Direk Dijital Radyografinin Kimlik Tespitinde Kullanımı

Abstract

BUgi fagl olarak adlandmlan yiizYllzmlzda meydana gelen teknolojik geli~meler di~ hekimligi alamnda da etki Ii olmu~tur. Son yeniliklerden birisi de Direkt Dijital Radyqgrafidir (DDR). DDR, bi/gisayar teknolojilerinin kulla hir dijital avrzca goriintiiler sistemidir. DDR'de konvansiyonel radyografideki elektronik tarafzndan ve film yerine projeksiyon teknikleri kulla hilgisayar sakla DDR'nin di~ rutin olarak kullamlmaslyla aflSlndan olan dental daha düzenli tutulabilecektir. Bu sayede kimlik tespiti daha hzzlz ve giivenli bir ~eki/de yapllabilecektir.

Keywords

• adli tıp
• Adli diş hekimliği
• Kimlik tespiti

References

1. Çötiloglu AS. Adli olaylarda kimlik belirlenmesi. In: Soysal Z, <;:akahr C. Adli tJp.Cilt I. istanbul Universitesi Cerrahpa~a TIp Fakiiltesi Yaymlan, istanbul,1999;73.
2. Harorh AB, Bocutoglu O. Adli tiP ve adli odontolojide kimlik tesbiti. Oral, 1990;7(78): 23-28.
3. Af~in H. iskelet kaimtIlannda di~lerden ya~ tayininde dentin transparasyonu gtiriintii analizi ytintemi. istanbul Universitesi Adli TIp Enstitilsii TIp Bilimleri Anabilim Dah(doktora tezi). istanbul, 1999:83.
4. lk AF. Di~ pulpasmdan ABO kan grubu tayini. Ankara Universitesi,Tlp Fakiiltesi,Adli TIp Anabilim Dah (uzmanhk tezi), Ankara, 1994:5.
5. inanlcl MA. <;:aglr S, Birgen N, Soysal Z. Di~ muayenesi ile kimligin saptanmasl ve aglz i«i otopsi uygulamasl. Akademik Dental Di~hekimligi Dergisi, 2000;2(3): 1-6.
6. TunalI i. Adli TIp. Se«kin Yaymclhk, Ankara, 2001:49.
7. Delattre VF. Stimson PG. Self-assessment of the forensic value of dental records. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 1999;44(5):906-909.
8. Wood RE. Kirk NJ, Sweet DJ. Digital dental radiographic identification in the pediatric, mixed, and permanent dentitions. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 1999;44(5):910-916.

9. Hubar 1S, Carr RF. Computed dental radiography used to reproduce tiliim tincesi film position. Journal of Forensic Sciences,1999;44(2):401-404.
10. BaYlrh G. Rontgen l~mlan ve di§ hekimliginde uygulamalar. istanbul Oniversitesi Baslmevi. istanbul, 1994:79-82.
11. Efeoglu E, KIil~ AR. Periodontal tedavide dijital radyografik goriintiileme metodlarl. iu Di§hek. Fak. Derg., 1996;30:89-98.
12. Ala~am T, Uzel i, Ala~am A, Aydm M. Endodonti. Ban§ Yaymlan. Ankara, 2000;96-98.
13. YazlClOglu AN, Yara§ S. Standardize paralel, bite-wing, a~l ortaYl tekniklerinin periodontal klinik muayene ile kar§lla~tIrllmasl A.O Di§hek. Fak. Derg., 1993;20(1 ):85-91.
14. Karakurumer K, ~ahin M. Giinaydm Y, Dogan N. Di§hekimliginde radyolojik tam yontemleri. A.O Di§hek. Fak. Derg, 1990; 17(3):469-473.
15. Hausmann E. Radiographic and digital imaging in periodontal practice. J. Periodontol., 2000;71(3):497-503.
16. Vandre RH, Webber RL. Future trends in dental radiology. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod., 1995;80(4):471-8.
17. Musselwhite JM, Klitzman B, Maixner W, Burkes EJ, Laser Doppler flowmetry: A clinical test of pulpal vitality. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod., 1997;84:411-9.
18. Lindhe J, Karring T, Lang NP. Clinical periodontology and implant dentistry, third edition. Munksgaard, 1998:713.
19. Kaya T, Adapmar B, Ozkan R, Temel radyoloji teknigi. Giinq-Nobel Tip Kitabevleri, 1997;70.
20. Aydm 0, Alasya D, Di§hekimliginde direkt dijital radyografi. Atatiirk Universitesi Di§hek. Fak. Derg., 1998;8(2):78-84.
21. Akgiil HM, Yllmaz AB, Direkt dijital radyografi (DDR). Atatiirk Universitesi Di§hek. Fak. Derg., 1998;8(1):100-104.
22. Benz C, Mouyen F. Evaluation of the new Radio Visiography system image qUality. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol., 1991 ;72(5):627-31.
23. Mouyen F, Benz C, Sonnabend E, Lodter JP. Presentation and physical evaluation of radiovisiography. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol., 1989;68(2):238-242.
24. Sullivan JE, Di Fiore PM, Koerber A. Radiovisiography in the detection of periapical lesions. Journal of Endodontics, 2000;26( 1 ):32-35.
25. Walker A, Horner K, Czajka J, Shearer AC, Wilson NHF. Quantitative assessment of a new dental imaging system. The British Journal of Radiology, 1991 ;64:529-536.
26. Sanderink GCH. Imaging:New versus traditional technological aids. International Dental Journal, 1993;43:335-342.
27. Farman AG, Scarfe WC, Schick DB, Rumack PM, Computed dental radiography:Evaluation of a new charge-coupled device-based intraoral radiographic system. Quintessence International, 1995;26(6):399-404.
28. Stamatakis HC, Welander U, McDavid WD. Physical properties of a photostimulable phosphor system for intra-oral radiography. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, 2000;29(1):28-34.
29. Oliveira AE, De Almeida SM, Paganini GA, Haiter Neto F, Boscolo FN. Comporative study of two digital radiographic storage phosphor systems. Braz Dent J. 2000;11(2):111-116.
30. Wallace JA, Nair MK, Colaco MF, Kapa SF. A comparative evaluation of the diagnostic efficacy of film and digital sensors for detection of simulated periapical lesions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 2001;92:93-7.
31. Yoshiura K, Kawazu T, Tokumori K, Tanaka T, Kanda S. Assessment of image quality in dental radiography, part 2 optimum exposure conditions for detection of small mass changes in 6 intraoral radiography systems. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 1999;87:123-9.
32. Attaelmanan AG, Borg E, Grondahl HG. Signal-to-noise ratios of 6 intraoral digital sensors. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 2001 ;91 :611-5.
33. Ke~eci AD. Egri kanallann geni§letilmesinde kulianIian 3 manuel yontemin intraoral dijital radyografi yardlmlyla kar§Iia§tmlmasl, Ege Oniversitesi Saghk BiJimleri EnstitiisU, Di§ hastahklarl ve tedavisi(doktora tezi), izmir, 1997:47.
34. Cohen S, Burns RC. Pathways of the pulp, eighth edition. Mosby, St Louis, 2002:938-941.
35. Akdeniz BG. Periapikal doku degi§iklikleri ve dijital radyografi. Di§ HekimIiginde KIinik Dergisi, 1999; 12(2):52-6.
36. CDR user quide (CDR kullamm klavuzu), Schick technologies inch.,1999.
37. Hokett SD, Honey JR, Ruiz F, Baisden MK, Hoen MM. Assessing the effectiveness of direct digital radiography barrier sheats and finger cots. JADA, 2000; 131 :463-7.
38. Cederberg RA, Tidwell E, Frederiksen NL, Benson BW. Endodontic working lenght assessment :comparison of storage phosphor digital imaging and radiographic film. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 1998;85:325-8.
39. Versteeg KH, Sanderink GCH, Von Ginkel FC, Van der Stelt PF. Estimating distances on direct digital images and conventinal radiographs. JADA, 1997; 128:439-443.
40. Lim KF, Loh M, Hong YH. Intra-oral computed radiography-an in vitro' evalution. J. Dent, 1996;24:359-364.
41. Burger CL, Mork TO, Hutter JW, Nicoll B. Direct digital radiography versus conventional radiography for estimation of canallenght in curved canals. Journal of Endodontics, 1999;25(4):260-63.
42. Scmage P, Pfeiffer P, Nergiz I, Pitzer U. Analysis of digital image clarity for clinical purposes. Journal of Marmara University Dental Faculty, 1999;3(2):931-9.