Research Article

Comparision of the scoring systems to predict clinical outcomes in older adults with biliary pancreatitis: a cross-sectional study

Volume: 4 Number: 4 October 22, 2022
EN

Comparision of the scoring systems to predict clinical outcomes in older adults with biliary pancreatitis: a cross-sectional study

Abstract

Aim: The issue of which scoring system is appropriate in older adults patients with acute biliary pancreatitis is an ongoing debate. We aimed to compare the efficiency of four existing scoring systems in predicting clinical outcomes in the elderly with acute biliary pancreatitis. Material and Method: The study included patients aged 60 years and older with a diagnosis of acute biliary pancreatitis. Clinical findings, routine laboratory examinations, and imaging findings were retrospectively accessed through the hospital information system and reviewed. Then, the efficacy of Ranson, Bedside Index of Severity in Acute Pancreatitis (BISAP), Glasgow-Imrie, and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II scoring systems in predicting mortality, severity, organ failure, complications, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and prolonged hospital stay (PHS) were compared. Results: The Ranson score was compared with three other existing scoring systems in primary and secondary outcomes in 364 eligible patients. The area under the curve (AUC) values of the Ranson, BISAP, Glasgow, and APACHE II scores were 0.787 (95% CI: 0.649-0.925), 0.856 (95% CI: 0.784-0.929), 0.908 (95% CI: 0.854-0.961), and 0.836 (95% CI: 0.702-0.971) for mortality. Although the AUC of the Ranson score for mortality was lower than that of the other scores, no significant difference was found in pairwise comparisons with the other three scores (p>0.05 for all). Conclusion: The Ranson scoring system was the weakest among the assessed scoring systems in predicting clinical outcomes in older adults with biliary pancreatitis.

Keywords

References

  1. Machicado JD, Yadav D. Epidemiology of recurrent acute and chronic pancreatitis: similarities and differences. Dig Dis Sci 2017; 62: 1683-91.
  2. Peery AF, Crockett SD, Barritt AS, et al. Burden of gastrointestinal, liver, and pancreatic diseases in the United States. Gastroenterology 2015; 149: 1731-41.
  3. Pendharkar SA, Salt K, Plank LD, Windsor JA, Petrov MS. Quality of life after acute pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pancreas 2014; 43: 1194-200.
  4. Hazra N, Gulliford M. Evaluating pancreatitis in primary care: a population-based cohort study. Br J Gen Pract 2014; 64: e295-301.
  5. Lindkvist B, Appelros S, Manjer J, Borgström A. Trends in incidence of acute pancreatitis in a Swedish population: is there really an increase? Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2004; 2: 831-7.
  6. Clegg A, Young J, Iliffe S, Rikkert MO, Rockwood K. Frailty in elderly people. Lancet; 381: 752-62.
  7. Yadav D, Lowenfels AB. Trends in the epidemiology of the first attack of acute pancreatitis: A systematic review. Pancreas 2006; 33: 323-30.
  8. Banks PA, Bollen TL, Dervenis C, et al. Acute Pancreatitis Classification Working Group. Classification of acute pancreatitis--2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus. Gut 20131; 62: 102-11.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Health Care Administration

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

October 22, 2022

Submission Date

July 28, 2022

Acceptance Date

August 24, 2022

Published in Issue

Year 2022 Volume: 4 Number: 4

APA
İnan, O., Acehan, M. F., Şahiner, E. S., Aslan, M., Altıparmak, E., & Ateş, İ. (2022). Comparision of the scoring systems to predict clinical outcomes in older adults with biliary pancreatitis: a cross-sectional study. Anatolian Current Medical Journal, 4(4), 394-400. https://doi.org/10.38053/acmj.1150437
AMA
1.İnan O, Acehan MF, Şahiner ES, Aslan M, Altıparmak E, Ateş İ. Comparision of the scoring systems to predict clinical outcomes in older adults with biliary pancreatitis: a cross-sectional study. Anatolian Curr Med J / ACMJ / acmj. 2022;4(4):394-400. doi:10.38053/acmj.1150437
Chicago
İnan, Osman, Muhammed Fatih Acehan, Enes Seyda Şahiner, Meryem Aslan, Emin Altıparmak, and İhsan Ateş. 2022. “Comparision of the Scoring Systems to Predict Clinical Outcomes in Older Adults With Biliary Pancreatitis: A Cross-Sectional Study”. Anatolian Current Medical Journal 4 (4): 394-400. https://doi.org/10.38053/acmj.1150437.
EndNote
İnan O, Acehan MF, Şahiner ES, Aslan M, Altıparmak E, Ateş İ (October 1, 2022) Comparision of the scoring systems to predict clinical outcomes in older adults with biliary pancreatitis: a cross-sectional study. Anatolian Current Medical Journal 4 4 394–400.
IEEE
[1]O. İnan, M. F. Acehan, E. S. Şahiner, M. Aslan, E. Altıparmak, and İ. Ateş, “Comparision of the scoring systems to predict clinical outcomes in older adults with biliary pancreatitis: a cross-sectional study”, Anatolian Curr Med J / ACMJ / acmj, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 394–400, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.38053/acmj.1150437.
ISNAD
İnan, Osman - Acehan, Muhammed Fatih - Şahiner, Enes Seyda - Aslan, Meryem - Altıparmak, Emin - Ateş, İhsan. “Comparision of the Scoring Systems to Predict Clinical Outcomes in Older Adults With Biliary Pancreatitis: A Cross-Sectional Study”. Anatolian Current Medical Journal 4/4 (October 1, 2022): 394-400. https://doi.org/10.38053/acmj.1150437.
JAMA
1.İnan O, Acehan MF, Şahiner ES, Aslan M, Altıparmak E, Ateş İ. Comparision of the scoring systems to predict clinical outcomes in older adults with biliary pancreatitis: a cross-sectional study. Anatolian Curr Med J / ACMJ / acmj. 2022;4:394–400.
MLA
İnan, Osman, et al. “Comparision of the Scoring Systems to Predict Clinical Outcomes in Older Adults With Biliary Pancreatitis: A Cross-Sectional Study”. Anatolian Current Medical Journal, vol. 4, no. 4, Oct. 2022, pp. 394-00, doi:10.38053/acmj.1150437.
Vancouver
1.Osman İnan, Muhammed Fatih Acehan, Enes Seyda Şahiner, Meryem Aslan, Emin Altıparmak, İhsan Ateş. Comparision of the scoring systems to predict clinical outcomes in older adults with biliary pancreatitis: a cross-sectional study. Anatolian Curr Med J / ACMJ / acmj. 2022 Oct. 1;4(4):394-400. doi:10.38053/acmj.1150437

 

TR DİZİN ULAKBİM and International Indexes (1b)
 

Interuniversity Board (UAK) Equivalency:  Article published in Ulakbim TR Index journal [10 POINTS], and Article published in other (excuding 1a, b, c) international indexed journal (1d) [5 POINTS]

Note: Our journal is not WOS indexed and therefore is not classified as Q.

You can download Council of Higher Education (CoHG) [Yüksek Öğretim Kurumu (YÖK)] Criteria) decisions about predatory/questionable journals and the author's clarification text and journal charge policy from your browser. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/journal/3449/file/4924/show

 

Journal Indexes and Platforms: 

TR Dizin ULAKBİM, Google Scholar, Crossref, Worldcat (OCLC), DRJI, EuroPub, OpenAIRE, Turkiye Citation Index, Turk Medline, ROAD, ICI World of Journal's, Index Copernicus, ASOS Index, General Impact Factor, Scilit.


 

The indexes of the journal's are;


 

download?token=eyJhdXRoX3JvbGVzIjpbXSwiZW5kcG9pbnQiOiJqb3VybmFsIiwib3JpZ2luYWxuYW1lIjoiVHJfSW5kZXhfbG9nby5wbmciLCJwYXRoIjoiMDFiOS82MmZhLzA3MzMvNjlkZjNlNTdhMmI4ZjkuODYxMzMxMjQucG5nIiwiZXhwIjoxNzc2MjQxNzY3LCJub25jZSI6ImQyMTQ4MjdiNTg1ZjVmMGQwYzAzZTMxNzMwM2QwMThmIn0.RmnGvwR536HdIoKpGO-ApytZ5aRPRT_BFXE2EpGSIqc

asos-index.png
 
f9ab67f.png
 
WorldCat_Logo_H_Color.png
 

 

18596download?token=eyJhdXRoX3JvbGVzIjpbXSwiZW5kcG9pbnQiOiJqb3VybmFsIiwib3JpZ2luYWxuYW1lIjoiT3BlbkFpcmUuanBnIiwicGF0aCI6IjUyMWYvZjljYy8wMDk3LzY5ZGYzZDNiYmVkZGU0LjQzNDM2OTU3LmpwZyIsImV4cCI6MTc3NjI0MTQ4NCwibm9uY2UiOiIwYjgxZDE2NzRiNzhjMWQyOGVmMDM1OTA1MzI5NjdjZiJ9.xeFppR1ubA4i-dHG-u07ht9bQNogFheXQjLyEaP9GgAimages?q=tbn:ANd9GcQgDnBwx0yUPRKuetgIurtELxYERFv20CPAUcPe4jYrrJiwXzac8rGXlzd57gl8iikb1Tk&usqp=CAU

 

84039476_619085835534619_7808805634291269632_n.jpg

 

 

 

The platforms of the journal's are;
 

COPE.jpg
 
images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTbq2FM8NTdXECzlOUCeKQ1dvrISFL-LhxhC7zy1ZQeJk-GGKSx2XkWQvrsHxcfhtfHWxM&usqp=CAUicmje_1_orig.png
 
 
ncbi.png
 
ORCID_logo.pngimages?q=tbn:ANd9GcQlwX77nfpy3Bu9mpMBZa0miWT2sRt2zjAPJKg2V69ODTrjZM1nT1BbhWzTVPsTNKJMZzQ&usqp=CAU
 

 

images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTaWSousoprPWGwE-qxwxGH2y0ByZ_zdLMN-Oq93MsZpBVFOTfxi9uXV7tdr39qvyE-U0I&usqp=CAU
 


 


 

 


 


The indexes/platforms of the journal are;
 

TR Dizin Ulakbim, Crossref (DOI), Google Scholar, EuroPub, Directory of Research Journal İndexing (DRJI), Worldcat (OCLC), OpenAIRE, ASOS Index, ROAD, Turkiye Citation Index, ICI World of Journal's, Index Copernicus, Turk Medline, General Impact Factor, Scilit 
 


Journal articles are evaluated as "Double-Blind Peer Review"

 

All articles published in this journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND)