Research Article

Evaluation of the Regulatory Structure of Local Animal Experiments Ethics Committees at Universities with Faculties of Veterinary Medicine in Turkey

Volume: 14 Number: 2 December 25, 2025
EN TR

Evaluation of the Regulatory Structure of Local Animal Experiments Ethics Committees at Universities with Faculties of Veterinary Medicine in Turkey

Abstract

As of January 2025, this study assessed the current status of Local Animal Experiments Ethics Committees (HADYEK) at 29 universities in Turkey that host faculties of veterinary medicine. The primary aim of the research is to examine the structural and functional characteristics of these ethics committees within institutions actively engaged in education and research. Relevant data concerning the committees were retrieved from open-access databases available on the official websites of the respective universities. The principal legal framework underpinning this study is the Regulation on the Working Procedures and Principles of Animal Experiments Ethics Committees, which was enacted upon its publication in the Official Gazette dated February 15, 2014 (No. 28914). Within this context, the dates on which HADYEK directives were approved by university senates were accepted as the official establishment dates of the committees. The review revealed that the majority of these committees were established in or after 2014, and thus, the evaluations were conducted in reference to the provisions of the aforementioned regulation. The second major source of data for this study consists of the HADYEK directives issued by the universities with faculties of veterinary medicine. These institutional documents define the foundational principles and operational procedures of the committees and serve as critical references for evaluating their alignment with the national regulatory framework. The data were analyzed systematically using a document analysis method and presented in tabular format. Explanatory notes and the citation details of the relevant issues of the Official Gazette are provided in footnotes within the respective sections. In the discussion section, the implementation practices across institutions are evaluated based on the 26 articles of the 2014 regulation; similarities and divergences among the directives are examined in detail. The findings are interpreted through an integrated approach, considering both the content analysis results and relevant literature.

Keywords

References

  1. Anonymous (1994). Official Gazette, 09 July 1994, No. 21985.
  2. Anonymous (2004a). Official Gazette, 16 May 2004, No. 25464.
  3. Regulation on the Protection of Animals Used for Experimental and Other Scientific Purposes, and on the Establishment, Operation, Supervision, Procedures, and Principles of Animal Breeding Facilities and Laboratories Conducting Experiments.
  4. Anonymous (2004b). Official Gazette, 24 June 2004, No. 5199.
  5. Anonymous (2006a). The Implementation Instructions for the Regulation on the Protection, Use, Inspection, Procedures, and Principles of Laboratory Animals Used for Experimental and Other Scientific Purposes, issued by the Ministry of Food, Agriculture, and Livestock, 25 April 2006, No. 24.
  6. Anonymous (2006b). Official Gazette, 06 July 2006, No. 26220.
  7. Anonymous (2014). Official Gazette, 15 February 2014, No. 28914.
  8. Anonymous (2025a). Establishment Dates of Veterinary Faculties. YÖK Atlas. Retrieved 25 July 2025, from https://yokatlas.yok.gov.tr/ lisans-bolum.php?b=10232

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Veterinary Sciences (Other)

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

December 25, 2025

Submission Date

August 13, 2025

Acceptance Date

November 3, 2025

Published in Issue

Year 2025 Volume: 14 Number: 2

APA
Koç Gültekin, A. (2025). Evaluation of the Regulatory Structure of Local Animal Experiments Ethics Committees at Universities with Faculties of Veterinary Medicine in Turkey. Animal Health Production and Hygiene, 14(2), 31-39. https://doi.org/10.53913/aduveterinary.1763928
AMA
1.Koç Gültekin A. Evaluation of the Regulatory Structure of Local Animal Experiments Ethics Committees at Universities with Faculties of Veterinary Medicine in Turkey. Animal Health, Prod and Hyg. 2025;14(2):31-39. doi:10.53913/aduveterinary.1763928
Chicago
Koç Gültekin, Aysun. 2025. “Evaluation of the Regulatory Structure of Local Animal Experiments Ethics Committees at Universities With Faculties of Veterinary Medicine in Turkey”. Animal Health Production and Hygiene 14 (2): 31-39. https://doi.org/10.53913/aduveterinary.1763928.
EndNote
Koç Gültekin A (December 1, 2025) Evaluation of the Regulatory Structure of Local Animal Experiments Ethics Committees at Universities with Faculties of Veterinary Medicine in Turkey. Animal Health Production and Hygiene 14 2 31–39.
IEEE
[1]A. Koç Gültekin, “Evaluation of the Regulatory Structure of Local Animal Experiments Ethics Committees at Universities with Faculties of Veterinary Medicine in Turkey”, Animal Health, Prod and Hyg, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 31–39, Dec. 2025, doi: 10.53913/aduveterinary.1763928.
ISNAD
Koç Gültekin, Aysun. “Evaluation of the Regulatory Structure of Local Animal Experiments Ethics Committees at Universities With Faculties of Veterinary Medicine in Turkey”. Animal Health Production and Hygiene 14/2 (December 1, 2025): 31-39. https://doi.org/10.53913/aduveterinary.1763928.
JAMA
1.Koç Gültekin A. Evaluation of the Regulatory Structure of Local Animal Experiments Ethics Committees at Universities with Faculties of Veterinary Medicine in Turkey. Animal Health, Prod and Hyg. 2025;14:31–39.
MLA
Koç Gültekin, Aysun. “Evaluation of the Regulatory Structure of Local Animal Experiments Ethics Committees at Universities With Faculties of Veterinary Medicine in Turkey”. Animal Health Production and Hygiene, vol. 14, no. 2, Dec. 2025, pp. 31-39, doi:10.53913/aduveterinary.1763928.
Vancouver
1.Aysun Koç Gültekin. Evaluation of the Regulatory Structure of Local Animal Experiments Ethics Committees at Universities with Faculties of Veterinary Medicine in Turkey. Animal Health, Prod and Hyg. 2025 Dec. 1;14(2):31-9. doi:10.53913/aduveterinary.1763928