Dahili kliniklerde yatan hastaların kronik hastalık bakımı ve sağlıklı yaşam biçimlerinin belirlenmesi

Year 2021, Volume: 7 Issue: 2, 158 - 168, 30.08.2021

Gülden Atan Gülcan Bahçecioğlu Turan Zülfünaz Özer

https://doi.org/10.30569/adiyamansaglik.887965

Abstract

Amaç: Bu çalışma, dahili kliniklerde yatan hastaların kronik hastalık bakımı ve sağlıklı yaşam biçimlerinin belirlenmesi amacıyla yapıldı.
Gereç ve Yöntem: Tanımlayıcı ve kesitsel olarak yapılan çalışma, Mayıs–Ağustos 2019 tarihleri arasında yürütülmüştür. Çalışmanın örneklemini ise kronik hastalığı olan 207 hasta oluşturdu.
Bulgular: Çalışmaya dahil edilen hastaların kronik hastalık bakımını değerlendirme ölçeği ile sağlıklı yaşam biçimi davranışları ölçeği arasında istatistiksel olarak önemli, pozitif yönde anlamlı bir ilişki olduğu saptandı.
Sonuç: Kronik hastalığı olan bireylerin bakım memnuniyetleri ve sağlıklı yaşam biçimi davranışları arasında pozitif bir ilişki olduğu saptandı. Kronik hastalıkla yaşamak zorunda olan bu bireylerin sağlıklı yaşam biçimlerini destekleyici eğitimler verilmesi önerilmektedir.

Keywords

Kronik hastalık, Sağlıklı yaşam, Dahili klinik

Determination of chronic illness care and healthy lifestyles of patients hospitalized in internal medicine clinics

Abstract

Aim: This study aimed to determine the chronic disease care and healthy lifestyles of patients hospitalized in internal medicine clinics.
Materials and Methods: A descriptive and cross-sectional study was conducted from May 1 to August 31, 2019. The study population consisted of 207 patients with chronic diseases.
Results: It was found that there was a statistically significant, and positively significant relationship was found between the chronic disease care assessment scale and the healthy lifestyle behaviors scale of the patients included in the study.
Conclusion: Positive association was detected between care satisfaction and healthy lifestyle behaviours of individuals with chronic disease. It may be recommended to provide training that supports the healthy lifestyles of these individuals who have to live with chronic diseases.

Keywords

Chronic illness, Healthy life, Internal clinic.

References

• Bektaş Akpınar N, Aşkın Ceran M, Karatay Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Yüksekokulu Hemşirelik Bölümü K, et al. Kronik Hastalıklar ve Rehabilitasyon Hemşireliği Chronic Diseases and Rehabilitation Nursing.2019; 3: 40-152.
• Chiaranai C, Chularee S, Srithongluang S. Older people living with chronic illness. Geriatr Nurs (Minneap) 2018; 39: 513–520.
• Usuba K, Li AKC, Nowrouzi-Kia B. Trend of the burden of chronic illnesses: using the Canadian Community Health Survey. Public Health 2019; 177: 10–18.
• Tshomo Y, Chaimongkol N. Prevalence of depression and its associated factors among persons with chronic medical illness in Bhutan. Arch Psychiatr Nurs 2019; 33: 347–351.
• Karabulutlu EY, Atman R, Yağcı S. Evaluation care of persons with chronic illness. 2015;3:16-30.
• Köse E, Güçiz Doğan B, Çetin Ekerbiçer H, et al. Study of Healthy Lıfe Behavıors and Related Factors In Students In Sakarya Unıversıty Medıcal Faculty Classes of I, II, III.Sakarya Tıp Dergisi.2018;8:20-29.
• Taşkın Yılmaz F, Karakoç Kumsar A, Çelik S. The Association Between Healthy Lifestyle Behaviors and Level of Knowledge About Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors in People With Type 2 Diabetes. J Educ Res Nurs. Epub ahead of print 2018. DOI: 10.5222/head.2018.063.
• Trindade IA, Barbosa R, Ferreira C, et al. Further validation of the cognitive fusion questionnaire – chronic illness (CFQ-CI) in different health condition samples. J Context Behav Sci 2020; 16: 45–48.
• Çalışkan C, Arberk K, Üner S. Healthy lifestyle behaviours of university students. Türkiye Halk Sağlığı Derg 2018; 16: 204–2013.
• Glasgow RE, Wagner EH, Schaefer J, et al. Development and validation of the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC). Med Care 2005; 43: 436–444.
• İncirkuş K, Nahcivan NÖ. Validity and Reliability Study of Turkish Version of The Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care-Patient Form. 2011;4:102-109.
• Walker SN, Hill-Polerecky DM. Psychometric Evaluation of the Health-Promoting Lifestyle Profile II. Univ Nebraska Med Cent Omaha 1996; Unpublished.
• Bahar Z, Beşer A, Gördes N, et al. Healthy Life Style Behavior Scale II:A Reliability And Validity Study. CÜ Hemşirelik Yüksekokulu Dergisi 2008; 12:1-13.
• Schmittdiel J, Mosen DM, Glasgow RE, et al. Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) and improved patient-centered outcomes for chronic conditions. J Gen Intern Med 2008; 23: 77–80.
• Taggart J, Chan B, Jayasinghe UW, et al. Patients Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) in two Australian studies: Structure and utility. J Eval Clin Pract 2011; 17: 215–221.
• Vrijhoef HJM, Berbee R, Wagner EH, et al. Quality of integrated chronic care measured by patient survey: Identification, selection and application of most appropriate instruments. Heal Expect 2009; 12: 417–429.
• Cramm JM, Nieboer AP. Factorial validation of the patient assessment of chronic illness care (PACIC) and PACIC short version (PACIC-S) among cardiovascular disease patients in the Netherlands. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2012; 10: 104.
• Jackson GL, Weinberger M, Hamilton NS, et al. Racial/ethnic and educational-level differences in diabetes care experiences in primary care. Prim Care Diabetes 2008; 2: 39–44.
• Ludt S, Van Lieshout J, Campbell SM, et al. Identifying factors associated with experiences of coronary heart disease patients receiving structured chronic care and counselling in European primary care. BMC Health Serv Res 2012; 12: 221.
• Rosemann T, Laux G, Szecsenyi J, et al. The Chronic Care Model: Congruency and predictors among primary care patients with osteoarthritis. Qual Saf Heal Care 2008; 17: 442–446.
• Houle J, Beaulieu MD, Lussier MT, et al. Patients’ experience of chronic illness care in a network of teaching settings. Can Fam Physician 2012; 58: 1366–1373.
• Simonsen N, Koponen AM, Suominen S. Patients’ assessment of chronic illness care: A validation study among patients with type 2 diabetes in Finland. BMC Health Serv Res; 18. Epub ahead of print June 2018. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-018-3206-7.
• Glasgow RE, Whitesides H, Nelson CC, et al. Use of the patient assessment of chronic illness care (PACIC) with diabetic patients: Relationship to patient characteristics, receipt of care, and self-management. Diabetes Care 2005; 28: 2655–2661.
• Teuteberg D, Newcomb P, Sosa S. Nurse Practitioner Management of Uninsured, Rural Adults With Chronic Illness. J Nurse Pract 2019; 15: e77–e79.
• Aksoy T, Uçar H.. Hemşirelik Öğrencilerinin Sağlıklı Yaşam Biçimi Davranışları. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Fakültesi Dergisi 2014; 1(2): 53-67.
• Kolaç N, Balcı AS, Şişman FN, Ataçer BE, Dinçer S. Fabrika çalışanlarında sağlıklı yaşam biçimi davranışı ve sağlık algısı. Bakırköy Tıp Dergisi 2018; 14: 267-274.
• Gould DW, Graham-Brown M, Watson EL, Vıana JL, Smıth AC.( 2014) Physiological benefits of exercise in pre-dialysis chronic disease. Nephrology 2014; 19(9): 519-527.
• Yüceler Kaçmaz H, Çürük GN. Healthy lifestyle behaviours and attitudes of relatives of patients with colorectal cancer towards protection from colorectal cancer. Turkısh J Clin Lab 2017; 9: 36–49.
• Johansson P, Dahlström U, Broström A. Factors and interventions influencing health-related quality of life in patients with heart failure: A review of the literature. European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing 2006; 5: 5–15.
• Demir G, Arıöz A. Healthy Life Style Behaviors of Migrant Women and Influencing Factors. Journal of Duzce University Health Sciences Institute 2014;4:1-8.
• O’Connor SR, Connaghan J, Maguire R, et al. Healthcare professional perceived barriers and facilitators to discussing sexual wellbeing with patients after diagnosis of chronic illness: A mixed-methods evidence synthesis. Patient Education and Counseling 2019; 102: 850–863.