Research Article

Evaluation of the Parotid Gland with Ultrasonography of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes

Volume: 4 Number: 2 August 28, 2025
TR EN

Evaluation of the Parotid Gland with Ultrasonography of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes

Abstract

Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the parotid gland thickness of patients with type 2 diabetes by ultrasonography. Material and Methods A total of 50 patients were examined twice by 1 observer at 2 week intervals. During ultrasonographic examination of both parotid glands, the probe was moved in trans verse (craniocaudal) and longitudinal (anteroposterior) directions while the patient's teeth were occluded. During the measurements, the patient lay on a flat surface with their head resting on a pillow. Results In the control group, the right parotid glands were significantly thicker than the left parotid glands (p = 0.023). However, there was no significant difference in parotid gland thickness between the right and left sides in patients with type 2 diabetes (p = 0.275). There was also no significant difference in parotid gland thicknesses between patients with type 2 diabetes and the control group (P > 0.05). Conclusion Ultrasonography may be a prospective diagnostic test for detecting and monitoring the impact of systemic diseases on the soft tissues of the head and neck, but more research is needed.

Keywords

References

  1. 1. Hand AR. Salivary glands. Dental Science for the Medical Professional: An Evidence-Based Approach; 2023. p.49-66.
  2. 2. Lawrence JM, Divers J, Isom S et al. Trends in prevalence of type 1 and type 2 diabetes in children and adolescents in the US, 2001-2017. Jama. 2021; 326(8): 717-727.
  3. 3. Carda C, Mosquera-Lloreda N, Salom L et al. Structural and functional salivary disorders in type 2 diabetic patients. Medicina Oral Patologia Oral y Cirugia Bucal. 2006; 11(4): 209. 4. Hausegger KW, Krasa H, Plezmann W et. al. Sonogrphie der spichelderusen. Ultraschall Med. 1993; 14:68-74.
  4. 5. Tomic D, Jonathan E, Dianna JM The burden and risks of emerging complications of diabetes mellitus. Nature Reviews Endocrinology. 2022; 18.9: 525-539.
  5. 6. Spinnato P, Patel DB, Di Carlo M et al. Imaging of musculoskeletal soft-tissue infections in clinical practice: a comprehensive updated review. Microorganisms. 2022; 10(12): 2329.
  6. 7. Hussain S, Mubeen I, Ullah N et al. Modern diagnostic imaging technique applications and risk factors in the medical field: a review. BioMed research international. 2022(1); 5164970.
  7. 8. Rumack CM Diagnostic ultrasound. Elsevier/Mosby. 2011; 1(vol 1): 2-33.
  8. 9. Afzelius P, Nielsen MY, Ewertsen C et al. Imaging of the major salivary glands. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2016; 36(1): 1–10.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

August 28, 2025

Submission Date

May 22, 2025

Acceptance Date

July 7, 2025

Published in Issue

Year 2025 Volume: 4 Number: 2

Vancouver
1.Tansu Çimen, Füsun Yaşar. Evaluation of the Parotid Gland with Ultrasonography of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes. Akd Dent J [Internet]. 2025 Aug. 1;4(2):83-8. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA44GW78AA

Founded: 2022

Period: 3 Issues Per Year

Publisher: Akdeniz University