Prevalence of Malocclusions in Orthodontic Patients: an Epidemiological Study

Year 2025, Volume: 4 Issue: 2, 104 - 112, 28.08.2025

Merve Berika Kadıoğlu , Nazlı Türkel , Meliha Rübendiz

https://doi.org/10.62268/add.1695848

Abstract

Aim
The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of malocclusions in the sagittal, vertical, and transverse directions in individuals receiving orthodontic treatment and to investigate the relationship with gender.
Material and Methods
A total of 2.710 individuals (1.543 females and 1.167 males) who applied to the clinic for orthodontic treatment were included in the study. In this retrospective cross-sectional study, pre-treatment intraoral photographs and cephalometric films were evaluated, and malocclusions were classified according to sagittal, vertical, and transverse occlusal relationships. The percentage distribution of malocclusions was calculated, and gender differences were analysed using the Pearson Chi-square test.
Results
The prevalence of Class I, Class II, and Class III maloc clusions were determined as 32.9%, 48.9%, and 18.2%, respectively. The prevalence of posterior crossbite in the transverse direction was determined to be 23%. In the vertical direction, 58.9% of individuals had normal overbite, 17.7% had openbite, and 23.4% had deepbite. No significant differences were found between genders in terms of sagittal and transverse malocclusions. A significant difference was found only in the prevalence of deepbite in the vertical direction, which was higher in males than in females (P < 0.001).
Conclusion
In this study, it was determined that Class II malocclusions were predominant in the sagittal direction in individuals undergoing orthodontic treatment, and that gender differences were statistically significant only in terms of the prevalance of overbite in the vertical direction. These findings provide important information for both developing preventive dentistry policies and predicting the need for orthodontic treatment in the future.

Keywords

Orthodontics , Malocclusion , Epidemiology , Prevalence

Ortodontik Tedavi Gören Bireylerde Malokluzyon Prevalansı: Epidemiyolojik Çalışma

Abstract

Amaç
Bu çalışmanın amacı, ortodontik tedavi görmekte olan bireylerde sagittal, vertikal ve transversal düzlemlerdeki malokluzyonların prevalansını belirlemek ve bu malokluz yonların cinsiyetle olan ilişkisini incelemektir.
Gereç ve Yöntemler
Çalışmaya, Ankara Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Ortodonti Anabilim Dalı’na tedavi amacıyla başvuran, 1543 kadın ve 1167 erkek olmak üzere toplam 2710 birey dahil edilmiştir. Retrospektif ve kesitsel nitelikteki bu çalışmada, bireylerin tedavi başı ağız içi fotoğrafları ve sefalometrik filmleri değerlendirilerek sagittal, vertikal ve transversal malokluzyon okluzal ilişkilerine göre sınıflandırılmıştır. Malokluzyonların yüzde dağılımı hesaplanmış ve Pearson Ki-Kare testi ile cinsiyetler arası farklılıklar analiz edilmiştir.
Bulgular
Elde edilen bulgulara göre, sagittal yönde Sınıf I, Sınıf II ve Sınıf III malokluzyon prevalansı sırasıyla %32.9, %48.9 ve %18.2 olarak belirlenmiştir. Transversal yönde posterior çapraz kapanış prevalansı %23 olarak belirlenirken, vertikal yönde %58.9 oranında normal overbite, %17.7 oranında openbite, %23.4 oranında deepbite saptanmıştır. Cinsiyetler arası karşılaştırmada sagittal ve transversal malokluzyonlar açısından cinsiyetler bakımından anlamlı fark tespit edilmemiştir. Cinsiyetler arasında yalnızca vertikal yönde deepbite prevalansının erkeklerde kadınlara kıyasla daha yüksek olmasından kaynaklı anlamlı farklılık olduğu bulunmuştur (P < 0.001).
Sonuç
Bu çalışmada ortodontik tedavi gören bireylerde sagittal yönde Sınıf II malokluzyonların baskın olduğu ve cinsiyet farklılığının yalnızca vertikal yönde overbite dağılımı bakımından istatistiksel olarak anlamlı olduğu belirlenmiştir. Bu bulgular, hem koruyucu diş hekimliği politikalarını geliştirmek hem de ortodontik tedavi ihtiyacını önceden tahmin etmek adına önemli bilgiler sağlamaktadır.

Keywords

Ortodonti , Malokluzyon , Epidemiyoloji , Prevalans

Ethical Statement

Ankara Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Klinik Araştırmalar Etik Kurulu, Karar no: 36290600/45/2022

Supporting Institution

Herhangi bir finansal/mali destek alınmamıştır.

Thanks

İstatistiksel analiz için katkılarından dolayı Sn. Ahmet Gül’e teşekkürlerimizi sunarız.

References

• 1. Angle EH. Classification of malocclusion. Dent Cosmos. 1899; 41: 350-7.
• 2. Magalhães IB, Pereira LJ, Marques LS, Gameiro GH. The influence of malocclusion on masticatory performance. A systematic review. Angle Orthod. 2010; 80: 981-7.
• 3. De Ridder L, Aleksieva A, Willems G, Declerck D, Cadenas de Llano-Pérula M. Prevalence of orthodontic malocclusions in healthy children and adolescents: a systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19: 7446.
• 4. Kadıoğlu MB, Çakmak B, Altunal EK, Rübendiz M. Evaluation of orthodontic treatment method preferences of dentistry students, dentists and orthodontic residents. Turk J Orthod. 2023; 36: 101-10.
• 5. Tsai ZZ, Chang M, Tseng YC. Distribution of different skeletal and dental relations among orthodontic patients in recent 5 years: a retrospective study. Taiwan J Orthod. 2023; 35:128-35.
• 6. Alhammadi MS, Halboub E, Fayed MS, Labib A, El-Saaidi C. Global distribution of malocclusion traits: a systematic review. Dental Press J Orthod. 2018; 23: E1-10.
• 7. Sarı Z, Uysal T, Karaman Aİ, Başçiftçi FA, Üşümez S, Demir A. Orthodontic malocclusions and evaluation of treatment alternatives: an epidemiologic study. Turk J Orthod. 2003; 16: 119-26.
• 8. Başçiftçi FA, Abdullah D, Zafer S, Tancan U. Prevalence of orthodontic malocclusions on school children in Konya: an epidemiologic study. Turkish J Orthod. 2002; 15: 92-8.
• 9. Celikoglu M, Akpinar S, Yavuz I. The pattern of malocclusion in a sample of orthodontic patients from Turkey. Med Oral Pathol Oral Cir Bucal. 2010; 15: E791-6.
• 10. Nur B, İlhan D, Fişekçioğlu E, Oktay İ, Tülin Arun. Prevalence of orthodontic malocclusion and evaluation criteria in 7 geographic regions of Turkey. Turkish J Orthod. 2013; 26: 154-61.
• 11. Emine K, Lale T, Kahraman G. Distribution of sagittal occlusal relationships in different stages of dentition. Braz Oral Res. 2015; 29: S1806.
• 12. Gelgör IE, Karaman AI, Ercan E. Prevalence of malocclusion among adolescents in central Anatolia. Eur J Dent. 2007; 1: 125-31.
• 13. Londono J, Ghasemi S, Moghaddasi N, Baninajarian H, Fahimipour A, Hashemi S, et al. Prevalence of malocclusion in Turkish children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Exp Dent Res. 2023; 9: 689-700.
• 14. Chen H, Lin L, Chen J, Huang F. Prevalence of malocclusion traits in primary dentition 2010-2024: a systematic review. Healthcare (Basel). 2024; 12: 1321.
• 15. Pałka J, Gawda J, Byś A, Zawadka M, Gawda P. Assessment of growth changes in the width of dental arches caused by removable appliances over a period of 10 months in children with malocclusion. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19: 3442.
• 16. Goyal S, Goyal S. Pattern of dental malocclusion in orthodontic patients in Rwanda: a retrospective hospital based study. Rwanda Med J. 2012; 69: 13-8.
• 17. Cenzato N, Nobili A, Maspero C. Prevalence of dental malocclusions in different geographical areas: scoping review. Dent J (Basel). 2021; 9: 117.
• 18. Lombardo G, Vena F, Negri P, Pagano S, Barilotti C, Paglia L, et al. Worldwide prevalence of malocclusion in the different stages of dentition: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2020; 21:115-22.
• 19. Akbulut Y. Investigation of the distribution of orthodontic anomalies among patients in the Eastern Anatolia region. Eur J Ther. 2020; 26: 270-4.
• 20. Sayin MO, Türkkahraman H. Malocclusion and crowding in an orthodontically referred Turkish population. Angle Orthod. 2004; 74: 635-9.
• 21. Giri N, Acharya A, Jha R. Pattern of malocclusion in patients undergoing orthodontic treatment at a tertiary care teaching hospital. J Nep Soc Periodontol Oral Implant. 2021; 5: 26-8.
• 22. Willems G, De Bruyne I, Verdonck A, Fieuws S, Carels C. Prevalence of dentofacial characteristics in a belgian orthodontic population. Clin Oral Investig. 2001; 5: 220-6.
• 23. Piao Y, Kim SJ, Yu HS, Cha JY, Baik HS. Five-year investigation of a large orthodontic patient population at a dental hospital in South Korea. Korean J Orthod. 2016; 46: 137-45.
• 24. Wilmot JJ, Barber HD, Chou DG, Vig KW. Associations between severity of dentofacial deformity and motivation for orthodontic-orthognathic surgery treatment. Angle Orthod. 1993; 63: 283-8.
• 25. Rahman MM, Jahan H, Hossain MZ. Pattern of malocclusion in patients seeking orthodontic treatment at Dhaka Dental College and Hospital. Bangladesh J Orthodont Dentofac Orthop. 2013; 3: 9-11.
• 26. Gul-e-Erum, Fida M. Pattern of malocclusion in orthodontic patients: a hospital based study. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2008; 20: 43-7.
• 27. Thilander B, Pena L, Infante C, Parada SS, de Mayorga C. Prevalence of malocclusion and orthodontic treatment need in children and adolescents in Bogota, Colombia. An epidemiological study related to different stages of dental development. Eur J Orthod. 2001; 23: 153-67.
• 28. Ciuffolo F, Manzoli L, D’Attilio M, Tecco S, Muratore F, Festa F, et al. Prevalence and distribution by gender of occlusal characteristics in a sample of Italian secondary school students: a cross-sectional study. Eur J Orthod. 2005; 27: 601-6.
• 29. Perillo L, Masucci C, Ferro F, Apicella D, Baccetti T. Prevalence of orthodontic treatment need in Southern Italian school children. Eur J Orthod. 2010; 32: 49-53.
• 30. Bilgic F, Gelgor IE, Celebi AA. Malocclusion prevalence and orthodontic treatment need in Central Anatolian adolescents compared to European and other nations’ adolescents. Dental Press J Orthod. 2015; 20: 75-81.
• 31. Gungor K, Taner L, Kaygisiz E. Prevalence of posterior crossbite for orthodontic treatment timing. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2016; 40: 422-4.