Direk Dijital Radyografinin Kimlik Tespitinde Kullanımı

Yıl 2002, Cilt: 16 Sayı: 1, 13 - 19, 30.04.2002

Kürşat Er Fatma Yücel Beyaztaş Kerem Engin Akpınar

https://izlik.org/JA33BX97HS

Öz

BUgi fagl olarak adlandmlan yiizYllzmlzda meydana gelen teknolojik geli~meler di~ hekimligi alamnda da etki Ii olmu~tur. Son yeniliklerden birisi de Direkt Dijital Radyqgrafidir (DDR). DDR, bi/gisayar teknolojilerinin kulla hir dijital avrzca goriintiiler sistemidir. DDR'de konvansiyonel radyografideki elektronik tarafzndan ve film yerine projeksiyon teknikleri kulla hilgisayar sakla DDR'nin di~ rutin olarak kullamlmaslyla aflSlndan olan dental daha düzenli tutulabilecektir. Bu sayede kimlik tespiti daha hzzlz ve giivenli bir ~eki/de yapllabilecektir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

adli tıp , Adli diş hekimliği , Kimlik tespiti

Kaynakça

• Çötiloglu AS. Adli olaylarda kimlik belirlenmesi. In: Soysal Z, <;:akahr C. Adli tJp.Cilt I. istanbul Universitesi Cerrahpa~a TIp Fakiiltesi Yaymlan, istanbul,1999;73.
• Harorh AB, Bocutoglu O. Adli tiP ve adli odontolojide kimlik tesbiti. Oral, 1990;7(78): 23-28.
• Af~in H. iskelet kaimtIlannda di~lerden ya~ tayininde dentin transparasyonu gtiriintii analizi ytintemi. istanbul Universitesi Adli TIp Enstitilsii TIp Bilimleri Anabilim Dah(doktora tezi). istanbul, 1999:83.
• lk AF. Di~ pulpasmdan ABO kan grubu tayini. Ankara Universitesi,Tlp Fakiiltesi,Adli TIp Anabilim Dah (uzmanhk tezi), Ankara, 1994:5.
• inanlcl MA. <;:aglr S, Birgen N, Soysal Z. Di~ muayenesi ile kimligin saptanmasl ve aglz i«i otopsi uygulamasl. Akademik Dental Di~hekimligi Dergisi, 2000;2(3): 1-6.
• TunalI i. Adli TIp. Se«kin Yaymclhk, Ankara, 2001:49.
• Delattre VF. Stimson PG. Self-assessment of the forensic value of dental records. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 1999;44(5):906-909.
• Wood RE. Kirk NJ, Sweet DJ. Digital dental radiographic identification in the pediatric, mixed, and permanent dentitions. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 1999;44(5):910-916.
• Hubar 1S, Carr RF. Computed dental radiography used to reproduce tiliim tincesi film position. Journal of Forensic Sciences,1999;44(2):401-404.
• BaYlrh G. Rontgen l~mlan ve di§ hekimliginde uygulamalar. istanbul Oniversitesi Baslmevi. istanbul, 1994:79-82.
• Efeoglu E, KIil~ AR. Periodontal tedavide dijital radyografik goriintiileme metodlarl. iu Di§hek. Fak. Derg., 1996;30:89-98.
• Ala~am T, Uzel i, Ala~am A, Aydm M. Endodonti. Ban§ Yaymlan. Ankara, 2000;96-98.
• YazlClOglu AN, Yara§ S. Standardize paralel, bite-wing, a~l ortaYl tekniklerinin periodontal klinik muayene ile kar§lla~tIrllmasl A.O Di§hek. Fak. Derg., 1993;20(1 ):85-91.
• Karakurumer K, ~ahin M. Giinaydm Y, Dogan N. Di§hekimliginde radyolojik tam yontemleri. A.O Di§hek. Fak. Derg, 1990; 17(3):469-473.
• Hausmann E. Radiographic and digital imaging in periodontal practice. J. Periodontol., 2000;71(3):497-503.
• Vandre RH, Webber RL. Future trends in dental radiology. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod., 1995;80(4):471-8.
• Musselwhite JM, Klitzman B, Maixner W, Burkes EJ, Laser Doppler flowmetry: A clinical test of pulpal vitality. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod., 1997;84:411-9.
• Lindhe J, Karring T, Lang NP. Clinical periodontology and implant dentistry, third edition. Munksgaard, 1998:713.
• Kaya T, Adapmar B, Ozkan R, Temel radyoloji teknigi. Giinq-Nobel Tip Kitabevleri, 1997;70.
• Aydm 0, Alasya D, Di§hekimliginde direkt dijital radyografi. Atatiirk Universitesi Di§hek. Fak. Derg., 1998;8(2):78-84.
• Akgiil HM, Yllmaz AB, Direkt dijital radyografi (DDR). Atatiirk Universitesi Di§hek. Fak. Derg., 1998;8(1):100-104.
• Benz C, Mouyen F. Evaluation of the new Radio Visiography system image qUality. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol., 1991 ;72(5):627-31.
• Mouyen F, Benz C, Sonnabend E, Lodter JP. Presentation and physical evaluation of radiovisiography. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol., 1989;68(2):238-242.
• Sullivan JE, Di Fiore PM, Koerber A. Radiovisiography in the detection of periapical lesions. Journal of Endodontics, 2000;26( 1 ):32-35.
• Walker A, Horner K, Czajka J, Shearer AC, Wilson NHF. Quantitative assessment of a new dental imaging system. The British Journal of Radiology, 1991 ;64:529-536.
• Sanderink GCH. Imaging:New versus traditional technological aids. International Dental Journal, 1993;43:335-342.
• Farman AG, Scarfe WC, Schick DB, Rumack PM, Computed dental radiography:Evaluation of a new charge-coupled device-based intraoral radiographic system. Quintessence International, 1995;26(6):399-404.
• Stamatakis HC, Welander U, McDavid WD. Physical properties of a photostimulable phosphor system for intra-oral radiography. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, 2000;29(1):28-34.
• Oliveira AE, De Almeida SM, Paganini GA, Haiter Neto F, Boscolo FN. Comporative study of two digital radiographic storage phosphor systems. Braz Dent J. 2000;11(2):111-116.
• Wallace JA, Nair MK, Colaco MF, Kapa SF. A comparative evaluation of the diagnostic efficacy of film and digital sensors for detection of simulated periapical lesions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 2001;92:93-7.
• Yoshiura K, Kawazu T, Tokumori K, Tanaka T, Kanda S. Assessment of image quality in dental radiography, part 2 optimum exposure conditions for detection of small mass changes in 6 intraoral radiography systems. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 1999;87:123-9.
• Attaelmanan AG, Borg E, Grondahl HG. Signal-to-noise ratios of 6 intraoral digital sensors. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 2001 ;91 :611-5.
• Ke~eci AD. Egri kanallann geni§letilmesinde kulianIian 3 manuel yontemin intraoral dijital radyografi yardlmlyla kar§Iia§tmlmasl, Ege Oniversitesi Saghk BiJimleri EnstitiisU, Di§ hastahklarl ve tedavisi(doktora tezi), izmir, 1997:47.
• Cohen S, Burns RC. Pathways of the pulp, eighth edition. Mosby, St Louis, 2002:938-941.
• Akdeniz BG. Periapikal doku degi§iklikleri ve dijital radyografi. Di§ HekimIiginde KIinik Dergisi, 1999; 12(2):52-6.
• CDR user quide (CDR kullamm klavuzu), Schick technologies inch.,1999.
• Hokett SD, Honey JR, Ruiz F, Baisden MK, Hoen MM. Assessing the effectiveness of direct digital radiography barrier sheats and finger cots. JADA, 2000; 131 :463-7.
• Cederberg RA, Tidwell E, Frederiksen NL, Benson BW. Endodontic working lenght assessment :comparison of storage phosphor digital imaging and radiographic film. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 1998;85:325-8.
• Versteeg KH, Sanderink GCH, Von Ginkel FC, Van der Stelt PF. Estimating distances on direct digital images and conventinal radiographs. JADA, 1997; 128:439-443.
• Lim KF, Loh M, Hong YH. Intra-oral computed radiography-an in vitro' evalution. J. Dent, 1996;24:359-364.
• Burger CL, Mork TO, Hutter JW, Nicoll B. Direct digital radiography versus conventional radiography for estimation of canallenght in curved canals. Journal of Endodontics, 1999;25(4):260-63.
• Scmage P, Pfeiffer P, Nergiz I, Pitzer U. Analysis of digital image clarity for clinical purposes. Journal of Marmara University Dental Faculty, 1999;3(2):931-9.