Kısıntılı ve Tam Sulama Koşullarında Verim ve Lif Kalitesi Bakımından Üstün İleri Pamuk (Gossypium hirsutum L.) Hatlarının Seleksiyonu

Year 2020, Volume: 17 Issue: 2, 199 - 206, 31.12.2020

Hatice Kübra Gören Huseyin Başal

https://doi.org/10.25308/aduziraat.702803

Cited By: 1

Abstract

Bu çalışma, F8 generasyonunda pamuk (Gossypium hirsutum L.) döl sıraları arasından verim ve lif kalitesi bakımından üstün ileri pamuk hatlarını belirlemek amacıyla 2018 yılında Aydın Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Tarla Bitkileri deneme alanında augmented deneme desenine uygun olarak; tek bitki döl sıraları ve beş adet kontrol çeşit (Gloria, Flash, DP332, Candia ve Claudia) ile dört tekerrürlü ve sıra uzunluğu 12 m olacak şekilde damla sulama yöntemi kullanılarak tam (%100) ve kısıntılı sulama (%50) koşullarında yürütülmüştür. Çalışma sonucunda elde edilen veriler değerlendirildiğinde; tam sulama koşullarında Carmen x Nazilli-503 (hat no: 1), DPL-90 x Tamcot-22 (hat no: 10), BA-308 x Carmen (hat no: 38), DPL-90 x Tamcot-22 (hat no: 66) ve ST-373 x DPL-90 (hat no: 72) ileri pamuk hatlarının verim ve lif kalite özellikleri yönünden öne çıktığı gözlemlenmiştir. Kısıntılı sulama koşullarında ise Nazilli-503 x Tamcot-22 (hat no: 6), ST-373 x Carmen (hat no: 23), BA-308 x Nazilli-503 (hat no: 47), BA-308 x Carmen (hat no: 72), ve Ş-2000 x Tamcot-22 (hat no: 90) ileri pamuk hatlarının su stresine dayanıklı veya tolerant olduğu saptanmıştır. Tam ve kısıntılı sulama koşullarına uygun, verim ve lif kalitesi yüksek yeni pamuk çeşitlerinin tescil edilmesi amacıyla seçilmiş ileri pamuk hatları çeşit verim denemelerine alınacaktır.

Keywords

Diallel melezleme, pamuk ıslahı, su stresi

Supporting Institution

Aydın Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Bilimsel Araştırma Projeleri Birimi

Project Number

ZRF-18028

Thanks

Bu çalışmanın yürütülmesinde maddi desteklerinden dolayı Aydın Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Bilimsel Araştırma Projeleri Birimine Teşekkür ederiz.

Selection of Advanced Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) Lines for Yield and Fiber Quality Under Deficit and Full Irrigation Condititons

Abstract

This study was carried out at Aydin Adnan Menderes University, Agriculture Faculty Field Crops Experiment fields under drip irrigation system to investigate the response of cotton hybrid populations to water stress in F8 generations in accordance with Augmented randomized complete block design. Each lines and five control varieties (Gloria, Flash, DP332, Candia and Claudia) were planted one row and 12 m long under irrigated (%100: full irrigation) and water stress (%50: deficit irrigation) conditions. The result of the study revealed that in F8 generation; Carmen x Nazilli-503 (line no: 1), DPL-90 x Tamcot-22 (line no: 10), BA-308 x Carmen (line no: 38), DPL-90 x Tamcot-22 (line no: 66) and ST-373 x DPL-90 (line no: 72) cotton advanced lines exhibited the highest seed cotton yield and fiber quality. As for under deficit water stress condition Nazilli-503 x Tamcot-22 (line no: 6), ST-373 x Carmen (line no: 23), BA-308 x Nazilli-503 (line no: 47), BA-308 x Carmen (line no: 72), and Ş-2000 x Tamcot-22 (line no: 90) were found to be drought resistant or tolerant hybrid populations. In order to register new cotton varieties with high yield and fiber quality suitable for full and limited irrigation conditions, selected cotton lines will be tested for variety yield tests.

Keywords

Diallel hybridization, cotton breeding, water stress

Project Number

ZRF-18028

References

• Asadi R, Kohi N, Tavassoli A (2011) Effect of Irrigation Regime and Method of Strip Irrigation System on Yield, Yield Components and Water Use Efficiency of Cotton under Drought Stress Conditions of Orzouiyeh Region of Kerman Province in Iran. Scientific Research and Essays 6(27): 5812-5819.
• Babb VM, Haigler CH (2001) Sucrose Phosphate Synthase Activity Rises in Correlation with High-rate Cellulose Synthesis in Three Heterotrophic Systems. Plant Physiology 127: 1234-1242.
• Balkchom KS, Reeves DW, Shaw JN, Burmester CH, Curtis LM (2006) Cotton Yield and Fiber Quality From Irrigated Tillage Systems in The Tennessee Valley. Agronomy Journal 98: 596-602.
• Barnabás B, Jäger K, Fehér A (2008) The Effect of Drought and Heat Stress on Reproductive Processes in Cereals. Plant, cell and environment 31(1): 11-38.
• Basal H, Dagdelen N, Unay A, Yılmaz E (2009) Effects of Deficit Drip Irrigation Ratios on Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) Yield and Fiber Quality. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 195: 19-29.
• Bayraç HN, Doğan E (2016) Türkiye’de İklim Değişikliğinin Tarım Sektörü Üzerine Etkileri. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 11(1): 23-48.
• Bota J, Medrano H, Flexas J (2004) Is Photosynthesis Limited by Decreased Rubisco Activity and RuBP Content under Progressive Water Stress. New Phytologist 162(3): 671-681.
• Cave J (2013) Cotton Lint Yield, Fiber Quality, and Water-Use Efficiency As İnfluenced by Cultivar and Irrigation Level. Master of Sciences, Texas Tech University, USA.
• Dağdelen N, Başal H, Yılmaz E, Gürbüz T, Akçay SM (2009) Different Drip Irrigation Regimes Affect Cotton Yield, Water Use Efficiency and Fiber Quality in Western Turkey. Agricultural Water Management 96: 111-120.
• Ertek A, Kanber R (2003) Effects of Different Drip Irrigation Programs on The Boll Number and Shedding Percentage and Yield of Cotton. Agricultural Water Management 60: 1-11.
• Gao M, Snider J, Bai H, Hu W, Wang R, Meng Y, Zhou Z (2020) Drought Effects on Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum l.) Fibre Quality and Fibre Sucrose Metabolism during The Flowering and Boll‐Formation Period. J Agro Crop Sci. 2020 (00): 1–13.
• Gerik TJ, Faver KL, Thaxton PM, El-Zik KM (1996) Late Season Water Stress in Cotton: I. Plant Growth, Water Use and Yield. Crop Science 36: 914-921.
• Guinn G, Mauney J (1984) Fruiting of Cotton. II. Effects of Plant Moisture Status and Active Boll Load on Boll Retention. Agron. J. 76: 94-98.
• Hu W, Snider JL, Wang H, Zhou Z, Chastain DR, Whitaker J, Bourland FM (2018a) Water-Induced Variation in Yield and Quality Can Be Explained by Altered Yield Component Contributions in Field-Grown Cotton. Field Crops Research 224: 139-147.
• Hu W, Loka DA, Fitzsimons TR, Zhou Z, Oosterhuis DM (2018b) Potassium Deficiency Limits Reproductive Success by Altering Carbohydrate and Protein Balances in Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Environmental and Experimental Botany 145: 87-94.
• Hussein F, Janat M, Yakoub A (2011) Assessment of Yield and Water Use Efficiency of Drip Irrigated Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) as Affected by Deficit Irrigation. Turkish Journal of Agrıculture and Forestry 35: 611-621.
• IPCC (2013) Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge UniversityPress, Cambridge, United Kingdomand New York, USA.
• Kadıoğlu M, Ünal Y, İlhan A, Yürük C (2017) Türkiye'de İklim Değişikliği ve Tarımda Sürdürülebilirlik, Türkiye Gıda ve İçecek Sanayi Dernekleri Federasyonu, http://www.hidropolitikakademi.org/wpcontent/uploads/2017/11/IklimDegisikligiRaporumin.pdf, (Erişim Tarihi: 23.01.2020).
• Karademir Ç, Karademir E, Gençer O (2011) Yield and Fiber Quality of F1 and F2 Generations of Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) Under Drought Stress Conditions. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science 17: 795-805.
• Kloth RH, Turley RB (2010) Physiology of seed and fiber development. Physiology of cotton, Springer, Dordrecht.
• Lokhande S, Reddy KR (2014) Reproductive and Fiber Quality Responses of Upland Cotton to Moisture Deficiency. Agron. J. 106: 1060-1069.
• McWilliams D (2004) Drought Strategies for Cotton. Cooperative Extension Service Circular 582 College of Agriculture and Home Economics http://www.cahe.nmsu.edu/pubs/circulars (Erişim Tarihi: 15.10.2011).
• McMichael BL, Hesketh JD (1982) Field Investigations of The Response of Cotton to Water Deficits. Field Crops Research 5: 319-333.
• Mert M (2005) Irrigation of Cotton Cultivars Improves Seed Cotton Yield, Yield Components and Fibre Properties in The Hatay Region, Turkey. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, 55: 44-50.
• Ulu B, Başal H (2018) F3:6 Generasyonunda Pamuk (Gossypium hirsutum L.) Döl Sıralarının Tam ve Kısıtlı Sulama Koşullarında Verim ve Lif Kalite Özelliklerinin Belirlenmesi. Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 15(1): 65-71.
• Parida AK, Dagaonkar VS, Phalak MS, Umalkar GV, Aurangabadkar LP (2007) Alterations in Photosynthetic Pigments, Protein and Osmotic Components in Cotton Genotypes Subjected to Short-Term Drought Stress Followed by Recovery. Plant Biotechnology Reports 1(1): 37-48.
• Papastylianou P, Argyrokastritis I (2014) Effect of Limited Drip Irrigation Regime on Yield, Yield Components and Fiber Quality of Cotton Under Mediterranean Conditions. Agricultural Water Management 142: 127-134.
• Petersen RG, Calvin LD (1965) Methods of Soil Analysis. Agron. Monogr. 9: 54-72.
• Pettigrew WT (2001) Environmental Effects on Cotton Fiber Carbohydrate Concentration and Quality. Crop Science 41: 1108-1113.
• Pettigrew WT (2004) Moisture Deficit Effect on Cotton Lint Yield, Yield Components and Boll Distribution. Agronomy Journal 96: 377-383.
• Pettigrew W, Gerik T (2007) Cotton Leaf Photosynthesis and Carbonmetabolism. Adv. Agron 94: 209–236.
• Price K (2009) Investigation of Methods to Evaluate Drought Toerance in Cotton. The Degree of Doctor of Philosopy, Texas Tech University, Texas Lubbock, USA.
• Rai E (2011) Mechanism of Drought Tolerance in Cotton-Response of Cotton Cultivars to Irrigation in The Texas High Plains. Master of Science, Texas Tech University, USA.
• Shareef M, Gui D, Zeng F, Ahmed Z, Waqas M, Zhang B, Fiaz M (2018) Impact of Drought on Assimilates Partitioning Associated Fruiting Physiognomies and Yield Quality Attributes of Desert Grown Cotton. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum 40(4): 71.
• Snowden C, Ritchie G, Cave J, Keeling W, Rajan N (2013) Multiple Irrigation Levels Affect Boll Distribution, Yield, and Fiber Micronaire in Cotton. Agronomy Journal 105: 1536-1544.
• Şahin A (2000) Melezleme Islahı ile Kuraklığa Dayanıklı Pamuk Çeşitlerinin Geliştirilmesi. Pamuk Araştırma İstasyonu Müdürlüğü Yayınları. Nazilli.
• Tang F, Zhu J, Wang T, Shao D (2017) Water Deficit Effects on Carbon Metabolism in Cotton Fibers during Fiber Elongation Phase. Acta physiologiae plantarum 39(3): 69.
• Wang R, Gao M, Ji S, Wang S, Meng Y, Zhou Z (2016) Carbon Allocation, Osmotic Adjustment, Antioxidant Capacity and Growth in Cotton under Long-Term Soil Drought During Flowering and Boll-Forming Period. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 107: 137-146.
• Zhang WJ, Shu HM, Hu HB, Chen BL, Wang YH, Zhou ZG (2007) Genotypic Differences in Some Physiological Characteristics During Cotton Fiber Thickening and Its Influence on Fiber Strength. Acta Agronomica Sinica 31: 927-935.
• Zhang D, Luo Z, Liu S, Li W, Dong H (2016) Effects of Deficit Irrigation and Plant Density on The Growth, Yield and Fiber Quality of Irrigated Cotton. Field Crops Research 197: 1-9.