahraman, C., Cebeci, U., & Ruan, D. (2004). Multi-attribute comparison of catering service companies using fuzzy AHP: The case of Turkey. International Journal of Production Economics, 87(2), 171-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5273(03)00099-9 google scholar
11. Koca, G., & Yıldırım, S. (2021). Bibliometric analysis of DEMATEL method. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 4(1), 85-103. https://doi.org/10.31181/dmame2104085g google scholar
12. Kuzu, A. C. (2023). Application of fuzzy DEMATEL approach in maritime transportation: A risk analysis of anchor loss. Ocean Engineering, 273, 113786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.113786 google scholar
13. Li, C. W., & Tzeng, G. H. (2009). Identification of a threshold value for the DEMATEL method using the maximum mean de-entropy algorithm to find critical services provided by a semiconductor intellectual property mall. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(6), 9891-9898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2009.01.073 google scholar
14. Mirmousa, S., & Dehnavi, H. D. (2016). Development of criteria of selecting the supplier by using the fuzzy DEMATEL method. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 230, 281-289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.09.036 google scholar
15. Muhammad, M. N., & Cavus, N. (2017). Fuzzy DEMATEL method for identifying LMS evaluation criteria. Procedia computer science, 120, 742-749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.11.304 google scholar
16. Organ, A. (2013). Evaluation of machine selecton criteria by method of fuzzy DEMATEL. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 22(1), 157-172. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/cusosbil/issue/4392/60412 google scholar
17. Seker, S., & Zavadskas, E. K. (2017). Application of fuzzy DEMATEL method for analyzing occupational risks on construction sites. Sustainability, 9(11), 2083. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9112083 google scholar
18. Tzeng, G. H., Chiang, C. H., & Li, C. W. (2007). Evaluating intertwined effects in e-learning programs: A novel hybrid MCDM model based on factor analysis and DEMATEL. Expert systems with Applications, 32(4), 1028-1044. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2006.02.004 google scholar
19. Ur Rehman, U. (2023). Selection of database management system by using multi-attribute decision-making approach based on probability complex fuzzy aggregation operators. Journal of Innovative Research in Mathematical and Computational Sciences, 2(1), 1-16. Retrieved from https://jirmcs.agasr.org/index.php/jirmcs/article/view/12 google scholar
20. Wang, M., Lu, J., Zhang, X., Wang, B., & Cao, L. (2024). Analysis of factors influencing women's participation in engineering education: An improved fuzzy DEMATEL approach. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, e22730. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22730 google scholar
21. Wu, W. W., & Lee, Y. T. (2007). Developing global managers’ competencies using the fuzzy DEMATEL method. Expert Systems with Applications, 32(2), 499-507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2005.12.005 google scholar
22. Yadegaridehkordi, E., Nilashi, M., Nizam Bin Md Nasir, M. H., Safie Bin Mohd Satar, N., & Momtazi, S. (2023). Evaluating COVID-19 infection prevention measures in Malaysia: A fuzzy DEMATEL approach. Digital Health, 9, 20552076231211670. https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076231211670 google scholar
23. Yao, J. S., & Wu, K. (2000). Ranking fuzzy numbers based on decomposition principle and signed distance. Fuzzy sets and Systems, 116(2), 275-288. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(98)00122-5 google scholar
24. Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control. 8(3): 338-353. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X google scholar
25. Zhou, Q., Huang, W., & Zhang, Y. (2011). Identifying critical success factors in emergency management using a fuzzy DEMATEL method. Safety Science, 49(2), 243-252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2010.08.005 google scholar