Aims: Mortality rates remain high among patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) following successful return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) after cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Identifying risk factors specific to this patient group may directly inform clinical decision-making processes. This study aimed to identify the clinical and laboratory parameters associated with mortality in post-CPR ICU patients and to compare machine learning models developed using these parameterswith traditional statistical analyses.
Methods: This retrospective study included a total of 82 patients treated in a tertiary-level ICU between 2020 and 2023. The post-CPR group (n=41) consisted of patients admitted to the ICU following effective CPR and ROSC, while the control group (n=41) included randomly selected patients with similar clinical characteristics who had not undergone CPR. Demographic data, clinical scores (APACHE II, SOFA, NUTRIC), laboratory values, and survival outcomes were recorded. Mortality prediction models were developed using the Random Forest algorithm applied to class-balanced datasets generated with the ADASYN
method.
Results: The post-CPR group had significantly higher scores and biomarker levels, including APACHE II, SOFA, and CRP, whereas albumin and GFR levels were notably lower. Both ICU and hospital mortality rates were significantly elevated in this group (75.6% and 80.5%, respectively; p<0.001). In general ICU mortality models developed using Random Forest, variables such as inotropic support, APACHE II, SOFA, and CRP emerged as prominent predictors, and the model demonstrated high predictive performance (AUC: 0.914). In the subgroup of post-CPR patients, factors such as thrombocyte count, mean platelet volume, and sex were found to be particularly influential in predicting mortality.
Conclusion: Both traditional statistical analyses and machine learning models provide clinically meaningful results in predicting early mortality among post-CPR patients. In particular, the need for inotropic support and elevated inflammatory markers appear to be strong predictors of mortality. The high predictive performance of AI-supported models, even with small sample sizes, highlights their potential clinical utility, though prospective observational studies are needed to further validate these models. However, the limited cohort size and the absence of resuscitation-specific variables such as initial CPR rhythm and duration represent important limitations that should be addressed in future prospective studies. The dataset used for model development, along with the executable Python scripts, is available for sharing.
Aims: Mortality rates remain high among patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) following successful return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) after cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Identifying risk factors specific to this patient group may directly inform clinical decision-making processes. This study aimed to identify the clinical and laboratory parameters associated with mortality in post-CPR ICU patients and to compare machine learning models developed using these parameters with traditional statistical analyses.
Methods: This retrospective study included a total of 82 patients treated in a tertiary-level ICU between 2020 and 2023. The post-CPR group (n=41) consisted of patients admitted to the ICU following effective CPR and ROSC, while the control group (n=41) included randomly selected patients with similar clinical characteristics who had not undergone CPR. Demographic data, clinical scores (APACHE II, SOFA, NUTRIC), laboratory values, and survival outcomes were recorded. Mortality prediction models were developed using the Random Forest algorithm applied to class-balanced datasets generated with the ADASYN
method.
Results: The post-CPR group had significantly higher scores and biomarker levels, including APACHE II, SOFA, and CRP, whereas albumin and GFR levels were notably lower. Both ICU and hospital mortality rates were significantly elevated in this group (75.6% and 80.5%, respectively; p<0.001). In general ICU mortality models developed using Random Forest, variables such as inotropic support, APACHE II, SOFA, and CRP emerged as prominent predictors, and the model demonstrated high predictive performance (AUC: 0.914). In the subgroup of post-CPR patients, factors such as thrombocyte count, mean platelet volume, and sex were found to be particularly influential in predicting mortality.
Conclusion: Both traditional statistical analyses and machine learning models provide clinically meaningful results in predicting early mortality among post-CPR patients. In particular, the need for inotropic support and elevated inflammatory markers appear to be strong predictors of mortality. The high predictive performance of AI-supported models, even with small sample sizes, highlights their potential clinical utility, though prospective observational studies are needed to further validate these models. However, the limited cohort size and the absence of resuscitation-specific variables such as initial CPR rhythm and duration represent important limitations that should be addressed in future prospective studies. The dataset used for model development, along with the executable Python scripts, is available for sharing.
Primary Language | English |
---|---|
Subjects | Intensive Care |
Journal Section | Research Articles |
Authors | |
Publication Date | July 28, 2025 |
Submission Date | May 27, 2025 |
Acceptance Date | June 14, 2025 |
Published in Issue | Year 2025 Volume: 7 Issue: 4 |
TR DİZİN ULAKBİM and International Indexes (1b)
Interuniversity Board (UAK) Equivalency: Article published in Ulakbim TR Index journal [10 POINTS], and Article published in other (excuding 1a, b, c) international indexed journal (1d) [5 POINTS]
Note: Our journal is not WOS indexed and therefore is not classified as Q.
You can download Council of Higher Education (CoHG) [Yüksek Öğretim Kurumu (YÖK)] Criteria) decisions about predatory/questionable journals and the author's clarification text and journal charge policy from your browser. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/journal/3449/file/4924/show
Journal Indexes and Platforms:
TR Dizin ULAKBİM, Google Scholar, Crossref, Worldcat (OCLC), DRJI, EuroPub, OpenAIRE, Turkiye Citation Index, Turk Medline, ROAD, ICI World of Journal's, Index Copernicus, ASOS Index, General Impact Factor, Scilit.The indexes of the journal's are;
The platforms of the journal's are;
The indexes/platforms of the journal are;
TR Dizin Ulakbim, Crossref (DOI), Google Scholar, EuroPub, Directory of Research Journal İndexing (DRJI), Worldcat (OCLC), OpenAIRE, ASOS Index, ROAD, Turkiye Citation Index, ICI World of Journal's, Index Copernicus, Turk Medline, General Impact Factor, Scilit
Journal articles are evaluated as "Double-Blind Peer Review"
All articles published in this journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND)