Aims: The aim of this study is to examine the effects of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), psychological needs, and empathy
(EMP) on burnout (BRN) levels among professional and family caregivers.
Methods: The study sample consists of a total of 379 participants, including 197 professional caregivers and 182 family caregivers.
Participants were selected using the snowball sampling method. Data were collected using the PTSD checklist for DSM-5 (PCL
5), the Toronto Empathy Questionnaire, the Basic Psychological Needs Scale, the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI), and a
Socio-Demographic Information Form. The study was conducted using a relational survey model, and structural equation
modeling (SEM) was employed to examine both direct and indirect effects.
Results: The SEM findings revealed that PTSD had a significant direct effect on BRN, which was partially mediated by
psychological needs and EMP. Notably, the mediating role of empathy was more pronounced in the professional caregiver group,
where the direct effect of PTSD on BRN dropped by nearly 49% after accounting for EMP and psychological needs. In contrast,
this reduction was only 15% among family caregivers, suggesting that professional caregivers are more vulnerable to BRN due to
EMP-driven mechanisms. Additionally, the indirect effects were also statistically significant. These findings suggest that unmet
psychological needs and high levels of EMP may contribute to increased BRN among caregivers.
Conclusion: The findings revealed that both psychological needs and EMP play a partial mediating role in the relationship
between PTSD and BRN. As caregivers’ levels of EMP increase, they may become more vulnerable to BRN. Addressing unmet
psychological needs and promoting balanced EMP are considered important for protecting the mental health of both professional
and family caregivers.
Aims: The aim of this study is to examine the effects of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), psychological needs, and empathy (EMP) on burnout (BRN) levels among professional and family caregivers.
Methods: The study sample consists of a total of 379 participants, including 197 professional caregivers and 182 family caregivers. Participants were selected using the snowball sampling method. Data were collected using the PTSD checklist for DSM-5 (PCL 5), the Toronto Empathy Questionnaire, the Basic Psychological Needs Scale, the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI), and a Socio-Demographic Information Form. The study was conducted using a relational survey model, and structural equation modeling (SEM) was employed to examine both direct and indirect effects.
Results: The SEM findings revealed that PTSD had a significant direct effect on BRN, which was partially mediated by psychological needs and EMP. Notably, the mediating role of empathy was more pronounced in the professional caregiver group, where the direct effect of PTSD on BRN dropped by nearly 49% after accounting for EMP and psychological needs. In contrast, this reduction was only 15% among family caregivers, suggesting that professional caregivers are more vulnerable to BRN due to EMP-driven mechanisms. Additionally, the indirect effects were also statistically significant. These findings suggest that unmet psychological needs and high levels of EMP may contribute to increased BRN among caregivers.
Conclusion: The findings revealed that both psychological needs and EMP play a partial mediating role in the relationship between PTSD and BRN. As caregivers’ levels of EMP increase, they may become more vulnerable to BRN. Addressing unmet psychological needs and promoting balanced EMP are considered important for protecting the mental health of both professional and family caregivers.
| Primary Language | English |
|---|---|
| Subjects | Trauma Psychology |
| Journal Section | Research Article |
| Authors | |
| Submission Date | May 11, 2025 |
| Acceptance Date | June 4, 2025 |
| Publication Date | July 28, 2025 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2025 Volume: 7 Issue: 4 |
TR DİZİN ULAKBİM and International Indexes (1b)
Interuniversity Board (UAK) Equivalency: Article published in Ulakbim TR Index journal [10 POINTS], and Article published in other (excuding 1a, b, c) international indexed journal (1d) [5 POINTS]
Note: Our journal is not WOS indexed and therefore is not classified as Q.
You can download Council of Higher Education (CoHG) [Yüksek Öğretim Kurumu (YÖK)] Criteria) decisions about predatory/questionable journals and the author's clarification text and journal charge policy from your browser. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/journal/3449/file/4924/show
Journal Indexes and Platforms:
TR Dizin ULAKBİM, Google Scholar, Crossref, Worldcat (OCLC), DRJI, EuroPub, OpenAIRE, Turkiye Citation Index, Turk Medline, ROAD, ICI World of Journal's, Index Copernicus, ASOS Index, General Impact Factor, Scilit.The indexes of the journal's are;
The platforms of the journal's are;
|
The indexes/platforms of the journal are;
TR Dizin Ulakbim, Crossref (DOI), Google Scholar, EuroPub, Directory of Research Journal İndexing (DRJI), Worldcat (OCLC), OpenAIRE, ASOS Index, ROAD, Turkiye Citation Index, ICI World of Journal's, Index Copernicus, Turk Medline, General Impact Factor, Scilit
Journal articles are evaluated as "Double-Blind Peer Review"
All articles published in this journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND)