Abstract
Özbilgi/Amaç: Kemik biyomekaniği araştırmalarının multidisipliner içeriği nedeniyle, konuyla ilgili kaynaklarda belirgin bir kavram kargaşası dikkati çekmektedir. Bu nedenle, kemik biyomekaniği ve mekanik özelliklerin ölçülmesinde yaygın olarak kullanılan genel terminolojinin biyoloji veya sağlık alanındaki araştırıcıların da kullanabileceği şekilde sunulması amaçlanmıştır.Materyal Metot: Mekanik test grafikleri, çalışmalar ve literatür bilgilerin derlemesiBulgular ve Sonuç: Mekanik özellikler kemiğin fonksiyon ve yapısını gösteren temel parametrelerdir. Uygun düzenekler hazırlanarak yapılan çeşitli biyomekanik testler, bir kemikte ne tür yapısal değişikliklerin kırılmayı kolaylaştırdığı, hangi tedavilerin ne şekilde ve kombinasyonlarda uygulanması gerektiği hakkında değerlendirme yapmamızı sağlar. Bu tür çalışmalarda genel biyomekanik terminolojinin biyoloji veya sağlık alanında çalışan araştırıcılar tarafından da anlaşılması kemikteki tüm mekanik değişimlerin yorumlanabilmesi açısından önemlidir.
Keywords
References
- An YH, Barfield WR, and RA Draughn (2000). Basic concepts of mecha- nical property measurement and bone biomechanics, In: Mechani- cal Testing of Bone and the Bone-Implant Interface YH An and RA Draughn (Eds.), CRC Press. Boca Raton, pp. 23-40.
- An YH, Friedman RJ (1999). Animal Models in Ortopaedic Research. CRC Press. Boca Raton. pp: 139-163.
- An YH, Qian K, Friedman RJ (1996). Mechanical symmetry of rabbit bo- nes studied by bending and indentiation testing. American Journal of Veterinary Research. 57 (12): 1786-1789.
- Chao P, Lewis DD, Kowaleski MP, Pozzi A (2012). Biomechanic concepts applicable to minimally Invasive Fracture Repair in Small Animals. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Small Animal Practice. 42: 853- 872
- Delehay JN, Wiesel SW (2001). Principles of Ortopeadic Medicine and surgery. WB. Saunders Company. Philadelphia, pp:117-138.
- Domaniç F, Erdik E, Zengin N (1974). Modern Üniversite Fiziği. Çağlayan Kitapevi. İstanbul. 22-26s, 311-318s.
- Frankel V H, and Nordin M (2001). Biomechanics of bone. In: Basic of the Musculoskeletal System, Frankel V H, and Nordin M (Eds), Lippincott Williams &Wilkins. USA, pp: 26-60.
- Hirano T, Burr DB, Turner CH, Sato M, Cain RL, Hock JM (1999). Anabolic effects of human biosynthetic parathyroid hormone fragment (1- 34), LY333334, on remodeling and mechanical properties of cortical bone in rabbits. J Bone Miner Res.14 (1): 536-545.
- Huiskes R, and Rietbergen BV (2005). Biomechanics of bone. In: Basic Orthopedic Biomechnics and Mechano-biology, Mow VC and Huis- kes R (Eds), Lippincott Williams &Wilkins. USA, pp: 123-179.
- Kutsal YG (2004). Osteoporozda Kemik Kalitesi. Güneş Kitabevi. Ankara. 123-136s. 175-192s.
- Martin RB, Burr DB, Sharkey NA (2004). Skeletal Tissue Mechanics, Springer USA, pp: 127-180.
- Rodgers MM, and Cavanagh P (1984). Glossary of biomechanical Ter- ms; Concepts, and Units. Journal of American Physical Therapy As- sociation, 64: 1886-1902
- Sevil F (2006). Tavşan Femur’unun Morfometrik ve Biyomekanik Özel- likleri Üzerine Ovariektominin Etkisi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Adnan Mednderes Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü. Anatomi Anabilm Dalı AN-YL-2006-0001, Aydın.
- Sevil F, Kara ME (2010). The effects of ovariectomy on bone mineral density, geometrical and biomechanical characteristics in the rabbit femur. Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumato- logy. 23: 31–36
- Shahar R, Banks-Sills L, Eliasy R (2003). Stres and strain distrubution in the intact canine femur: finite elemet analysis. Medical Engineering and Physics; 25: 387-395.
- Turner CH, and Burr DB (1993). Basic Biomechanical Measurements of bone: a tutorial. Bone. 14: 595-608.
- Turner CH (2002). Biomechanic of bone: Determinants of skeletal fragi- lity and bone quality. Osteoporosis International. 13: 97-104
Abstract
Background/Aim: Because biomechanical studies require a multidisciplinary working, the unclear terminologies are used in this field references. The aim of this review is to present the basic concepts of assessment of mechanical properties of bones, especially for biosciences researchers. Material and Method: Mechanical test diagrams and bone biomechanics studiesResults and Conclusion: Mechanical properties are basic parameters to show the function and structure of bone. In this context, the biomechanical testing methods supply the valuable knowledge to determine the type of structural change of the bone that may cause to break, or to assist in choice for optimum treatment method in orthopedic diseases. The biosciences researchers, however, should be familiar test properly.
Keywords
References
- An YH, Barfield WR, and RA Draughn (2000). Basic concepts of mecha- nical property measurement and bone biomechanics, In: Mechani- cal Testing of Bone and the Bone-Implant Interface YH An and RA Draughn (Eds.), CRC Press. Boca Raton, pp. 23-40.
- An YH, Friedman RJ (1999). Animal Models in Ortopaedic Research. CRC Press. Boca Raton. pp: 139-163.
- An YH, Qian K, Friedman RJ (1996). Mechanical symmetry of rabbit bo- nes studied by bending and indentiation testing. American Journal of Veterinary Research. 57 (12): 1786-1789.
- Chao P, Lewis DD, Kowaleski MP, Pozzi A (2012). Biomechanic concepts applicable to minimally Invasive Fracture Repair in Small Animals. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Small Animal Practice. 42: 853- 872
- Delehay JN, Wiesel SW (2001). Principles of Ortopeadic Medicine and surgery. WB. Saunders Company. Philadelphia, pp:117-138.
- Domaniç F, Erdik E, Zengin N (1974). Modern Üniversite Fiziği. Çağlayan Kitapevi. İstanbul. 22-26s, 311-318s.
- Frankel V H, and Nordin M (2001). Biomechanics of bone. In: Basic of the Musculoskeletal System, Frankel V H, and Nordin M (Eds), Lippincott Williams &Wilkins. USA, pp: 26-60.
- Hirano T, Burr DB, Turner CH, Sato M, Cain RL, Hock JM (1999). Anabolic effects of human biosynthetic parathyroid hormone fragment (1- 34), LY333334, on remodeling and mechanical properties of cortical bone in rabbits. J Bone Miner Res.14 (1): 536-545.
- Huiskes R, and Rietbergen BV (2005). Biomechanics of bone. In: Basic Orthopedic Biomechnics and Mechano-biology, Mow VC and Huis- kes R (Eds), Lippincott Williams &Wilkins. USA, pp: 123-179.
- Kutsal YG (2004). Osteoporozda Kemik Kalitesi. Güneş Kitabevi. Ankara. 123-136s. 175-192s.
- Martin RB, Burr DB, Sharkey NA (2004). Skeletal Tissue Mechanics, Springer USA, pp: 127-180.
- Rodgers MM, and Cavanagh P (1984). Glossary of biomechanical Ter- ms; Concepts, and Units. Journal of American Physical Therapy As- sociation, 64: 1886-1902
- Sevil F (2006). Tavşan Femur’unun Morfometrik ve Biyomekanik Özel- likleri Üzerine Ovariektominin Etkisi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Adnan Mednderes Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü. Anatomi Anabilm Dalı AN-YL-2006-0001, Aydın.
- Sevil F, Kara ME (2010). The effects of ovariectomy on bone mineral density, geometrical and biomechanical characteristics in the rabbit femur. Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumato- logy. 23: 31–36
- Shahar R, Banks-Sills L, Eliasy R (2003). Stres and strain distrubution in the intact canine femur: finite elemet analysis. Medical Engineering and Physics; 25: 387-395.
- Turner CH, and Burr DB (1993). Basic Biomechanical Measurements of bone: a tutorial. Bone. 14: 595-608.
- Turner CH (2002). Biomechanic of bone: Determinants of skeletal fragi- lity and bone quality. Osteoporosis International. 13: 97-104
Details
| Primary Language | Turkish |
|---|---|
| Journal Section | Research Article |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | June 1, 2013 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2013 Volume: 2 Issue: 2 |