Mısırda Bazı Kalite Özelliklerinin Genetik Analizi

Yıl 2019, , 193 - 199, 31.12.2019

Elif Özdemir , Bayram Sade

https://doi.org/10.25308/aduziraat.578043

Cited By: 4

Öz

Tarla denemeleri 2015 – 2016 yetiştirme sezonlarında
Konya, Türkiye koşullarında yürütülmüştür. 
Denemede materyal olarak 7 ana, 3 baba hat ve 2015 yılında line × tester
yöntemine göre üretilmiş 21 F₁ kombinasyonuna ait tohumluklar
kullanılmıştır. Her bir genotipe ait tohumluklar 2016 yılının Mayıs ayının
ikinci haftası içerisinde el ile 5 m uzunluğundaki sıralara “Tesadüf Blokları
Deneme Deseni” ne göre üç tekerrürlü olarak 70 × 20 ekim düzeninde
ekilmişlerdir. Her bir parsel 5 m uzunluğunda iki sıradan oluşacak şekilde
tasarlanmıştır. Ebeveynlerin ve melezlerin koçanları Ekim ayı içerisinde tane
nem oranları yaklaşık %20 olduğunda hasat edilmişlerdir.  Laboratuvar analizleri 2017 – 2018 yıllarında
yapılmış, analizlerde 7 ana hat, 3 test edici ve 21 melez mısır kombinasyonuna
ait tohumluklar kullanılmıştır. Her bir genotipte ham yağ oranı (HYO), ham
protein oranı (HPO), hektolitre ağırlığı (HA), nişasta içeriği (Nİ) ve bin tane
ağırlığı (BTA) özellikleri belirlenmiştir. Popülasyonun varyans bileşenleri, ebeveynlerin
genel kombinasyon yeteneği (GKY), melezlerin ise özel kombinasyon yeteneği
(ÖKY) değerleri hesaplanmıştır. Hat 3.2 (HPO; 0.448*, HA; 8.794*, BTA;
24.805**), 3.4 (HPO; 0.054*, HYO; 1.019**, HA; 23.905**), 14.21 (HPO; 0.176**,
HYO; 1.297**, HA; 18.349**), 3.6 (HYO; 1.441**, Nİ; 2.145**), 14.2 (Nİ;
1.675**, HA; 21.460**), 14.26 (Nİ; 2.566**, BTA; 35.550**) ve 14.20 (HPO;
0.767**)’ nin birçok özellikte pozitif ve önemli GKY değerlerine sahip
oldukları izlenmiştir. Denemeden elde edilmiş bulgular denemeye konu
popülasyonun arzu edilen kalite kriterlerine sahip melezlerin geliştirilmesine
uygun olduğunu göstermiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

line × tester, ıslah, GKY, ÖKY, mısırda kalite

Destekleyen Kurum

Selçuk Üniversitesi Bilimsel Araştırma Projeleri Koordinatörlüğü

Proje Numarası

18101014

Genetic Analysis of Some Quality Traits in Maize

Öz

Field experiments were
conducted during the 2015 – 2016 growing seasons in Konya, Turkey. Seven inbred
lines, 3 testers and 21 F₁ progenies that were produced by line x
tester mating design in 2015 were used as materials.  Seeds of each genotype were sown by hand to 5
m long rows according to “Randomized Complete Block Design” with three replications
with spacing of 70 × 20 cm in second week of May in 2016. Each replicate plot
was consisted of two 5 m long rows. Corn cobs of parentages and crosses were
harvested manually in October when the moisture content of the grains was approximately 20%. Laboratory
analyses were performed during the 2017 – 2018 with seeds of 7 inbred lines, 3
testers and 21 hybrid maize combinations. Crude oil content (COC), crude
protein content (CPC), hectolitre weight (HW), starch content (SC) and thousand
grain weight (TGW) traits of each genotype were determined. The variance
compounds of the population, general combining abilities (GCAs) of the
parentages and specific combining abilities (SCAs) of the progenies were
calculated. Line 3.2 (CPC; 0.448*, HW; 8.794*, TGW; 24.805**), line 3.4 (CPC;
0.054*, COC; 1.019**, HW; 23.905**), line 14.21 (CPC; 0.176**, COC; 1.297**,
HW; 18.349**), line 3.6 (COC; 1.441**, SC; 2.145**), line 14.2 (SC; 1.675**,
HW; 21.460**), line 14.26 (SC; 2.566**, TGW; 35.550**) and line 14.20 (CPC;
0.767**) had significant and positive GCAs at several properties. Our results
suggested that this population is suitable for developing progenies with
appropriate quality traits.

Anahtar Kelimeler

breeding, GCA, line × tester, SCA, quality in maize

Proje Numarası

18101014

Kaynakça

• Alan Ö, Sönmez K, Budak Z, Kutlu İ, Ayter NÖ (2011) The effect of sowing dates on yield and agricultural characteristics of sweet corn (Zea mays saccharata Sturt.) in Eskisehir ecological conditions. Journal of Selcuk Agriculture and Food Sciences, 25: 34-41.
• Aliu S, Rusinovci I, Fetahu S, Rozman L (2012) Genetic diversity and correlation for grain yield and quality traits in local maize (Zea mays L.). Notulae Scientia Biologicae, 4: 126-130.
• Anonymous (2017) 2016 Yılı Hububat Raporu. Turkish Grain Board Publishes, Ankara.
• Chnapek M, Tomka M, Gregánová Z, Gálová Z (2014) Protein complex of wheat, buckwheat and maize in relation to celiac disease. The Journal of Microbiology, Biotechnology and Food Sciences, 3: 88-92.
• Ding J, Ma J, Zhang C, Dong H, Xi Z, Xia Z, Wu J (2011) QTL mapping for test weight by using F2:3 population in maize. Journal of Genetics, 1: 75-80.
• Dorsey-Redding C, Hurburg RC, Johnson LA, Fox SR (1991) Relationships among maize quality factors. Cereal Chemistry, 68: 602-605.
• Emeklier Y (2012) Sıcak İklim Tahılları. Ankara Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Yayınları, Ankara, p.119.
• Fasahat P, Rajabi A, Rad JM, Derera J (2016) Principles and utilization of combining ability in plant breeding. Biom. Biostat. Int. J, 4: 1-24.
• Hussain AH, Sulaiman RI (2011) Estimation of some parameters, heterosis and heritability for yield and morhological traits in inbred line of maize (Zea mays L.) using line x tester method. Journal of Tikrit University for Agricultural Sciences, 11: 359-383.
• Iqbal AM, Nevhi SA, Wani SA, Rehana Q, Dar ZA (2007) Combining ability analysis for yield and yield related traits in maize (Zea mays L.). International Journal of Plant Breeding and Genetics, 1: 101-107.
• Iqbal M, Khan K, Rahman H, Khalil IH, Sher H, Bakht J (2010) Heterosis for morphological traits in subtropical maize (Zea mays L.). Maydica, 55: 38-41
• Kempthorn O (1957) An Introduction Genetic Statistics. The Iowa State Uni. Press, Iowa, p.564.
• Khan S, Dadheech A, Dubey RB, Bharti B (2016) Combining ability and gene action studies for grain yield and quality parameters in yellow seeded maize (Zea mays L.) using line× tester crosses. International Journal of Bio-Resource and Stress Management, 7: 508–514.
• Kirtok Y (1998) Mısır; Üretimi ve Kullanımı. Kocaoluk Yayıncılık Sanayi ve Ticaret Ltd. Şti., Adana, p.445.
• Li H, Yang Q, Fan N, Zhang M, Zhai H, Ni Z, Zhang Y (2017) Quantitative trait locus analysis of heterosis for plant height and ear height in an elite maize hybrid zhengdan 958 by design III. BMC Genetics, 18: 2-10.
• Machikowa T, Saetang C, Funpeng K (2011) General and specific combining ability for quantitative characters in sunflower. Journal of Agricultural Science, 3: 91-95.
• Mahesh N, Wali MN, Gowda MVC, Motagi BN, Uppinal NF (2013) Genetic analysis of grain yield, starch, protein and oil content in single cross hybrid maize. Karnataka J. Agric. Sci., 26: 185-189.
• Mosse J (1990) Nitrogen to protein conversion factor for ten cereals and six legumes or oilseeds, a reappraisal of its definition and determination, variation according to species and to seed protein content. J. Agric. Food Chem., 38: 17-24.
• Musila RN, Diallo AO, Makumbi D, Njoroge K (2010) Combining ability of early–maturing quality protein maize inbred lines adapted to Eastern Africa. Field Crops Research, 119: 231-237.
• Nagma K, Baskheti DC, Mamta S, Devi E (2014) Combining ability analysis for grain yield and agronomic characters in maize (Zea mays L.). Environment & Ecology, 32: 461-464.
• Patil AE, Charjan SU, Patil SR, Udasi RN, Puttawar MR, Palkar AB (2012) Studies on heterosis and combining ability analysis in maize (Zea mays L.). Journal of Soils and Crops, 22: 129-138.
• Rodrigo O, Faria MV, Neumann M, Battistelli GM, Tegoni RG, Resende JTV (2012) Genetic divergence among maize hybrids and correlations with heterosis and combining ability. Acta Scientiarum Agronomy, 34: 37-44.
• Saleem M, Ahsan M, Aslam M, Majeed A (2008) Comparative evaluation and correlation estimates for grain yield and quality attributes in maize. Pak. J. Bot., 40: 2361-2367.
• Schaefer HC (1946) The role of proteins in animal nutrition. Oil and Soap, 1: 375–379. Singh RK, Chaudhary BD (1979) Biometrical Methods in Quantitative Genetic Analysis, Kalyani Publishers, New Delhi, p. 318.
• Singh N, Vasudev S, Yadava DK, Chaudhary DP, Prabhu KV (2014) Oil Improvement In Maize: Potential and Prospects. In Dharam C, Sandeep K, Langyan S (eds) Maize: Nutrition Dynamics and Novel Uses. Springer, Indian, p. 77-82.
• Singh M, Dubey RB, Ameta KD, Haritwal S, Bhagchand O (2017) Combining ability analysis for yield contributing and quality traits in yellow seeded late maturing maize (Zea mays L.) hybrids using line x tester. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry, 6: 112-118.
• Sofi PA, Rather AG, Warsi MZK (2007) Implications of epistasis in maize breeding. International Journal of Plant Breeding and Genetics, 1: 1-11.
• Sprague GF, Tatum LA (1942) General vs. specific combining ability in single crosses of corn. Agronomy Journal, 34: 923-932.
• Sun N, Xu T, Liu Y, Ye C, Jiang Z, Du F, Wang Y (2018) Preparation of two oligopeptides from corn protein and their protective effect on acute alcohol intoxication in mice. Biomedical Research, 29: 1284-1289.
• Tan Ş (2005) Bitki Islahında Istatistik ve Genetik Metotlar. Ege Tarımsal Araştırma Enstitüsü, Menemen, p. 251.
• Tan AS (2010) Study on the Determination of Combining Abilities of Inbred Lines for Hybrid Breeding Using Line x Tester Analysis in Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Helia, 33: 131-148.
• Tongbram SD, Baskheti DC (2014) General and specific combining ability studies in maize (Zea mays L.) using diallel mating design. International Journal of Basic and Applied Agricultural Research, 12: 48-52.
• Topal A, Aydın C, Akgün N, Babaoglu M (2004) Diallel cross analysis in durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.): identification of best parents for some kernel physical features. Field Crops Research, 87: 1-12.
• Wang K, Wang W, Ye R, Liu A, Xiao J, Liu Y, Zhao Y (2017) Mechanical properties and solubility in water of corn starch-collagen composite films: Effect of starch type and concentrations. Food Chemistry, 216: 209-2.