Aims: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of maternal body-mass index (BMI) in the first trimester on perinatal outcomes in pregnant women diagnosed with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).
Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 210 women with GDM, categorized into three groups based on firsttrimester BMI: normal weight (BMI<25.0 kg/m²), overweight (BMI 25.0–29.9 kg/m²), and obese (BMI≥30.0 kg/m²). Perinatal outcomes such as preterm birth, low birth weight, macrosomia, NICU admission, and Apgar scores were compared across groups. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to evaluate the independent association between obesity and adverse perinatal outcomes.
Results: The rates of preterm birth <37 weeks (35.7%, p<0.001) and <34 weeks (11.4%, p=0.016) were significantly higher in the obese group. Although low birth weight (<2500 g) was observed in 10.0% of obese women, this difference was not statistically significant (p=0.211). Macrosomia (≥4000 g) was more frequent in the obese group (11.4%) but did not reach statistical significance (p=0.261). NICU admission rates were higher in obese women (22.9%, p=0.089). In adjusted analyses, obesity was independently associated with increased odds of preterm birth <34 weeks (adjusted OR: 6.01, p=0.012) and low birth weight (adjusted OR: 4.68, p=0.026). Additionally, Spearman correlation analysis revealed a weak, non-significant positive correlation between gestational weight gain and gestational age at birth (r=0.122, p=0.077).
Conclusion: In pregnant women with GDM, first-trimester maternal obesity is associated with an increased risk of early preterm birth and low birth weight. These findings underscore the importance of assessing and managing maternal BMI early in pregnancy to improve perinatal outcomes.
Aims: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of maternal body-mass index (BMI) in the first trimester on perinatal outcomes in pregnant women diagnosed with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).
Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 210 women with GDM, categorized into three groups based on firsttrimester BMI: normal weight (BMI<25.0 kg/m²), overweight (BMI 25.0–29.9 kg/m²), and obese (BMI≥30.0 kg/m²). Perinatal outcomes such as preterm birth, low birth weight, macrosomia, NICU admission, and Apgar scores were compared across groups. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to evaluate the independent association between obesity and adverse perinatal outcomes.
Results: The rates of preterm birth <37 weeks (35.7%, p<0.001) and <34 weeks (11.4%, p=0.016) were significantly higher in the obese group. Although low birth weight (<2500 g) was observed in 10.0% of obese women, this difference was not statistically significant (p=0.211). Macrosomia (≥4000 g) was more frequent in the obese group (11.4%) but did not reach statistical significance (p=0.261). NICU admission rates were higher in obese women (22.9%, p=0.089). In adjusted analyses, obesity was independently associated with increased odds of preterm birth <34 weeks (adjusted OR: 6.01, p=0.012) and low birth weight (adjusted OR: 4.68, p=0.026). Additionally, Spearman correlation analysis revealed a weak, non-significant positive correlation between gestational weight gain and gestational age at birth (r=0.122, p=0.077).
Conclusion: In pregnant women with GDM, first-trimester maternal obesity is associated with an increased risk of early preterm birth and low birth weight. These findings underscore the importance of assessing and managing maternal BMI early in pregnancy to improve perinatal outcomes.
Primary Language | English |
---|---|
Subjects | Obstetrics and Gynaecology |
Journal Section | Research Articles |
Authors | |
Publication Date | September 15, 2025 |
Submission Date | June 16, 2025 |
Acceptance Date | July 22, 2025 |
Published in Issue | Year 2025 Volume: 7 Issue: 5 |
TR DİZİN ULAKBİM and International Indexes (1b)
Interuniversity Board (UAK) Equivalency: Article published in Ulakbim TR Index journal [10 POINTS], and Article published in other (excuding 1a, b, c) international indexed journal (1d) [5 POINTS]
Note: Our journal is not WOS indexed and therefore is not classified as Q.
You can download Council of Higher Education (CoHG) [Yüksek Öğretim Kurumu (YÖK)] Criteria) decisions about predatory/questionable journals and the author's clarification text and journal charge policy from your browser. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/journal/3449/file/4924/show
Journal Indexes and Platforms:
TR Dizin ULAKBİM, Google Scholar, Crossref, Worldcat (OCLC), DRJI, EuroPub, OpenAIRE, Turkiye Citation Index, Turk Medline, ROAD, ICI World of Journal's, Index Copernicus, ASOS Index, General Impact Factor, Scilit.The indexes of the journal's are;
The platforms of the journal's are;
The indexes/platforms of the journal are;
TR Dizin Ulakbim, Crossref (DOI), Google Scholar, EuroPub, Directory of Research Journal İndexing (DRJI), Worldcat (OCLC), OpenAIRE, ASOS Index, ROAD, Turkiye Citation Index, ICI World of Journal's, Index Copernicus, Turk Medline, General Impact Factor, Scilit
Journal articles are evaluated as "Double-Blind Peer Review"
All articles published in this journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND)