Research Article

Predicting Health Spending in Turkey Using the GPR, SVR, and DT Models

Volume: 5 Number: 1 June 29, 2021
EN TR

Predicting Health Spending in Turkey Using the GPR, SVR, and DT Models

Abstract

Rising healthcare costs for countries and the long-term maintainability of this situation are at the center of the political agenda. The steady increase in health spending puts pressure on government budgets, healthcare, and personal patient financing. Policymakers would like to plan reforms to reduce these costs to adapt to problems that may arise. This has led planners to decision support systems and forecasting models. In this paper, three machine learnings algoritms, namely Support Vector Regression (SVR), Decision Tree Regression (DT), and Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) are employed to design a forecasting model for Health Spendings (HS) of Turkey considering various determinants. Gross domestic product per capita, urban population rate, unemployment rate, population ages 65 and above, the life expectancy, the physicians’ rate, and the total number of hospital beds are used as inputs. The data set consists of 30 years between 1990-2019, which splits as training and test sets. Developed models were compared considering performance metrics, and the most accurate model was identified. The coefficient of determinations (R2) for SVR, GPR, and DT models are 0.9929, 0.9989, and 0.9611 in the training phase, 0.9536, 0.8944, and 0.1166 in the testing stage, respectively. Therefore, the SVR model has accurate prediction results with the highest R2 and the least root mean square error values in the testing phase. The study showed that the proposed SVR model reduced RMSE value by 32.02% and 39.66% compared to the GPR and DT models, respectively. Consequently, the Health Spendings of Turkey can be predicted by employing SVR with high accuracy.

Keywords

References

  1. Akca, N., Sonmez, S., Yilmaz, A., 2017. Determinants of health expenditure in OECD countries: A decision tree model. Pakistan J. Med. Sci. 33, 1490–1494. https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.336.13300
  2. Aliyu, A.A., Amadu, L., 2017. Urbanization, cities, and health: The challenges to Nigeria - A review. Ann. Afr. Med. 16, 149–158. https://doi.org/10.4103/aam.aam_1_17
  3. Anderson, G.F., Frogner, B.K., 2008. Health spending in OECD countries: Obtaining value per dollar. Health Aff. 27, 1718–1727. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.27.6.1718
  4. Bauer, G., Davies, J.K., Pelikan, J., Consortium, on behalf of the E.T.W.G. and T.E., 2006. The EUHPID Health Development Model for the classification of public health indicators. Health Promot. Int. 21, 153–159. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/dak002
  5. Biadgilign, S., Ayenew, H.Y., Shumetie, A., Chitekwe, S., Tolla, A., Haile, D., Gebreyesus, S.H., Deribew, A., Gebre, B., 2019. Good governance, public health expenditures, urbanization and child undernutrition Nexus in Ethiopia: An ecological analysis. BMC Health Serv. Res. 19, 1–10. https://doi.org /10.1186/s12913- 018 -3822-2
  6. Boyce, T., Brown, C., 2019. Economic and social impacts and benefits of health systems. World Heal. Organ. 56.Ceylan, Z., 2020. Investigation the insights between health expenditures and air quality. Int. J. Glob. Warm. 20, 203–215. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJGW.2020.106594
  7. Ceylan, Z., Atalan, A., 2020. Estimation of healthcare expenditure per capita of Turkey using artificial intelligence techniques with genetic algorithm-based feature selection. J. Forecast. 279–290. https://doi.org/10.1002/for.2747
  8. Cinaroglu, S., 2020. Modelling unbalanced catastrophic health expenditure data by using machine-learning methods. Intell. Syst. Accounting, Financ. Manag. 27, 168–181. https://doi.org/10.1002/isaf.1483

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Computer Software

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

June 29, 2021

Submission Date

February 18, 2021

Acceptance Date

May 24, 2021

Published in Issue

Year 2021 Volume: 5 Number: 1

APA
Güleryüz, D. (2021). Predicting Health Spending in Turkey Using the GPR, SVR, and DT Models. Acta Infologica, 5(1), 155-166. https://izlik.org/JA88CW53HN
AMA
1.Güleryüz D. Predicting Health Spending in Turkey Using the GPR, SVR, and DT Models. ACIN. 2021;5(1):155-166. https://izlik.org/JA88CW53HN
Chicago
Güleryüz, Didem. 2021. “Predicting Health Spending in Turkey Using the GPR, SVR, and DT Models”. Acta Infologica 5 (1): 155-66. https://izlik.org/JA88CW53HN.
EndNote
Güleryüz D (June 1, 2021) Predicting Health Spending in Turkey Using the GPR, SVR, and DT Models. Acta Infologica 5 1 155–166.
IEEE
[1]D. Güleryüz, “Predicting Health Spending in Turkey Using the GPR, SVR, and DT Models”, ACIN, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 155–166, June 2021, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA88CW53HN
ISNAD
Güleryüz, Didem. “Predicting Health Spending in Turkey Using the GPR, SVR, and DT Models”. Acta Infologica 5/1 (June 1, 2021): 155-166. https://izlik.org/JA88CW53HN.
JAMA
1.Güleryüz D. Predicting Health Spending in Turkey Using the GPR, SVR, and DT Models. ACIN. 2021;5:155–166.
MLA
Güleryüz, Didem. “Predicting Health Spending in Turkey Using the GPR, SVR, and DT Models”. Acta Infologica, vol. 5, no. 1, June 2021, pp. 155-66, https://izlik.org/JA88CW53HN.
Vancouver
1.Didem Güleryüz. Predicting Health Spending in Turkey Using the GPR, SVR, and DT Models. ACIN [Internet]. 2021 Jun. 1;5(1):155-66. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA88CW53HN