TR
Comparison of Cephalometric and Dental Cast Measurements of Patients Treated with Single Lower Incisor Extraction and Non-extraction Orthodontic Treatment
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the treatment results of patients treated with non-extraction (NE) and single lower incisor extraction (SLIE) using cephalometric and dental cast analysis.
Methods: The lateral cephalometric radiographs and dental casts of 40 patients (20 patients of treated with Single Lower Incisor Extraction (SLIE), and 20 patients of treated with non-extraction (NE) were examined. The positions of the upper and lower incisors were examined cephalometrically; dental arch widths, arch lengths, Little Irregularity Index and Bolton Analysis were measured on the dental casts.
Results: In the SLIE and NE group, the amounts of maxillary irregularity were 2.67 ± 0.30 (mm) and 3.07 ± 0.36 (mm), the amounts of mandibular irregularity were 7.11±0.27 (mm) and 3.29±0.46 (mm) respectively. Lower intercanine (3-3) width was significantly decreased in the SLIE group and the changes between the groups were statistically significant as well. In SLIE group, no statistically significant change was observed in the parameters of the upper and lower incisor measurements, while in the NE group, the upper incisor angle (1-NA˚) and the distance of the upper incisors to the N-A plane (1-NA (mm)) increased significantly (p<0.05).
Conclusion: Successful dentoalveolar outcomes may be achieved by performing SLIE therapy as an alternative to NE applied to treat Class I patients with mandibular irregularity. Lower incisor extraction can be applied to avoid lower incisor protrusion.
Keywords
References
- 1. Kokich VG, Shapiro PA. Lower incisor extraction in orthodontic treatment: four clinical reports. Angle Orthod 1984; 54(2):139-53.
- 2. Proffit WR, Fields HW Jr, Sarver DE. Contemporary orthodontics, 5th ed. St Louis: Mosby; 2013.
- 3. Ileri Z, Bascifti FA, Malkoc S, Ramoglu SI. Comparison of the outcomes of the lower incisor extraction, premolar extraction and non-extraction treatments. Eur J Orthod 2012; 34:681-5.
- 4. Nazir R, Amanat N, Rizvi KR. Pattern, prevalence and severity of malocclusion among university students. J Pak Dent Assoc 2013; 22:13-8.
- 5. Melo L, Ono Y, Takagi Y. Indicators of mandibular dental crowding in the mixed dentition. Pediatr Dent 2001; 23:118-22.
- 6. Giancotti A, Garino F, Mampieri G. Lower incisor extraction treatment with the Invisalign® technique: three case reports. JO 2015; 42:33-44.
- 7. Grob DJ. Extraction of a mandibular incisor in a Class I malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995; 108:533-41.
- 8. Riedel RA, Little RM, Bui TD. Mandibular incisor extraction-Post retention evaluation of stability and relapse. Angle Orthod 1992; 62:103-16.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Dentistry
Journal Section
Research Article
Publication Date
July 27, 2022
Submission Date
April 26, 2022
Acceptance Date
May 18, 2022
Published in Issue
Year 2022 Volume: 1 Number: 1
APA
Esenlik, E., & Yüksel Coşkun, E. (2022). Comparison of Cephalometric and Dental Cast Measurements of Patients Treated with Single Lower Incisor Extraction and Non-extraction Orthodontic Treatment. Akdeniz Diş Hekimliği Dergisi, 1(1), 6-13. https://izlik.org/JA83GA52PN
AMA
1.Esenlik E, Yüksel Coşkun E. Comparison of Cephalometric and Dental Cast Measurements of Patients Treated with Single Lower Incisor Extraction and Non-extraction Orthodontic Treatment. Akd Dent J. 2022;1(1):6-13. https://izlik.org/JA83GA52PN
Chicago
Esenlik, Elçin, and Esra Yüksel Coşkun. 2022. “Comparison of Cephalometric and Dental Cast Measurements of Patients Treated With Single Lower Incisor Extraction and Non-Extraction Orthodontic Treatment”. Akdeniz Diş Hekimliği Dergisi 1 (1): 6-13. https://izlik.org/JA83GA52PN.
EndNote
Esenlik E, Yüksel Coşkun E (July 1, 2022) Comparison of Cephalometric and Dental Cast Measurements of Patients Treated with Single Lower Incisor Extraction and Non-extraction Orthodontic Treatment. Akdeniz Diş Hekimliği Dergisi 1 1 6–13.
IEEE
[1]E. Esenlik and E. Yüksel Coşkun, “Comparison of Cephalometric and Dental Cast Measurements of Patients Treated with Single Lower Incisor Extraction and Non-extraction Orthodontic Treatment”, Akd Dent J, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 6–13, July 2022, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA83GA52PN
ISNAD
Esenlik, Elçin - Yüksel Coşkun, Esra. “Comparison of Cephalometric and Dental Cast Measurements of Patients Treated With Single Lower Incisor Extraction and Non-Extraction Orthodontic Treatment”. Akdeniz Diş Hekimliği Dergisi 1/1 (July 1, 2022): 6-13. https://izlik.org/JA83GA52PN.
JAMA
1.Esenlik E, Yüksel Coşkun E. Comparison of Cephalometric and Dental Cast Measurements of Patients Treated with Single Lower Incisor Extraction and Non-extraction Orthodontic Treatment. Akd Dent J. 2022;1:6–13.
MLA
Esenlik, Elçin, and Esra Yüksel Coşkun. “Comparison of Cephalometric and Dental Cast Measurements of Patients Treated With Single Lower Incisor Extraction and Non-Extraction Orthodontic Treatment”. Akdeniz Diş Hekimliği Dergisi, vol. 1, no. 1, July 2022, pp. 6-13, https://izlik.org/JA83GA52PN.
Vancouver
1.Elçin Esenlik, Esra Yüksel Coşkun. Comparison of Cephalometric and Dental Cast Measurements of Patients Treated with Single Lower Incisor Extraction and Non-extraction Orthodontic Treatment. Akd Dent J [Internet]. 2022 Jul. 1;1(1):6-13. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA83GA52PN