FARKLI PAMUK (GOSSYPIUM HIRSUTUM L.) ÇEŞİTLERİNDE MEYVE DALLARININ, VERİM, VERİM UNSURLARI VE LİF KALİTE ÖZELLİKLERİNE ETKİSİNİN SAPTANMASI

Year 2009, Volume: 6 Issue: 2, 47 - 55, 01.06.2009

İsa Özkan Mustafa Ali Kaynak

Abstract

Meyve dallarının verim, verim unsurları ve lif kalite özelliklerine etkisinin saptanması amacıyla yapılan bu çalışma; 1997, 1998 ve 1999 yıllarında Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi araştırma alanında, tesadüf blokları deneme desenine göre, üç tekerrürlü olarak, sıra arası 70 cm, sıra üzeri 20 cm, sıra uzunluğu 12 m olan 4 sıralı parsellerde yürütülmüştür. Araştırmada materyal olarak, Gossypium hirsutum L. türüne ait Nazilli 84 (bölge standart çeşidi), Deve Tüyü (kahverengi lifli), Siokra 107 B (okra yapraklı) çeşitleri ile G. hirsutum ile G. barbadense melezi olan Acalpi 1952 çeşidi kullanılmıştır. Çalışmada; meyve dallarındaki kütlü pamuk verimi, koza kütlü ağırlığı, lif uzunluğu ve lif mukavemeti özelliklerinin 7. meyve dalına kadar üstün olduğu; çırçır randımanının ve lif inceliğinin 6. ile 10. meyve dallarında üstün olduğu belirlenmiştir.

Keywords

Pamuk, Meyve Dalları, Verim ve Kalite Özellikleri

Determining the Effects of Fruiting Branches on Yield, Yield Component and Fiber Quality Characteristics on Various Cotton Varieties

Abstract

This study was carried out to determine effect of fruiting branches on yield, yield components and fiber quality
characteristicsi at Agricultural Faculty's experimental field of Adnan Menderes University in 1997, 1998 and
1999. Field trials were conducted in Randomised Complete Block Design with three replications. Each plot was
comprised of 4 rows in 12 m long with 70 cm apart from each other and plants 20 cm spaced on a row.
In this study, Nazilli 84 (national standard variety), Deve Tüyü (brown fiber), Siokra 107B (okra leaf) varieties
including G. hirsutum L. and G. hirsutum and G. barbadense crossing variety named Acalpi 1952 were used as a
material.
Results showed that on each fruiting branch from first to seventh seed cotton yield, seed cotton weight per boll,
fiber length and fiber strength were generally higher than those on the other fruiting branches. On the other hand,
ginning turnout and fiber fineness on fruiting branches between 6 and 10 had higher values than those on the other
fruiting branches.

Keywords

Cotton, Fruiting Branch, Yield and Quality Characteristics

References

• C İ VA R O Ğ L U , A . , 1 9 9 3 . P a m u ğ u n Te k n o l o j i k Özelliklerinin Tespiti. T.C. Tarım ve Köyişleri Bakanlığı Tarımsal Araştırmalar Genel Müdürlüğü, Nazilli Pamuk Araştırma Enstitüsü Müdürlüğü, Pamuk Araştırma Proje ve Sonuçları Raporu, proje no:75.
• CONSTABLE, G.A., 1991. Mapping the Production and Survival of Fruit on Field-Grown Cotton. Agron. J. 83:374-378.
• ÇOPUR, O., 1999. Harran Ovası Koşullarında Farklı Ekim Zamanlarının, Pamukta (Gossypium hirsutum L.) Çiçeklenme, Verim, Verim Unsurları ve Erkencilik Kriterlerine Etkisi Üzerinde Bir Araştırma. T.C. Harran Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Doktora Tezi.
• EDMISTEN, K., 1995. The Cotton Plant. North Carolina 1354.
• SUBRAHMANYAM, Y., A. MENT, V. KUMAR, and M.C. BHALOD, 1987. Study of the Quality of Cotton Lint in relation to Different Pickings and Position the Main Stem. ISCI Journal , Indian Society for Cotton Improvement 7, 4 pp. [CTRL Publications (New Series) No: 380] Quality Evaluation Unit, CTRL, Surat, Gurajat, India.
• Http://ipmwww.ncsu.edu/cotton/agronomy/cotton_pl ant.html
• YOUNG, E.F.Jr., R.M. TAYLOR and H.D. PETERSEN,
• FRY, K.E., 1985. Earlines Factors in Three Pima Cotton
• Day-Degree Units and Time in Relation to
• Vegetative Development and Fruiting for Three
• Cultivars of Cotton. Crop Sci. 20, 370-374.
• GÜNEŞ, Y., 1996. Harran Ovası Koşullarında Ümitvar Pamuk Çeşitlerinde, Odun ve Meyve Dallarında Oluşan Kozaların, Koza ve Lif Özellikleri Yönünden Karşılaştırılması. T.C. Harran Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Geliş Tarihi Kabul Tarihi :18.06.2009
• JENKINS, J.N., J.C. McCARTY, Jr., and W.L. PARROT, 1990a. Effectiveness of Fruiting Sites in Cotton: Yield. Crop Sci. 30:365-369.
• JENKINS, J.N., J.C. McCARTY, Jr., and W.L. PARROT, 1990b. Fruiting Efficiency in Cotton: Boll Size and Boll Set Percentage Crop Sci. 30: 857- 860.
• KERBY, T.A., K. HAKE, and M. KEELEY, 1986. Cotton Fruiting Modification with Mepiquat Chloride. Agron. J. 78:907-12.
• KERBY, T.A., M. KEELEY and S. JOHNSON, 1987. Growth and Development of Acala Cotton. Oakland: University of California, Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Bulletin 1921.
• KERBY, T.A. and G.F. RUPPENICKER, 1989. Node and Fruiting Branch Position Effects on Fiber and Seed Quality Characteristics. In J.M. Brown (ed.), Proc. Beltwide Cotton Prod. Res. Conf., Nashville, Tenn., Jan. 2-7, 1989 pp.98-100. Memphis, Tenn.: National Cotton Council of America.
• KERBY, T.A. and K. HAKE, 1996. Cotton Production Manual. Publication 3352. University of California, Division of Agricultural and Natural Resources. Pp.335-341.
• LANDIVAR, J.A. and J.A. HICKEY, 1998. Using Plant Mapping to Determine Potential Lint Yield of Cotton Crops Abstracts Vol:51 No:4.
• NAMKEN, L.N., M.D. HEILMAN and R.H. DILDAY, 1979. Arrangement of Sympodia and Earliness Potential of Cotton. Crop Sci. September-October:620- 622.
• OZUNA, S.E. and J.C. SILVERTOOTH, 1998. Fruiting Distribution Patterns Among Three Cotton Varieties U n d e r I r r i g a t e d C o n d i t i o n s . Http://ag.arizona.edu/pubs/crops/az10062a.html
• OZUNA, S.E., E.J. NORTON and J.C. SILVERTOOTH, 1998. Fruiting Distribution Pattern Among Three Cotton Varieties Under Irrigated Conditions. National Cotton Council: 1725-1730 University of Arizona , Tucson, AZ, USA.
• REDDY, K.R., J.N. McKINION, G.W. WALL, N.C. B H AT TA C H A RYA , E . F. H O D G E S a n d S . BHATTACHARYA, 1991. Effect of Temperature on Pima Cotton Growth and Development. National Cotton Concil, Mephis TN. Beltwide Cotton Conference pg. 841.
• STAGGENBORG, S.A. and D.R. KRIEG, 1994. Fruiting Site Production and Fruit Size Responses of Cotton to Water Supply per Plant. National Cotton Concil, Mephis TN. Beltwide Cotton Conference pp. 1351
• Copyright of Journal of Adnan Menderes University, Agricultural Faculty is the property of Adnan Menderes
• University and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the
• copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.