Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the potential mutagenic effects associated to extracts from current self-adhesive flowable resin composite (Vertise Flow,Kerr Corp, Orange, CA, USA) that allows skipping the time-consuming adhesive processes. Study design: The materials were eluted in dimethyl sulphoxide and the extracts were tested either after 1 day or 7 day incubation period at 370C. Mutagenic effects of the materials were tested on Salmonella typhipmurium strain TA 100 using the standard plate incorporation assay in the absence of S9 fraction from rat liver. The data were statistically analyzed using twoway variance analysis (p<0.05). Results: The dose of the material and incubation as well as the interactions between these factors exhibited varying degrees of influences on the Salmonella typhipmurium colony number. However no mutagenic effect was detected for the self-adhesive restorative material. Conclusion: It can be concluded that the adhesive restorative material tested in this study has no mutagenic potential.

Keywords

• diş beyazlatma, direkt kompozit veneer, laminate veneer, ön çapraşıklık

AESTHETIC MANAGEMENT OF ANTERIOR TEETH WITH DIRECT COMPOSITE VENEERS AND BLEACHING AFTER FIXED ORTHODONTIC TREATMENT

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the potential mutagenic effects associated to extracts from current self-adhesive flowable resin composite (Vertise Flow,Kerr Corp, Orange, CA, USA) that allows skipping the time-consuming adhesive processes. Study design: The materials were eluted in dimethyl sulphoxide and the extracts were tested either after 1 day or 7 day incubation period at 370C. Mutagenic effects of the materials were tested on Salmonella typhipmurium strain TA 100 using the standard plate incorporation assay in the absence of S9 fraction from rat liver. The data were statistically analyzed using twoway variance analysis (p<0.05). Results: The dose of the material and incubation as well as the interactions between these factors exhibited varying degrees of influences on the Salmonella typhipmurium colony number. However no mutagenic effect was detected for the self-adhesive restorative material. Conclusion: It can be concluded that the adhesive restorative material tested in this study has no mutagenic potential.

Keywords

• anterior crowding, direct composite veneers, laminate veneers, tooth bleaching

References

1. Kokich VG. Create realistic objectives. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011; 139(6):713.
2. Rodriguez Flores JM. Multidisciplinary orthodontic treatment in adult patients: the future of orthodontics. Int J Orthod Milwaukee. 2010; 21(3):11-21.
3. Wylie WL. The mandibular incisor-its role in facial esthetics. Angle Orthod. 1955; 25:32-41.
4. Senty EL. The maxillary cuspid and missing lateral incisor: esthetics and occlusion. Angle Orthod. 1976; 46:365-371.
5. Nathoo SA. The chemistry and mechanisms of extrinsic and intrinsic discoloration. J Am Dent Assoc. 1997; 128 Suppl:6S-10S.
6. Hattab FN, Qudeimat MA, al-Rimawi HS. Dental discoloration: an overview. J Esthet Dent. 1999; 11(6):291-310.
7. Watts A, Addy M. Tooth discolouration and staining: a review of the literature. Br Dent J. 2001; 190(6):309-16.
8. Ozel Y, Ozel E, Attar N, Aksoy G. Bleaching in dentistry. EÜ Dişhek Fak Derg 2007; 28: 33-40.

9. Zantner C, Derdilopoulou F, Martus P, Kielbassa AM. Randomized clinical trial on the efficacy of 2 over-the-counter whitening systems. Quintessence Int. 2006; 37(9):695- 706.
10. Yap AU, Wattanapayungkul P. Effects of in- office tooth whiteners on hardness of tooth- colored restoratives. Oper Dent. 2002; 27(2):137-41.
11. Attin T, Paqué F, Ajam F, Lennon AM. Review of the current status of tooth whitening with the walking bleach technique. Int Endod J. 2003; 36(5):313-29.
12. Roberson TM, Heymann HO, Swift Jr EJ. Sturdevant’s Art and Science of Operative Dentistry. 5th ed. Mosby Inc, Missouri. 2006; p:637-648.
13. Kokich VG, Spear FM. Guidelines for managing the orthodontic-restorative patient. Semin Orthod. 1997; 3(1):3-20.
14. Savana K, Ansari A, Hamsa R, Kumar M, Jain A, Singh A. Interdisciplinary therapy in orthodontics: an overview. Int J Advanced Health Sci. 2014; 1(5):23-31.
15. Burstone CJ. Diagnosis and treatment planning of patients with asymmetries. Semin Orthod. 1998; 4(3):153-64.
16. Bishara SE, Burkey PS, Kharouf JG. Dental and facial asymmetries: a review. Angle Orthod. 1994; 64(2):89-98.
17. Jordan RE. Esthetic Composite Bonding Techniques and Materials. St. Louis, Mosby-Year Book, Inc. 2nd ed. 1993; p:84- 86,132-134,140,150.
18. Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Porcelain veneers: a review of the literature. J Dent. 2000; 28(3):163- 77.
19. Meijering AC, Roeters FJ, Mulder J, Creugers NH. patients’ satisfaction with different types of veneer restorations. J Dent. 1997; 25(6):493-7.
20. Chiche GJ, Pinault A. Esthetics of anterior fixed prosthodontics. Chicago, Quintessence. 1994; p:42-46.