Restorative Treatment of Teeth with Excess Matter Loss with Indirect Composite Restoration: 5 Case Reports

Yıl 2022, , 310 - 317, 19.09.2022

Fikri Öcal , Burak Dayı

https://doi.org/10.54617/adoklinikbilimler.1105505

Öz

Material losses in teeth due to various reasons can be restored with direct and indirect applications. In this case report, treatment of posterior teeth with extensive dental tissue loss with indirect composite restorations (GC Gradia Plus, Tokyo, Japan) is described on five separate cases. The teeth with excessive substance loss were prepared using conservative dentistry methods, preserving the remaining tissue. Then the measurements were taken and the models were obtained. Restorations prepared on the models were polymerized in a special polymerization bakery (GC Labolight DUO, Tokyo, Japan) and bonded with dual cure cement (G-CEM LinkACE, Tokyo, Japan). In the short-term (1-2 weeks) and long-term (12-28 months) follow-ups, it was observed that the remaining tooth tissue was preserved and the tooth was in function. The use of indirect composites in the restoration of teeth with excessive substance loss gives successful results in preserving the remaining tooth tissue and restoring the lost function.

Anahtar Kelimeler

composite, dental treatment, indirect restorations

Madde Kaybı Fazla Olan Dişlerin İndirekt Kompozit Restorasyon ile Restoratif Tedavisi: 5 Olgu Sunumu

Öz

Dişlerde çeşitli nedenlerle meydana gelen madde kayıpları direk ve indirekt uygulamalarla restore edilebilmektedir. Bu olgu sunumunda, beş ayrı vaka üzerinde, geniş diş dokusu kaybının olduğu posterior bölge dişlerinin indirekt kompozit restorasyonlarla (GC Gradia Plus, Tokyo, Japonya) tedavisi anlatılmaktadır. Aşırı madde kayıplı dişlerin konservatif diş hekimliği yöntemleri ile kalan dokusu korunarak preparasyonları yapıldı. Ardından ölçüleri alındı ve modeller elde edildi. Modeller üzerinde hazırlanan restorasyonlar özel polimerizasyon fırınında (GC Labolight DUO, Tokyo, Japonya) polimerize edildi ve çift yönlü sertleşebilen siman (G-CEM LinkACE, Tokyo, Japonya) ile yapıştırıldı. Kısa dönem (1-2 haftalık) ve uzun dönem (12-28 aylık) takiplerde kalan diş dokusunun korunduğu ve dişin fonksiyonda olduğu görüldü. Aşırı madde kaybı olan dişlerin restorasyonunda indirekt kompozitlerin kullanımı kalan diş dokusunun korunmasında ve kaybolan fonksiyonun geri kazanımında başarılı sonuçlar vermektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

diş tedavisi, indirekt restorasyon, kompozit

Kaynakça

• Ericson D. What is minimally invasive dentistry? Oral Health Prev Dent. 2004;2:287-92.
• Azeem RA, Sureshbabu NM. Clinical performance of direct versus indirect composite restorations in posterior teeth: A systematic review. J Conserv Dent. 2018;21(1):2-9.
• Manhart J, Scheibenbogen-Fuchsbrunner A, Chen H, Hickel R. A 2-year clinical study of composite and ceramic inlays. Clin Oral Investig. 2000;4(4):192-8.
• Tekçe N, Göktürk Sa, Karakuyu H, Tuncer S. Fazla Madde Kayipli Dişlerin İndirekt Yöntem İle Konservatif Tedavisi: 4 Olgu Sunumu. Atatürk univ diş hekim fak derg. 2015;25(13):23-31.
• Khan A, Satou N, Shintani H, Taira M, Wakasa K, Yamaki M. Effects of post‐curing by heat on the mechanical properties of visible‐light cured inlay composites. J Oral Rehabil. 1993;20(6):605-14.
• Manhart J, Chen H, Hamm G, Hickel R. Review of the clinical survival of direct and indirect restorations in posterior teeth of the permanent dentition. Oper Dent. 2004;29:481-508.
• Karaarslan ES, Ertas E, Bulucu B. Clinical evaluation of direct composite restorations and inlays: Results at 12 months. J Restor Dent. 2014;2(2):70-7.
• Tsujimoto A, Jurado C, Villalobos-Tinoco J, Barkmeier W, Fischer N, Takamizawa T et al. Wear resistance of indirect composite resins used for provisional restorations supported by implants. J Adv Prosthodont 2019;11(4):232-8.
• Ersöz B, Karaoğlanoğlu S, OKTAY EA, AYDIN N. Color stability and surface roughness of resin based direct and indirect restorative materials. EADS. 2021;48(1):1-6.
• Moraes R, Goncalves LdS, Lancellotti AC, Consani S, Correr-Sobrinho L, Sinhoreti MA. Nanohybrid resin composites: nanofiller loaded materials or traditional microhybrid resins? Oper Dent. 2009;34(5):551-7.
• Lu P-Y, Chiang Y-C. Restoring large defect of posterior tooth by indirect composite technique: A case report. J Dent. 2018;6(4):54-61.
• Paul SJ, Schärer PJ. The dual bonding technique: a modified method timprove adhesive luting procedures. Int J Periodontics Restor Dent. 1997;17(6):537-45.
• Yoshida Y, Nagakane K, Fukuda R, Nakayama Y, Okazaki M, Shintani H et al. Comparative study on adhesive performance of functional monomers. J Dent Res. 2004;83(6):454-8.
• Braga R, Ballester R, Carrilho M. Pilot study on the early shear strength of porcelain-dentin bonding using dual-cure cements. J Prosthet Dent.1999;81(3):285-9.
• van Dijken JW, Örmin A, Olofsson AL. Clinical performance of pressed ceramic inlays luted with resin-modified glass ionomer and autopolymerizing resin composite cements. J Prosthet Dent. 1999;82(5):529-35.
• Gresnigt MM, Özcan M, van den Houten ML, Schipper L, Cune MS. Fracture strength, failure type and Weibull characteristics of lithium disilicate and multiphase resin composite endocrowns under axial and lateral forces. Dent Mater. 2016;32(5):607-14.
• Belli R, Geinzer E, Muschweck A, Petschelt A, Lohbauer U. Mechanical fatigue degradation of ceramics versus resin composites for dental restorations. Dent Mater. 2014;30(4):424-32.
• Cao L, Zhao X, Gong X, Zhao S. An in vitro investigation of wear resistance and hardness of composite resins. Int J Clin. Med. 2013;6(6):423-30.
• Montes M, de Goes MF, Ambrosano G, Duarte RM, Sobrinho LC. The effect of collagen removal and the use of a low-viscosity resin liner on marginal adaptation of resin composite restorations with margins in dentin. Oper Dent. 2003;28(4):378-87.