Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Grade IV hemoroidal hastalıkta modifiye Ferguson hemoroidektomi yönteminin cerrahi sonuçları

Year 2025, Volume: 7 Issue: 5, 652 - 656, 15.09.2025
https://doi.org/10.38053/acmj.1736977

Abstract

Amaç: Grade IV internal hemoroidal hastalık, genellikle cerrahi müdahale gerektiren ileri evre bir hemoroidal patolojiyi temsil eder. Kapalı eksizyonel bir teknik olan Ferguson hemoroidektomi, postoperatif iyileşme süreci ve komplikasyon profili açısından sunduğu avantajlar nedeniyle sık tercih edilmektedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, grade IV internal hemoroidal hastalığı olan hastalarda modifiye Ferguson hemoroidektomi yönteminin etkinliğini, postoperatif sonuçlarını ve komplikasyon oranlarını değerlendirmektir.
Yöntemler: Bu retrospektif analizde, Mart 2021 ile Aralık 2024 tarihleri arasında modifiye Ferguson hemoroidektomi uygulanan grade IV internal hemoroidal hastalığa sahip 229 hasta incelendi. Demografik veriler, postoperatif komplikasyonlar, postoperatif ağrı düzeyi, nüks oranları ve günlük yaşama dönüş süresi kaydedildi. Postoperatif takip süresi ortalama 16,8 ay olarak gerçekleşti.
Bulgular: Yaş ortalaması 43,7 ± 10,7 yıl olan 229 hastanın %58’i erkekti ve %81’ine üç kadran hemoroidektomi uygulandı. Postoperatif komplikasyonlar arasında üriner retansiyon (%3,9), üriner sistem enfeksiyonu (%0,9), hafif kanama (%1,3), hafif anal stenoz (%0,9) ve minör perianal enfeksiyon (%5,2) yer aldı. Postoperatif ortanca VAS ağrı skorları 1. günde 4 (dağılım: 2–7), 7. günde ise 2 (dağılım: 1–5) idi. Preoperatif ve postoperatif Cleveland Clinic İnkontinans Skorları arasında anlamlı fark saptanmadı (p > 0,05). Hastaların normal günlük yaşantıya dönüş süresi ortanca 12 gündü (dağılım: 5–19 gün).
Sonuç: Modifiye Ferguson hemoroidektomi, grade IV internal hemoroidal hastalıkta düşük komplikasyon ve nüks oranları ile etkin ve güvenli bir cerrahi seçenek sunmakta, aynı zamanda hızlı bir iyileşme profili göstermektedir. Elde edilen veriler, bu tekniğin ileri hemoroidal hastalıklarda güvenilir bir tedavi seçeneği olduğunu desteklemektedir.

References

  • Lohsiriwat V, Jitmungngan R. Strategies to reduce post-hemorrhoidectomy pain: a systematic review. Medicina (Kaunas). 2022; 58(3): 418. doi:10.3390/medicina58030418
  • Gallo G, Sacco R, Sammarco G. Epidemiology of hemorrhoidal disease. In: Ratto C, Parello A, Litta F. (eds) Hemorrhoids. Coloproctology, vol 2. Springer, Cham. 2018. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-53357-5_1
  • Gallo G, Martellucci J, Sturiale A, et al. Consensus statement of the Italian society of colorectal surgery (SICCR): management and treatment of hemorrhoidal disease. Tech Coloproctol. 2020 Feb;24(2):145-164. doi:10. 1007/s10151-020-02149-1
  • Simillis C, Thoukididou SN, Slesser AA, Rasheed S, Tan E, Tekkis PP. Systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing clinical outcomes and effectiveness of surgical treatments for haemorrhoids. Br J Surg. 2015;102(13):1603-1618. doi:10.1002/bjs.9913
  • Gülen M, Emral AC, Ege B. Hemoroid lastik band ligasyonu komplikasyonlarının yönetimi: masif rektal kanama. Namik Kemal Med J. 2024;12(1):40-44. doi:10.4274/nkmj.galenos.2023.36036
  • Sobrado Júnior CW, Obregon CA, E Sousa Júnior AHDS, Sobrado LF, Nahas SC, Cecconello I. A new classification for hemorrhoidal disease: the creation of the "BPRST" staging and its application in clinical practice. Ann Coloproctol. 2020;36(4):249-255. doi:10.3393/ac.2020.02.06
  • Klang E, Sobeh T, Amitai MM, Apter S, Barash Y, Tau N. Post hemorrhoidectomy complications: CT imaging findings. Clin Imaging. 2020;60(2):216-221. doi:10.1016/j.clinimag.2019.12.015
  • Bhatti MI, Sajid MS, Baig MK. Milligan-Morgan (open) versus Ferguson haemorrhoidectomy (closed): a systematic review and meta-analysis of published randomized, controlled trials. World J Surg. 2016;40(6):1509-1519. doi:10.1007/s00268-016-3419-z
  • Jeong HY, Song SG, Lee JK. Predictors of postoperative urinary retention after semiclosed hemorrhoidectomy. Ann Coloproctol. 2022;38(1):53-59. doi:10.3393/ac.2021.00304.0043
  • Tammela T. Postoperative urinary retention--why the patient cannot void. Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl. 1995;175:75-77.
  • Bleday R, Pena JP, Rothenberger DA, Goldberg SM, Buls JG. Symptomatic hemorrhoids: current incidence and complications of operative therapy. Dis Colon Rectum. 1992;35(5):477-481. doi:10.1007/BF02049406
  • Kaidar-Person O, Person B, Wexner SD. Hemorrhoidal disease: a comprehensive review. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;204(1):102-117. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.08.022
  • Milone M, Maietta P, Leongito M, Pesce G, Salvatore G, Milone F. Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy: is still the gold standard treatment? Updates Surg. 2012;64(3):191-194. doi:10.1007/s13304-012-0155-2
  • Lee KC, Liu CC, Hu WH, Lu CC, Lin SE, Chen HH. Risk of delayed bleeding after hemorrhoidectomy. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2019;34(2):247-253. doi:10.1007/s00384-018-3176-6
  • Guenin MO, Rosenthal R, Kern B, Peterli R, von Flüe M, Ackermann C. Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy: long-term results and patient satisfaction after Ferguson's hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;48(8):1523-1527. doi:10.1007/s10350-005-0084-y
  • Eu KW, Teoh TA, Seow-Choen F, Goh HS. Anal stricture following haemorrhoidectomy: early diagnosis and treatment. Aust N Z J Surg. 1995;65(2):101-103. doi:10.1111/j.1445-2197.1995.tb07270.x
  • Lohsiriwat V, Jitmungngan R. Strategies to reduce post-hemorrhoidectomy pain: a systematic review. Medicina (Kaunas). 2022; 58(3):418. doi:10.3390/medicina58030418
  • Khanna R, Khanna S, Bhadani S, Singh S, Khanna AK. Comparison of ligasure hemorrhoidectomy with conventional Ferguson's hemorrhoidectomy. Indian J Surg. 2010;72(4):294-297. doi:10.1007/s 12262-010-0192-3

Surgical outcomes of modified Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy for grade IV hemorrhoidal disease

Year 2025, Volume: 7 Issue: 5, 652 - 656, 15.09.2025
https://doi.org/10.38053/acmj.1736977

Abstract

Aims: Grade IV internal hemorrhoidal disease represents an advanced stage of hemorrhoidal pathology, often necessitating surgical intervention. Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy, a closed excisional technique, is frequently employed for its reported advantages in postoperative recovery and complication profiles. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness, postoperative outcomes, and complication rates of modified Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy in patients with grade IV internal hemorrhoidal disease.
Methods: In this retrospective analysis, 229 patients with grade IV internal hemorrhoidal disease who underwent modified Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy between March 2021 and December 2024 were included. Demographic data, postoperative complications, postoperative pain, recurrence rates, and time to return to daily activities were recorded. Postoperative follow-up was conducted up to a mean duration of 16.8 months.
Results: Among 229 patients (mean age 43.7±10.7 years; 58% male), 81% underwent three-quadrant hemorrhoidectomy. Postoperative complications included urinary retention (3.9%), urinary tract infection (0.9%), minor bleeding (1.3%), mild anal stenosis (0.9%), and minor perianal infection (5.2%). The median postoperative VAS pain scores were 4 (range: 2–7) on day 1 and 2 (range: 1–5) on day 7. No significant differences were observed in preoperative and postoperative Cleveland Clinic Incontinence Scores (p>0.05). Median time to return to normal daily activities was 12 days (range 5–19).
Conclusion: Modified Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy provides an effective and safe surgical option for grade IV internal hemorrhoidal disease, with low complication and recurrence rates and a favorable recovery profile. These results support its use as a reliable treatment approach in advanced hemorrhoidal disease.

Ethical Statement

This study received ethical approval from the Ethics Committee of Atilim University Faculty of Medicine, Medicana International Ankara Hospital (approval number: 32, dated 09.11.2023).

References

  • Lohsiriwat V, Jitmungngan R. Strategies to reduce post-hemorrhoidectomy pain: a systematic review. Medicina (Kaunas). 2022; 58(3): 418. doi:10.3390/medicina58030418
  • Gallo G, Sacco R, Sammarco G. Epidemiology of hemorrhoidal disease. In: Ratto C, Parello A, Litta F. (eds) Hemorrhoids. Coloproctology, vol 2. Springer, Cham. 2018. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-53357-5_1
  • Gallo G, Martellucci J, Sturiale A, et al. Consensus statement of the Italian society of colorectal surgery (SICCR): management and treatment of hemorrhoidal disease. Tech Coloproctol. 2020 Feb;24(2):145-164. doi:10. 1007/s10151-020-02149-1
  • Simillis C, Thoukididou SN, Slesser AA, Rasheed S, Tan E, Tekkis PP. Systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing clinical outcomes and effectiveness of surgical treatments for haemorrhoids. Br J Surg. 2015;102(13):1603-1618. doi:10.1002/bjs.9913
  • Gülen M, Emral AC, Ege B. Hemoroid lastik band ligasyonu komplikasyonlarının yönetimi: masif rektal kanama. Namik Kemal Med J. 2024;12(1):40-44. doi:10.4274/nkmj.galenos.2023.36036
  • Sobrado Júnior CW, Obregon CA, E Sousa Júnior AHDS, Sobrado LF, Nahas SC, Cecconello I. A new classification for hemorrhoidal disease: the creation of the "BPRST" staging and its application in clinical practice. Ann Coloproctol. 2020;36(4):249-255. doi:10.3393/ac.2020.02.06
  • Klang E, Sobeh T, Amitai MM, Apter S, Barash Y, Tau N. Post hemorrhoidectomy complications: CT imaging findings. Clin Imaging. 2020;60(2):216-221. doi:10.1016/j.clinimag.2019.12.015
  • Bhatti MI, Sajid MS, Baig MK. Milligan-Morgan (open) versus Ferguson haemorrhoidectomy (closed): a systematic review and meta-analysis of published randomized, controlled trials. World J Surg. 2016;40(6):1509-1519. doi:10.1007/s00268-016-3419-z
  • Jeong HY, Song SG, Lee JK. Predictors of postoperative urinary retention after semiclosed hemorrhoidectomy. Ann Coloproctol. 2022;38(1):53-59. doi:10.3393/ac.2021.00304.0043
  • Tammela T. Postoperative urinary retention--why the patient cannot void. Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl. 1995;175:75-77.
  • Bleday R, Pena JP, Rothenberger DA, Goldberg SM, Buls JG. Symptomatic hemorrhoids: current incidence and complications of operative therapy. Dis Colon Rectum. 1992;35(5):477-481. doi:10.1007/BF02049406
  • Kaidar-Person O, Person B, Wexner SD. Hemorrhoidal disease: a comprehensive review. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;204(1):102-117. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.08.022
  • Milone M, Maietta P, Leongito M, Pesce G, Salvatore G, Milone F. Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy: is still the gold standard treatment? Updates Surg. 2012;64(3):191-194. doi:10.1007/s13304-012-0155-2
  • Lee KC, Liu CC, Hu WH, Lu CC, Lin SE, Chen HH. Risk of delayed bleeding after hemorrhoidectomy. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2019;34(2):247-253. doi:10.1007/s00384-018-3176-6
  • Guenin MO, Rosenthal R, Kern B, Peterli R, von Flüe M, Ackermann C. Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy: long-term results and patient satisfaction after Ferguson's hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;48(8):1523-1527. doi:10.1007/s10350-005-0084-y
  • Eu KW, Teoh TA, Seow-Choen F, Goh HS. Anal stricture following haemorrhoidectomy: early diagnosis and treatment. Aust N Z J Surg. 1995;65(2):101-103. doi:10.1111/j.1445-2197.1995.tb07270.x
  • Lohsiriwat V, Jitmungngan R. Strategies to reduce post-hemorrhoidectomy pain: a systematic review. Medicina (Kaunas). 2022; 58(3):418. doi:10.3390/medicina58030418
  • Khanna R, Khanna S, Bhadani S, Singh S, Khanna AK. Comparison of ligasure hemorrhoidectomy with conventional Ferguson's hemorrhoidectomy. Indian J Surg. 2010;72(4):294-297. doi:10.1007/s 12262-010-0192-3
There are 18 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects General Surgery
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Ahmet Cihangir Emral 0000-0003-3976-1387

Gökay Çetinkaya 0000-0002-1333-5059

Merter Gülen 0000-0002-9864-5119

Bahadır Ege 0000-0001-7420-5656

Submission Date July 7, 2025
Acceptance Date September 3, 2025
Publication Date September 15, 2025
Published in Issue Year 2025 Volume: 7 Issue: 5

Cite

AMA Emral AC, Çetinkaya G, Gülen M, Ege B. Surgical outcomes of modified Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy for grade IV hemorrhoidal disease. Anatolian Curr Med J / ACMJ / acmj. September 2025;7(5):652-656. doi:10.38053/acmj.1736977

TR DİZİN ULAKBİM and International Indexes (1b)

Interuniversity Board (UAK) Equivalency:  Article published in Ulakbim TR Index journal [10 POINTS], and Article published in other (excuding 1a, b, c) international indexed journal (1d) [5 POINTS]

Note: Our journal is not WOS indexed and therefore is not classified as Q.

You can download Council of Higher Education (CoHG) [Yüksek Öğretim Kurumu (YÖK)] Criteria) decisions about predatory/questionable journals and the author's clarification text and journal charge policy from your browser. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/journal/3449/file/4924/show

Journal Indexes and Platforms: 

TR Dizin ULAKBİM, Google Scholar, Crossref, Worldcat (OCLC), DRJI, EuroPub, OpenAIRE, Turkiye Citation Index, Turk Medline, ROAD, ICI World of Journal's, Index Copernicus, ASOS Index, General Impact Factor, Scilit.


The indexes of the journal's are;

18596


asos-index.png

f9ab67f.png

WorldCat_Logo_H_Color.png

      logo-large-explore.png

images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQgDnBwx0yUPRKuetgIurtELxYERFv20CPAUcPe4jYrrJiwXzac8rGXlzd57gl8iikb1Tk&usqp=CAU

index_copernicus.jpg


84039476_619085835534619_7808805634291269632_n.jpg





The platforms of the journal's are;

COPE.jpg

images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTbq2FM8NTdXECzlOUCeKQ1dvrISFL-LhxhC7zy1ZQeJk-GGKSx2XkWQvrsHxcfhtfHWxM&usqp=CAUicmje_1_orig.png


ncbi.png

ORCID_logo.pngimages?q=tbn:ANd9GcQlwX77nfpy3Bu9mpMBZa0miWT2sRt2zjAPJKg2V69ODTrjZM1nT1BbhWzTVPsTNKJMZzQ&usqp=CAU


images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTaWSousoprPWGwE-qxwxGH2y0ByZ_zdLMN-Oq93MsZpBVFOTfxi9uXV7tdr39qvyE-U0I&usqp=CAU






The
 
indexes/platforms of the journal are;

TR Dizin Ulakbim, Crossref (DOI), Google Scholar, EuroPub, Directory of Research Journal İndexing (DRJI), Worldcat (OCLC), OpenAIRE, ASOS Index, ROAD, Turkiye Citation Index, ICI World of Journal's, Index Copernicus, Turk Medline, General Impact Factor, Scilit 


Journal articles are evaluated as "Double-Blind Peer Review"

All articles published in this journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND)