Abstract
Objectives There is not enough data on the effect of COVID 19 on spleen volume in patients with COVID-19. Our aim was to compare the spleen volume of the COVID-19 patients with the control group.
Methods 214 Patients (121 men, 93 women) who have a diagnosis of COVID 19 who have thorax CT were included in the study. In the patient group, there was evidence of viral pneumonia on thoracic CT or PCR was positive, all of them were patients who received treatment for COVID. The control group consisted of 185 patients (106 men, 79 women). Interobserver agreement was calculated. Analysis of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to identify a spleen volume cutoff value at which the accuracy for COVID 19 diagnosis was maximised.
Results The mean spleen volume of the patient group was found to be 260 (range, 96.3-565, SD: 82.5) which was statistically significantly higher than the control group which was 220 (range, 125.9-331.9, SD: 34.5) (p <0.05). Excellent agreement was found between two blind observers and between intraobserver spleen volume measurements. In our study, the spleen volume for the diagnosis of COVID-19 pneumonia was 208.4 (AUC 0.639; 95% CI 0.584-0.695), sensitivity and specificity were 69.6% and 66.7%, respectively.
Conclusions Quantitative evaluation of spleen volume can give an idea about the COVID diagnosis. Spleen volume is higher in COVID group than control group.
Primary Language | English |
---|---|
Subjects | Health Care Administration |
Journal Section | Research Articles |
Authors | |
Publication Date | April 24, 2021 |
Published in Issue | Year 2021 Volume: 3 Issue: 2 |
TR DİZİN ULAKBİM and International Indexes (1b)
Interuniversity Board (UAK) Equivalency: Article published in Ulakbim TR Index journal [10 POINTS], and Article published in other (excuding 1a, b, c) international indexed journal (1d) [5 POINTS]
Note: Our journal is not WOS indexed and therefore is not classified as Q.
You can download Council of Higher Education (CoHG) [Yüksek Öğretim Kurumu (YÖK)] Criteria) decisions about predatory/questionable journals and the author's clarification text and journal charge policy from your browser. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/journal/3449/file/4924/show
Journal Indexes and Platforms:
TR Dizin ULAKBİM, Google Scholar, Crossref, Worldcat (OCLC), DRJI, EuroPub, OpenAIRE, Turkiye Citation Index, Turk Medline, ROAD, ICI World of Journal's, Index Copernicus, ASOS Index, General Impact Factor, Scilit.The indexes of the journal's are;
The platforms of the journal's are;
The indexes/platforms of the journal are;
TR Dizin Ulakbim, Crossref (DOI), Google Scholar, EuroPub, Directory of Research Journal İndexing (DRJI), Worldcat (OCLC), OpenAIRE, ASOS Index, ROAD, Turkiye Citation Index, ICI World of Journal's, Index Copernicus, Turk Medline, General Impact Factor, Scilit
EBSCO, DOAJ, OAJI is under evaluation.
Journal articles are evaluated as "Double-Blind Peer Review"