Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Evaluation of the satisfaction of relatives of patients being treated in the intensive care unit

Year 2024, Volume: 6 Issue: 5, 313 - 318, 30.09.2024

Abstract

Aims: There has been no previous study on the satisfaction of relatives of patients receiving treatment in the intensive care unit of our hospital. Our study was conducted to improve quality and service in our intensive care unit. A survey was conducted to evaluate the satisfaction of the relatives of patients receiving treatment.
Methods: The satisfaction of the relatives of the patients who were treated for at least 3 days in the 3rd Step general intensive care unit at Mardin Training and Research Hospital between 01. February 2023 and 01. June 2023 was evaluated in line with the surveys. A questionnaire was given to each patient’s relative by the attending physician to be filled out.
Results: 114 patient relatives participated in the study. 12 patient relatives did not agree to fill out the survey. 102 patient relatives filled out the satisfaction survey.
Conclusion: Waiting room in intensive care unit conditions need to be improved. In our study, we think that patient relatives have confidence in the treatments applied to their patients and are satisfied with the skills and abilities of doctors and nurses.

References

  • Sungono V, Hariyanto H, Soesilo TEB, et al. Cohort study of the APACHE II score and mortality for different types of intensive care unit patients. Postgraduate Med J. 2022;98:914-918. doi:10.1136/postgradmedj-2021-140376
  • Naqvi IH, Mahmood K, Ziaullaha S, Kashif SM, Sharif A. Better prognostic marker in ICU-APACHE II. SOFA or SAP II! Pakistan J Med Sci. 2016;32:1146-1151. doi:10.12669/pjms.325.10080
  • Parpucu ÜM, Küçük O, Aydemir S. Factors influencing morbidity and mortality rates in tertiary intensive care units in Turkey: a retrospective cross-sectional study. Healthcare (Basel). 2024;12(6):1-13. doi:10.3390/healthcare12060689
  • Stricker KH, Kimberger O, Schmidlin K, Zwahlen M, Mohr U. Rothen HU. Family satisfaction in the intensive care unit: what makes the difference?. Intensive Care Med. 2009;35(12): 2051-2059. doi:10.1007/s00134-009-1611-4
  • Schwarzkopf D, Behrend S, Skupin H, et al. Family satisfaction in the intensive care unit: a quantitative and qualitative analysis. Intensive Care Med. 2013;39(6):1071-1079. doi:10.1007/s00134-013-2862-7
  • Johnson D, Wilson M, Cavanaugh B, Bryden C, Gudmundson D, Moodley O. Measuring the ability to meet family needs in an intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 1998;26:266-271. doi:10.1097/00003246-199802000-00023
  • Hunziker S, McHugh W, Sarnoff-Lee B, et al. Predictors and correlates of dissatisfaction with intensive care. Crit Care Med. 2012;40:1554-1565. doi:10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182451c70
  • Wasser T, Pasquale MA, MatchettSC, Bryan Y, Pasquale M. Establishing reliability and validity of the critical care family satisfaction survey. Crit Care Med. 2001;29:192-196. doi:10.1097/00003246-200101000-00038
  • Dodek PM, Heyland DK, Rocker GM, Cook DJ. Translating family satisfaction data into quality improvement. Crit Care Med. 2004;32:1922-1927. doi:10.1097/01.ccm.0000139920.53790.61
  • Wall RJ, Engelberg RA, Downey L. Heyland DK. Curtis JR. Refinement. scoring. and validation of the family satisfaction in the intensive care unit (FS-ICU) survey. Crit Care Med. 2007;35:271-279. doi:10.1097/01.CCM.0000251122.15053.50
  • Erden İA, Pamuk AG, Akıncı SB, Turgut HC, Sarıcaoğlu F, Aypar Ü. Yoğun bakım ünitesinde aile memnuniyetinin değerlendirilmesi. Türk Yoğ Bak Dern Derg. 2010;8:18-25.
  • Dodek PM, Wong H, Heyland DK, et al. The relationship between organizational culture and family satisfaction in criticalcare. Crit Care Med. 2012;40:1506-12. doi:10.1097/CCM.0b013e318241e368
  • Azoulay E, Chevret S, Leleu G, et al. Half the families of intensive care unit patients experience in adequate communication with physicians. Crit Care Med. 2000;28:3044-3049. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200008000-00061
  • Heyland DK, Rocker GM, Dodek PM, et al. Family satisfaction with care in the intensive care unit: results of a multiple center study. Crit Care Med. 2002;30:1413-1418. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200207000-00002
  • Aydın K, Tokur ME, Daş T, et al. Anestezi yoğun bakım ünitesinde hasta yakını memnuniyetinin değerlendirilmesi. DEÜ Tıp Fak Derg. 2016;30(2):61-70.
  • Erdal Ç, Tunalı Y, Dilmen Ö, Akçıl F, Yentür E. Yoğun bakım ünitesinde yatan hastaların yakınlarının memnuniyetinin değerlendirilmesi. Türk Yoğ Bak Dern Derg. 2013;11:64-71. doi: 10.4274/Tybdd.36855
  • İncesu E. Yoğun bakımda yatan hasta yakınlarının memnuniyetinin araştırılması. Gümüşhane Üniv Sağ Bil Derg (GÜSBD). 2018;7(4):27-37.
  • Ali A, Krishnareddy K, Loney T, Hon H. Family satisfaction with intensive care services: a survey from three tertiary hospital units. Ibnosina J Med Biomed Sci. 2019;11:62-67. doi:10.4103/ijmbs.ijmbs_93_18
  • Maxim T, Alvarez A, Hojberg Y, et al. Family satisfaction in thetrauma and surgical intensive care unit: another important quality measure. Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2019;4(1):e000302. doi:10.1136/tsaco- 2019-000302
  • Akelma H, Çelik E. Yoğun bakım ve bilinci kapalı hasta ile iletişim. Kaçan H. Bayram Değer V. editörler. İçinde: Sağlikta İletişim: Disiplinler arası Çağdaş Bir Yaklaşım. Ankara: Akademisyen Yayınev Kitabevi. 2023. p.121-130.
  • Min J, Kim Y, Lee JK, et al. Survey of family satisfaction with intensive care units: a prospective multicenter study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018;97(32):e11809. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000011809
Year 2024, Volume: 6 Issue: 5, 313 - 318, 30.09.2024

Abstract

References

  • Sungono V, Hariyanto H, Soesilo TEB, et al. Cohort study of the APACHE II score and mortality for different types of intensive care unit patients. Postgraduate Med J. 2022;98:914-918. doi:10.1136/postgradmedj-2021-140376
  • Naqvi IH, Mahmood K, Ziaullaha S, Kashif SM, Sharif A. Better prognostic marker in ICU-APACHE II. SOFA or SAP II! Pakistan J Med Sci. 2016;32:1146-1151. doi:10.12669/pjms.325.10080
  • Parpucu ÜM, Küçük O, Aydemir S. Factors influencing morbidity and mortality rates in tertiary intensive care units in Turkey: a retrospective cross-sectional study. Healthcare (Basel). 2024;12(6):1-13. doi:10.3390/healthcare12060689
  • Stricker KH, Kimberger O, Schmidlin K, Zwahlen M, Mohr U. Rothen HU. Family satisfaction in the intensive care unit: what makes the difference?. Intensive Care Med. 2009;35(12): 2051-2059. doi:10.1007/s00134-009-1611-4
  • Schwarzkopf D, Behrend S, Skupin H, et al. Family satisfaction in the intensive care unit: a quantitative and qualitative analysis. Intensive Care Med. 2013;39(6):1071-1079. doi:10.1007/s00134-013-2862-7
  • Johnson D, Wilson M, Cavanaugh B, Bryden C, Gudmundson D, Moodley O. Measuring the ability to meet family needs in an intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 1998;26:266-271. doi:10.1097/00003246-199802000-00023
  • Hunziker S, McHugh W, Sarnoff-Lee B, et al. Predictors and correlates of dissatisfaction with intensive care. Crit Care Med. 2012;40:1554-1565. doi:10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182451c70
  • Wasser T, Pasquale MA, MatchettSC, Bryan Y, Pasquale M. Establishing reliability and validity of the critical care family satisfaction survey. Crit Care Med. 2001;29:192-196. doi:10.1097/00003246-200101000-00038
  • Dodek PM, Heyland DK, Rocker GM, Cook DJ. Translating family satisfaction data into quality improvement. Crit Care Med. 2004;32:1922-1927. doi:10.1097/01.ccm.0000139920.53790.61
  • Wall RJ, Engelberg RA, Downey L. Heyland DK. Curtis JR. Refinement. scoring. and validation of the family satisfaction in the intensive care unit (FS-ICU) survey. Crit Care Med. 2007;35:271-279. doi:10.1097/01.CCM.0000251122.15053.50
  • Erden İA, Pamuk AG, Akıncı SB, Turgut HC, Sarıcaoğlu F, Aypar Ü. Yoğun bakım ünitesinde aile memnuniyetinin değerlendirilmesi. Türk Yoğ Bak Dern Derg. 2010;8:18-25.
  • Dodek PM, Wong H, Heyland DK, et al. The relationship between organizational culture and family satisfaction in criticalcare. Crit Care Med. 2012;40:1506-12. doi:10.1097/CCM.0b013e318241e368
  • Azoulay E, Chevret S, Leleu G, et al. Half the families of intensive care unit patients experience in adequate communication with physicians. Crit Care Med. 2000;28:3044-3049. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200008000-00061
  • Heyland DK, Rocker GM, Dodek PM, et al. Family satisfaction with care in the intensive care unit: results of a multiple center study. Crit Care Med. 2002;30:1413-1418. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200207000-00002
  • Aydın K, Tokur ME, Daş T, et al. Anestezi yoğun bakım ünitesinde hasta yakını memnuniyetinin değerlendirilmesi. DEÜ Tıp Fak Derg. 2016;30(2):61-70.
  • Erdal Ç, Tunalı Y, Dilmen Ö, Akçıl F, Yentür E. Yoğun bakım ünitesinde yatan hastaların yakınlarının memnuniyetinin değerlendirilmesi. Türk Yoğ Bak Dern Derg. 2013;11:64-71. doi: 10.4274/Tybdd.36855
  • İncesu E. Yoğun bakımda yatan hasta yakınlarının memnuniyetinin araştırılması. Gümüşhane Üniv Sağ Bil Derg (GÜSBD). 2018;7(4):27-37.
  • Ali A, Krishnareddy K, Loney T, Hon H. Family satisfaction with intensive care services: a survey from three tertiary hospital units. Ibnosina J Med Biomed Sci. 2019;11:62-67. doi:10.4103/ijmbs.ijmbs_93_18
  • Maxim T, Alvarez A, Hojberg Y, et al. Family satisfaction in thetrauma and surgical intensive care unit: another important quality measure. Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2019;4(1):e000302. doi:10.1136/tsaco- 2019-000302
  • Akelma H, Çelik E. Yoğun bakım ve bilinci kapalı hasta ile iletişim. Kaçan H. Bayram Değer V. editörler. İçinde: Sağlikta İletişim: Disiplinler arası Çağdaş Bir Yaklaşım. Ankara: Akademisyen Yayınev Kitabevi. 2023. p.121-130.
  • Min J, Kim Y, Lee JK, et al. Survey of family satisfaction with intensive care units: a prospective multicenter study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018;97(32):e11809. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000011809
There are 21 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Anaesthesiology
Journal Section Research Articles
Authors

Metin Kılınç 0000-0002-1813-1274

Enes Çelik 0000-0002-5546-4924

Hakan Akelma 0000-0002-0387-8738

Publication Date September 30, 2024
Submission Date June 30, 2024
Acceptance Date September 2, 2024
Published in Issue Year 2024 Volume: 6 Issue: 5

Cite

AMA Kılınç M, Çelik E, Akelma H. Evaluation of the satisfaction of relatives of patients being treated in the intensive care unit. Anatolian Curr Med J / ACMJ / acmj. September 2024;6(5):313-318.

TR DİZİN ULAKBİM and International Indexes (1b)

Interuniversity Board (UAK) Equivalency:  Article published in Ulakbim TR Index journal [10 POINTS], and Article published in other (excuding 1a, b, c) international indexed journal (1d) [5 POINTS]

Note: Our journal is not WOS indexed and therefore is not classified as Q.

You can download Council of Higher Education (CoHG) [Yüksek Öğretim Kurumu (YÖK)] Criteria) decisions about predatory/questionable journals and the author's clarification text and journal charge policy from your browser. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/journal/3449/file/4924/show

Journal Indexes and Platforms: 

TR Dizin ULAKBİM, Google Scholar, Crossref, Worldcat (OCLC), DRJI, EuroPub, OpenAIRE, Turkiye Citation Index, Turk Medline, ROAD, ICI World of Journal's, Index Copernicus, ASOS Index, General Impact Factor, Scilit.


The indexes of the journal's are;

18596


asos-index.png

f9ab67f.png

WorldCat_Logo_H_Color.png

      logo-large-explore.png

images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQgDnBwx0yUPRKuetgIurtELxYERFv20CPAUcPe4jYrrJiwXzac8rGXlzd57gl8iikb1Tk&usqp=CAU

index_copernicus.jpg


84039476_619085835534619_7808805634291269632_n.jpg





The platforms of the journal's are;

COPE.jpg

images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTbq2FM8NTdXECzlOUCeKQ1dvrISFL-LhxhC7zy1ZQeJk-GGKSx2XkWQvrsHxcfhtfHWxM&usqp=CAUicmje_1_orig.png

cc.logo.large.png

ncbi.png

ORCID_logo.pngimages?q=tbn:ANd9GcQlwX77nfpy3Bu9mpMBZa0miWT2sRt2zjAPJKg2V69ODTrjZM1nT1BbhWzTVPsTNKJMZzQ&usqp=CAU


images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTaWSousoprPWGwE-qxwxGH2y0ByZ_zdLMN-Oq93MsZpBVFOTfxi9uXV7tdr39qvyE-U0I&usqp=CAU






The
 
indexes/platforms of the journal are;

TR Dizin Ulakbim, Crossref (DOI), Google Scholar, EuroPub, Directory of Research Journal İndexing (DRJI), Worldcat (OCLC), OpenAIRE, ASOS Index, ROAD, Turkiye Citation Index, ICI World of Journal's, Index Copernicus, Turk Medline, General Impact Factor, Scilit 


EBSCO, DOAJ, OAJI is under evaluation.

Journal articles are evaluated as "Double-Blind Peer Review"