Aim: The choice of anesthesia management for hip fracture surgery is among the modifiable risk factors that can affect the outcome. This study aims to investigate the effects of two different anesthesia techniques on kidney functions with the RIFLE (Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss, and End-stage renal failure) risk score in patients who were operated on for hip fracture.
Material and Method: Serum creatinine values lower than 1.5 times (Normal value: 1.2 mg/dL) and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) below 60 mg/dl, over 65 years old, without serious comorbidity, hemoglobin (Hb) value over 9 g/dl 60 patients were included. The demographic data and biochemical parameters of the patients were recorded. The patients were randomized into two groups as spinal anesthesia (Group S) and general anesthesia (Group G). During the surgery, a urinary catheter was applied to the patients and urine output was monitored. Balance liquid electrolyte regimen was applied and after Hb control, an appropriate blood regimen was planned with Hb above 9 g/dl. Postoperatively, patients were followed at 6th, 12th, and 24th hours on the first day, and then at 24-hour intervals in the first postoperative week, and were evaluated with the RIFLE risk scores.
Results: There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of demographic data, fracture type, laboratory values, and urine volumes (p > 0.05). In the comparison of intragroup urea values, the decrease in the 5th time interval compared to the baseline value was statistically significant in Group G. There was no statistically significant difference between the measurement times in Group S (p > 0.05). Preoperative creatinine values were found to be statistically significantly higher than other measurement times in the patient group in Group S (p < 0.05). In both groups, it was found that all measurement time urine amounts were statistically different from each other (p < 0.05). In comparisons between groups, There was no statistically significant difference in terms of RIFLE risk score and postoperative outcome at all measurement times (p>0.05).
Conclusion: There is no difference between the anesthesia method applied in hip fracture surgery and the change in renal function of patients, based on RIFLE criteria and laboratory parameters. In addition, a significant improvement in renal functions was observed in both groups, especially during the discharge period, according to preoperative values, which may indicate that the stress response to surgery can be effectively limited in both anesthesia methods.
General anesthesia spinal anesthesia hip fracture renal functions geriatric RIFLE postoperative
Primary Language | English |
---|---|
Subjects | Health Care Administration |
Journal Section | Research Articles |
Authors | |
Publication Date | March 29, 2022 |
Published in Issue | Year 2022 |
TR DİZİN ULAKBİM and International Indexes (1b)
Interuniversity Board (UAK) Equivalency: Article published in Ulakbim TR Index journal [10 POINTS], and Article published in other (excuding 1a, b, c) international indexed journal (1d) [5 POINTS]
Note: Our journal is not WOS indexed and therefore is not classified as Q.
You can download Council of Higher Education (CoHG) [Yüksek Öğretim Kurumu (YÖK)] Criteria) decisions about predatory/questionable journals and the author's clarification text and journal charge policy from your browser. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/journal/3449/file/4924/show
Journal Indexes and Platforms:
TR Dizin ULAKBİM, Google Scholar, Crossref, Worldcat (OCLC), DRJI, EuroPub, OpenAIRE, Turkiye Citation Index, Turk Medline, ROAD, ICI World of Journal's, Index Copernicus, ASOS Index, General Impact Factor, Scilit.The indexes of the journal's are;
The platforms of the journal's are;
The indexes/platforms of the journal are;
TR Dizin Ulakbim, Crossref (DOI), Google Scholar, EuroPub, Directory of Research Journal İndexing (DRJI), Worldcat (OCLC), OpenAIRE, ASOS Index, ROAD, Turkiye Citation Index, ICI World of Journal's, Index Copernicus, Turk Medline, General Impact Factor, Scilit
EBSCO, DOAJ, OAJI is under evaluation.
Journal articles are evaluated as "Double-Blind Peer Review"