Factors Affecting Orthodontists Decision on Tooth Extraction in Fixed Orthodontic Treatment

Year 2024, Volume: 3 Issue: 3, 150 - 159, 31.12.2024

Halime Ertürk Demirkıran , T. Hakan Bulut

https://doi.org/10.62268/add.1569405

Abstract

The decision to extract teeth for orthodontic treatment is one of the issues that orthodontists frequently encounter and need to consider in detail during the treatment planning phase. Diagnostic methods that have evolved over time, changing aesthetic perceptions, and the treatment goals that have been influenced by these factors constitute the main factors affecting the orthodontic extraction decision. The process of diagnosis and treatment planning in orthodontics involves identifying malocclusion and dentofacial anomalies, determining the etiology of the problem, setting treatment goals, and designing a treatment plan to achieve these goals. In orthodontic treatment, the primary consideration should be where the dentist wants to place the teeth. At this point, extraction or non-extraction orthodontic treatment is not a treatment goal; it is merely a way to achieve the treatment goal. Before starting the treatment, various factors such as anatomical, physiological, and functional limitations, biomechanical principles, patient cooperation and satisfaction, and treatment duration should be examined. Finding variables that explain the preference of one therapeutic approach over another helps accelerate the decision-making process and serves to form treatment forecasts. The aim of this review, prepared based on these approaches, is to examine the factors that influence orthodontists' decisions regarding extraction in fixed orthodontic treatments.

Keywords

Orthodontist, fixed orthodontic treatment, tooth extraction

Sabit Ortodontik Tedavide Ortodontistlerin Diş Çekimi Kararını Etkileyen Faktörler

Abstract

Ortodontide tedavi amacıyla diş çekimi kararı, tedavi planlama aşamasında ortodontistlerin sık karşılaştığı ve ayrıntılı düşünülmesi gereken konulardan birisidir. Zamanla gelişen tanı yöntemleri, hasta ve hekimlerin değişen estetik algısı ve bunların etkisi ile farklılaşan tedavi hedefleri ortodontik amaçlı diş çekimi kararını etkileyen temel etmenleri oluşturmaktadır. Ortodontide tanı ve tedavi planlama süreci; maloklüzyon ve dentofasiyal anomalilerin tanımlanması, problemin etiyolojisinin tespiti, tedavi hedeflerinin belirlenmesi ve bu hedeflere ulaşmak için bir tedavi planı tasarlanmasını kapsamaktadır. Ortodontik tedavi sürecindeki ilk düşünce, hekimin dişleri hangi konuma yerleştirmek istediğine karar vermek olmalıdır. Bu aşamada, çekimli veya çekimsiz ortodontik tedavi bir tedavi hedefi değil, sadece tedavi hedefini gerçekleştirmek için bir araçtır. Tedaviye başlamadan önce anatomik, fizyolojik ve fonksiyonel sınırlamalar, biyomekanik prensipler, hasta iş birliği ve memnuniyeti ile tedavi süresi gibi çeşitli faktörlere dayanan gereklilikler incelenmelidir. Bir terapötik tedavi yaklaşımını diğer tedavi seçeneğine tercih etmeyi açıklayan değişkenlerin bulunması karar verme aşamasının hızlanmasına yardımcı olur ve tedavi öngörülerinin oluşmasına hizmet eder. Bu yaklaşımlar temelinde hazırlanan bu derlemenin amacı; sabit ortodontik tedavilerde ortodontistlerin diş çekimi kararını etkileyen faktörleri incelemektir.

Keywords

Ortodontist, sabit ortodontik tedavi, diş çekimi

References

• 1. Evrard A, Tepedino M, Cattaneo PM, Cornelis MA. Which factors influence orthodontists in their decision to extract? A questionnaire survey. J Clin Exp Dent. 2019;11:432-38.
• 2. Ribarevski P, Vig P, Weyant R, O'brien K. Consistency of orthodontic extraction decisions. Eur J Orthod. 1996;18:77-80.
• 3. Jerrold L, Chay C, Accornero M. The extraction of teeth: Part 1 diagnostic and treatment considerations. Semin Orthod. 2019;25:309-17.
• 4. Zaytoun ML. An empirical approach to the extraction versus non-extraction. Carolina Digital Repository, Master of Science Thesis, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Graduate School, 2019, 1-45.
• 5. Salzman JA. An evaluation of extraction in orthodontics. Am J Orthod. 1965;51:928-9.
• 6. Seymenoğlu ZD. An analysis upon extraction decision in orthodontics. Çukurova Üniversitesi, Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ortodonti Ana Bilim Dalı, 2010, 1-75.
• 7. Khan WU, Ijaz M, Ijaz K, Raja A. Various patterns of extraction in patients with crowding. Pakistan Orthod J. 2017;9:106-13.
• 8. Konstantonis D, Anthopoulou C, Makou M. Extraction decision and identification of treatment predictors in Class I malocclusions. Prog Orthod. 2013;14:1-8.
• 9. Jackson TH, Guez C, Lin FC, Proffit WR, Ko CC. Extraction frequencies at a university orthodontic clinic in the 21st century: demographic and diagnostic factors affecting the likelihood of extraction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2017;151:456-62.
• 10. Saghafi N, Heaten LJ, Bayirli B, Turpin DL, Khosravi V, Bollen AM. Influence of clinicians' experience and gender on extraction decision in orthodontics. Angle Orthod. 2017;87:641-50.
• 11. Proffit WR, Fields HW, Larson B, Sarver DM. Orthodontic Treatment Planning: From Problem List to Specific Plan, in Contemporary Orthodontics. 6th Edition, Editor: Dr. William Proffit, 2018, p218-245.
• 12. Soheilifar S, Soheilifar S, Mollabashi V, Amini P, Bakhshaei A, Naghdi N. Extraction versus non-extraction orthodontic treatment: Soft tissue profile changes in borderline class I patients. Dent Med Problems, 2020;57:275-83.
• 13. Chaturvedi R, Kumar A, Rana V, Aggarwal A, Chandra L. A correlation of permanent anterior tooth fracture with type of occlusion and craniofacial morphology. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2013;6:80-4.
• 14. Cheng HC, Wang YC. Effect of nonextraction and extraction orthodontic treatments on smile esthetics for different malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2018;153:81-6.
• 15. Rinchuse DJ, Busch LS, DiBagno D, Cozzani M. Extraction treatment, part 1: the extraction vs. nonextraction debate. J Clin Orthod. 2014;48:753-60.
• 16. Kouli A, Papagiannis A, Konstantoni N, Halazonetis DJ, Konstantonis D. A geometric morphometric evaluation of hard and soft tissue profile changes in borderline extraction versus non-extraction patients. European Journal of Orthodontics, 2019;41:264-72.
• 17. Aniruddh YV, Ravi K, Edeinton A. Comparative evaluation of soft tissue changes in Class I borderline patients treated with extraction and nonextraction modalities. Dental Press J Orthod. 2016;21:50-9.
• 18. Bowman SJ, Johnston JE. The esthetic impact of extraction and nonextraction treatments on Caucasian patients. Angle Orthod. 2000;70:3-10.
• 19. Erdinç AE, Nanda RS, Dandajena TC. Profile changes of patients treated with and without premolar extractions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007;132:324-31.
• 20. Carlos de Oliveira Ruellas A, Martins de Oliveira Ruellas R, Lourenço Romano F, Melo Pithon M, Lacerda dos Santos R. Tooth extraction in orthodontics: an evaluation of diagnostic elements. Dental Press J Orthod, 2010;15:134-57.
• 21. Klapper L, Navarro SF, Bowman D, Pawlowski B. The influence of extraction and nonextraction orthodontic treatment on brachyfacial and dolichofacial growth patterns. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1992;101:425-30.
• 22. Christou T, Betlej A, Aswad N, Ogdon D, Kau CH. Clinical effectiveness of orthodontic treatment on smile esthetics: a systematic review. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2019;11:89-101.
• 23. Ghaffar F, Fida M. Effect of extraction of first four premolars on smile aesthetics. Eur J Orthod. 2011;33:679-83.
• 24. Johnson DK, Smith RJ, Louis S. Smile estheties after orthodontic treatment with and without extraction of four first premolars. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995;108:162-7.
• 25. Işıksal E, Hazar S, Akyalçın S. Smile esthetics: perception and comparison of treated and untreated smiles. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006;129:8-16.
• 26. Kantharaju VH, Shivaprakash G, Shamnur N. The Relationship between posttreatment smile esthetics and the ABO objective grading system: Class I extraction versus non-extraction cases. Turk J Orthod. 2021;34:39-45.
• 27. Akyalçın S, Misner K, English JD, Alexander WG, Alexander JM, Gallerano R. Smile esthetics: evaluation of long-term changes in the transverse dimension. Korean J Orthod. 2017;47:100-7.
• 28. Hyung Yang Il, Seok Nahm D, Hak Baek S. Which hard and soft tissue factors relate with the amount of buccal corridor space during smiling? Angle Orthod. 2008;78:5-11.
• 29. Mah M, Tan WC, Ong SH, Chan YH, Foong K. Three-dimensional analysis of the change in the curvature of the smiling line following orthodontic treatment in incisor class II division 1 malocclusion. Eur J Orthod. 2014;36:657-64.
• 30. Tauheed S, Shaikh A, Fida M. Microaesthetics of the smile: extraction vs. nonextraction. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2012;22:230-4.
• 31. Williams BH. A text-book of orthodontia. J Prosth Dent. 1960;10:191-2.
• 32. Nanda R, Margolis MJ. Treatment strategies for midline discrepancies. Semin Orthod. 1996;2:84-9.
• 33. Bishara SE, Burkey PS, Kharouf JG. Dental and facial asymmetries: a review. Angle Orthod. 1994;64:89-98.
• 34. Kronmiller JE. Development of asymmetries. Semin Orthod. 1998;4:134-7.
• 35. Persson M. Mandibular asymmetry of hereditary origin. Am J Orthod. 1973;63:1-11.
• 36. Janson G, Dainesi EA, Henriques JFC, de Freitas MR, de Lima KJRS. Class II subdivision treatment success rate with symmetric and asymmetric extraction protocols. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003;124:257-64.
• 37. Jerrold L, Accornero M, Chay C. The extraction of teeth: Part 2 considerations regarding which teeth to extract. Semin Orthod. 2019;25:318-22.
• 38. Al-Ani MH, Mageet AO. Extraction planning in orthodontics. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2018;19:619-23.
• 39. Travess H, Roberts-Harry D, Sandy J. Orthodontics. Part 8: Extractions in orthodontics. Br Dent J. 2004;196:195-203.
• 40. Burrow SJ. To extract or not to extract: a diagnostic decision, not a marketing decision. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008;133:341-42.
• 41. Peck S. Extractions, retention and stability: the search for orthodontic truth. Eur J Orthod. 2017;39:109-15.
• 42. Angst C, Eliades T, Papageorgiou SN. Stability of occlusal outcome during long-term retention: the time-dependent variation of the American Board of Orthodontics index. Eur J Orthod. 2021;43:1-7.
• 43. Zafarmand AH, Qamari A, Zafarmand MM. Mandibular incisor re-crowding: is it different in extraction and non-extraction cases? Oral Health Dent Manag. 2014;13:669-74.
• 44. McNeil C, McIntyre GT, Laverick S. How much incisor decompensation is achieved prior to orthognathic surgery? J Clin Experiment Dent. 2014;6:225-9.
• 45. Ko EWC, Hsu SSP, Hsieh HY, Wang YC, Huang CS, Chen YR. Comparison of progressive cephalometric changes and postsurgical stability of skeletal Class III correction with and without presurgical orthodontic treatment. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011;69:1469-77.
• 46. Kokich VG, Spear FM. Guidelines for managing the orthodontic-restorative patient. Semin Orthod. 1997;3:3-20.
• 47. Flores FN, Moreira,VP, Heuser CA. Assessing the impact of stemming accuracy on information retrieval - a multilingual perspective. Information Processing & Management. 2016;52:840-54.
• 48. Uribe G. Ortodoncia: teoría y clínica. Semin Orthod. 2010;3:456-73.
• 49. Peña-Reyes D, Freitas JQ, Freitas KMS, Bellini-Pereira SA, Aliaga-Del Castillo A, Janson G, Freitas MR. Third molar comparison in class I and II extraction and non-extraction orthodontic treatment: a retrospective longitudinal study. Turk J Orthod. 2024;37:7-13.
• 50. Vig PS, Weintraub JA, Brown C, Kowalsk CJ. The duration of orthodontic treatment with and without extractions: a pilot study of five selected practices. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1990;97:45-51.
• 51. Beckwith FR, Ackerman RJ, Cobb CM, Tira DE. In evaluation of factors affecting duration of orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999;115:439-47.