Research Article

Evaluation of Supervised Machine Learning Methods for Forest Fire Severity Classification

Volume: 10 Number: 1 June 30, 2026
EN

Evaluation of Supervised Machine Learning Methods for Forest Fire Severity Classification

Abstract

Forest fires are among the most destructive natural disasters, causing substantial ecological, economic, and human losses. Accurate assessment of fire severity is crucial for preparedness, rapid response, and efficient resource management. This study evaluates three supervised machine learning (ML) algorithms—Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA), Kernel Naive Bayes (KNB), and Fine Gaussian Support Vector Machine (Fine Gaussian SVM)—to classify forest fire severity using a real-world dataset from Türkiye. The dataset includes over 15,000 fire incidents (2010–2024) and 36 initial features. To improve predictive performance and reduce dimensionality, feature selection was performed using the Chi-square test. Fire severity was reclassified into three levels (low, moderate, high) based on burned area (hectares). Models were trained and validated with 10-fold cross-validation. KNB achieved the highest accuracy (82%), followed by Fine Gaussian SVM (79%) and LDA (65%). The advantage of KNB likely stems from its ability to capture nonlinear class boundaries and probabilistic structures typical of complex environmental data. Overall, the results suggest that nonlinear, kernel-based classifiers outperform linear methods for forest fire severity classification. The proposed national-scale, interpretable framework can support policymakers and disaster-management authorities in developing intelligent early warning systems and optimizing suppression resource allocation in high-risk areas.

Keywords

References

  1. Abhilash, P. M., & Chakradhar, D. (2021). Sustainability improvement of WEDM process by analysing and classifying wire rupture using kernel-based Naive Bayes classifier. Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, 43(64), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-021-02805-z google scholar
  2. Acar, Z., & Gonencgil, B. (2023). Forest fires in southern Turkey July-August 2021. Revista de Climatología, 23, 46-57. https://doi.org/10.59427/rcli/2023/v23.46-57 google scholar
  3. Afuwape, A. A., Xu, Y., Anajemba, J. H., & Srivastava, G. (2021). Performance evaluation of secured network traffic classification using a machine learning approach. Computer Standards & Interfaces, 78, 103545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csi.2021.103545 google scholar
  4. Albaba, A., Simões-Capela, N., Wang, Y., Hendriks, R. C., De Raedt, W., & Van Hoof, C. (2021). Assessing the signal quality of electrocardiograms from varied acquisition sources: A generic machine learning pipeline for model generation. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 130, 104164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.104164 google scholar
  5. Amatulli, G., Peréz-Cabello, F., & de la Riva, J. (2013). Mapping lightning/human-caused wildfires occurrence under ignition point location uncertainty. Ecological Modelling, 265, 149-159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.08.001 google scholar
  6. Anand, A., Saxena, A., & Singh, K. (2024). Statistical features based content-based image retrieval using machine learning classifiers. In 2024 IEEE 3rd World Conference on Applied Intelligence and Computing (AIC) (pp. 1102-1109). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/AIC61668.2024.10731120 google scholar
  7. Barati Jozan, M. M., Khosravi, H., Lotfata, A., Cios, K. J., & Tabesh, H. (2025). Predicting firefighter injury and entrapment in urban firefighting operations: An investigation into the effectiveness of modified fire time stages and machine learning. Health Science Reports, 8(3), e70327. https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.70327 google scholar
  8. Bayat, G., & Yıldız, K. (2022). Comparison of the machine learning methods to predict wildfire areas. Turkish Journal of Science and Technology, 17(2), 241-250. google scholar

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Machine Learning (Other)

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

June 30, 2026

Submission Date

August 2, 2025

Acceptance Date

April 9, 2026

Published in Issue

Year 2026 Volume: 10 Number: 1

APA
Pekşen, M. F., Geçer, H. S., & Eren, B. (2026). Evaluation of Supervised Machine Learning Methods for Forest Fire Severity Classification. Acta Infologica, 10(1), 438-463. https://doi.org/10.26650/acin.1756825
AMA
1.Pekşen MF, Geçer HS, Eren B. Evaluation of Supervised Machine Learning Methods for Forest Fire Severity Classification. ACIN. 2026;10(1):438-463. doi:10.26650/acin.1756825
Chicago
Pekşen, Muhammed Fatih, Hüseyin Serdar Geçer, and Beytullah Eren. 2026. “Evaluation of Supervised Machine Learning Methods for Forest Fire Severity Classification”. Acta Infologica 10 (1): 438-63. https://doi.org/10.26650/acin.1756825.
EndNote
Pekşen MF, Geçer HS, Eren B (June 1, 2026) Evaluation of Supervised Machine Learning Methods for Forest Fire Severity Classification. Acta Infologica 10 1 438–463.
IEEE
[1]M. F. Pekşen, H. S. Geçer, and B. Eren, “Evaluation of Supervised Machine Learning Methods for Forest Fire Severity Classification”, ACIN, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 438–463, June 2026, doi: 10.26650/acin.1756825.
ISNAD
Pekşen, Muhammed Fatih - Geçer, Hüseyin Serdar - Eren, Beytullah. “Evaluation of Supervised Machine Learning Methods for Forest Fire Severity Classification”. Acta Infologica 10/1 (June 1, 2026): 438-463. https://doi.org/10.26650/acin.1756825.
JAMA
1.Pekşen MF, Geçer HS, Eren B. Evaluation of Supervised Machine Learning Methods for Forest Fire Severity Classification. ACIN. 2026;10:438–463.
MLA
Pekşen, Muhammed Fatih, et al. “Evaluation of Supervised Machine Learning Methods for Forest Fire Severity Classification”. Acta Infologica, vol. 10, no. 1, June 2026, pp. 438-63, doi:10.26650/acin.1756825.
Vancouver
1.Muhammed Fatih Pekşen, Hüseyin Serdar Geçer, Beytullah Eren. Evaluation of Supervised Machine Learning Methods for Forest Fire Severity Classification. ACIN. 2026 Jun. 1;10(1):438-63. doi:10.26650/acin.1756825