İmplant Destekli Sabit Protetik Restorasyonlarda Konvansiyonel Ölçü Teknikleri ile Dijital Ölçü Sistemlerinin Karşılaştırmalı Değerlendirmesi ve İmplant Tarama Gövdelerinin İncelenmesi

Abstract

Günümüzde implant destekli sabit protetik restorasyonlarda dijital ölçü sistemlerinin kullanılmasıyla hasta konforunun ve hızlı bir iş akışının sağlandığı belirtilmektedir. Dijital ölçü sistemlerinin kullanıldığı durumlarda tek üyeli ve 3-4 implanta kadar olan kısmi dişsiz alanlarda konvansiyonel ölçü teknikleri ile benzer doğruluk elde edilebileceği ancak uzun dişsiz boşluklarda ve tam ark rehabilitasyonlarda ise tam istenilen sonuçlara ulaşılamadığı bildirilmektedir. Dijital ölçünün doğruluğu ve netliği üzerine etkisi olduğu bilinen farklı materyal, boyut, şekil ve özelliklerde geliştirilmiş implant tarama gövdeleri ile ilgili çalışmalar bulunmaktadır.

Keywords

• dijital ölçü
• implant tarama gövdesi
• konvansiyonel ölçü

Comparative Evaluation of Conventional Impression Techniques and Digital Impression Systems in Implant-Supported Fixed Prosthesis and Investigation of Implant Scanbodies

Abstract

It is stated that the use of digital impression systems in implant-supported fixed prosthesis provides patient comfort and an easier workflow. In cases where digital impression systems are used, similar accuracy can be obtained with conventional impression techniques in single-unit and partially edentulous areas up to 3-4 implants, but in long edentulous areas and full arch rehabilitations, the desired results cannot be achieved. There are studies on implant scanbodies developed in different materials, sizes, shapes and properties known to have an effect on the accuracy and precision of digital impressions.

Keywords

• digital impression
• implant scanbody
• conventinal impression

References

1. The Glossary of Prosthodontic Terms: Ninth Edition. J Prosthet Dent. 2017 May;117(5S):e1-e105.
2. Richi MW, Kurtulmus-Yilmaz S, Ozan O. Comparison of the accuracy of different impression procedures in case of multiple and angulated implants. Head Face Med. 2020;16(1):1–12.
3. Mizumoto RM, Yilmaz B. Intraoral scan bodies in implant dentistry: A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2018;120(3):343–52.
4. Sahin S, Cehreli MC. The Significance of Passive Framework Fit in Implant Prosthodontics: Current Status. Implant Dent. 2001;10(2) 85–92.
5. Keskin Özyer E, Kahramanoğlu E, Aslan YU, Özkan Y. İmplant Destekli Protetik Restorasyonlarda Kullanılan Ölçü Yöntemleri ve Materyalleri: Derleme. European Journal of Research in Dentistry. 2019; 3(2), 124-132.
6. Kiraz MS, Çevik P. İmplant Üstü Protezlerde Konvansiyonel ve Dijital Ölçü Teknikleri. Selcuk Dent J. 2022;9(1):268-77.
7. Burgess JO, Lawson NC, Robles A. Comparing digital and conventional impressions: assessing the accuracy, efficiency, and value of today’s systems. J inside Dentistry. 2013;9(11).
8. Sang J. Lee, Jason D. Lee. Digital Impressions for Implant-Supported Fixed Dental Prostheses. Curr Oral Health Rep. 2017;4:136–141

9. Demirdag ED. İmplant üstü sabit protezlerde kullanılan ölçü komponentleri, iyileşme başlıkları ve güncel tasarım yöntemleri.Güncel Protetik Diş Tedavisi Çalışmaları. II-bölüm 8.
10. Jivraj S. Impression techniques for implant dentistry. British Dental Journal: BDJ online. November 2006
11. Anusavice K, Shen CH, Rawls R. Phillips’ Sci Dent Mater. 2013.Chapter 8. Impression Materials.151–81.
12. Aktöre H, Kurtulmuş-Yilmaz S. The evaluation of factors that affect the accuracy of implant impressions. Cumhur Dent J. 2015;18(2):214–27.
13. Lee H, So JS, Hochstedler JL, Ercoli C. The accuracy of implant impressions: A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2008;100(4):285–91.
14. Monaco C, Scheda L, Baldissara P, Zucchelli G. Implant Digital Impression in the Esthetic Area. J Prosthodont. 2019 Jun;28(5):536-40.
15. Moreira AH, Rodrigues NF, Pinho AC, Fonseca JC, Vilaça JL. Accuracy Comparison of Implant Impression Techniques: A Systematic Review. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015 Oct;17 Suppl 2:e751-64.
16. Aslan YU. Farklı ölçü maddelerinin boyutsal stabilite ve doğruluk, yüzey detayı, değme açısı ve ıslanabilirlik açısından değerlendirilmesi. İstanbul. MÜ Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Doktora Tezi. 2012.
17. Mirebani A, Najafova L, Sarı T, Kurtulmuş H. İmplant üstü geleneksel ölçü yöntem, teknik ve malzemelerinin karşılaştırılmalı olarak gözden geçirilmesi:sistematik bir güncelleme. Aydin Dental Journal. 2019;5(1):27-50.
18. Christensen GJ. Impressions are changing: deciding on conventional, digital or digital plus in-office milling. The journal of the american dental association. 2009 Oct;140(10): 1301- 4.
19. Bilmenoğlu, Ç. İmplantüstü sabit protezlerin yapımında dijital ölçü sistemlerinin karşılaştırılması. Doktora Tezi. 2015.
20. Ahlholm P, Sipilä K, Vallittu P, Jakonen M, Kotiranta U. Digital Versus Conventional Impressions in Fixed Prosthodontics: A Review. J Prosthodont. 2018 Jan;27(1):35-41.
21. Dikmen M. Ağıziçi Dijital Tarayıcılara Güncel Bir Bakış. Turkiye Klin. J Prosthodont-Special Topics. 2018;4(1):37-41.
22. Aswani K, Wankhade S, Khalikar A, Deogade S. Accuracy of an intraoral digital impression: A review. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2020 Jan-Mar;20(1):27-37.
23. Kihara H, Hatakeyama W, Komine F, Takafuji K, Takahashi T, Yokota J, Oriso K, Kondo H. Accuracy and practicality of intraoral scanner in dentistry: A literature review. J Prosthodont Res. 2020 Apr;64(2):109-13.
24. Resende CCD, Barbosa TAQ, Moura GF, Tavares LDN, Rizzante FAP, George FM, Neves FDD, Mendonça G. Influence of operator experience, scanner type, and scan size on 3D scans. J Prosthet Dent. 2021 Feb;125(2):294-299.
25. Strub JR, Rekow ED, Witkowski S. Computer-aided design and fabrication of dental restorations: current systems and future possibilities. The Journal of the American Dental Association. 2006;137,9,1289-96.
26. Osman RB, Alharbi NM. Influence of scan technology on the accuracy and speed of intraoral scanning systems for the edentulous maxilla: An in vitro study. J Prosthodont. 2023 Dec;32(9):821-828.
27. Li Z, Huang R, Wu X, Chen Z, Huang B, Chen Z. Effect of Scan Pattern on the Accuracy of Complete- Arch Digital Implant Impressions with Two Intraoral Scanners. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2022 Jul- Aug;37(4):731-739.
28. Siqueira R, Galli M, Chen Z, Mendonça G, Meirelles L, Wang HL, Chan HL. Intraoral scanning reduces procedure time and improves patient comfort in fixed prosthodontics and implant dentistry: a systematic review. Clin Oral Investig. 2021 Dec;25(12):6517-31.
29. Erozan Ç. Dijital diş hekimliğinde farklı intraoral tarayıcı- cad yazılım kombinasyonlarının hassasiyetlerinin değerlendirilmesi.Yakın Doğu Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Doktora Tezi. 2019.
30. Güth JF, Keul C, Stimmelmayr M, Beuer F, Edelhoff D. Accuracy of digital models obtained by direct and indirect data capturing. Clin Oral Investig. 2013 May;17(4):1201-8.
31. Beuer F, Schweiger J, Edelhoff D. 2010. CAD/ CAM in dentistry: New Materials and Technologies. Dentistry, 2(4).
32. Mörmann WH. The evolution of the CEREC system. The Journal of the American Dental Association. 2006;137, 7S-13S.
33. Şadı B.. Sabit restorasyonların yapımında dijital ölçünün güncel yeri. İstanbul Üniversitesi. 2017
34. Gallardo YR, Bohner L, Tortamano P, Pigozzo MN, Laganá DC, Sesma N. Patient outcomes and procedure working time for digital versus conventional impressions: A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2018 Feb;119(2):214-9.
35. Manicone PF, De Angelis P, Rella E, Damis G, D'addona A. Patient preference and clinical working time between digital scanning and conventional impression making for implant-supported prostheses: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2022 Oct;128(4):589-96.
36. Bishti S, Tuna T, Rittich A, Wolfart S. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) of implant-supported reconstructions using digital workflows: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2021 Oct;32 Suppl 21:318-35.
37. Zimmermann M, Mehl A, Mörmann WH, Reich S. Intraoral scanning systems - a current overview. Int J Comput Dent. 2015; 18(2):101-29.
38. Patel N. Integrating three-dimensional digital technologies for comprehensive implant dentistry. The Journal of the American Dental Association. 2010;141, 20S-4S.
39. Joda T, Ferrari M, Gallucci GO, Wittneben JG, Brägger U. Digital technology in fixed implant prosthodontics. Periodontol 2000. 2017 Feb;73(1):178-92.
40. Punj A, Bompolaki D, Garaicoa J. Dental Impression Materials and Techniques. Dent Clin North Am. 2017;61(4):779–96.
41. Wilk, BL. Intraoral Digital Impressioning for Dental Implant Restorations Versus Traditional Implant Impression Techniques. Compendium of continuing education in dentistry. 2015;36(7), 529-33.
42. Rasaie V, Abduo J, Hashemi S. Accuracy of Intraoral Scanners for Recording the Denture Bearing Areas: A Systematic Review. J Prosthodont. 2021 Jul;30(6):520- 39.
43. Srivastava G, Padhiary SK, Mohanty N, Molinero- Mourelle P, Chebib N. Accuracy of Intraoral Scanner for Recording Completely Edentulous Arches-A Systematic Review. Dent J (Basel). 2023 Oct;18;11(10):241.
44. Kihara H, Hatakeyama W, Komine F, Takafuji K, Takahashi T, Yokota J, Oriso K, Kondo H. Accuracy and practicality of intraoral scanner in dentistry: A literature review. J Prosthodont Res. 2020 Apr;64(2):109-13.
45. Albanchez-González MI, Brinkmann JC, Peláez-Rico J, López-Suárez C, Rodríguez-Alonso V, Suárez- García MJ. Accuracy of Digital Dental Implants Impression Taking with Intraoral Scanners Compared with Conventional Impression Techniques: A Systematic Review of In Vitro Studies. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb;11;19(4):2026.
46. García-Gil I, Cortés-Bretón-Brinkmann J, Jiménez- García J, Peláez-Rico J, Suárez-García MJ. Precision and practical usefulness of intraoral scanners in implant dentistry: A systematic literature review. J Clin Exp Dent. 2020;12(8):e784-93.
47. Park SW, Choi YD, Lee DH. The effect of the improperly scanned scan body images on the accuracy of virtual implant positioning in computer-aided design software. J Adv Prosthodont. 2020;12(3): 107-13.
48. Zhang YJ, Shi JY, Qian SJ, Qiao SC, Lai HC. Accuracy of full-arch digital implant impressions taken using intraoral scanners and related variables: A systematic review. Int J Oral Implantol (Berl). 2021 May;12;14(2):157-179.
49. Abduo J, Elseyoufi M. Accuracy of Intraoral Scanners: A Systematic Review of Influencing Factors. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2018 Aug;30;26(3):101-21.
50. Carneiro Pereira AL, Souza Curinga MR, Melo Segundo HV, da Fonte Porto Carreiro A. Factors that influence the accuracy of intraoral scanning of total edentulous arches rehabilitated with multiple implants: A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2023 Jun;129(6):855-62.
51. Christensen GJ. Will digital impressions eliminate the current problems with conventional impressions? Journal of the American Dental Association. 2008;139(6),761–763.
52. Chen Y, Zhai Z, Li H, Yamada S, Matsuoka T, Ono S, et al. Influence of Liquid on the Tooth Surface on the Accuracy of Intraoral Scanners: An In Vitro Study. J Prosthodont. 2022 Jan;31(1):59-64.
53. Gómez-Polo M, Ortega R, Sallorenzo A, Agustín- Panadero R, Barmak AB, Kois JC, et al. Influence of the surface humidity, implant angulation, and interimplant distance on the accuracy and scanning time of complete-arch implant scans. J Dent. 2022 Dec;127:104307.
54. Gallardo YNR, Noriega J, Rodrigues-Olivio I, Sesma N. A digital technique for cloning the emergence profile of the interim to the definitive implant-supported restoration. J Prosthet Dent. 2023 Dec;7:S0022-3913(23)00765-5.
55. Monaco C, Evangelisti E, Scotti R, Mignani G, Zucchelli G. A fully digital approach to replicate peri-implant soft tissue contours and emergence profile in the esthetic zone. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016 Dec;27(12):1511-4.
56. Dhingra A, Taylor T, Flinton R. Digital Custom Impression Technique to Record Emergence Profile and Fabrication of an Esthetic Implant Supported Restoration. J Prosthodont. 2020 Aug;29(7):636-9.
57. Monaco C, Ragazzini N, Scheda L, Evangelisti E. A fully digital approach to replicate functional and aesthetic parameters in implant-supported full-arch rehabilitation. J Prosthodont Res. 2018 Jul;62(3):383-5.
58. Yilmaz B, Abou-Ayash S. A digital intraoral implant scan technique using a combined healing abutment and scan body system. J Prosthet Dent. 2020 Feb;123(2):206-9.
59. Jahn D, inventor. NT-Trading GmbH, assignee. Scanbody for determination of positioning and orientation of a dental implant. US patent 14 011 936. December 25, 2014.
60. Pachiou A, Zervou E, Tsirogiannis P, Sykaras N, Tortopidis D, Kourtis S. Characteristics of intraoral scan bodies and their influence on impression accuracy: A systematic review. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2023;1-13.
61. Lee JH, Bae JH, Lee SY. Trueness of digital implant impressions based on implant angulation and scan body materials. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1): 21892.
62. Logozzo S, Zanetti EM, Franceschini G, Kilpelä A, Mäkynen A. Recent advances in dental optics - Part I: 3D intraoral scanners for restorative dentistry. Opt Lasers Eng .2014;54:203–21.
63. Logozzo S, Kilpelä A, Mäkynen A, Zanetti EM, Franceschini G. Recent advances in dental optics - Part II: Experimental tests for a new intraoral scanner. Opt Lasers Eng. 2014;54:187–96.
64. Lim JH, Mangal U, Nam NE, Choi SH, Shim JS, Kim JE. A Comparison of Accuracy of Different Dental Restorative Materials between Intraoral Scanning and Conventional Impression-Taking: An In Vitro Study. Materials (Basel). 2021 Apr;19;14(8):2060.
65. Althubaitiy R, Sambrook R, Weisbloom M, Petridis H. The Accuracy of Digital Implant Impressions when Using and Varying the Material and Diameter of the Dental Implant Scan Bodies. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2022 Nov;30;30(4):305-313.
66. Arcuri L, Pozzi A, Lio F, Rompen E, Zechner W, Nardi A. Influence of implant scanbody material, position and operator on the accuracy of digital impression for complete-arch: a randomized in vitro trial. J Prosthodont Res. 2020;64(2):128-36.
67. Schmidt A, Billig JW, Schlenz MA, Rehmann P, Wöstmann B. Influence of the accuracy of intraoral Scanbodies on implant position: differences in manufacturing tolerances. Int J Prosthodont. 2019;32(5): 430-2.
68. Arcuri L, Lio F, Papa A, Nardi A, Barlattani A Jr. Influence of implant scanbody material and operator on scanning fluency and polygonal mesh numbers of digital impression: an in vitro study. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. 2019;33(6 Suppl. 2):179-88.
69. Kato T, Yasunami N, Furuhashi A, Sanda K, Ayukawa Y. Effects of autoclave sterilization and multiple use on implant Scanbody deformation In vitro. Materials (Basel). 2022 Nov;2;15(21):7717.
70. Elena Sicilia et al. Effect of supramucosal height of a scan body and implant angulation on the accuracy of intraoral scanning: An in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent. 2023 Feb;22:S0022-3913(23)00060-4.
71. Pan Y, Tsoi JKH, Lam WYH, Chen Z, Pow EHN. Does the geometry of scan bodies affect the alignment accuracy of computer-aided design in implant digital workflow: An in vitro study? Clin Oral Implants Res. 2022 Mar;33(3):313-21.
72. Gimenez-Gonzalez B, Hassan B, Özcan M, Pradíes G. An in vitro study of factors influencing the performance of digital intraoral impressions operating on active Wavefront sampling technology with multiple implants in the edentulous maxilla. J Prosthodont. 2017;26(8): 650-5.
73. Chan DC, Chung AK, Haines J, Yau EH, Kuo CC. The accuracy of optical scanning: influence of convergence and die preparation. Oper Dent. 2011;36:486-91.
74. Motel C, Kirchner E, Adler W, Wichmann M, Matta RE. Impact of Different Scan Bodies and Scan Strategies on the Accuracy of Digital Implant Impressions Assessed with an Intraoral Scanner: An In Vitro Study. J Prosthodont. 2020 Apr;29(4):309-14.
75. Kim J, Son K, Lee KB. Displacement of scan body during screw tightening: A comparative in vitro study. J Adv Prosthodont. 2020 Oct;12(5):307-315.
76. Diker E, Terzioglu H, Gouveia DNM, Donmez MB, Seidt J, Yilmaz B. Effect of material type, torque value, and sterilization on linear displacements of a scan body: An in vitro study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2023 Apr;25(2):419-25.
77. Gómez-Polo M, Sallorenzo A, Ortega R, Gómez-Polo C, Barmak AB, Att W, Revilla-León M. Influence of implant angulation and clinical implant scan body height on the accuracy of complete arch intraoral digital scans. J Prosthet Dent. 2024 Jan;131(1):119-27.
78. Sequeira V, Harper MT, Lilly CL, Bryington MS. Accuracy of digital impressions at varying implant depths: an In vitro study. J Prosthodont. 2023;32(1):54- 61.