Effect of Surface Finishing Methods and Aging on Surface Roughness and Color Stability of Hybrid Ceramic

Yıl 2022, , 25 - 31, 17.01.2022

Senem Ünver , Gamze Mandalı , Arzu Zeynep Yıldırım , Özlem Oflezer

https://doi.org/10.54617/adoklinikbilimler.1004611

Öz

AIM: The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of four different surface finishing methods and aging on the surface roughness and color stability of dental hybrid ceramic.

MATERIAL AND METHODS: Hybrid ceramic blocks were prepared with dimension of 12x14x1 mm and 4 groups were determined as; polishing with technical kit (ET), polishing with clinical kit (EC), glazing of sandblasting surface (ES) and glazing of etching surface (EA) (n=10). Color parameters and surface roughness values were measured. Thermocycling procedure was applied. Color and surface roughness values were re-measured. ΔE values were calculated and data was analyzed with Kruskal Wallis, Bonferroni Dunn and Wilcoxon signed ranks tests. Surface analysis were performed with scanning electron microscope to 2 specimens of each group.

RESULTS: Significant difference was not observed among ΔE values of the groups with different types of surface finishing procedure. Before and after aging, EA group had lowest surface roughness values. After aging, surface roughness values increased for ES group.

CONCLUSION: The color stability of hybrid ceramic material was not affected by the surface finishing method, and the lowest surface roughness values were observed in the glazing of sandblasting surface group.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Color, hybrid ceramic, roughness, surface treatment, thermocycling

Yüzey Bitirme İşlemleri ve Yaşlandırmanın Hibrit Seramik Materyalde Yüzey Pürüzlülüğü ve Renk Stabilitesine Etkisi

Öz

AMAÇ: Bu çalışmanın amacı, dört farklı yüzey bitirme metodunun ve yaşlandırma işleminin dental hibrid seramik materyalde yüzey pürüzlülüğü ve renk stabilitesi üzerine etkisinin değerlendirilmesidir.

GEREÇ VE YÖNTEM: Hibrid seramik bloklar 12x14x1 mm boyutlarında hazırlandı ve örnekler yüzey bitirme metotlarına göre; teknik kitle polisaj (ET), klinik kitle polisaj (EC), kumlanan yüzeye glaze (ES) ve asitlenen yüzeye glaze (EA) olmak üzere 4 alt gruba ayrıldı (n=10). Renk parametreleri ve yüzey pürüzlülük değerleri ölçüldü. Tüm örneklere yaşlandırma işlemi uygulandı. Renk ve yüzey pürüzlülük değerleri tekrar ölçüldü. Renk değişim (ΔE) değerleri hesaplandı ve verilerin analizi Kruskal Wallis, Bonferroni Dunn ve Wilcoxon signed ranks testleri kullanılarak yapıldı. Her gruptan 2 örnekte Taramalı Elektron Mikroskobuyla (SEM) yüzey analizi yapıldı.

BULGULAR: Farklı yüzey bitirme işlemi uygulanan grupların ΔE değerleri arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı fark gözlenmedi. Yaşlandırma işlemi öncesi ve sonrasında, EA grubu en düşük yüzey pürüzlülük değerlerini gösterdi. Yaşlandırma işlemi sonrasında ES grubunun yüzey pürüzlülük değerleri yükseldi.

SONUÇ: Hibrit seramik materyalin renk stabilitesi yüzey bitirme metodundan etkilenmedi ve en düşük yüzey pürüzlülük değerleri asitlenmiş yüzeye glaze uygulanan grupta görüldü.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Hibrit seramik, pürüzlülük, renk, yaşlandırma, yüzey işlemi

Kaynakça

• 1.Facenda JC, Borba M, Corazza PH. A literature review on the new polymer-infiltrated ceramic-network material (PICN). J Esthet Restor Dent 2018; 30: 281-6.
• 2.Dirxen C, Blunck U, Preissner S. Clinical performance of a new biomimetic double network material. Open Dent J 2013; 7: 118-22.
• 3.Petrini M, Ferrante M, Su B. Fabrication and characterization of biomimetic ceramic/polymer composite materials for dental restoration. Dent Mater 2013; 29: 375-80.
• 4.Spitznagel FA, Horvath SD, Guess PC, et al. Resin bond to indirect composite and new ceramic/polymer materials: A review of the literature. J Esthet Restor Dent 2014; 26: 382-93.
• 5.Leung BT, Tsoi JK, Matinlinna JP, et al.. Comparison of mechanical properties of three machinable ceramics with an experimental fluorophlogopite glass ceramic. J Prosthet Dent 2015; 114: 440-5.
• 6.Kim KH, Loch C, Waddell JN, et al. Surface characteristics and biofilm development on selected dental ceramic materials. Int J Dent 2017; doi.org/10.1155/2017/7627945
• 7.Sagsoz O, Demirci T, Demirci G, et al. The effects of different polishing techniques on the staining resistance of CAD/CAM resin-ceramics. J Adv Prosthodont 2016; 8: 417-22.
• 8.Mota EG, Nunes LS, Fracasso LM, et al. The effect of milling and postmilling procedures on the surface roughness of CAD/CAM materials. J Esthet Restor Dent 2017; 29: 450-8.
• 9. Uchimura JY, Sato F, Bianchi G, et al. Color stability over time of three resin-based restorative materials stored dry and in artificial saliva. J Esthet Restor Dent 2014; 26: 279-87.
• 10.de Oliveira DC, Ayres AP, Rocha MG, et al. Effect of different in vitro aging methods on color stability of a dental resin-based composite using CIELAB and CIEDE2000 color-difference formulas. J Esthet Restor Dent 2015; 27: 322-30.
• 11.Arocha MA, Mayoral JR, Lefever D, et al. Color stability of siloranes versus methacrylate-based composites after immersion in staining solutions. Clin Oral Investig 2013; 17: 1481-7.
• 12. Falkensammer F, Arnetzl GV, Wildburger A, et al. Color stability of different composite resin materials. J Prosthet Dent 2013; 109: 378-83.
• 13.de Oliveira ALBM, Botta AC, Campos JA, et al. Effects of immersion media and repolishing on color stability and superficial morphology of nanofilled composite resin. Microsc Microanal 2014; 20: 1234-9.
• 14.Motro PF, Kursoglu P, Kazazoglu E. Effects of different surface treatments on stainability of ceramics. J Prosthet Dent 2012; 108: 231-7.
• 15.Vichi A, Fonzar RF, Goracci C, et al. Effect of finishing and polishing on roughness and gloss of lithium disilicate and lithium silicate zirconia reinforced glass ceramic for CAD/CAM systems. Oper Dent 2018; 43: 90-100.
• 16.Paravina RD, Ghinea R, Herrera LJ, et al. Color difference thresholds in dentistry. J Esthet Restor Dent 2015; 27 Suppl 1: 1-9.
• 17.Lawson NC, Burgess JO. Gloss and stain resistance of ceramic-polymer CAD/CAM restorative blocks. J Esthet Restor Dent 2016; 28: 40-5.
• 18.Awad D, Stawarczyk B, Liebermann A, et al. Translucency of esthetic dental restorative CAD/CAM materials and composite resins with respect to thickness and surface roughness. J Prosthet Dent 2015; 113: 534-40.
• 19.Ozarslan MM, Büyükkaplan UŞ, Barutcigil Ç, et al. Effects of different surface finishing procedures on the change in surface rouhness and color of a polymer infiltrated ceramic network material. J Adv Prosthodont 2016; 8: 16-20.
• 20.Bollen CM, Lambrechts P, Quirynen M. Comparison of surface roughness of oral hard materials to the threshold surface roughness for bacterial plaque retention: a review of the literature. Dent Mater 1997; 13: 258-69.
• 21.Holand W, Schweiger M, Rheinberger VM, et al. Bioceramics and their applications for dental restoration. Adv Appl Cera 2009; 108: 373-80.
• 22. Vasudeva G. Monomer systems for dental composites and their future: a review. J Calif Dent Assoc 2009; 37: 389-98.
• 23.Saba DA, Salama RA, Haridy R. Effect of different beverages on the color stability and microhardness of CAD/CAM hybrid versus feldspathic ceramic blocks: An in-vitro study. Futur Dent J 2017; 3: 61-6.
• 24. Kilinc H, Turgut S. Optical behaviors of esthetic CAD-CAM rstorations after different surface finishing and polishing procedures and UV aging: An in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2018; 120: 107-13.
• 25.Imirzalioglu P, Karacaer O, Yilmaz B, et al. Color stability of denture acrylic resins and a soft lining material against tea, coffee, and nicotine. J Prosthodont 2010; 19: 118-24.
• 26.Motro PF, Kursoglu P, Kazazoglu E. Effects of different surface treatments on stainability of ceramics. J Prosthet Dent 2012; 108: 231-7.
• 27.Xie C, Han Y, Zhao XY, et al. Microtensile bond strength of one- and two-step self-etching adhesives on sclerotic dentin: the effects of thermocycling. Oper Dent 2010; 35: 547-55.