Aims: It is critical to know the localization, anatomy and dimensions of mental foramen (MF) to avoid nerve damage during surgical procedures in the mandibular anterior region and to ensure complete local anesthesia for dental procedures. The aim of our study was to retrospectively evaluate the morphological and morphometric features of MF using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and to contribute to the existing data.
Methods: In our study, the location of the MF, its horizontal diameter, its vertical diameter, the distance of the MF to the alveolar crest, the distance to the lower border of the mandible, the distance to the apex of the adjacent tooth and the distance to the midline were evaluated in the CBCT images of 500 patients between the ages of 18-65. In addition, the types of exit of the mental nerve from the MF were examined. Pearson Chi-square test was used to analyze categorical variables. Normally distributed characteristics were compared using the student t test.
Results: In our study, CBCT images of 500 cases, 250 (50%) of which were male and 250 (50%) of which were female were examined (mean age: 37.12±11.91). No significant relationship was found between MF location and gender (p>0.05). In the right mandibular region, a statistically significant difference was found between the vertical and horizontal diameters of the MF (higher in males), the distance to the alveolar crest (higher in males), the distance of the MF to the lower border of the mandible (higher in males), the distance to the midline (higher in males) and gender (p<0.05). No statistically significant relationship was found between MF exit types and gender in the right and left mandibular regions (p>0.05).
Conclusion: It is important to examine the localization, size and distance of MF to neighboring anatomical structures, the presence and dimensions of alveolar loop (AL) with CBCT before procedures with high risk of complications in the interforaminal region.
Primary Language | English |
---|---|
Subjects | Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology |
Journal Section | Research Articles |
Authors | |
Publication Date | March 21, 2025 |
Submission Date | January 7, 2025 |
Acceptance Date | January 27, 2025 |
Published in Issue | Year 2025 Volume: 7 Issue: 2 |
TR DİZİN ULAKBİM and International Indexes (1b)
Interuniversity Board (UAK) Equivalency: Article published in Ulakbim TR Index journal [10 POINTS], and Article published in other (excuding 1a, b, c) international indexed journal (1d) [5 POINTS]
Note: Our journal is not WOS indexed and therefore is not classified as Q.
You can download Council of Higher Education (CoHG) [Yüksek Öğretim Kurumu (YÖK)] Criteria) decisions about predatory/questionable journals and the author's clarification text and journal charge policy from your browser. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/journal/3449/file/4924/show
Journal Indexes and Platforms:
TR Dizin ULAKBİM, Google Scholar, Crossref, Worldcat (OCLC), DRJI, EuroPub, OpenAIRE, Turkiye Citation Index, Turk Medline, ROAD, ICI World of Journal's, Index Copernicus, ASOS Index, General Impact Factor, Scilit.The indexes of the journal's are;
The platforms of the journal's are;
The indexes/platforms of the journal are;
TR Dizin Ulakbim, Crossref (DOI), Google Scholar, EuroPub, Directory of Research Journal İndexing (DRJI), Worldcat (OCLC), OpenAIRE, ASOS Index, ROAD, Turkiye Citation Index, ICI World of Journal's, Index Copernicus, Turk Medline, General Impact Factor, Scilit
EBSCO, DOAJ, OAJI is under evaluation.
Journal articles are evaluated as "Double-Blind Peer Review"